Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7fkt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T05:51:33.729Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The European Marriage Pattern and Its Measurement

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 February 2016

Sarah G. Carmichael ,
Alexandra de Pleijt ,
Jan Luiten van Zanden  and
Tine De Moor
Sarah G. Carmichael
Affiliation:
Sarah G. Carmichael is post-doctoral researcher at the Department of Economic and Social History, Utrecht University, Drift 6, 3512 BS, Utrecht, The Netherlands. E-mail: [email protected].
Alexandra de Pleijt
Affiliation:
Alexandra de Pleijt is post-doctoral researcher at the London School of Economics, Department of Economic History, Houghton Street, London, WC2A 2AE, United Kingdom. Email: [email protected]
Jan Luiten van Zanden
Affiliation:
Jan Luiten van Zanden is Professor, Department of Economic and Social History, Utrecht University, Drift 6, 3512 BS, Utrecht, The Netherlands. E-mail: Utrecht University, [email protected].
Tine De Moor
Affiliation:
Tine De Moor is Professor, Department of Economic and Social History, Utrecht University, Drift 6, 3512 BS, Utrecht, The Netherlands. E-mail: Utrecht University, [email protected].
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

We review different interpretations of the European Marriage Pattern (EMP) and explore how they relate to the discussion of the link between the EMP and economic growth. Recently Dennison and Ogilvie have argued that the EMP did not contribute to growth in Early Modern Europe. We argue that the link between the EMP and economic growth is incorrectly conceptualized. Age of marriage is not a good scale for the degree to which countries were characterized by EMP. Rather, the economic effects of the EMP should be seen in the broader context of how marriage responds to changing economic circumstance.

Type
Articles
Information
The Journal of Economic History , Volume 76 , Issue 1 , March 2016 , pp. 196 - 204
Copyright
Copyright © The Economic History Association 2016 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

We thank the editors of the Journal of Economic History and an anonymous referee for their comments on an earlier version of this Note. We also thank Winny Bierman for her editorial assistance.

