Published online by Cambridge University Press: 11 May 2010
On this occasion it seems wise to take a leaf from Wassily W. Leontief's book as President of the American Economic Association. He discussed a problem of his organization. His presidential address was a plea for economists to limit their creation of models, especially those difficult of empirical testing, and to test some of those susceptible of verification. My remarks will also deal with a problem, one in the Economic History Association, how it came about, and what we might do about it.
1 Gay, Edwin F., “The Tasks of Economic History,” The Journal of Economic History, I, Supplement (Dec. 1941), 14.Google Scholar
2 Johnson, E. A. J., “New Tools for the Economic Historian,” The Journal of Economic History, I (Dec. 1941), 30CrossRefGoogle Scholar–38 (quotation p. 31).
3 Boorstin, Daniel, “Enlarging the Historian's Vocabulary,” in Fogel, Robert W. and Engerman, Stanley L., eds., The Reinterpretation of American Economic History (New York: Harper & Row, 1971), p. xi.Google Scholar
4 Landes, David S., The Unbound Prometheus: Technological Change and Industrial Development in Western Europe from 1750 to the Present (Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press, 1969Google Scholar); Hughes, Jonathan, Industrialization and Economic History: Theses and Conjectures (New York: McGraw-Hill, Inc., 1970Google Scholar).