Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-vdxz6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-20T07:13:41.607Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

It's a Mad, Mad World: Using Emotion Inductions in a Survey

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 April 2015

Kathleen Searles  and
Kyle Mattes
Kathleen Searles
Affiliation:
Department of Political Science and Manship School of Mass Communication, Louisiana State University, 240 Stubbs Hall, Baton Rouge, LA, USA; e-mail: [email protected]
Kyle Mattes
Affiliation:
Florida International University, Department of Politics and International Relations, Miami, FL, USA The University of Iowa, Department of Political Science, Iowa City, IA, USA
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Recent research has uncovered a dynamic role for emotion in political decision-making. Anger in particular has increased in importance as scholars uncover its role in motivating participation and partisanship. One method for examining these effects is to use an induction to invoke an emotion, though such techniques are often limited to the laboratory. We discuss pertinent psychological research on induction, test several methods, and make practical recommendations for political science survey research. Using a unique research design which varies the way anger is invoked, we first find significant effects using a scenario induction. We replicate these findings with an adult sample and extend the results to political inductions. We are able to offer practical advice to scholars interested in replicating the effects of angry campaign ads or better understanding the effects of anger arousal on political behavior.

Keywords

Emotioninductionsurvey experimentpolitical psychology
Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Experimental Political Science , Volume 2 , Issue 2 , Winter 2015 , pp. 172 - 182
Copyright
Copyright © The Experimental Research Section of the American Political Science Association 2015 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Bower, G. H., Gilligan, S. G. and Monteiro, K. P.. 1981. “Selectivity of Learning Caused by Affective States.” Journal of Experimental Psychology 110 (4): 451–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brader, T. 2006. Campaigning for Hearts and Minds: How Emotional Appeals in Political Ads Work. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Carver, C. S. 2004. “Negative Affects Deriving from the Behavioral Approach System.” Emotion 4 (1): 3–22.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dovidio, J. F., Kawakami, K. and Beach, K. R.. 2001. “Implicit and Explicit Attitudes: Examination of the Relationship between Measures of Intergroup Bias.” In Blackwell Handbook of Social Psychology, eds. Brown, R. and Gaertner, S.. (pp. 175–197). Malden, MA: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Ekman, P. 1992. “An Argument for Basic Emotions.” Cognition and Emotion 6 (3/4): 169–200.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Engebretson, T. O., Sitora, A. D., Niaura, R. S., Edwards, K. and Brown, W. A.. 1999. “A Simple Laboratory Method for Inducing Anger: A Preliminary Investigation.” Journal of Psychosomatic Research 47 (1): 13–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harmon-Jones, E., Amodio, D. M. and Zinner, L. R.. 2007. “Social Psychological Methods in Emotion Elicitation.” In Handbook of Emotion Elicitation and Assessment, eds. Coan, J. A. and Allen, J. J. B.. (pp. 91–105), New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Keltner, D., Ellsworth, P. C. and Edwards, K.. 1993. “Beyond Simple Pessimism: Effects of Sadness and Anger on Social Perception.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 64 (5): 740–52.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lang, P. J., Bradley, M. M. and Cuthbert, B. N.. 1999. International Affective Picture System (IAPS): Instruction Manual and Affective Ratings. Technical Report A-6. Gainesville, FL: The Center for Research in Psychophysiology, University of Florida.Google Scholar
Lerner, J. and Keltner, D.. 2001. “Fear, Anger, and Risk.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 81 (1): 146–59.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lodge, M. and Taber, C.. 2005. “Implicit Affect for Political Candidates, Parties, and Issues: An Experimental Test of the Hot Cognition Hypothesis.” Political Psychology 26 (3): 455–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
MacKuen, M. B., Wolak, J., Keele, L. and Marcus, G. E.. 2010. “Civic Engagements: Resolute Partisanship or Reflective Deliberation.” American Journal of Political Science 54 (2): 440–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marcus, G. E., Neuman, W. R., MacKuen, M., Wolak, J. and Keele, L.. 2006. “The Measure and Mismeasure of Emotion.” In Feeling Politics, ed. Redlawsk, David P.. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Marin, M. M. and Bhattacharya, J.. 2009. “Effects of Musical Training on Subjective Emotional Responses to Romantic Piano Music.” British Association of Cognitive Neuroscience Annual Meeting, London (UK), 21–23.Google Scholar
Mikels, J. A., Frederickson, B. L., Larkin, G. R., Lindberg, C. M., Maglio, S. J. and Reuter-Lorenz, P. A.. 2005. “Emotional Category Data on Images from the International Affective Picture System.” Behavioral Research Methods 37 (4): 626–30.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Moons, W. G. and Mackie, D. M.. 2007. “Thinking Straight While Seeing Red: The Influence of Anger on Information Processing.” Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 33 (5): 706–20.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Philippot, P. 1993. “Inducing and Assessing Differentiated Emotion-Feeling States in the Laboratory.” Cognition and Emotion 71: 171–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Small, D. A. and Lerner, J. S.. 2008. “Emotional Policy: Personal Sadness and Anger Shape Judgments about a Welfare Case.” Political Psychology 29 (2): 149–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Valentino, N. A., Brader, T., Groenendyk, E. W., Gregorowicz, K. and Hutchings, V. L.. 2011. “Election Night's Alright for Fighting: The Role of Emotions in Political Participation.” Journal of Politics 73: 156–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Velten, E. 1968. “A Laboratory Task for Induction of Mood States.” Behavioral Research Therapy 6 (4): 473–82.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Watson, D. and Clark, L. A.. 1997. “The Measurement and Mismeasurement of Mood: Recurrent and Emergent Issues.” Journal of Personality Assessment, 68 (2): 267–96.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Supplementary material: File

Searles and Mattes supplementary material

Appendix

Download Searles and Mattes supplementary material(File)
File 3.5 MB