Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jkksz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T19:52:09.014Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Economic Growth in England Before the Industrial Revolution: Some Methodological Issues

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 February 2011

Richard M. Hartwell
Richard M. Hartwell
Affiliation:
Nuffield College, Oxford
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

This paper, as presented at the Fourth Congress of the International Economic History Association, is the first of four concerned with economic growth in England before the industrial revolution, in what, for purposes of brevity and analytical distinction, I propose to call “preindustrial England.” It might be prudent for this period to talk of “economic change” (“the movement of economic processes over time”) rather than “economic growth” (“the growth of output per head of population”), because change does not necessarily imply growth, and because, for the thousand years which preceded English industrialization, the historians are uncertain about the direction and duration of the secular trend of the economy over long periods, although they seem to have identified some periods of growth as well as some periods of decline.

Type
Articles
Information
The Journal of Economic History , Volume 29 , Issue 1 , March 1969 , pp. 13 - 31
Copyright
Copyright © The Economic History Association 1969

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 The other papers are entitled: “Economic Growth in England, 1550-1750”; “Capitalism: A Critical and Historiographical Survey”; and “The Use of Economic Theory in the Economic History of Preindustrial Economy.”

2 Kuznets, S., Economic Change (London: Heinemann, 1954), p. viiGoogle Scholar.

3 Lewis, W. A., The Theory of Economic Growth (London: Allen and Unwin, 1955), p. 9Google Scholar.

4 Sombart, W., Die Ordnung des Wirtschaftslebens (Leipzig: Enzyklopadie der Rechts- und Staatswissenschaft, 1925)Google Scholar; and “Capitalism,” Encyclopaedia of the Social Sciences, vol. III (New York: Macmillan, 1930), pp. 195–208Google Scholar.

5 Ashley, W. J., The Economic Organization of England (London: Longmans, Green & Co., 1914), pp. 35–6Google Scholar; see also, Bücher, C., Industrial Evolution (New York: Henry Holt and Co., 1901), pp. 89 ffGoogle Scholar.

6 For an account of obvious confusion about the term “capitalism,” see Hilton, R. H., “Capitalism—What's in a Name?,” Past and Present, 1 (1952)CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

7 By very long-term here I mean several centuries. For a shorter-term background of the industrial revolution, see: Hartwell, R. M. (Ed.), The Causes of the Industrial Revolution in England (London: Methuen, 1967)Google Scholar; Jones, E. L. (Ed.), Agriculture and Economic Growth in England 1650-1815 (London: Methuen, 1967)Google Scholar, and Flinn, M. W., Origins of the Industrial Revolution (London: Longmans, 1966)Google Scholar.

8 See, however, Higgins, B., Economic Development: Principles, Problems and Politics (rev. ed.; London: Constable, 1968), p. 161Google Scholar, who declares, “the acceleration of economic development in Europe after 1500 … culminated in the industrial Revolution … [and] has been labeled ‘the rise of capitalism.’”

9 Gill, R. T., Economic Development: Past and Present (Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice-Hall, 1963), p. 40Google Scholar.

10 See, however, Dobb, M., Studies in the Development of Capitalism (London: Routledge, 1946)Google Scholar and Landes, D. (Ed.), The Rise of Capitalism (New York: Macmillan, 1966)Google Scholar.

11 Cunningham, W., The Progress of Capitalism in England (Cambridge, [Eng.]: The University Press, 1916)Google Scholar; Ashley, , Economic OrganizationGoogle Scholar; Tawney, R. H., Religion and the Rise of Capitalism (London: John Murray, 1926)Google Scholar; Lipson, E., The Economic History of England (London: A. & C. Black, 1931)Google Scholar; Dobb, , Development of CapitalismGoogle Scholar; Weber, M., The Protestant Ethic and the Spirit of Capitalism (London: Allen and Unwin, 1930)Google Scholar; Sombart, W., The Quintessence of Capitalism (London: E. P. Dutton, 1915)Google Scholar; Pirenne, H., “The Stages in the Social History of Capitalism,” American Historical Review, XIX (1913–1914)Google Scholar; Sée, H., Modern Capitalism: Its Origin and Evolution (London: Noel Douglas, 1928)Google Scholar; Hamilton, E. J., “American Treasure and the Rise of Capitalism (1500-1700),” Economica, IX (1929)Google Scholar.

12 For example, Sée, Modern Capitalism, chs. V, VI, and VII.

13 Pirenne, , “Stages of Capitalism,” pp. 500–15Google Scholar.

14 Cunningham, , Progress of Capitalism, p. 21, andGoogle ScholarWestern Civilization, Vol. II (Cambridge, [Eng.]: The University Press, 1913), p. 162Google Scholar.

