Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-fscjk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T17:12:46.321Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Productivity, Wages, and Labor Politics in Brazil, 1945–1962

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 March 2007

Renato P. Colistete
Renato P. Colistete
Affiliation:
Professor of Economic History, Department of Economics, Universidade de São Paulo (USP), Brazil. Departamento de Economia, FEA-USP; Av. Prof. Luciano Gualberto, 908, Cidade Universitária; São Paulo - SP, CEP: 05508-900; Brazil. E-mail: [email protected].
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

After World War II Brazil experienced exceptionally high economic growth, ranking tenth among the largest economies by 1960. Yet evidence shows that real wages lagged far behind productivity, especially from 1956, the heyday of “developmentalism”—an economic ideology aimed at state-led, accelerated industrialization, with foreign and domestic private capital as active partners. The outcome diverged from that of the “social compact for growth,” the cornerstone of the “golden age” in Europe and Japan. A key reason was that in Brazil left-wingers controlled the main trade unions and pushed an agenda of social reform that was widely rejected by industrialists.

Type
ARTICLES
Information
The Journal of Economic History , Volume 67 , Issue 1 , March 2007 , pp. 93 - 127
Copyright
© 2007 The Economic History Association

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abel Cristopher, and Colin Lewis, Eds. Welfare, Poverty and Development in Latin America. Houndmills: Macmillan, 1993.
Ação Socialista, October 1959. São Paulo.
Abreu Marcelo. Brasil e a Economia Mundial, 1930–1945. Rio de Janeiro: Civilização Brasileira, 1999.
Arquivo Edgar Leuenroth. Universidade Estadual de Campinas. São Paulo.
Arquivo do Sindicato das Indústrias de Fiação e Tecelagem em Geral do Estado de São Paulo, São Paulo.
Armstrong Paul, Andrew Glyn, and John Harrison. Capitalism since 1945. Oxford: Blackwell, 1991.
Benevides Maria Vitória. O PTB e o Trabalhismo. Partido e Sindicato em São Paulo, 1945–1964. São Paulo: Brasiliense, 1989.
Bethell Leslie. “Brazil.” In Latin America between the Second World War and the Cold War, 1944–1948, edited by Leslie Bethell and Ian Roxborough, 33–65. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1992.
Bethell Leslie, and Roxborough Ian. “Introduction: The Postwar Conjuncture in Latin America: Democracy, Labor, and the Left.” In Latin America between the Second World War and the Cold War, 1944–1948, edited by Leslie Bethell and Ian Roxborough, 1–32. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1992.
Biblioteca Roberto Simonsen. Federação das Indústrias do Estado de São Paulo. São Paulo.
Bielschowsky Ricardo. Pensamento Econômico Brasileiro. O Ciclo Ideológico do Desenvolvimentismo. Rio de Janeiro: IPEA/INPES, 1988.
Boletim Informativo da FIESP, various dates. São Paulo.
Brazil. Instituto Brasileiro de Geografia e Estatística (IBGE). Anuário Estatístico do Brasil. Rio de Janeiro: IBGE, various dates.
Brazil. Produção Industrial de São Paulo. Rio de Janeiro: IBGE, various dates.
Brazil. Produção Industrial Brasileira. Rio de Janeiro: IBGE, various dates.
Brazil. Recenseamento Geral do Brasil, Censo Demográfico, 1960. Rio de Janeiro: IBGE, 1960.
Brazil. Estatísticas Históricas do Brasil. 2nd ed., Rio de Janeiro: IBGE, 1990.
Bulmer-Thomas Victor. The Economic History of Latin America since Independence. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1994.
Cardoso Eliana, and Ann Helewege. Latin America's Economy. Diversity, Trends and Conflicts. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1995.
Cameron David, and Chris Wallace. “Macroeconomic Performance in the Bretton Woods Era and After.” Oxford Review of Economic Policy 18 (2002): 479–494.Google Scholar
Carew Andrew. “The Schism Within the World Federation of Trade Unions, Government and Trade Union Diplomacy.” International Review of Social History 24 (1984): 297–335.Google Scholar
