Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-p9bg8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T11:29:32.440Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Individual versus Group Play in the Repeated Coordinated Resistance Game

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 March 2015

Timothy N. Cason  and
Vai-Lam Mui
Timothy N. Cason
Affiliation:
Department of Economics, Krannert School of Management, Purdue University, 403 W. State St., West Lafayette, IN 47907-2056, USA; e-mail: [email protected]
Vai-Lam Mui
Affiliation:
Department of Economics, Monash Business School, Monash University, P.O. Box 11E, Clayton, Victoria 3800, Australia; email: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This paper reports an experiment to evaluate the effectiveness of repeated interactions in deterring leaders from using divide-and-conquer strategies to extract surplus from their subordinates, when every decision-maker involved is a group instead of an individual. We find that both the resistance rate by subordinates and the divide-and-conquer transgression rate by leaders are the same in the group and individual repeated coordinated resistance games. Similar to the individual game, adding communication to the group game can help deter opportunistic behavior by the leaders even in the presence of repetition.

Keywords

Communicationcoordinated resistancedivide-and-conquerlaboratory experimentrepeated gamesgroup decision-making
Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Experimental Political Science , Volume 2 , Issue 1 , Spring 2015 , pp. 94 - 106
Copyright
Copyright © The Experimental Research Section of the American Political Science Association 2015 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Abbink, K., Brandts, J., Herrmann, B., and Orzen, H.. 2010. “Intergroup Conflict and Intra-Group Punishment in an Experimental Contest Game.” American Economic Review 100 (1): 420–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Acemoglu, D. and Robinson, J.. 2006. Economic Origins of Dictatorship and Democracy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Acemoglu, D. and Robinson, J.. 2012. Why Nations Fail: The Origins of Power, Prosperity, and Poverty. New York: Crown Publishers.Google Scholar
Acemoglu, D., Robinson, J., and Verdier, T.. 2004. “Kleptocracy and Divide-and-Rule: A Model of Personal Rule.” Journal of the European Economic Association 2 (2–3): 162–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bornstein, G. and Ben-Yossef, M.. 1994. “Cooperation in Intergroup and Single-Group Social Dilemmas.” Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 30 (1): 52–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bornstein, G. and Yaniv, I.. 1998. “Individual and Group behavior in the Ultimatum Game: Are Groups more ‘rational’ players?” Experimental Economics 1 (1): 101–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cason, T. and Mui, V.-L.. 1997. “A Laboratory Study of Group Polarization in the Team Dictator Game.” Economic Journal 107 (444): 1465–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cason, T. and Mui, V.-L.. 2007. “Communication and Coordination in the Laboratory Collective Resistance Game.” Experimental Economics 10 (3): 251–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cason, T. and Mui, V.-L.. 2014. “Coordinating Resistance through Communication and Repeated Interaction.” Economic Journal 124 (574): F226–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Charness, G. and Sutter, M.. 2012. “Groups Make Better Self-Interested Decisions.” Journal of Economic Perspectives 26 (3): 157–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cohen, J. 1960. “A Coefficient of Agreement for Nominal Scales.” Educational and Psychological Measurement 20 (1): 37–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cooper, D. and Kagel, J.. 2005. “Are two Heads Better than One? Team versus Individual Play in Signaling Games.” American Economic Review 95 (3): 477–509.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cox, J. 2002. “Reciprocity, and Other-Regarding Preferences: Groups vs. Individuals and Males vs. Females.” In Advances in Experimental Business Research, eds. Zwick, R. and Rapoport, A.. New York: Kluwer Academic Publishers.Google Scholar