15 To the classical economists, economic progress depended on, first, the rate of growth of population, and, second, capital accumulation which allowed technological improvements and greater productivity. The emphasis on capital continued in economic as well as in historical literature. See, for example, Cairncross, A. K., “The Place of Capital in Economic Progress,” Factors in Economic Development (London: Allen and Unwin, 1962), for a skeptical voiceGoogle Scholar.

16 Pirenne, H., Economic and Social History of Medieval Europe (London: Kegan Paul, 1936), p. 49Google Scholar; Stephenson, C., Borough and Town (Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1933), pp. 205 ffGoogle Scholar.

17 Weber, , Protestant Ethic andGoogle ScholarTawney, , Religion and CapitalismGoogle Scholar.

18 M. J. Kitch (Ed.), Capitalism and the Reformation (London: Longmans, 1967), p. xivGoogle Scholar.

19 E. J. Hamilton, “American Treasure and the Rise of Capitalism (1500-1700)”; “Profit Inflation and the Industrial Revolution, 1751-1800,” Quarterly Journal of Economics, LVI (1941–1942)Google Scholar; “The History of Prices before 1750,” XI Congrès International des Sciences Historiques, Rapports, Vol. I (Uppsala, 1960)Google Scholar.

20 Sèe, , Modem Capitalism, p. 41Google Scholar; Cunningham, , The Growth of Industry and Commerce in Modern Times: Laissez Faire (Cambridge, [Eng.]: The University Press, 1925), p. 873Google Scholar.

21 See, Modern Capitalism, p. 84Google Scholar.

22 Dobb, , Development of Capitalism, p. 19Google Scholar.

23 This discontinuity is also linked with cultural change. As Herlihy, D. writes: “Some historians have dared to see in these transformations of the central Middle Ages a major turning point in Western history, marking the emergence of ideals, attitudes an d traditions of behaviour which have since remained a permanen t part of our ‘modem civilization,’” Medieval Culture and Society (New York: Harper, 1968), p. XiiiCrossRefGoogle Scholar.

24 See Hartwell, R. M., “The Cause s of the Industrial Revolution: An Essay in Methodology,” Economic History Review, 2d ser. XVIII (1965)Google Scholar.

25 Latouche, R., The Birth of Western Economy: Economic Aspects of the Dark Ages (London: Methuen, 1967), p. 309Google Scholar.

26 Carus-Wilson, E. M., “An Industrial Revolution in the Thirteent h Century,” Economic History Review, XI (1941)Google Scholar; Nef, J. U., “The Progress of Technology and the Growth of Larg e Scale Industry in Great Britain, 1540-1640,” Economic History Review, V (1934)Google Scholar; and Roover, R. De, “The Commercial Revolution of the Thirteenth Century,” Bulletin of the Business Historical Society, XVI (1942)Google Scholar.

27 For example, N. S. B. Gras entitled his history of industry, Industrial Evolution (Oxford University Press, 1930), while admitting (p. 90) “in the whole recorded part of industrial history there has apparently occurred but one great break in evolutionary development. That break is called the Industrial Revolution.”Google Scholar

28 See, for example, Black, C. E., The Dynamics of Modernization: A Study in Comparative History (New York: Harper and Row, 1967), which has an extensive bibliographical essay (pp. 175–99) on modernizationGoogle Scholar.

29 A clear recognition of this can be found in Cipolla, C., The Economic History of World Population (London: Penguin, 1962)Google Scholar.

30 Hartwell, , Causes of the Industrial Revolution, IntroductionGoogle Scholar.

31 See Deane, P. and Cole, W. A., British Economic Growth, 1688-1959 (Cambridge University Press, 1962)Google Scholar, for detailed statistics, which, although criticized, have been accepted generally as indicating long-term trends in the structure and output of the British economy since the late sixteenth century.

32 Many obstacles to growth are both a cause and consequence of poverty, so that there is “a vicious circle” which perpetuates the low rate of growth. See, for example, Nurkse, R., Problems of Capital Formation in Underdeveloped Countries (Oxford: Basil Blackwell, 1953), p. 5Google Scholar, where he shows that low real incomes account for both low savings and lack of investment incentives on the one hand, and low demand and low investment on the other.

33 Rostow, w. W., “The Take-off into Self-sustained Growth,” The Economic Journal, LXVI (1956), p. 261Google Scholar.

34 On the development of the English economy by 1750, see Hartwell, , Causes of the Industrial Revolution, pp. 22–3. On growth before 1750, see my forthcoming articleGoogle Scholar.

