Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gvvz8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T17:39:22.993Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Encomienda or Slavery? The Spanish Crown's Choice of Labor Organization in Sixteenth-Century Spanish America

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 March 2009

Timothy J. Yeager
Affiliation:
Assistant Professor of Economics at Humboldt State University, School of Business &; Economics, Humboldt State University, Arcata, California 95521-8299.

Abstract

When the Spaniards conquered the New World, they resorted to a form of native labor organization called the encomienda. The encomienda differed from slavery in that the Crown imposed inheritance, trading, and relocation restrictions on encomenderos. Such restrictions cost the Crown revenue by providing incentives for colonists to deplete more quickly the stock of native labor and by keeping native labour in areas of low-revenue productivity. This loss of revenue makes the Crown's Preference for the encomienda curious. The Crown opted for the encomienda, however, to secure its rule and to satisfy an ideological bias against slavery.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © The Economic History Association 1995

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Alston, , Lee, , K. Dalta, Sama, and B. Nugent, Jeffrey. “Tenancy Choice in a Competitive Framework with Transaction Costs.” Journal of Political Economy 92, no. 6 (1984): 1121–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Arcilia, Farías, Eduardo, . El régimen de la encomienda en Venezuela. Caracas: Universidad Central de Venezuela, 1966.Google Scholar
Batchelder, Ronald W., and Sanchez, Nicolés. “The Encomienda and the Optimizing Imperialist: An Interpretation of Spanish Imperialism in the Americas.” UCLA Department of Economics, Working Paper No. 501, Los Angeles, CA, 01 1989.Google Scholar
Chaunu, , Huguette, and Pierre, . “Le mouvement des navires et des merchandises entre l' Espagne et l' Amerique, de 1504 a 1650.” Seville et l' Atlantique (1504–1650), Vols. 6 and 7. Paris, 1955.Google Scholar
Cole, , A., JeffreyThe Potosí Mita, 1573–1700: Compulsory Indian Labor in the Andes. Stanford: Stanford University Press, 1985.Google Scholar
Cook, , David, Noble. Demographic Collapse, Indian Peru, 1520–1620. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press, 1981.Google Scholar
Cook, , F., Sherburne, and Byrd Simpson, Lesley. The Population of Central Mexico in the Sixteenth Century. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1948.Google Scholar
Elliott, J. H. “The Spanish Conquest and Settlement of America.” In The Cambridge History of Latin America, Vol. 1, edited by Bethell, Leslie, 149206. New York: Cambridge University Press, 1984.Google Scholar
García, Bernal, Cristina, Manuelo. Población y encomienda en Yucatán bajo los Austrias. Seville, 1978.Google Scholar
Gibson, , Charles, . The Aztecs Under Spanish Rule: A History of the Indians of the Valley of Mexico, 1519–1810. Stanford: Stanford University Press, 1964.Google Scholar
Glade, , P., WilliamThe Latin American Economies: A Study of Their Institutional Evolution. New York: American Book Company, 1969.Google Scholar
González, Pomes, Isabel, María. La encomienda indígena en Chile durante el siglo XVIII. Santiago: Universidad Católica de Chile, 1966.Google Scholar
González, Rodríguez, Adolfo-Luis, . La encomienda en Tucumán. Seville, 1984.Google Scholar
Hanke, , Lewis, . Aristotle And The American Indians: A Study in Race Prejudice in the Modern World. Chicago: Henry Regenery Co., 1959.Google Scholar
Haring, C. H.American Gold And Silver Production In The First Half Of The Sixteenth Century.” The Quarterly Journal of Economics 29, 05 (1915): 433–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heinl, Robert D. Jr, and Heinl, Nancy G.. Written in Blood: The Story of the Haitian People 1492–1971. Boston: Houghton Muffin, 1978.Google Scholar
Hemming, , John, . Red Gold: The Conquest of the Brazilian Indians. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1978.Google Scholar
Johnson, H. B. “The Portuguese Settlement of Brazil, 1500–1580.” In The Cambridge History of Latin America, Vol. 1, edited by Bethell, Leslie, 249–86. New York: Cambridge University Press, 1984.Google Scholar
Keith, , G., RobertConquest and Agrarian Change: The Emergence of the Hacienda System on the Peruvian Coast. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1976.Google Scholar
López, Arellano, Luisa, María. “Las encomiendas de Popayán en los siglos XVII y XVIII.” La encomienda en Popayán. Seville, 1977.Google Scholar
Newson, , A, Linda. The Cost of Conquest: Indian Decline in Honduras Under Spanish Rule. Boulder: Westview Press, 1986.Google Scholar
Newson, , A., LindaIndian Survival In Colonial Nicaragua. Norman: University of Oklahoma Press, 1987.Google Scholar
North, , C., DouglassInstitutions, Institutional Change and Economic Performance. New York: Cambridge University Press, 1990.Google Scholar
Padilla, Altamirano, Silvia, . “Tasaciones de encomiendas de Popayán en el siglo XVI.” La encomienda en Popayán. Seville, 1977.Google Scholar
Puente, Brunke, Jose, . Encomienda y encomenderos en el Perú. Seville: Excma. Diputacíon Provincial De Seville, 1992.Google Scholar
Ruiz Rivera, Julián B.Encomienda y mita en Nueva Granada en el siglo XVII. Seville, 1975.Google Scholar
Simpson, , Byrd, Lesley. The Encomienda in New Spain. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1966.Google Scholar
Vásquezde Espinosa, A. de Espinosa, A., Description of the Indies (c. 1620). Translated by Charles, Upton Clark. Washington: Smithsonian Institutions Press, 1968.Google Scholar
Veliz, , Claudio, . The Centralist Tradition of Latin America. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1980.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yeager, , J., Timothy “An Explanation for the Interregional Pattern of Encomiendas and Indian Slavery in Spanish America. 1518 to 1550.” Unpublished Manuscript, 1994.Google Scholar
Zavala, , A., SilvioLa encomienda indiana. Madrid: Ministerio del Estado, 1935.Google Scholar