Cox, J. and Hayne, S.. 2006. “Barking up the Right Tree: Are Small Groups Rational Agents?” Experimental Economics 9 (3): 209–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davis, D. and Harless, D.. 1996. “Group vs. Individual Performance in a Price-Searching Experiment.” Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 66 (2): 215–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Druckman, J., Green, D., Kuklinski, J., and Lupia, A., eds. 2011. Cambridge Handbook of Experimental Political Science. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Druckman, J. and Kam, C.. 2011. “Students as Experimental Participants: A Defense of the ‘Narrow Data Base.’” In Cambridge Handbook of Experimental Political Science, eds. Druckman, J., Green, D., Kuklinski, J., and Lupia, A.. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Feri, F., Irlenbusch, B., and Sutter, M.. 2010. “Efficiency Gains from Team-Based Coordination—Large-Scale Experimental Evidence.” American Economic Review 100 (4): 1892–912.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fischbacher, U. 2007. “z-Tree: Zurich Toolbox for Readymade Economic Experiments.” Experimental Economics 10 (2): 171–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Greif, A. 2006. Institutions and the Path to the Modern Economy: Lessons from Medieval Trade. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Insko, C., Hoyle, R., Pinkley, R., Hong, G.-Y., Slim, R., Dalton, B., Lin, Y.-H., Ruffin, P., Dardis, G., Bernthal, P., and Schopler, J.. 1988. “Individual-Group Discontinuity: The Role of a Consensus Rule.” Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 24 (6): 505–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kocher, M. and Sutter, M.. 2005. “The Decision Maker Matters: Individual versus Group behaviour in Experimental Beauty-Contest Games.” Economic Journal 115 (500): 200–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kocher, M. and Sutter, M.. 2007. “Individual versus Group behavior and the Role of the Decision making Procedure in Gift-Exchange Experiments.” Empirica 34 (1): 63–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krippendorff, K. 2003. Content Analysis: An Introduction to Its Methodology. (Second Edition) Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
Kugler, T., Kausel, E., and Kocher, M.. 2012. “Are Groups more Rational than Individuals? A Review of Interactive Decision Making in Groups.” Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Cognitive Science 3 (4): 471–82.Google ScholarPubMed
Kugler, T., Bornstein, G., Kocher, M., and Sutter, M.. 2007. “Trust between Individuals and Groups: Groups are Less Trusting than Individuals but Just as Trustworthy.” Journal of Economic Psychology 28 (6): 646–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Luhan, W., Kocher, M., and Sutter, M.. 2009. “Group Polarization in the Team Dictator Game Reconsidered.” Experimental Economics 12 (1): 26–41.Google Scholar
Morgan, P. and Tindale, R.. 2002. “Group versus Individual Performance in Mixed-Motive Situations: Exploring an Inconsistency.” Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 87 (1): 44–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Müller, W. and Tan, F.. 2013. “Who Acts more Like a Game Theorist? Group and Individual Play in a Sequential Market Game and the Effect of the Time Horizon.” Games and Economic Behavior 82 (1): 658–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
North, D. 1990. Institutions, Institutional Change, and Economic Performance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
North, D. and Weingast, B.. 1989. “Constitutions and Commitment: The Evolution of Institutions Governing Public Choice in Seventeenth Century England.” Journal of Economic History 49 (4): 803–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rigdon, M. and Smith, D.. 2010. “The Role of Solidarity and Reputation Building in Coordinating Collective Resistance.” Working Paper, University of Michigan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schopler, J. and Insko, C.. 1992. “The Discontinuity Effect in Interpersonal and Intergroup Relations: Generality and Mediation.” European Review of Social Psychology 3 (1): 121–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sutter, M., Czermark, S., and Feri, F.. 2013. “Strategic Sophistication of Individuals and Teams: Experimental Evidence.” European Economic Review 64 (1): 395–410.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Weingast, B. 1995. “The Economic Role of Political Institutions: Market-Preserving Federalism and Economic Development.” Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization 11 (1): 1–31.Google Scholar
Weingast, B. 1997. “The Political Foundations of Democracy and the Rule of Law.” American Political Science Review 91 (2): 245–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wildschut, T. and Insko, C.. 2007. “Explanations of Interindividual-Intergroup Discontinuity: A Review of the Evidence.” European Review of Social Psychology 18 (1): 175–211.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Supplementary material: File

Cason and Mui supplementary material

Appendix A

Download Cason and Mui supplementary material(File)
File 273.4 KB
Supplementary material: File

Cason and Mui supplementary material

Appendix B

Download Cason and Mui supplementary material(File)
File 43.6 KB
Supplementary material: File

Cason and Mui supplementary material

Appendix C

Download Cason and Mui supplementary material(File)
File 234.9 KB
Supplementary material: File

Cason and Mui supplementary material

Appendix D

Download Cason and Mui supplementary material(File)
File 26.5 KB