35 See Deane and Cole, British Economic Growth, for estimates of rates of growth of population and capital formation, and for other growth indexes.

36 Ashton, T. S., An Economic History of England: The 18th Century (London: Methuen, 1955), p. 125Google Scholar.

37 Wilson, C., England's Apprenticeship, 1603-1763 (London: Longmans, 1965), p. 236Google Scholar.

38 Habakkuk, H. J. and Deane, P., “The Take-off in Britain,” The Economics of Take-off into Sustained Growth, ed. Rostow, W. W. (London: Macmillan, 1963), p. 82Google Scholar.

39 Eric Jones has suggested to me that whereas subsistence needs (food, shelter, and clothing) had been satisfied by small-scale industries in which technical change was slow and in which the economies of scale were relatively unimportant, the more sophisticated and complex demands of the second half of the eighteenth century could be satisfied only by the development of new techniques, and, in some cases, by a larger scale of industrial unit.

40 Ashley, , Economic Organization, p. 1411Google Scholar.

41 This point has not been stressed enough by economic historians. See, however, Habakkuk's, H. J. comment, “The Historical Experience of the Basic Conditions of Economic Progress,” Economic Progress, ed. L. H. Dupriez (Louvain: Institut de Recherches Economiques et Sociales, 1955), p. 150Google Scholar, “It is probable that the most important of the conditions which made Europe the cradle of economic advance originated very far back in her history.”

42 For example, the admission of Lipsey, R. G., An Introduction to Positive Economics (London: Weidenfeld and Nicolson, 1963), p. 175Google Scholar, about the theory of production: “There is no theory of long-run costs in the sense of a body of hypotheses that predict something about the world and are, therefore, at least in principle, refutable.”

43 For Marx, history consisted of a series of stages in an inevitable evolution of society and economy towar d socialism; each stage had its characteristic technology, and its uniquely induced class struggle which led to the breakdown of the system and to the emergence of a new and higher form of social and economic organization. Technological chang e was the prime mover; the class struggle was the means of “progress.” For Malthus, population pressure was the prime mover of history, an d although he had his own version of the classical theory of development, it is the long-term relationship between population and resources, as he envisaged it, which has ha d a profound influence on historical thinking. See, for example, Bath, B. H. Slicher van, The Agrarian History of Western Europe, A.D. 500-1850 (London: Edward Arnold, 1963), p. 89Google Scholar, for a discussion of European economic growth, 1150-1300, where he argues that agricultural expansion had not kept pace with population: “The result was relative overpopulation.”

44 On the theory of stages, see Hoselitz, B. F., “Theories of Stages of Economic Growth,” Theories of Economic Growth, by Hoselitz, B. F. et al. (Glencoe, Ill.: The Free Press, 1960) for a detailed and critical summary of the German school—List, Hildebrand, Bücher, Schmoller and Sombart—and for a short account of other exponents—See, Hauser, Heckscher, Block, and Spiethoff. See, also,Google ScholarGras, N. S. B., “Stages in Economic History,” Journal of Economic and Business History, II (1930)Google Scholar, for a summary of the usefulness of economic stages for historians. For a critique of Rostow, see: Cairncross, A. K., “The Stages of Economic Growth,” ch. 8 of Factors in Economic Development; and E. E. Hagen, On the Theory of Social Change: How Economic Growth Begins (Homewood, ID.; The Dorsey Press, 1962), appendixGoogle Scholar.

45 Wilson, C., England's Apprenticeship, p. 288Google Scholar.

46 Westerfield, R. B., Middlemen in English Business, Particularly Between 1660 and 1760 (New Haven: Yale University Press, 1915), p. 214Google Scholar.

47 Kerridge, E., The Agricultural Revolution (London: Allen and Unwin, 1967), p. 15Google Scholar.

48 Jones, E., in a review of The Agrarian History of England and Wales, Vol. IV (Cambridge University Press, 1967) Economic History Review, 2d. ser.; XXI (1968)Google Scholar.

49 Davis, R., A Commercial Revolution (Historical Association Pamphlet, no. 64, London, 1967), p. 3Google Scholar.

50 For a summary of transport developments see Duckham, B. F., The Transport Revolution, 1750-1830 (Historical Association Aids for Teachers Series, no. 14, 1967)Google Scholar.

51 Dickson, P. G. M., The Financial Revolution in England: A Study in the Development of Public Credit in England, 1688-1756 (London: Macmillan, 1967)Google Scholar.

52 Singer, C., A Short History of Scientific Ideas to 1900 (Oxford, [Eng.]: The University Press, 1959), chs. VII and VIIIGoogle Scholar.

53 Harris, J. R., “The Employment of Steam Power in the Eighteenth Century,” History, LII, 175 (1967), p. 147Google Scholar.

