Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t8hqh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T01:11:51.713Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Family Income, Mortality, and Fertility on the Eve of the Demographic Transition: A Case Study of Rosny-Sous-Bois

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 March 2009

David R. Weir
David R. Weir
Affiliation:
Visiting Associate Professor of Economics and Fellow of the Population Research Center, NORC and the University of Chicago, 1155 E. 60th St., Chicago, IL 60637.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This article combines uniquely detailed household-level tax assessments with reconstituted family histories for an eighteenth-century agricultural village near Paris. The tax records reveal substantial diversity in income among taxpayers despite the exemptions given privileged landowners. High-income households had significantly lower levels of infant and adult mortality, earlier age at marriage of the wife, and slightly lower rates of emigration by their surviving children. Marital fertility was high at all income levels. These classic Malthusian patterns were found at the household level more than a generation after the last great subsistence crises and resulted in a much higher local rate of replacement for the better-off families.

Type
Articles
Information
The Journal of Economic History , Volume 55 , Issue 1 , March 1995 , pp. 1 - 26
Copyright
Copyright © The Economic History Association 1995

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Archives Nationales de la France, Paris. [ANF]Google Scholar
Bardet, Jean-Pierre, Rouen aux XVIIe et XVIIIe siècles: les mutations d'un espace social (Paris, 1983).Google Scholar
Bardet, Jean-Pierre, “Innovators and Imitators in the Practice of Contraception in Town and Country,” in van der Woude, A. D., Hayami, Akira, and de Vries, Jan, eds., Urbanization in History: A Process of Dynamic Interactions (Oxford, 1990), pp. 264–81.Google Scholar
Bardet, Jean-Pierre, “Acceptation et refus de la vie à Paris au XVIIIe siècle,” in Bardet, Jean-Pierre and Foisil, Madeleine, eds., La vie, la mort, la foi, le temps: mélanges offerts à Pierre Chaunu (Paris, 1993), pp. 67–83.Google Scholar
Bideau, Alain, Dupâquier, Jacques, and Gutierrez, Hector, “La mort quantifiée,” in Dupâquier, Jacques, ed., Histoire de la Population Française (Paris, 1988), pp. 222–42.Google Scholar
Blayo, Yves, “La mortalité en France de 1740 à 1829,” Population, 30 (11 1975), pp. 221–44.Google Scholar
Blum, Alain, “Estimation de la mortalité locale des adultes à partir des fiches de families,” Population, 42 (01-02 1987), pp. 39–56.Google Scholar
Blum, Alain, and Bringé, Arnaud, “Mortalité locale et générale en France, 1670–1829,” in Blum, Alain, Bonneuil, Noel, and Blanchet, Didier, eds., Modèles de la démographie historique (Paris, 1992), pp. 11–44.Google Scholar
Blum, Alain, Houdaille, Jacques, and Lamouche, Marc, “Élements sur la mortalité différentielle à la fin du XVIIIe et au début du XIXe siècle,” Population, 44 (01-02 1989), pp. 29–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Charbonneau, Henry, Tourouvre-au-Perche aux XVIIe et XVIIIe siècles (Paris, 1970).Google Scholar
Clamageran, J. J., Histoire de l'Impôt en France (Paris, 1876), vol. 3.Google Scholar
Coale, Ansley J., and Demeny, Paul, Regional Model Life Tables and Stable Populations (2nd. edn., New York, 1983).Google Scholar
Deparcieux, Antoine, Essai sur les probabilités de la durée de la vie humaine (Paris, 1746).Google Scholar
Derouet, Bernard, “Une démographie sociale différentielle: Clés pour un système auto-régulateur des populations rurales d'Ancien Régime,” Annales: E.S.C., 35 (01-02 1980), pp. 3–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dupâquier, Jacques, “Des roles de taille à la démographie historique: l'exemple du Vexin français,” Annales de Démographie Historique, (1965), pp. 31–42.Google Scholar
Dupâquier, Jacques, “Des roles de taille à la démographie historique: l'exemple de Crulai,” Population, 24 (01-02 1969), pp. 89–104.Google Scholar
Dupâquier, Jacques, La population rurale du Bassin parisien à l'époque de Louis XIV (Paris, 1979).Google Scholar
Dupâquier, Jacques et al. , Paroisses et communes de France: Région parisienne (Paris, 1974).Google Scholar
Dupâquier, Jacques, ed., Histoire de la population française (Paris, 1988).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Esmonin, Edmond, La taille en Normandie au temps de Colbert (1661–1683) (Paris, 1913).Google Scholar
Fleury, Michel, and Henry, Louis, “Pour connaître la population de la France depuis Louis XIV. Plan de travaux par sondage,” Population, 13 (10-12 1958), pp. 663–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fogel, Robert W., “Second Thoughts on the European Escape from Hunger: Famines, Chronic Malnutrition, and Mortality,” in Osmani, S. R., ed., Nutrition and Poverty (Oxford, 1991).Google Scholar
