No CrossRef data available.
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 03 February 2011
AS Hugh Aitken explained in our September issue, the editorship of this, the spring number of THE JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC HISTORY, which in memory of Edwin F. Gay is entitled also THE TASKS OF ECONOMIC HISTORY, falls now on someone involved in preparing the program for our annual meeting. Except in our business meeting and in the session devoted to discussing doctoral dissertations, we met last fall with the International Economic History Association. Accordingly we are presenting here, in addition to the summaries of dissertations, a few of the papers which were prepared for the Fourth Congress of the International Economic History Association and which were discussed at its meeting at the University of Indiana, Bloomington, Indiana, September 10–14, 1968. This issue of THE JOURNAL may be considered a kind of supplement to the volume containing the proceedings of the Congress, a volume which is in the process of publication by the University of Indiana Press. In order to minimize delays in the publication of those proceedings, the Executive Committee of the International Economic History Association approved restricting its content to the rapports and brief summaries of the communications. Other outlets are being found for the full texts of the many valuable communications presented for discussion at Bloomington.
1 Gathered in London on April 10, 1967, for the discussion of these memoranda were Jean-Francois Bergier, Witold Kula, Emmanuel LeRoy Ladurie, Sigismund P. Pach, Felipe Ruiz-Martin, and Frederic C. Lane.
2 Under the title “Formation et Structures du Capitalisme (XVeau XVIIIe siecles)” it will appear of course in the volume of proceedings being published by the University of Indiana Press, along with the other rapports prepared for that section, namely, Hermann Kellenbenz, “Marchands Capitalistes et Classes Sociales,” and Sigismund P. Pach, “Favorable and Unfavorable Conditions for Capitalist Growth: The Shift of International Trade Routes in the 15–17 Centuries.“