54 Deane, and Cole, , British Economic Growth, pp. 79–80Google Scholar.

55 Wilson, , England's Apprenticeship, pp. xii, 276Google Scholar.

56 Bath, Slicher van, Agrarian History, p. 207Google Scholar.

57 Mingay, G. F., “The Agricultural Depression, 1730-1750,” Economic History Review, 2d ser., VIII, 3 (1956)Google Scholar; John, A. H., “The Course of Agricultural Change, 1660-1760,” Studies in the Industrial Revolution, ed. Pressnell, L. S. (London: Ath-lone, 1960)Google Scholar; Kerridge, , Agricultural Revolution, p. 334Google Scholar. John's interpretation is much qualified, and even more in a subsequent article, “Aspects' of English Economic Growth in the First Half of the Eighteenth Century” (Economica, XXVIII, 1961), by seeing in the first half of the eighteenth century the beginnings of the industrial revolutionGoogle Scholar.

58 Nef, J. U., “The Progress of Technology and the Growth of Large Scale Industry in Great Britain, 1540-1640,” Economic History Review, V (1934), p. 4. The industrial histories used in this article are detailed in fn. 3, pp. 3-4Google Scholar.

59 Rees, W., Industry before the Industrial Revolution (2 vols.; Cardiff: University of Wales Press, 1968)Google Scholar.

60 Kenyon, G. H., The Glass Industry of the Weald (Leicester: The University Press, 1967)Google Scholar.

61 The Agrarian History of England and Wales, especially ch. 10 by P. Bowden; Kerridge, , Agricultural Revolution, p. 347Google Scholar.

62 Rabb, T. K., Enterprise and1 Empire: Merchant and Gentry Investment in the Expansion of England, 1575-1630 (Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1987), pp. 2, 97Google Scholar.

63 Wilson, , England's Apprenticeship, p. vGoogle Scholar.

64 The Agrarian History of England and Wales (Bowden), pp. 640–1Google Scholar.

65 Supple, B. E., Commercial Crisis and Change in England, 1600-1642 (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1959), pp. 52, 119–20Google Scholar.

66 Nef, J. U., The Rise of the British Coal Industry (London: Routledge, 1932), Vol. 1, p. 19Google Scholar.

67 Wilson, , England's Apprenticeship, p. 81Google Scholar.

68 Kerridge, , Agricultural Revolution, p. 348Google Scholar.

69 Latouche, , Birth of Western Economy, p. 309Google Scholar.

70 Metcalf, D. M., “The Prosperity of North-Western Europe in the Eighth and Ninth Centuries,” Economic History Review, 2d ser.; XX (1967), p. 356Google Scholar.

71 From an unpublished manuscript by A. R. Bridbury, with the permission of the author.

72 Bath, Slicher van, Agrarian History, p. 132Google Scholar.

73 Postan, M. M., “The Fifteenth Century,” Economic History Review, IX (1939)Google Scholar; “Some Economic Evidence of Declining Population in the later Middle Ages,” ibid., 2d ser.; II (1950).

74 Carus-Wilson, “Industrial Revolution. ”

75 Bath, Slicher van, Agrarian History, pp. 134, 136Google Scholar.

76 Helleiner, K. F., The Population of Europe from the Black Death to the Eve of the Vital Revolution,” The Cambridge Economic History of Europe, Vol. IV (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1967), pp. 13, 31Google Scholar.

77 Beresford, M., The Lost Villages of England (London: Butterworth, 1954)Google Scholar.

78 Cipolla, C. M., “Economic Depression of the Renaissance?,” Economic History Review, 2 d ser.; XVI (1964)Google Scholar; Carus-Wilson, E. M., “Trends in the Export of English Woollens in the Fourteenth Century,” Economic History Review, 2d ser.; Ill (1950), andGoogle Scholar “Evidences of Industrial Growth on some Fifteenth-Century Manors,” ibid., 2d ser.; XII (1959).

79 Bridbury, A. R., Economic Growth: England in the Later Middle Ages (London: Allen and Unwin, 1962)Google Scholar.

80 Beales, H. L., “‘The Great Depression’ in Industry and Trade,” Economic History Review, V (1934)Google Scholar.

81 Beveridge, W. and others, Prices and Wages in England (London: Longmans, Green and Co., 1939); B. H. Slicher van Bath, Yield Ratios, 810–1820 (A. A. G. Bijdragen, 10; Wagenigen, 1963)Google Scholar; Brown, E. H. Phelps and Hopkins, S. V., “Seven Centuries of Budding Wages,” Economica, XXII (1955)Google Scholar.