Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-4rdpn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-15T01:30:43.676Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Coethnicity and Corruption: Field Experimental Evidence from Public Officials in Malawi

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 April 2019

Brigitte Seim Open the ORCID record for Brigitte Seim [Opens in a new window]  and
Amanda Lea Robinson Open the ORCID record for Amanda Lea Robinson [Opens in a new window]
Brigitte Seim*
Affiliation:
Department of Public Policy, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC 27599, USA
Amanda Lea Robinson
Affiliation:
Department of Political Science, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH 43210, USA
*
*Corresponding author. Email: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Corruption is widespread in many developing countries, though public officials’ discretion in the solicitation of bribes may expose some citizens to more corruption than others. We derive expectations about how shared ethnicity between government officials and citizens should influence the likelihood of bribe solicitation. We evaluate these expectations through a field experiment in which Malawian confederates seek electricity connections from real government offices – an interaction that is often accompanied by bribe solicitation. Our field experiment exogenously varied coethnicity between the official and the confederate. We find that coethnicity increases the likelihood of expediting an electricity connection, both with and without a bribe, which we interpret as evidence of parochial corruption.

Keywords

Corruptionethnic identityethnicityparochialfield experimentMalawi
Type
Short Report
Information
Journal of Experimental Political Science , Volume 7 , Issue 1 , Spring 2020 , pp. 61 - 66
Copyright
© The Experimental Research Section of the American Political Science Association 2019 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

The authors contributed equally, and the ordering of the authors’ names reflects the principle of rotation across a series of articles. We are grateful to many colleagues for providing ideas and guidance on this project, especially Clark Gibson, Guy Grossman, Nahomi Ichino, Vlad Kogan, Paul Lagunes, Vittorio Merola, Jan Pierskalla, Nicholas Obradovich, and Pablo Querubin. The project also benefited from feedback at the 2014 NYU CESS Experimental Political Science Conference and the Comparative Politics Workshop at the Ohio State University. We especially wish to thank the dedicated and thoughtful team of research assistants in Malawi, who we do not list by name for their own protection. This research received human subjects approval from the Ohio State University Human Research Protection Program (HRPP), the University of California, San Diego’s Institutional Review Board, and the Malawi National Commission for Science and Technology’s (NCST) Committee on Research in the Social Sciences and Humanities. A pre-analysis plan for this study was filed with Open Science Framework prior to data collection and is available at http://goo.gl/OQRbWW. The data, code, and any additional materials required to replicate all analyses in this article are available at the Journal of Experimental Political Science Dataverse within the Harvard Dataverse Network, at: doi: 10.7910/DVN/N1HOB1. The authors have no conflicts of interest to report.

