Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-q99xh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T19:01:46.575Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Engines of Growth: The Productivity Advance of Indian Railways, 1874–1912

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 May 2013

Dan Bogart  and
Latika Chaudhary
Dan Bogart
Affiliation:
Associate Professor, Department of Economics, University of California, Irvine, 3151 Social Science Plaza, Irvine, CA 92697-5100. E-mail: [email protected].
Latika Chaudhary
Affiliation:
Assistant Professor, Department of Economics, Scripps College, 1030 Columbia Avenue, #4072, Claremont, CA 91711-3905. E-mail: [email protected].
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Railways were integral to the development of the Indian economy before World War I. This article presents new estimates of total factor productivity (TFP) for railways from 1874 to 1912, which highlight the strong performance of this key industrial sector. Railway-industry TFP growth was substantial averaging 2.3 percent per year and generating a 2.7 percent social savings for the Indian economy. A combination of factors contributed to TFP growth including greater capacity utilization, technological change, and improvements in organization and governance. Railways had higher TFP growth than most sectors in India and compared favorably with TFP growth in other countries.

Type
Articles
Information
The Journal of Economic History , Volume 73 , Issue 2 , June 2013 , pp. 339 - 370
Copyright
Copyright © The Economic History Association 2013 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

We thank Saumitra Jha, seminar participants at St. Andrews, Stanford, and Vanderbilt and conference participants at the All-UC Economic History Meetings in Berkeley, the Economic History Society Meetings in Cambridge, the UCLA Alumni Economics conference, the HI-POD conference on India and Great Divergence in Rajasthan, the World Economic History Congress in South Africa, and the Economic History Association Meetings in Vancouver. We thank the editor and two anonymous referees for detailed feedback. Finally, we thank the Center for Global Peace and Conflict Studies for providing valuable grant money. Garrett Neiman, Shivani Pundir, Jennifer Ringoen, Nilopa Shah, and Sanjana Tandon provided excellent research assistance.

