Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-mkpzs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T21:35:55.912Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Fertility and the Price of Children: Evidence from Slavery and Slave Emancipation

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 November 2014

Marianne H. Wanamaker
Marianne H. Wanamaker*
Affiliation:
Assistant Professor, Department of Economics, The University of Tennessee, 524 Stokely Management Center, Knoxville, TN 37996. E-mail: [email protected].
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Theories of the demographic transition often center on the rising price of children. A model of fertility derived from household production in the antebellum United States contains both own children and slaves as inputs. Changes in slaveholdings beget changes in the marginal product of the slaveowners’ own children and, hence, their price. I use panel data on slaveowning households between 1850 and 1870 to measure the slaveowners’ own fertility responses to exogenous changes in slaveholdings. Results indicate a strong, negative correlation between own child prices and fertility.

Type
Articles
Information
The Journal of Economic History , Volume 74 , Issue 4 , December 2014 , pp. 1045 - 1071
Copyright
Copyright © The Economic History Association 2014 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

Many thanks to Raquel Bernal, Hoyt Bleakley, Lou Cain, Celeste Carruthers, Joseph Ferrie, Mark Guglielmo, Tim Guinnane, Charles Manski, Robert Margo, Joel Mokyr, John Parman, Paul Rhode, Chris Taber, and anonymous referees for helpful comments and suggestions. Comments from participants at the Northwestern University Economic History Seminar, Northwestern Labor Lunch and the University of Chicago Center for Population Economics Workshop on Economics and Biodemography of Aging and Health Care are gratefully acknowledged. In addition, I thank The Graduate School at Northwestern University for funding this research.

References

REFERENCES

Becker, Gary S. “An Economic Analysis of Fertility.” In Demographic and Economic Changein Developed Countries, A Conference of the Universities-National Bureau Committee for Economic Research, 209–231. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1960.Google Scholar
Becker, Gary S., and H. Gregg Lewis. “On The Interaction Between the Quantity and Quality of Children.” Journal of Political Economy 81, no. 2 (1973): S279–S288.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Calomiris, Charles W., and Pritchett, Jonathan. B. “Preserving Slave Families for Profit: Traders’ Incentives and Pricing in the New Orleans Slave Market.” The Journal of Economic History 69, no. 4 (2009): 986–1011.Google Scholar
Carter, Susan B., Ransom, Roger L., and Sutch, Richard. “Family Matters: The Life-Cycle Transition and the Unparalleled Antebellum American Fertility Decline.” In History Matters: Essays on Economic Growth, Technology, and Demographic Change, edited by Guinnane, Timothy, Sundstrom, William, and Whatley, Warren, 271–327. Stanford: Stanford University Press, 2003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cleland, John, and Wilson, Christopher. “Demand Theories of the Fertility Transition: AnIconoclastic View.” Population Studies 41, no. 1 (1987): 5–30.Google Scholar
Coale, Ansley J., and Watkins, Susan Cotts, The Decline of Fertility in Europe. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1986.Google Scholar
Fogel, Robert W., and Engerman, Stanley L.. Time on the Cross. Boston: Little, Brown, 1974.Google Scholar
Fogel, Robert W., and Engerman, Stanley L.. 1976. Slave Sales and Appraisals, 1775–1865. ICPSR Data set No.7421.Google Scholar
Galor, Oded, “From Stagnation to Growth: Unified Growth Theory.” In Handbook of Economic Growth, edited by Aghion, Philippe and Durlauf, Steven N., 171–293. Amsterdam: Elsevier, 2005.Google Scholar
Hahn, Steven. The Roots of Southern Populism: Yeoman Farmers and the Transformation of the Georgia Upcountry, 1850–1890. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2006.Google Scholar
Haines, Michael, “Fertility and Mortality in the United States.” EH. Net Encyclopedia, edited by Whaples, Robert. Available online at http://eh.net/encyclopedia/fertility-and-mortality-in-the-united-states/, March 19, 2008.Google Scholar
Manser, Marilyn, and Brown, Murray. “Marriage and Household Decision-Making: A Bargaining Analysis.” International Economic Review 21, no. 1 (1980): 31–44.Google Scholar
Margo, Robert, “The North-South Wage Gap Before and After the Civil War.” In Slavery in the Development of the Americas, edited by Eltis, David, Lewis, Frank D., and Sokoloff, Kenneth L., 324–41. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2004.Google Scholar
McCurry, Stephanie. Masters of Small Worlds: Yeoman Households, Gender, Relations, and the Political Culture of the Antebellum South Carolina Low Country. New York: Oxford University Press, 1995.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moen, Jon, “Changes in the Productivity of Southern Agriculture between 1860 and 1880.” In Without Consent or Contract: The Rise and Fall of American Slavery Vol. 1, edited by Fogel, Robert and Engerman, Stanley, 321–50. New York: W.W. Norton and Company, 1992.Google Scholar
Olson, John, “The Occupational Structure of Southern Plantations during the LateAntebellum Era.” In Without Consent or Contract: The Rise and Fall of AmericanSlavery Vol. 1, edited by Fogel, Robert and Engerman, Stanley, 137–69. New York: W.W. Norton and Company, 1992.Google Scholar
Ransom, Roger, and Sutch, Richard. One Kind of Freedom: The Economic Consequences of Emancipation. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2001.Google Scholar
Ruggles, Steven, Sobek, Matthew, Alexander, J. Trent, Fitch, Catherine, Goeken, Ronald, Hall, Patricia, King, Miriam, and Ronnander, Carrie. Integrated Public Use Microdata Series: Version 4.0 (Machine-Readable Database). Minnesota Population Center, Minneapolis, 2008.Google Scholar
Steckel, Richard H. “Slave Height Profiles from Coastwise Manifests.” Explorations in Economic History 16 (1979: 363–80.Google Scholar
Steckel, Richard H. “The Fertility of American Slaves.” Research in Economic History 7 (1982: 239–86.Google ScholarPubMed
Steckel, Richard H. “A Dreadful Childhood: The Excess Mortality of American Slaves.” Social Science History (Winter 1986): 427–65.Google Scholar
Steckel, Richard H. “Women, Work and Health under Plantation Slavery in the United States.” In More than Chattel: Black Women and Slavery in America, edited by Gaspar, David Barry and Hine, Darlene Clark, 43–60. Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 1996.Google Scholar
Steckel, Richard H., and Ziebarth, Nicolas. “A Troublesome Statistic: Traders and CoastalShipments in the Westward Movement of Slaves.” The Journal of Economic History 73, no. 3 (2013): 792–809.Google Scholar
Sutch, Richard, “The Breeding of Slaves for Sale and the Westward Expansion of Slavery, 1850–1860.” In Race and Slavery in the Western Hemisphere: Quantitative Studies, edited by Engerman, Stanley L. and Genovese, Eugene D., 173–201. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1975.Google Scholar
Thompson, Warren S., and Whelpton, P.K.. Population Trends in the United States. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1933.Google Scholar
Zelnik, Melvin, “Age Heaping in the United States Census: 1880-1950.” Milbank Memorial Fund Quarterly 39, no. 3 (1961): 540–73.Google Scholar
Supplementary material: PDF

Wanamaker Supplementary Material

Appendix

Download Wanamaker Supplementary Material(PDF)
PDF 5.7 MB