Galloway, Patrick, “Differentials in Demographic Responses to Annual Price Variations in Pre-Revolutionary France: A Comparison of Rich and Poor Areas in Rouen, 1681–1787,” European Journal of Population, 22 (1986), pp. 269–305.Google Scholar
Guérout, Jean, “La taille dans la région parisienne au XVIIe siècle d'après les fonds de l'élection de Paris aux Archives Nationales,” Mémoires de Paris et Ile-de-France 13 (1962), pp. 145–358.Google Scholar
Guérout, Jean, Rôles de la Taille de l'Élection de Paris (Paris, 1981).Google Scholar
Henry, Louis, “Fécondité des mariages dans le quart sud-ouest de la France de 1720 à 1829,” Annales: E.S.C., 27 (05-06 1972), pp. 612–39; 977–1,023.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Henry, Louis, Techniques d'analyse en démographie historique (Paris, 1980).Google Scholar
Henry, Louis, and Houdaille, Jacques, “Fécondité des mariages dans le quart nord-ouest de la France de 1670 à 1829,” Population, 28 (07-10 1973), pp. 873–924.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Henry, Louis, and Houdaille, Jacques, “Fécondité des mariages dans le quart sud-est de la France de 1670 à 1829,” Population, 33 (07-10 1978), pp. 855–83.Google Scholar
Hoffman, Philip, “Taxes and Agrarian Life in Early Modern France: Land Sales, 1550–1730,” this Journal, 46 (03 1986), pp. 37–55.Google Scholar
Hoffman, Philip, “Land Rents and Agricultural Productivity: The Paris Basin, 1450–1789,” this Journal, 51 (12 1991), pp. 771–806.Google Scholar
Houdaille, Jacques, “Fécondité des mariages dans le quart nord-est de la France de 1670 à 1829,” Annales de Démographie Historique, (1976), pp. 341–92.Google Scholar
Houdaille, Jacques, “La mortalité des enfants dans la France rurale de 1690 à 1779,” Population, 39 (01 1984), pp. 77–106.Google Scholar
Houdaille, Jacques, “La noblesse française 1600–1900,” Population, 44 (05-06 1989), pp. 501–14.Google Scholar
Lachiver, Marcel, La population de Meulan du XVIIe au XIXe siècle (Paris, 1969).Google Scholar
Lachiver, Marcel, Vin, vigne, et vignerons en région parisienne du XVIIe au XIXe siècle (Pontoise, 1982).Google Scholar
Le Bras, Hervé and Dinet, Dominique, “Mortalité des laics et mortalité des religieux: les Bénédictins de St. Maur aux XVIIe et XVIIIe siècles,” Population, 35 (03-04 1980), pp. 347–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lee, Ronald D., “Short-term Variation: Vital Rates, Prices, and Weather,” in Wrigley, E. A. and Schofield, Roger, The Population History of England, 1541–1871: A Reconstruction (Cambridge, MA, 1981), pp. 356–401.Google Scholar
Marion, Marcel, Les impôts directs sous l'Ancien Régime (Paris, 1910).Google Scholar
Marion, Marcel, Dictionnaire des institutions de la France aux XVIIe et XVIIIe siècles (Paris, 1923).Google Scholar
Moriceau, Jean-Marc, and Postel-Vinay, Gilles, Ferme, entreprise, famille: Grande exploitation et changements agricoles, les Chartier XVIIe-XVIIIe siècles (Paris, 1992).Google Scholar
Mroz, Thomas A., and Weir, David R., “Structural Change in Life Cycle Fertility During the Fertility Transition: France Before and After the Revolution of 1789,” Population Studies, 44 (01 1990), pp. 61–87.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Perrenoud, Alfred, “L'inégalité sociale devant le mort à Genève au XVIIe siècle,” Population, 30 (11 1975), pp. 221–44.Google Scholar
Richards, Toni, “Weather, Nutrition, and the Economy: The Analysis of Short-Run Fluctuations in Births, Deaths, and Marriages, France 1740–1909,” in Bengtsson, Tommy, Fridzilius, Gustav, and Ohlsson, Rolf, eds., Pre-industrial Population Change (Stockholm, 1984), pp. 357–89.Google Scholar
Ruggles, Steven, “Migration, Marriage, and Mortality: Correcting Sources of Bias in English Family Reconstitutions,” Population Studies, 46 (11 1992), pp. 507–22.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Teitelbaum, Michael S., The British Fertility Decline: Demographic Transition in the Crucible of the Industrial Revolution (Princeton, 1984).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Touzery, Mireille, Dictionnaire des paroisses fiscales de la généralité de Paris (Paris, 1991).Google Scholar
Weir, David R., “Life Under Pressure: France and England, 1670–1870,” this Journal, 44 (03 1984), pp. 34–65.Google Scholar
Weir, David R., “Markets and Mortality in France, 1600–1789,” in Walter, John and Schofield, Roger, eds., Famine, Disease and the Social Order in Early Modern Society (Cambridge, 1989), pp. 201–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weir, David R., “Tontines, Public Finance, and Revolution in France and England, 1688–1789,” this Journal, 49 (03 1989), pp. 95–124.Google Scholar
Weir, David R., “Urbanization, Cities, and Fertility Decline in France, 1700–1911,” in mimeo, Population Research Center (Chicago, 1993).Google Scholar
Weir, David R., “New Estimates of Nuptiality and Marital Fertility for France, 1740–1911,” Population Studies, 48 (07 1994), pp. 307–31.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wrigley, E.A., and Schofield, Roger, The Population History of England, 1541–1871: A Reconstruction (Cambridge, 1981).Google Scholar