Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-hc48f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T21:39:16.540Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The Immigrant Assimilation Puzzle in Late Nineteenth-Centuty America

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 March 2009

Timothy J. Hatton
Affiliation:
Professor of Economics at the University of Essex, Wivenhoe Park, Colchester, Essex C04 3SQ, U.K.

Abstract

Recent studies suggest that the earnings of pre-1890 immigrants grew slowly compared with those of natives and imply that these immigrants did not assimilate well into the American labor market. Using data for Michigan and California this article estimates new specifications for immigrant and native-born earnings, and finds that immigrants who arrived as children had similar earnings profiles to the native-born. Immigrants who arrived as adults suffered an initial earnings disadvantage but their earnings grew faster than those of the native-born. These results are consistent with the traditional view that pre-1890 immigrants assimilated well.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © The Economic History Association 1997

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Blau, Francine D.Immigration and Labor Earnings in Early Twentieth Century America.” Research in Population Economics 2 (1980): 2141.Google Scholar
Borjas, George J.Assimilation, Changes in Cohort Quality and the Earnings Immigrants,” Journal of Labor Economics 3, no. 4 (1985): 463–89.Google Scholar
Borjas, George J.The Economics of Immigration.” Journal of Economic Literature 32, no. 4 (1994): 16671717.Google Scholar
Borjas, George J.Assimilation and Cohort Quality Revisited: What Happened to Immigrant Earnings in the 1980s? Journal of Labor Economics 13, no. 2 (1995): 201–45.Google Scholar
Carter, Susan B., and Elizabeth, Savoca. “Gender Differences in Earning and Learning in Nineteenth Century America: The Role of Expected Job and Career Attachment.” Explorations in Economic History 28, no. 3 (1991): 323–43.Google Scholar
Carter, Susan B., Ransom, Roger L., Richard, Sutch, and Hongcheng, Zhao. Codebook and User’s Manual: A Survey of 3920 Male Workers in the Agricultural Implement and Iron Industries in Detroit, 1890. Berkeley: University of California, Berkeley, Institute of Business and Economic Research, 1993.Google Scholar
Carter, Susan B., Ransom, Roger L., Richard, Sutch, and Hongcheng, Zhao. Codebook and User’s Manual: A Survey of 4918 Male Workers in the Agriculture Implement and Iron Industries Outside Detroit in 1890. Berkeley: University of California, Berkeley, Institute of Business and Economic Research, 1993.Google Scholar
Carter, Susan B., Ransom, Roger L., Richard, Sutch, and Hongcheng, Zhao. Codebook and User’s Manual: A Survey of 3493 Wage Earners in Calfornia, 1892. Berkeley: University of California, Berkeley, Institute of Business and Economic Research, 1993.Google Scholar
Chiswick, Barry R.The Effect of Americanization on the Earnings of Foreign-born Men.” Journal of Political Economy 86, no. 5 (1978): 897921.Google Scholar
Chiswick, Barry R.Jewish Immigrant Skill and Occupational Attainment at the Turn of the Century.” Explorations in Economic History 28, no. 1 (1991): 6486.Google Scholar
Eichengreen, Barry J.Experience and the Male-Female Earnings Gap in the 1890s.” this JOURNAL 44, no. 3 (1984): 822–34.Google Scholar
Eichengreen, Barry J., and Gemery, Henry A.. “The Earnings of Skilled and Unskilled Immigrants at the End of the Nineteenth Century,” this JOURNAL 46, no. 2 (1986): 441–54.Google Scholar
Friedberg, Rachel M. “The Labor Market Assimilation of Immigrants in the United States: The Role of Age at Arrival.” Unpublished Manuscript, Brown University, 1992.Google Scholar
Friedberg, Rachel M. “The Success of Young Immigrants in the U.S. Labor Market: An Evaluation of Competing Explanations,” Unpublished Manuscript, Brown University, 1993.Google Scholar
Hanes, Christopher. “Immigrants’ Relative Rate of Wage Growth in the Late Nineteenth Century.” Explorations in Economic History 33, no. 1 (1996): 3564.Google Scholar
Hannon, Joan U.Ethnic Discrimination in a Nineteenth Century Mining District: Michigan Copper Mines, 1888.” Explorations in Economic History 19, no. 1 (1982): 2850.Google Scholar
Hannon, Joan U.City Size and Ethnic Discrimination: Michigan Agricultural Implements and Iron Working Industries, 1890.” this JOURNAL 42, no. 4 (1982): 825–45.Google Scholar
Higgs, Robert. “Race, Skill and Earnings: American Immigrants in 1909.” this JOURNAL 31, no. 2 (1971): 420–29.Google Scholar
Jasso, Guillermina, and Rosenzweig, Mark R.. “How Well Do U.S. Immigrants Do? Vintage Effects, Emigration Selectivity and Occupational Mobility.” Research in Population Economics. 6 (1988): 229–53.Google Scholar
Lalonde, Robert J., and Topel, Robert H.. “The Assimilation of Immigrants in the U.S. Labor Market.” In Immigrants and the Workforce: Economic Consequences for the United States and Source Areas, edited by Borjas, George J. and Freeman, Richard B., 7692. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1992.Google Scholar
Lebergott, Stanley. Manpower and Economic Growth: The American Record since 1800. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1964.Google Scholar
McGouldrick, Paul F., and Tannen, Michael B.. “Did American Manufacturers Discriminate Against Immigrants before 1914?” this JOURNAL 37, no. 1 (1977): 723–46.Google Scholar
Murphy, Kevin M., and Finis, Welch. “Empirical Age-Earnings Profiles.” Journal of Labor Economics 8, no. 2 (1990): 202–29.Google Scholar
Yuengert, Andrew M.Immigrant Earnings, Relative to What? The Importance of Earnings Function Specification and Comparison Points.” Journal of Applied Econometrics 9, no. 1 (1994): 7190.CrossRefGoogle Scholar