Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-94fs2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-05T04:04:49.420Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Social analysis of early Anglo-Saxon inhumation burials: archaeological methodologies

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 January 2017

Jeremy W. Huggett
Jeremy W. Huggett*
Affiliation:
Department of Archaeology, University of Glasgow, Glasgow G12 8QQ
Get access

Abstract

This paper presents a new approach to the social analysis of Anglo-Saxon inhumation burials from the fifth to seventh centuries AD. It defines a range of stylistic attributes which encapsulate a succession of decisions and actions by others concerning the burial of a single individual. It seeks to develop a new methodology which starts with the unit of burial and works outwards in scale to the cemetery and region beyond, and applies this methodology to examine the treatment of age and sex and identify the similarities and variability which exists across a range of burial attributes. The analysis summarised here employs data derived from twelve cemeteries, and examines the results at different scales, treating each cemetery both in isolation and as member of a wider group.

Cet article présente une nouvelle approche de l'analyse sociale des inhumations anglo-saxonnes du cinquième au septième siècles ap. J.C. II définit une gamme d'attributs stylistiques qui encapsulent une succession de décisions et d'actions prisent par d'autres concernant l'enterrement d'une seule et même personne. Il cherche à developper une nouvelle méthodologie qui commence avec l'enterrement et travaille à l'extérieur, è l'échelle du cimetière et au-delà, et applique cette méthodologie pour étudier le traitement de l'age et du sexe, identifier les ressemblances et les changements qui existent à travers une gamme d'attributs d'enterrement. L'analyse résumée ici utilise des données provenant de douze cimetières, et étudie les résultats aux échelles différentes, traitant chaque cimetière, soit comme membre d'un large groupe, soit en tant que tel.

Dieser Aufsatz stellt einen neuen Ansatz zur Sozialanalyse angelsächsischer Körperbestattungen des 5. bis 7. Jahrhunders n. Chr. vor. Es werden zunächst eine Reihe von stilistischen Attributen definiert, die eine Abfolge von Entscheidungen und Handlungen anderer in Hinsicht auf das Begräbnis des einzelnen Individuums zusammenfassen. Es wird dann versucht, eine neue Methodologie zu entwickeln, die mit der Einheit einer Bestattung beginnt und sich dann auf den Maßstab des ganzen Friedhofs und darüberhinaus ausweitet. Diese Methodologie wird angewandt, um die unterschiedliche Behandlung von Alter und Geschlecht zu untersuchen und die Variabilität unter einer Reihe von Begräbnisattributen festzustellen. Die hier zusammengefaßte Analyse beruht auf Daten von zwölf Freidhöfen, die jeweils auf verschiedenen Maßstäben, als einzelner Friedhof und als Vertreter einer größeren Gruppen, untersucht werden.

Type
Articles
Information
Journal of European Archaeology , Volume 4 , 1996 , pp. 337 - 365
Copyright
Copyright © European Association of Archaeologists 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Arnold, Christopher J., 1980. Wealth and social structure: a matter of life and death. In Rahtz, P., Dickinson, T., and Watts, L. (eds), Anglo-Saxon Cemeteries 1979: 81–142. Oxford: British Archaeological Reports (British Series 82).Google Scholar
Arnold, Christopher J., 1983. The Sancton-Baston potter. Scottish Archaeological Review 2: 17–30.Google Scholar
Binford, Lewis, 1971. Mortuary practices: their study and practice. In Brown, J. A. (ed.), Approaches to the Social Dimensions of Mortuary Practices: 6–29. Washington, D.C.: (Memoirs of the Society for American Archaeology 25).Google Scholar
Castleford, John, 1991. Is your confidence level significant? Archaeological Computing Newsletter 4: 3–8.Google Scholar
Crawford, Sally, 1991. When do Anglo-Saxon children count? Journal of Theoretical Archaeology 2: 17–24.Google Scholar
Dickinson, Tania, 1991. Material culture as social expression: the case of Saxon saucer brooches with running spiral decoration. Studien zur Sachsenforschung 7: 39–70.Google Scholar
Fisher, Genevieve, 1988. Style and sociopolitical organisation: a preliminary study from early Anglo-Saxon England. In Driscoll, S. T. and Nieke, M. R. (eds), Power and Politics in Early Medieval Britain and Ireland: 128–144. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar
Harke, Heinrich, 1992. Changing symbols in a changing society: the Anglo-Saxon weapon burial rite in the seventh century. In Carver, M. (ed.), The Age of Sutton Hoo: 149–165. Woodbridge: Boydell Press.Google Scholar
Hirst, Susan M., 1985. An Anglo-Saxon Inhumation Cemetery at Sewerby, East Yorkshire. York (York University Archaeological Publications 4).Google Scholar
Hodder, Ian, 1982. Symbols in Action. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Huggett, Jeremy W., 1992 A computer-based analysis of early Anglo-Saxon inhumation burials. , Staffordshire Polytechnic.Google Scholar
Huggett, Jeremy W., 1995. Numerical methods for burial analysis. In Lockyear, K. and Wilcock, J. D. (eds), Computer Applications and Quantitative Methods in Archaeology 1993: 183–190. Oxford: British Archaeological Reports (International Series S598).Google Scholar
Huggett, Jeremy W. and Richards, Julian, 1990. Anglo-Saxon Burial: the computer at work. In Southworth, E. (ed.), Anglo-Saxon Cemeteries: a reappraisal: 65–85. Stroud: Alan Sutton.Google Scholar
Leeds, E. T. and Harden, D. B., 1936. The Anglo-Saxon Cemetery at Abingdon, Berks. Oxford: Ashmolean Museum.Google Scholar
Meaney, A. L., 1964. A Gazetteer of Early Anglo-Saxon Burial Sites. London: Allen and Unwin.Google Scholar
Myres, J. N. L., 1969. Anglo-Saxon Pottery and the Settlement of England. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Myres, J. N. L. and Southern, W. H., 1973. The Anglo-Saxon Cremation Cemetery at Sancton, East Yorkshire. Hull: (Hull Museum Publications 218).Google Scholar
Pader, Ellen-Jane, 1982. Symbolism, Social Relations and the Interpretation of Mortuary Remains. Oxford: British Archaeological Reports (International Series 130).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Richards, Julian D., 1982. Anglo-Saxon pot shapes: cognitive investigations. Science and Archaeology 24: 33–46.Google Scholar
Richards, Julian D., 1984. Funerary symbolism in Anglo-Saxon England: further social dimensions of mortuary practices. Scottish Archaeological Review 3: 42–55.Google Scholar
Richards, Julian D., 1987. The Significance of Form and Decoration of Anglo-Saxon Cremation Urns. Oxford: British Archaeological Reports (British Series 166).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Richards, Julian D., 1988. Style and symbol: explaining variability in Anglo-Saxon cremation burials. In Driscoll, S. T. and Nieke, M. R. (eds), Power and Politics in Early Medieval Britain and Ireland: 145–161. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar
Sackett, J. R., 1982. Approaches to style in lithic archaeology. Journal of Anthropological Archaeology 1: 59–112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Samson, Ross, 1987. Social structures from Reihengräber: mirror or mirage? Scottish Archaeological Review 4: 116–126.Google Scholar
Saxe, Arthur, 1970. Social Dimensions of Mortuary Practices (unpublished PhD dissertation, Ann Arbor Microfilms).Google Scholar
Schiffer, Michael B., 1987. Formation Processes of the Archaeological Record. Albuquerque: University of New Mexico Press.Google Scholar
Shanks, Michael and Tilley, Christopher, 1992. Re-Constructing Archaeology: Theory and Practice. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Shephard, John F., 1979. The social identity of the individual in isolated barrows and barrow cemeteries in Anglo-Saxon England. In Burnham, B. and Kingsbury, J. (eds), Space, Hierarchy and Society: Interdisciplinary Studies in Sodai Area Analysis: 47–80. Oxford: British Archaeological Reports (International Series 59).Google Scholar
Sherlock, S. J. and Welch, M. G., 1992. An Anglo-Saxon Cemetery at Norton, Cleveland. London: Council for British Archaeology (Research Report 82).Google Scholar
Wiessner, P., 1983. Style and social information in Kalahari San projectile points. American Antiquity 48: 253–276.Google Scholar
Wiessner, P., 1984. Reconsidering the behavioural basis for style: a case study among the Kalahari San. Journal of Anthropological Archaeology 3: 190–234.Google Scholar
Wiessner, P., 1985. Style or isochrestic variation? A reply to Sackett 1985. American Antiquity 50: 160–166.Google Scholar
Wobst, H. Martin, 1977. Stylistic behaviour and information exchange. In Cleland, C. E. (ed.), Papers for the Director: Research Essays in Honour of James B. Griffin: 317–342. Ann Arbor: Museum of Anthropology University of Michigan (Anthropology Papers 61).Google Scholar