Carew Andrew. Labour under the Marshall Plan: The Politics of Productivity and the Marketing of Management Science. Manchester: Manchester University Press, 1987.
Carew Andrew. “Conflict Within the ICFTU: Anti-Communism and Anti-Colonialism in the 1950s.” International Review of Social History 41 (1996): 147–81.Google Scholar
Circular FIESP, no. 68/43, 28 April 1943.
Coatsworth John, and Alan Taylor, Eds. Latin America and the World Economy Since 1800. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1999.
Colistete Renato. Labour Relations and Industrial Performance in Brazil: Greater São Paulo, 1945–1960. Houndmills: Palgrave, 2001.CrossRef
Conniff Michael, Ed. Latin American Populism in Comparative Perspective. Albuquerque: University of New Mexico Press, 1982.
Costa Hélio. Em Busca da Memória. Comissão de Fábrica, Partido e Sindicato no Pós-Guerra. São Paulo: Scritta, 1995.
Cox Roberto. Production, Power, and World Order: Social Forces in the Making of History. New York: Columbia University Press, 1987.
Dean Warren. The Industrialization of São Paulo, 1880–1945. Austin: University of Texas Press, 1969.
Diniz Eli. Empresário, Estado e Capitalismo no Brasil, 1930–1945. Rio de Janeiro: Paz e Terra, 1978.
Eichengreen Barry. “Institutions and Economic Growth: Europe After World War II.” In Economic Growth in Europe Since 1945, edited by N. R. F. Crafts and Gianni Toniolo, 38–72. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1996.
Evans Peter. Embedded Autonomy. States and Industrial Transformation. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1995.
Fontes Paulo. Trabalhadores e Cidadãos. Nitro Química: A Fábrica e as Lutas Operárias nos Anos 50. São Paulo: Annablume, 1997.
French Jonh. The Brazilian Workers' ABC: Class Conflict and Alliances in Modern São Paulo. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press, 1992.
Furtado Celso. Economic Development of Latin America. Historical Background and Contemporary Problems. 2nd ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1976.
Gomes Angela de C. Burguesia e Trabalho. Política e Legislação Social no Brasil, 1917–1937. Rio de Janeiro: Campus, 1979.
Gomes Angela de C. A Invenção do Trabalhismo. Rio de Janeiro: Vértice, 1994.
Haber Stephen. Political Institutions and Economic Growth in Latin America. Esssays in Policy, History, and Political Economy. Stanford, CA: Hoover Institution Press, 2000.
Harding Timothy. “The Political History of Organized Labor in Brazil.” Ph.D. diss., Stanford University, 1973.
Henry J. “Developments in Brazilian Labor Organization Since VJ-Day.” Monthly Labor Review (March 1947): 433–43.
Hoje, various dates. São Paulo.
Humphrey John. Fazendo o “Milagre”: Controle Capitalista e Luta Operária na Indústria Automobilística Brasileira. Petrópolis: Vozes, 1982.
Knight Alan. “Populism and Neo-Populism in Latin America, Especially Mexico.” Journal of Latin American Studies 30 (1998): 223–48.Google Scholar
LaFeber W. America, Russia, and the Cold War, 1945–1996. 8th edn, New York: McGraw-Hill, 1997.
Leme Marisa. A Ideologia dos Industriais Brasileiros. Petrópolis: Vozes, 1979.
Leopoldi Maria Antonieta. “Industrial Associations and Economic Policy Making in Contemporary Brazil, 1930–1961.” D.Phil. diss., Oxford University, 1984.
Luz Nícia Villela. A Luta pela Industrialização no Brasil, 1808–1930. São Paulo: Difusão Européia do Livro, 1961.
Maddison Angus et alli. The Political Economy of Poverty, Equity, and Growth. Brazil and Mexico. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1992.
Maier Charles. “The Politics of Productivity: Foundations of American International Economic Policy After World War II.” In In Search for Stability. Explorations in Historical Political Economy. Charles Maier, 121–52. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1987.
Maier Charles. “The Postwar Social Contract: Comment.” International Labor and Working-Class History 50 (1996): 148–50.Google Scholar
Maranhão Ricardo. Sindicato e Democratização: Brasil, 1945–1950. São Paulo: Brasiliense, 1979.