References

REFERENCES

Alivelu, G. “Salient Aspects of the Growth Story of Indian Railways 1981–82 through 2007–08.” CESS Working Paper No. 86 (2010).Google Scholar
Bell, Horace. Railway Policy of India: With Map of Indian Railway System. Rivington, UK: Percival, 1894.Google Scholar
Blundell, Richard, and Bond, Stephen R.. “GMM Estimation with Persistent Panel Data: An Application to Production Functions.” Econometric Reviews 19, no. 19 (2000): 321–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bogart, Dan. “A Global Perspective on Railway Inefficiency and the Rise of State Ownership, 1880–1912.” Explorations in Economic History 47, no. 2 (2010): 158–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bogart, Dan, and Chaudhary, Latika. “Regulation, Costs, and Ownership: A Historical Perspective from Indian Railways.” American Economic Journal: Economic Policy 4, no. 1 (2012a): 28–57.Google Scholar
Bogart, Dan, and Chaudhary, Latika. “Railways in Colonial India: An Economic Achievement?” Working Paper, SSRN, 2012b. Available at http://ssrn.com/abstract=2073256.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Broadberry, Stephen, and Gupta, Bishnupriya. “The Historical Roots of India's Service-Led Development: A Sectoral Analysis of Anglo-Indian Productivity Differences, 1870–2000.” Explorations in Economic History 47, no. 3 (2010): 264–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
British Board of Trade. The Statistical Abstract of British India. London: Her Majesty's Stationery Office, 1880–1912.Google Scholar
Bureau of Railway News and Statistics. Railway Statistics of the United States of America. Chicago: R. R. Donnelley and Sons, 1913 and 1916.Google Scholar
Caves, Douglas W., Christensen, Laurits R., and Swanson, Joseph A.. “Productivity in U.S. Railroads, 1951–1974.” Bell Journal of Economics 11, no. 1 (1980): 166–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Christensen, R.O. “The State and Indian Railway Performance, 1870–1920. Part I. Financial Efficiency and Standards of Service.” Journal of Transport History 2, no. 2 (1981): 1–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clark, Greg. “Why Isn't the Whole World Developed? Lessons from the Cotton Mills.” The Journal of Economic History 47, no. 1 (1987): 141–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clark, Greg, and Wolcott, Susan. “Why Nations Fail: Managerial Decisions and Performance in Indian Cotton Textiles, 1890–1938.” The Journal of Economic History 59, no. 2 (1999): 397–423.Google Scholar
Crafts, Nicholas. “Productivity Growth in the Industrial Revolution: A New Growth Accounting Perspective.” The Journal of Economic History 64, no. 2 (2004): 521–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crafts, Nicholas, Mills, Terence C., and Mulatu, Abay. “Total Factor Productivity Growth on Britain's Railways, 1852–1912: A Reappraisal of the Evidence.” Explorations in Economic History 44, no. 4 (2007): 608–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Derbyshire, Ian. “Economic Change and the Railways in Northern India, 1860–1914.” Modern Asian Studies 21, no. 3 (1987): 521–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Derbyshire, Ian. “Private and State Enterprise: Financing and Managing the Railways of Colonial North India, 1859–1914.” In 27 Down: New Departures in Indian Railway Studies, edited by Kerr, Ian, 276–313. New Delhi: Orient Longman, 2007.Google Scholar
Dirección General de Ferrocarriles. Estadística de los ferrocarriles en explotación. Buenos Aires, 1913.Google Scholar
Donaldson, Dave. “Railways of the Raj: Estimating the Impact of Transportation Infrastructure.” Working Paper, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, 2012.Google Scholar
Feinstein, Charles. “Transport and Communications.” In Studies in Capital Formation in the United Kingdom, 1750–1920, edited by Feinstein, Charles and Pollard, Sidney, 312–54. Oxford: Clarendon, 1988.Google Scholar
Fishlow, Albert. “Productivity and Technological Change in the Railroad Sector, 1840–1910.” In Output, Employment, and Productivity in the United States After 1800, edited by Brady, Dorothy S., 583–646. New York: National Bureau of Economic Research, 1966.Google Scholar
Fogel, Robert. Railroads and American Economic Growth: Essays in Econometric History. Baltimore, MD: John Hopkins Press, 1970.Google Scholar
Foster, Lucia, Haltiwanger, John, and J. Krizan, C.. “Aggregate Productivity Growth: Lessons from Microeconomic Evidence.” In New Developments in Productivity Analysis, edited by Dean, E., Harper, M., and Hulten, Ch., 303–63. Chicago: Chicago University Press, 2001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Government of India. Report of the Indian Famine Commission. London: Her Majesty's Stationery Office, 1880.Google Scholar
Foster, Lucia, Haltiwanger, John, and J. Krizan, C.. Report to the Secretary of State for India in Council on Railways in India. Calcutta: Superintendent Government Printing, 1860–1881.Google Scholar
Foster, Lucia, Haltiwanger, John, and J. Krizan, C.. Administration Report on the Railways in India. Calcutta: Superintendent Government Printing, 1882–1912.Google Scholar
Foster, Lucia, Haltiwanger, John, and J. Krizan, C.. Prices and Wages in India. Calcutta: Superintendent Government Printing, 1896–1922.Google Scholar
Griliches, Zvi, and Jacques, Mareisse. “Production Functions: The Search for Identification.” In Econometrics and Economic Theory in the Twentieth Century: The Ragnar Prisch Centennial Symposium, 169–203. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1988.Google Scholar
Gupta, Bishnupriya. “Wages, Unions, and Labour Productivity: Evidence from Indian Cotton Mills.” Economic History Review 65, no. 1 (2011): 76–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Herranz-Loncán, Alfonso. “Railroad Impact in Backward Economies: Spain, 1850–1913.” The Journal of Economic History 66, no. 4 (2006): 853–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
House of Commons, Great Britain. “Coal Tables.” British Parliamentary Papers CCLXXXV. London: Her Majesty's Stationery Office, 1913.Google Scholar
Hurd, John II. “Railways.” In the Cambridge Economic History of India, Vol. 2: 1757–1970, edited by Kumar, D. and Desai, M., 737–61. London: Cambridge University Press, 1983.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hurd, John II. “A Huge Railway System But No Sustained Economic Development: The Company Perspective, 1884–1939: Some Hypotheses.” In 27 Down: New Departures in Indian Railway Studies, edited by Kerr, Ian, 314–62. New Delhi: Orient Longman, 2007.Google Scholar
Kerr, Ian. “Constructing Railways in India: An Estimate of the Numbers Employed, 1850–80. Indian Economic and Social History Review 20, no. 3 (1983): 317–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kerr, Ian. Engines of Change: The Railroads that Made India. Westport: Praeger, 2007.Google Scholar
Levinsohn, James, and Petrin, Amil. “Estimating Production Functions Using Inputs to Control for Unobservables.” Review of Economic Studies 70, no. 2 (2003): 317–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maddison, Angus. The World Economy: Historical Statistics. Paris: Development Centre, OECD, 2003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morris, David Morris, and Dudley, Cylde. “Selected Railway Statistics for the Indian Subcontinent.” ARTHA VIJÑANA 15, no. 3 (1975): 1–128.Google Scholar
Oum, Toe Hoon, W. G. Waters II, and Yu, Chunyan. “A Survey of Productivity and Efficiency Measurement in Rail Transport.” Journal of Transport Economics and Policy 33, no. 1 (1999): 9–42.Google Scholar
Roberston, Thomas. Report on the Administration and Working of Indian Railways. London: Darling & Son, 1903.Google Scholar
Rosegrant, Mark W., and Evenson, Robert E.. “Agricultural Productivity and Sources of Growth in South Asia.” American Journal of Agricultural Economics 74, no. 3 (1992): 757–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roy, Tirthankar. The Economic History of India, 1857–1947. New Delhi: Oxford University Press, 2010.Google Scholar
Sanyal, Nalinksha. Development of Indian Railways. Calcutta: University of Calcutta, 1930.Google Scholar
Shleifer, Andrei. “State versus Private Ownership.” Journal of Economic Perspectives 12, no. 4 (1998): 133–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sivasubramonian, S. The National Income of India in the Twentieth Century. New Delhi: Oxford University Press, 2000.Google Scholar
Summerhill, William R. Order Against Progress: Government, Foreign Investment, and Railroads in Brazil, 1854–1913. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press, 2003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sweeney, Stuart. Financing India's Imperial Railway, 1875–1914. London: Pickering & Chatto, 2011.Google Scholar
Syverson, Chad. “What Determines Productivity?” Journal of Economic Literature 49, no. 2 (2011): 326–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thorner, Daniel. “The Pattern of Railway Development in India.” Far Eastern Quarterly XIV (1955): 201–06.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thorner, Daniel. Investment in Empire: British Railways and Steam Shipping Enterprise in India, 1825–1949. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, 1977.Google Scholar
Van Biesebroeck, Johannes. “The Sensitivity of Productivity Estimates: Revisiting Three Important Debates.” Journal of Business and Economic Statistics 26, no. 3 (2008): 311–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar