Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-gb8f7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-30T20:48:14.719Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Woman underfoot in life and art: female representations in fourth-century Romano-British mosaics

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 January 2017

René Rodgers*
Affiliation:
Archaeology Department, 46 Saddler Street, University of Durham, Durham DH1 3NU, Great Britain
Get access

Abstract

Women are often depicted on Romano-British mosaics either as non-specific allegorical characters without personalities, such as personifications of seasons, fortune, learning, and so on, or as figures representative of the forces of nature, such as Medusa or the seasons. Medusa, often identified with chaos, is depicted already neutralised through the nature of her representation; while the seasons are frequently coupled with a male mythological figure such as Bacchus, related to the contrast between nature and culture. Other scenes of male association with culture include scenes from the hunt. Idealised portrayals of Roman social interests focus on male-oriented activities; activities of specifically female interest are not known. These representations are interpreted in light of Sherry Ortner's social attributes of a ‘universal subordination of women’.

Im allgemeinen finden sich Frauen auf romano-britischen Mosaiken entweder als unspezifische Allegorien ohne Personalität, Personifikationen der Jahreszeiten, des Glücks, des Lernens und so weiter, oder als Medusa abgebildet. Diese chaotische, mythische Kreatur, die als Darstellung der Natur gelesen werden kann, wird regelmäßig durch Enthauptung bezwungen. Andere weibliche Repräsentationen der Natur, wie die Jahreszeiten, werden regelmäßig von männlichen mythologischen Figuren, wie etwa Bacchus, kontrolliert. Andere Szenen von männlicher kultureller Eroberung der Natur – das Jagen! – sind weit verbreitet, Zirkusszenen lassen sich ebenfalls finden. Beides sind vornehmlich männliche Interessen; Aktivitäten von besonders weiblichem Interesse sind hingegen unbekannt. Diese Darstellungen werden interpretiert im Licht von Sherry Ortners sozialen Attributen der ‘universalen Unterordnung der Frauen.’

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © European Association of Archaeologists 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Brown, Peter, 1971. The World of Late Antiquity. London: Thames and Hudson.Google Scholar
Cantarella, Eva, 1987. Pandora's Daughters. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University.Google Scholar
Clark, Gillian, 1993. Women in Late Antiquity. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Drijvers, Jan Willem, 1987. Virginity and asceticism in late Roman western elites. In Blok, and Mason, (eds), Sexual Asymmetry: 241274. Amsterdam: Gieben.Google Scholar
Dunbabin, Katherine M.D., 1978. The Mosaics of Roman North Africa. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Ellis, Simon, 1988. The end of the Roman house. American Journal of Archaeology 92: 565576.Google Scholar
Henig, Martin, 1984. Religion in Roman Britain. New York: Batsford.Google Scholar
Ling, Roger, 1983. The seasons in Romano-British mosaic pavements. Britannia 14: 1322.Google Scholar
Morgan, Thomas, 1886. Romano-British Mosaic Pavements. London: Whiting and Co.Google Scholar
Neal, David, 1981. Roman Mosaics in Britain. London: Society for the Promotion of Roman Studies.Google Scholar
Ortner, Sherry B., 1974. Is female to male as nature is to culture? In Rosaldo, and Lamphere, (eds), Woman, Culture and Society: 6787. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Rainey, Anne, 1973. Mosaics in Roman Britain. Newton Abbot: David and Charles.Google Scholar
Ruesch, J. and Kees, W., 1970. Non-verbal Communication. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Scott, Sarah, 1991. An outline of a new approach for the interpretation of Romano-British mosaics and some comments on the possible significance of the Orpheus mosaics of 4th century Roman Britain. Journal of Theoretical Archaeology 2: 2935.Google Scholar
Scott, Sarah, 1993a. 4th Century Romano-British Mosaics: Aspects of Form and Meaning. , Univeristy of Oxford.Google Scholar
Scott, Sarah, 1993b. Household space and gendered patterns of access. Paper delivered at TAG Conference, Durham.Google Scholar
Smith, David, 1969. The mosaic pavements. In Rivet, A. L. F. (ed.), The Roman Villa in Britain: 71125. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Wallace-Hadrill, Andrew, 1988. The social structure of the Roman house. Papers of the British School at Rome 56: 4397.Google Scholar
Warner, Marina. 1985. Monuments and Maidens: The Allegory of the Female Form. London: Weidenfeld and Nicolson.Google Scholar