Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-g8jcs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-01T01:27:37.107Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Late Nineteenth-Century Anglo-American Factor-Price Convergence: Were Heckscher and Ohlin Right?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 March 2009

Kevin O'Rourke  and
Jeffrey G. Williamson
Kevin O'Rourke
Affiliation:
Lecturer, University College, Belfield, Dublin 4, Ireland.
Jeffrey G. Williamson
Affiliation:
Laird Bell Professor of Economics, Harvard Univeristy, Cambridge, MA 01238.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Due primarily to transport improvements, commodity prices in Britain and the United States tended to converge between 1870 and 1913. Heckscher and Ohlin, writing in 1919 and 1924, thought that these events should have contributed to factor-price convergence. It turns out that Heckscher and Ohlin were right: a significant share of the Anglo-American real-wage convergence was due to commodity-price convergence. It appears that this late nineteenth-century episode was the dramatic start of world-commodity and factor-market integration that continues today.

Type
Articles
Information
The Journal of Economic History , Volume 54 , Issue 4 , December 1994 , pp. 892 - 916
Copyright
Copyright © The Economic History Association 1994

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Abramovitz, Moses, “Catching Up, Forging Ahead, and Falling Behind,” this Journal, 46 (06 1986), pp. 385–406.Google Scholar
Bairoch, Paul, “International Industrialization Levels from 1750 to 1980,” Journal of European Economic History, 11 (Fall 1982), pp. 269–333.Google Scholar
Baumol, William J., Blackman, Sue A. B., and Wolff, Edward N., Productivity and American Leadership (Cambridge, MA, 1989)1.Google Scholar
Crafts, N. F. R., and Thomas, Mark, “Comparative Advantage in UK Manufacturing Trade 1910–1935,” Economic Journal, 96 (Sept. 1986), pp. 629–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Deane, Phyllis, and Cole, W. A., British Economic Growth, 1688–1959 (Cambridge, 1962).Google Scholar
Estevadeordal, Antonio, “Comparative Advantage at the Turn of the Century” (Ph.D. diss., Harvard University, 1993).Google Scholar
Feinstein, Charles K., National Income, Expenditure and Output of the United Kingdom, 1855–1965 (Cambridge, 1972).Google Scholar
Flam, Harry, and Flanders, M. June, eds., Heckscher-Ohlin Trade Theory (Cambridge, MA, 1991).Google Scholar
Gallman, Robert E., “Commodity Output, 1839–1899,” in Trends in the American Economy in the Nineteenth Century, NBER Studies in Income and Wealth, vol. 24 (Princeton, NJ, 1960).Google Scholar
Gallman, Robert E., “The United States Capital Stock in the Nineteenth Century,” in Engerman, Stanley and Gallman, Robert E., eds., Long-Term Factors in American Economic Growth, NBER Studies in Income and Wealth, vol. 51 (Chicago, 1982).Google Scholar
Gallman, Robert E., and Weiss, Thomas, “The Service Industries in the Nineteenth Century,” in Fuchs, Victor, ed., Production and Productivity in the Service Industries, NBER Studies in Income and Wealth, vol. 34 (Chicago, 1969).Google Scholar
Gerschenkron, Alexander, “Economic Backwardness in Historical Perspective,” in Hoselitz, Bert F., ed., The Progress of Underdeveloped Areas (Chicago, 1952), pp. 3–29.Google Scholar
Harley, C. Knick, “Transportation, the World Wheat Trade and the Kuznets Cycle,” Explorations in Economic History, 17 (07 1980), pp. 218–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harley, C. Knick, “Late Nineteenth Century Transportation, Trade and Settlement,” in Fischer, W., McInnis, R. M., and Schneider, J., eds., The Emergence of a World Economy, 1500–1914: Part II (Stuttgart, 1986), pp. 593–617.Google Scholar
Harley, C. Knick, “Ocean Freight Rates and Productivity, 1740–1913: The Primacy of Mechanical Invention Reaffirmed,” this Journal, 48 (12. 1988), pp. 851–76.Google Scholar
Harley, C. Knick, “The Antebellum American Tariff: Food Exports and Manufacturing,” Explorations in Economic History, 29 (10. 1992), pp. 375–400.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Isserlis, Leon, “Tramp Shipping Cargoes and Freights,” Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, CI, Part I ( 1938), pp. 304–417.Google Scholar