Martins Heloísa. Igreja e Movimento Operário no ABC. São Paulo: Hucitec, 1994.
Mazower Mark. Dark Continent. Europe's Twentieth Century. London: Penguin, 1998.
Negro Antonio. Ford Willys Anos 60. Sistema Auto de Dominação e Metalúrgicos do ABC. Master diss., Universidade Estadual de Campinas, 1994.
Netherlands. International Institute of Social History (IISH). ICFTU Archives. Regional Fund Committee. South America, General Correspondence. Brazil, General Correspondence. Brazil, Correspondence with/on the Rio Office. Amsterdam.
Notícias de Hoje (NH), various dates. São Paulo.
Rabe Stephen. “The Elusive Conference: United States Economic Relations with Latin America, 1945–1952.” Diplomatic History 2 (1978): 279–84.Google Scholar
Revista Industrial de São Paulo (RISP), various dates. São Paulo.
Revista do Trabalho (May–June 1947). São Paulo.
Rodrigues José Albertino. Sindicato e Desenvolvimento no Brasil. São Paulo: Símbolo, 1968.
Roxborough Ian. “The Urban Working Class and Labour Movement in Latin America since 1930.” In The Cambridge History of Latin America, vol. VI, edited by Leslie Bethell, 307–78. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1994.
Roxborough Ian. “Labor Control and the Postwar Growth Model in Latin America.” In Latin America in the 1940s. War and Postwar Transitions, edited by David Rock, 248–62. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1994.
Saretta Fausto. “A Política Econômica Brasileira, 1946–1950.” Revista de Sociologia e Política 4–5 (1996): 113–29.Google Scholar
Shapiro Helen. Engines of Growth. The State and Transnational Auto Companies in Brazil. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1994.
Sikkink Kathryn. Ideas and Institutions. Developmentalism in Brazil and Argentina. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 1991.
Sikkink Kathryn. “The Influence of Raúl Prebisch on Economic-Policy Making in Argentina, 1950–1962.” Latin American Research Review 23 (1988): 91–114.Google Scholar
Simão Aziz. Sindicato e Estado. São Paulo: Dominus, 1966.
Soskice David. “Wage Determination: The Changing Role of Institutions in Advanced Industrialized Countries.” Oxford Review of Economic Policy 6 (1990): 36–61.Google Scholar
Stein Stanley. The Brazilian Cotton Manufacture: Textile Enterprise in an Underdeveloped Area, 1850–1950. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1957.
Thorp Rosemary. Progress, Poverty and Exclusion. An Economic History of Latin America in the 20th Century. Baltimore: IDB, 1998.
Tolipan Ricardo, and Arthur Tinelli, Eds. A Controvérsia sobre Distribuição de Renda e Desenvolvimento. Rio de Janeiro: Zahar, 1975.
United Kingdom. Public Records Office (PRO). Foreign Office, Political Correspondence (FO 371). Ministry of Labour and National Service, Overseas Department (LAB 13). Kew Garden, London.
United States, National Archives and Records Administration (NARA). Department of State, Record Group (RG) 59. Foreign Service Posts of the Department of State, Record Group (RG) 84. College Park, MD.
Vianna Luiz Werneck. Liberalismo e Sindicato no Brasil. Rio de Janeiro: Paz e Terra, 1976.
Vianna Sérgio. “Política Econômica Externa e Industrialização: 1946–1951.” In Cem Anos de Política Econômica Republicana, 1889–1989, edited by Marcelo Abreu, 105–22. Rio de Janeiro: Campus, 1990.
Weinstein Barbara. For Social Peace in Brazil: Industrialists and the Remaking of the Working Class in São Paulo, 1920–1964. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press, 1996.
Weiss Michael. Warriors & Coup d' Etat. Brazilian-American Relations, 1945–1964. Albuquerque: University of New Mexico Press, 1993.
Wells John. “Industrial Accumulation and Living Standards in the Long-Run: The São Paulo Industrial Working Class, 1930–1975, Part II.” Journal of Development Studies 19 (1983): 297–328.Google Scholar
Wolfe Joel. Working Women, Working Men. São Paulo and the Rise of Brazil's Working Class, 1900–1955. Durham, NC: Duke University Press, 1993.
Zerkowski Z., and Veloso, M. A. “Seis Décadas de Economia Brasileira Através do PIB.” Revista Brasileira de Economia 36 (1982): 331–38.Google Scholar