Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-mlc7c Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-10T05:37:18.911Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

An American Call Is Worth More Than a European Call: The Value of American Exercise When the Market Is Not Perfectly Liquid

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 April 2021

Stephen Figlewski Open the ORCID record for Stephen Figlewski [Opens in a new window]
Stephen Figlewski*
Affiliation:
New York University Stern School of Business
*
[email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Theory says an American call should never be exercised early, except possibly just before an ex-dividend date. But the best market bid is regularly lower than the intrinsic value for in-the-money short-maturity options. An American option can always be exercised to recover the intrinsic value, whereas selling a European call in the market may return considerably less. The article derives the liquidity value of American exercise in closed form as a function of the bid–ask spread and shows empirically that it is of comparable magnitude to, and often greater than, the theoretical value of American exercise to collect a dividend.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis , Volume 57 , Issue 3 , May 2022 , pp. 1023 - 1057
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2021. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of the Michael G. Foster School of Business, University of Washington

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

I thank Richard Xu for able assistance on an earlier draft and the NASDAQ Educational Foundation for financial support. I am grateful for comments from Rob Neal, Scott Murray, Neil Pearson, Pascal François, and especially the referee, as well as participants at the 2018 Canadian Derivatives Institute Conference, the 2017 Derivatives and Volatility Conference at New York University (NYU), and seminars at the Instituto Tecnológico Autónomo de México (ITAM), Florida International University, Auburn University, Georgia State University, the University of Massachusetts, Lord Abbett, the University of Manchester, University College Dublin, and the University of Sussex.

References

Amihud, Y., and Mendelson, H.. “Asset Pricing and the Bid–Ask Spread.” Journal of Financial Economics, 17 (1986), 223–249.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barraclough, K., and Whaley, R.. “Early Exercise of Put Options on Stocks.” Journal of Finance, 67 (2012), 1423–1456.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Battalio, R.; Figlewski, S.; and Neal, R.. “Option Investor Rationality Revisited: The Role of Exercise Boundary Violations.” Financial Analysts Journal, 76 (2020), 82–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bollen, N., and Whaley, R.. “Does Net Buying Pressure Affect the Shape of Implied Volatility Functions?” Journal of Finance, 59 (2004), 711–753.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brennan, M. “The Pricing of Contingent Claims in Discrete Time Models.” Journal of Finance, 24 (1979), 53–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brooks, R., and Chance, D.. An Introduction to Derivatives and Risk Management, 7th ed. Mason, OH: Thomson South-Western (2007).Google Scholar
Brunnermeier, M., and Pedersen, L.. “Market Liquidity and Funding Liquidity.” Review of Financial Studies, 220 (2009), 2201–2238.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cao, J., and Han, B.. “Cross Section of Option Returns and Idiosyncratic Stock Volatility.” Journal of Financial Economics, 108 (2013), 231–249.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cao, W.; Ederington, L.; and Yadav, P.. “What Is the Value of Being American?” Working Paper, University of Oklahoma (2018).Google Scholar
Chin, F., and Garriott, C.. “Options Decimalization.” Journal of Derivatives, 25 (2017), 88–102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Christoffersen, P.; Goyenko, R.; Jacobs, K.; and Karoui, M.. “Illiquidity Premia in the Options Market.” Review of Financial Studies, 31 (2018), 811–851.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Copeland, T., and Galai, D.. “Information Effects on the Bid–Ask Spread.” Journal of Finance, 38 (1983), 1457–1469.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Diz, F., and Finucane, T.. “The Rationality of Early Exercise Decisions: Evidence from the S&P 500 Index Options Market.” Review of Financial Studies, 6 (1993), 765–797.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Figlewski, S. “Options Arbitrage in Imperfect Markets.” Journal of Finance, 44 (1989), 1289–1311.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Figlewski, S., and Freund, S.. “The Pricing of Convexity Risk and Time Decay in Options Markets.” Journal of Banking and Finance, 18 (1994), 73–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Finucane, T. “An Empirical Analysis of Common Stock Call Exercise: A Note.” Journal of Banking and Finance, 21 (1997), 563–571.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Garleanu, N.; Pedersen, L.; and Poteshman, A.. “Demand-Based Option Pricing.” Review of Financial Studies, 22 (2009), 4259–4299.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Green, C., and Figlewski, S.. “Market Risk and Model Risk for a Financial Institution Writing Options.” Journal of Finance, 54 (1999), 1465–1499.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ho, T., and Stoll, H.. “Optimal Dealer Pricing under Transactions and Return Uncertainty.” Journal of Financial Economics, 9 (1981), 47–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hull, J. Options, Futures, and Other Derivatives, 9th ed. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Education (2015).Google Scholar
Jensen, M., and Pedersen, L.. “Early Option Exercise: Never Say Never.” Journal of Financial Economics, 121 (2016), 278–299.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kolb, R. W., and Overdahl, J.. Futures, Options and Swaps, 5th ed. Malden, MA: Blackwell (2007).Google Scholar
Kyle, A. “Continuous Auctions and Insider Trading.” Econometrica, 53 (1985), 1315–1336.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Longstaff, F. “How Much Can Marketability Affect Security Values?” Journal of Finance, 50 (1995), 1767–1774.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Longstaff, F. “Valuing Thinly Traded Assets.” Management Science, 64 (2018), 3868–3878.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mayhew, S. “Market Structure, and Bid–Ask Spreads in Stock Option Markets.” Journal of Finance, 57 (2002), 931–958.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Merton, R. “Theory of Rational Option Pricing.” Bell Journal of Economics and Management Science, 68 (1973), 141–183.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Overdahl, J., and Martin, P.. “The Exercise of Equity Options: Theory and Empirical Tests.” Journal of Derivatives, 2 (1994), 38–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pool, V. K.; Stoll, H. R.; and Whaley, R. E.. “Failure to Exercise Call Options: An Anomaly and a Trading Game.” Journal of Financial Markets, 11 (2008), 1–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Poteshman, A. M., and Serbin, V.. “Clearly Irrational Financial Market Behavior: Evidence from the Early Exercise of Exchange Traded Stock Options.” Journal of Finance, 58 (2003), 37–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sundaram, R., and Das, S.. Derivatives Principles and Practice. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill/Irwin (2011).Google Scholar
Whaley, R. “On the Valuation of American Call Options on Stocks with Known Dividends.” Journal of Financial Economics, 9 (1981), 207–211.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zivney, T. “The Value of Early Exercise in Option Prices: An Empirical Investigation.” Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 26 (1991), 129–138.CrossRefGoogle Scholar