Kindall, James K., “Economic Factors in Specie Resumption: The United States, 1865–1879,” Journal of Political Economy, 59 (02. 1961), pp. 30–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kindleberger, Charles P., “Group Behavior and International Trade,” Journal of Political Economy, 59 (02.-12. 1951), pp. 30–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Learner, Edward E., Sources of International Comparative Advantage (Cambridge, MA, 1984).Google Scholar
Leontief, Wassily, “Domestic Production and Foreign Trade: The American Capital Position Re-examined,” Economic Internazionale, 7 (02. 1954), pp. 3–32.Google Scholar
Mokhtari, Manoucher, and Rassekh, Farhad, “The Tendency Towards Factor Price Equalization Among OECD Countries,” Review of Economics and Statistics, 71 (11. 1989), pp. 636–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nelson, Richard R., and Wright, Gavin, “The Rise and Fall of American Technological Leadership,” Journal of Economic Literature, 30 (12. 1992), pp. 1931–64.Google Scholar
North, Douglass C, “Ocean Freight Rates and Economic Development 1750–1913,” this Journal, 18 (12. 1958), pp. 537–55.Google Scholar
Nourse, Edwin G., American Agriculture and the European Market (New York, 1924).Google Scholar
O'Rourke, Kevin, “Burn Everything British But Their Coal: The Anglo-Irish Economic War of the 1930s,” this Journal, 51 (06 1991), pp. 357–66.Google Scholar
O'Rourke, Kevin, Taylor, Alan M., and Williamson, Jeffrey G., “Land, Labor and the Wage-Rental Ratio: Factor Price Convergence in the Late Nineteenth Century,” Historical Paper No. 46, National Bureau of Economic Research (Cambridge, MA, 1993).Google Scholar
O'Rourke, Kevin, and Williamson, Jeffrey G., “Were Heckscher and Ohlin Right? Putting the Factor-Price-Equalization Theorem Back into History,” Discussion Paper Number 1593, Harvard Institute of Economic Research (Cambridge, MA, 1992).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
O'Rourke, Kevin, Williamson, Jeffrey G., and Hatton, Timothy J., “Mass Migration, Commodity Market Integration, and Real Wage Convergence: The Late Nineteenth Century Atlantic Economy,” in Hatton, T. J. and Williamson, J. G., eds., Migration and the International Labor Market, 1850–1939 (London, 1994), pp. 203–20.Google Scholar
Rassekh, Farhad, “The Role of International Trade in the Convergence of Per Capita GDP in the OECD: 1950–85,” International Economic Journal, 6 (Winter 1992); pp. 1–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rutherford, Thomas, General Equilibrium Modeling with MPSIGE, Department of Economics, University of Western Ontario (London, Canada, 1988).Google Scholar
Samuelson, Paul A., “International Trade and the Equalization of Factor Prices,” Economic Journal, 70 (06 1948), pp. 65–94.Google Scholar
Sauerbeck, A., “Prices of Commodities and the Precious Metals,” Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, (1892– 1913), various issues.Google Scholar
U.S. Congress, Wholesale Prices, Wages, and Transportation, 52nd Congress, 2nd sess., Senate, (Washington, D.C., 1892– 1893).Google Scholar
U.S. Department of Commerce, Historical Statistics of the United States (Washington, D.C., 1975).Google Scholar
U.S. Department of Labor, Bureau of Labor Statistics, Wholesale Prices 1890–1922 (Washington, D.C., 1923).Google Scholar
Whitney, William G., “The Structure of the American Economy in the Late Nineteenth Century” (Ph.D. diss., Harvard University, 1968).Google Scholar
Williamson, Jeffrey G., Late Nineteenth-Century American Development (Cambridge, 1974).Google Scholar
Williamson, Jeffrey G., Did British Capitalism Breed Inequality? (London, 1985).Google Scholar
Williamson, Jeffrey G., “The Evolution of Global Labor Markets Since 1830: Background Evidence and Hypotheses,” Explorations in Economic History, 31 (1994, forthcoming).Google Scholar
Wright, Gavin, “The Origins of American Industrial Success, 1879–1940,” American Economic Review, 80 (09 1990), pp. 651–68.Google Scholar
Yates, P. Lamartine, Forty Years of Foreign Trade (New York, 1959).Google Scholar