References

Anti-Corruption Bureau. 2012. “Database of Citizen Corruption Reports.” Obtained from Anti-Corruption Bureau in June of 2012.Google Scholar
Barr, Abigail. 2004. Kinship, Familiarity, and Trust: An Experimental Investigation. In Foundations of Human Sociality: Economic Experiments and Ethnographic Evidence from Fifteen Small-Scale Societies, eds. Henrich, J., Boyd, R., Bowles, S., Camerer, C., Fehr, E. and Gintis, H.. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press, 305–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bernhard, Helen, Fischbacher, Urs and Fehr, Ernst. 2006. Parochial Altruism in Humans. Nature 442(7105): 912–15.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chingaipe, Henry. 2013. “Malawi National Integrity System Assessment Report.” https://www.transparency.org/whatwedo/nisarticle/malawi_2013 (October 7, 2017).Google Scholar
Ferree, Karen and Horowitz, Jeremy. 2010. Ties that Bind? The Rise and Decline of Ethno-Regional Partisanship in Malawi, 1994–2009. Democratization 17(3): 534–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fershtman, Chaim and Gneezy, Uri. 2001. Discrimination in a Segmented Society: An Experimental Approach. The Quarterly Journal of Economics 116(1): 351–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fried, Brian J., Lagunes, Paul and Venkataramani, Atheendar. 2010. Corruption and Inequality at the Crossroad: A Multimethod Study of Bribery and Discrimination in Latin America. Latin American Research Review 45(1): 76–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Habyarimana, James, Humphreys, Macartan, Posner, Daniel N. and Weinstein, Jeremy M.. 2009. Coethnicity. New York, NY: Russel Sage Foundation.Google Scholar
Isaksson, Ann-Sofie. 2015. Corruption Along Ethnic Lines: A Study of Individual Corruption Experiences in 17 African Countries. Journal of Development Studies 51(1): 80–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kaufmann, Daniel, Kraay, Aart and Mastruzzi, Massimo. 2012. “Worldwide Governance Indicators (WGI) Project.” http://info.worldbank.org/governance/wgi/index.aspx#home (October 7, 2017).Google Scholar
Kingston, Christopher. 2007. Parochial Corruption. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization 63(1): 73–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miguel, Edward and Gugerty, Mary Kay. 2005. Ethnic Diversity, Social Sanctions, and Public Goods in Kenya. Journal of Public Economics 89(11–12): 2325–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nawaz, Farzana. 2012. Overview of Corruption and Anti-Corruption in Malawi. Technical Report U4 Expert Answers. U4 Helpdesk, Transparency International, https://www.u4.no/publications/overview-of-corruption-and-anti-corruption-in-malawi (December 12, 2014)Google Scholar
Posner, Daniel N. 2004. The Political Salience of Cultural Difference: Why Chewas and Tumbukas are Allies in Zambia and Adversaries in Malawi. American Political Science Review 98(4): 529–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Robinson, Amanda Lea. 2016. Nationalism and Ethnic-Based Trust: Evidence from an African Border Region. Comparative Political Studies 49(14): 1819–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Robinson, Amanda Lea. 2017. Ethnic Diversity, Segregation, and Ethnocentric Trust in Africa. British Journal of Political Science. 1–23, doi:10.1017/S0007123417000540 Google Scholar
Robinson, Amanda Lea and Seim, Brigitte. 2018. Who is Targeted in Corruption? Disentangling the Effects of Wealth and Power on Exposure to Bribery. Quarterly Journal of Political Science 13(3): 313–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scott, J. C. 1972. Comparative Political Corruption. Englewoods Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
Seim, Brigitte and Robinson, Amanda. 2019. Replication Data for: Coethnicity and Corruption: Field Experimental Evidence from Public Officials in Malawi. Harvard Dataverse, V1, UNF:6:hSS2gJJMSV6KQM312qxg+A== [fileUNF]. doi: 10.7910/DVN/N1HOB1 Google Scholar
Smith, Daniel Jordan. 2001. Kinship and Corruption in Contemporary Nigeria. Ethnos 66(3): 344–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Transparency International. 2013. “Global Corruption Barometer.” https://www.transparency.org/gcb2013 (October 7, 2017).Google Scholar
Treisman, Daniel. 2000. The Causes of Corruption: A Cross-National Study. Journal of Public Economics 76(June): 399–457.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
United States Government. 2013. The World Factbook. Washington, DC: Central Intelligence Agency.Google Scholar
Waithima, A. and Burns, Justine. 2014. The Role of Ethnic Heterogeneity on Corruption: Experimental Evidence from Kenya. In Corruption in Africa: A Threat to Justice and Sustainable Peace, eds. Nduku, Elizabeth and Tenamwenye, John. Geneva, Switzerland: Globethnics.net, 169–203.Google Scholar
Zimmerman, Brigitte. 2014. Transparency, Accountability, and Corruption Displacement: Multi-Method Evidence from Local Government in Malawi. Ph.D. diss. University of California, San Diego.Google Scholar
Zimmerman, Brigitte. 2015. Voter Response to Scandal: Cashgate and the Malawian Election. In Democracy Maturing? The 2014 Malawi Tripartite Elections, eds. Patel, Nandini and Wahman, Michael. Lilongwe: National Initiative for Civic Education, 215–235.Google Scholar
Supplementary material: Link

Seim and Robinson Dataset

Dataset

https://doi.org/10.7910/DVN/N1HOB1
Link
Supplementary material: PDF

Seim and Robinson supplementary material

Seim and Robinson supplementary material 1

Download Seim and Robinson supplementary material(PDF)
PDF 611.7 KB