Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jn8rn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T09:11:19.092Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Male Retirement Behavior in the United States, 1930–1950

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 March 2009

Donald O. Parsons
Donald O. Parsons
Affiliation:
Professor of Economics, the Ohio State University, Columbus, OH 43210.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Explanations for the recent decline in the labor force attachment of males 65 years of age and older include the introduction of Old Age and Survivors Insurance and the growth in private pension programs. Neither hypothesis can explain the sizable decline that occurred between 1930 and 1950, when aggregate social security and private pension payments were small. Estimates from pooled state aggregate data indicate that the means-tested Old Age Assistance program established by the Social Security Act of 1935 significantly increased retirement activity in this period, particularly among low-income individuals.

Type
Articles
Information
The Journal of Economic History , Volume 51 , Issue 3 , September 1991 , pp. 657 - 674
Copyright
Copyright © The Economic History Association 1991

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Blinder, Alan S., “Private Pensions and Public Pensions: Theory and Fact” (NBER Working Paper No. 902, June 1982).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blinder, Alan S., Gordon, Roger H., and Wise, Donald E., “Reconsideration of the Work Disincentive Effects of Social Security”, National Tax Journal, 33 (12 1980), pp. 431–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blinder, Alan S., Gordon, Roger H., and Wise, Donald E., “Rhetoric and Reality in Social Security Analysis—A Rejoinder”, National Tax Journal, 34 (12 1981), pp. 473–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burkhauser, Richard V., “The Pension Acceptance Decision of Older Workers,” Journal of Human Resources, 14 (Winter 1979), pp. 63–72.Google Scholar
Burkhauser, Richard V., “The Early Acceptance of Social Security: An Asset Maximization Approach”, Industrial and Labor Relations Review, 33 (07 1980), pp. 484–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burkhauser, Richard V., and Turner, John, “Can Twenty-Five Million Americans Be Wrong?—A Response to Blinder, Gordon, and Wise”, National Tax Journal, 34 (12 1981), pp. 467–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Douglas, Paul H., Social Security in the United States (2nd edn., New York, 1939).Google Scholar
Durand, John D., The Labor Force in the United States, 1890–1960 (New York, 1948).Google Scholar
Feldstein, Martin, “Should Social Security Benefits be Means Tested?” Journal of Political Economy, 95 (06 1987), pp. 468–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fields, Gary S., and Mitchell, Olivia S., Retirement, Pensions, and Social Security (Cambridge, MA, 1984).Google Scholar
Friedman, Milton, and Cohen, W., Social Security: Universal or Selective (Washington, DC, 1972).Google Scholar
Hanna, Frank A., State Income Differentials, 1919–1954 (Durham, 1959).Google Scholar
Hausman, J. A., “Specification Tests in Econometrics”, Econometrica, 46 (11 1978), pp. 1251–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ippolito, Richard A., “Public Policies Towards Private Pensions”, Contemporary Policy Issues, 3 (04 1983), pp. 53–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lazear, Edward P., “Retirement from the Labor Force”, in Ashenfelter, Orley and Layard, Richard, eds., Handbook of Labor Economics (Amsterdam, 1986), pp. 305–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lebergott, Stanley, Manpower in Economic Growth: the American Record Since 1800 (New York, 1964).Google Scholar
Lee, Everett S., Miller, Ann Ratner, Brainerd, Carol P., and Easterlin, Richard, Population Redistribution and Economic Growth: United States, 1870–1950. Vol. 1:Google Scholar
Methodological Considerations and Reference Tables (Philadelphia, 1957).Google Scholar
Moen, Jon, “The Labor of Older Men: A Comment”, this JOURNA, 47 (09 1987), pp. 761–67.Google Scholar
Parsons, Donald O., “The Economics of Intergenerational Control”, Population and Development Review, 10 (03 1984), pp. 41–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ransom, Roger L., and Sutch, Richard, “The Labor of Older Americans: Retirement of Men On and Off the Job, 1870–1937”, this JOURNA, 46 (03 1986), pp. 1–30.Google Scholar
Ransom, Roger L., and Sutch, Richard, “The Decline of Retirement in the Years before Social Security: U.S. Retirement Patterns, 1870–1940”, in Ricardo-Campbell, Rita and Lazear, Edward P., eds., Issues in Contemporary Retirement (Stanford, 1988), pp. 3–26.Google Scholar
Ransom, Roger L., and Sutch, Richard, “The Trend in the Rate of Labor Force Participation of Older Men, 1870–1930: A Reply to Moen”, this JOURNA, 49 (03 1989), pp. 170–83.Google Scholar
Stevens, Robert B., ed., Statutory History of the United States: Income Security (New York, 1970).Google Scholar
Stevenson, Marietta, “Old Age Assistance”, Law and Contemporary Problems, 3 (04 1936), pp. 236–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
U.S. Bureau of the Census, Fifteenth Census of the United States (Washington, DC, 1932), “Unemployment”, vol. 2, General Report.Google Scholar
U.S. Bureau of the Census, Fifteenth Census of the United States (Washington, DC, 1933), vol. 2.Google Scholar
U.S. Bureau of the Census, Fifteenth Census of the United States: 1930 (Washington, DC, 1933), “General Report on Occupations, The Sex and Occupation of Gainful Workers”.Google Scholar
U.S. Bureau of the Census, Statistical Abstract of the United States 1939 (Washington, DC, 1940).Google Scholar
U.S. Bureau of the Census, Statistical Abstract of the United States 1940 (Washington, DC, 1941).Google Scholar
U.S. Bureau of the Census, Sixteenth Census of the United States, Characteristics of the Population, “The Labor Force: Wage or Salary Income in 1939,” (Washington, DC, 1943).Google Scholar
U.S. Bureau of the Census, Vital Statistics Rates in the United States 1900–1940 (Washington, DC, 1943).Google Scholar
U.S. Bureau of the Census, Statistical Abstract of the United States 1949 (Washington, DC, 1949).Google Scholar
U.S. Bureau of the Census, Statistical Abstract of the United States 1951 (Washington, DC, 1951).Google Scholar
U.S. Bureau of the Census, Census of Population 1950, Characteristics of the Population (Washington, DC, 1952), vol. 2.Google Scholar
U.S. Bureau of the Census, Statistical Abstract of the United States 1952 (Washington, DC, 1952).Google Scholar
U.S. Bureau of the Census, Historical Statistics of the United States, Colonial Times to 1970 (Washington, DC, 1975), part 1.Google Scholar
U.S. Bureau of the Census, 1980 Census of Population (Washington, DC, 1981), vol. 1, chap. C.Google Scholar
U.S. Bureau of the Census, 1980 Census of Population (Washington, DC, 1985), vol. 2, “The Geographic Mobility of the Population Across States and the Nation”.Google Scholar
U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Handbook of Labor Statistics (Washington, 1983), bulletin 2175.Google Scholar
U.S. Department of Health, Education, and Welfare, Social Security Administration, Bureau of Public Assistance, Trend Report (Washington, DC, 10 1956).Google Scholar
U.S. Department of Health, Education, and Welfare, Social Security Administration, Social Security Bulletin, Annual Statistical Supplement 1980 (Washington, DC, 1980).Google Scholar
U.S. Public Health Service, Vital Statistics Rates in the United States 1940–1960 (Washington, DC, 1968), special report by Robert D. Grove and Alice M. Hetzel.Google Scholar
Williamson, Jeffrey G., and Lindert, Peter H., American Inequality: A Macroeconomic History (New York, 1980).Google Scholar
Woytinsky, W. S., Earnings and Social Security in the United States (Washington, DC, 1943).Google Scholar