References

REFERENCES

Acemoglu, Daron, Robinson, James A., and Woren, Dan. Why Nations Fail: The Origins of Power, Prosperity and Poverty. New York: Crown Business 2012.Google Scholar
Becker, Gary S. “An Economic Analysis of Fertility.” In Demographic and Economic Change in Developed Countries, edited by the National Bureau of Economic Research, 209–40. New York: Columbia University Press 1960.Google Scholar
Becker, Gary S. “A Theory of the Allocation of Time.” Economic Journal 75, no. 299 (1965): 493 – 517.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Becker, Gary S. and Lewis, H. Gregg. “On the Interaction between the Quantity and Quality of Children.” Journal of Political Economy 81, no. 2, part 2 (1973): S279–S288.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Becker, Gary S. and Tomes, Nigel. “Child Endowments, and the Quantity and Quality of Children.” Journal of Political Economy 84, no. 4(2) (1976): S143–S162.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Becker, Sascha O. Cinnirella, Francesco, and Woessmann, Ludger. “The Trade-Off between Fertility and Education: Evidence from before the Demographic Transition.”Journal of Economic Growth 15, no. 3 (2010): 177–204.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brown, Susan L. “Family Structure Transitions and Adolescent Well-Being.” Demography 43, no. 3 (2006): 447–61.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Carmichael, Sarah., De Moor, Tine, and van Zanden, Jan Luiten. “Introduction.” History of the Family 16, no. 4 (2011): 309–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carmichael, Sarah, and van Zanden, Jan Luiten. “Towards an Ethnographic Understanding of the European Marriage Pattern: Global Correlates and Links with Female Status.” Population Histories in Context (forthcoming). CGEH Working Paper No. 67. Utrecht University, The Netherlands, Available at www.cgeh.nl/sites/default/files/WorkingPapers/cgehwp67_carmichaelvanzanden.pdf Google Scholar
Carmichael, Sarah, de Pleijt, Alexandra, van Zanden, Jan Luiten et al. “Reply to Tracy Dennison and Sheilagh Ogilvie: The European Marriage pattern and the Little Divergence.” CGEH Working Paper No. 70. Utrecht University, The Netherlands, 2015.Google Scholar
Cilliers, Jeanne. “Cape Colony Marriage in Perspective.” Ph.D. diss., Stellenbosch University, 2013.Google Scholar
Clark, Gregory. A Farewell to Alms. A Brief Economic History of the World. Princeton: Princeton University Press 2007.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
De Moor, Tine, and van Zanden, Jan Luiten. “Girl Power: The European Marriage Pattern and Labour Markets in the North Sea Region in the Late Medieval and Early Modern Period.” Economic History Review 63, no. 1 (2010): 1 – 33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dennison, Tracy, and Ogilvie, Sheilagh. “Does the European Marriage Pattern Explain Economic Growth?” CESifo Working Paper. No. 4244. CESifo Group Munich, 2013.Google Scholar
Dennison, Tracy, and Ogilvie, Sheilagh. “Does the European Marriage Pattern Explain Economic Growth?” Journal of Economic History 74, no. 3 (2014): 651–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Edwards, Jeremy, and Ogilvie, Sheilagh. “Contract Enforcement, Institutions, and Social Capital: The Maghribi Traders Reappraised.” Economic History Review 65, no. 2 (2012): 421–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Engelen, Th LM, and Wolf, Arthur P., eds. Marriage and the Family in Eurasia. Perspectives on the Hajnal Hypothesis. Amsterdam: Aksant 2005.Google Scholar
Greif, Avner. Institutions and the Path to the Modern Economy: Lessons from Medieval Trade. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 2006.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hajnal, John. “European Marriage Patterns in Perspective.” In Population in History: Essays in Historical Demography, edited by Glass, David and Eversley, D.E.C., 101–43. Chicago: Aldine 1965.Google Scholar
Laslett, Peter, and Wall, Richard, eds. Household and Family in Past Time. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 1972.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mason, Karen. “Gender and Family Systems in the Fertility Transition.” Population and Development Review 27 (2001): 160–76.Google Scholar
North, Douglass C. Structure and Change in Economic History. New York: Norton 1981.Google Scholar
Ogilvie, Sheilagh. “‘Whatever is, is Right—? Economic Institutions in PreIndustrial Europe.” Economic History Review 60, no. 4 (2007): 649–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ogilvie, Sheilagh. “Rehabilitating the Guilds: a Reply.” Economic History Review 61, no. 1 (2008): 175–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ogilvie, Sheilagh. Institutions and European Trade: Merchant Guilds, 1000–1800. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 2011.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rosenzweig, Mark R. and Zhang, Junsen. “Do Population Control Policies Induce More Human Capital Investment? Twins, Birth Weight and China's ‘One-Child’ Policy” Review of Economic Studies 76, no. 3 (2009): 1149–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rosenzweig, Mark R. and Wolpin, Kenneth I.. “Testing the Quantity-Quality Fertility Model: The Use of Twins as a Natural Experiment.” Econometrica: Journal of the Econometric Society 48, no. 1 (1980): 227–40.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Schultz, Theodore W. “Investment in Human Capital.” American Economic Review 51, no. 1 (1961): 1 – 17.Google Scholar
Todd, Emmanuel. The Explanation of Ideology: Family Structures and Social Systems. Oxford: Blackwell 1985.Google Scholar
Todd, Emmanuel. The Causes of Progress: Culture, Authority and Change. Oxford: Blackwell 1987.Google Scholar
Van der Woude, A. M. “Demografische ontwikkeling,” Algemene Geschiedenis der Nederlanden 5 (1980): 141–44.Google Scholar
Vogl, Tom. “Differential Fertility, Human Capital, and Development.” NBER Working Paper No. w19128, Cambridge, MA, 2013 Google Scholar
Wrigley, Edward Anthony, and Schofield, Roger S.. The Population History of England, 1541–1871: A Reconstruction. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1981.Google Scholar