Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2brh9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T04:23:50.577Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Beginnings of British Legislation for Old-Age Pensions

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 February 2011

Ronald V. Sires
Ronald V. Sires
Affiliation:
Whitman College
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

In A society operating completely on the principles of economic individualism, each adult person would be expected to make provision for his own needs and for those of his dependents. He would have to earn enough to provide food, clothing, and shelter, as well as develop the necessary frugality to lay by enough to care for himself and dependents during periods of illness and unemployment. He would likewise be expected to make provision for old age and for funeral expenses. The duties of an adult person in society would be looked upon as being not only economic but also moral in nature, requiring the constant making of choices in expenditure, not merely of what goods to buy but of the spacing of expenditures over long periods of time. If a person met with economic reverses and could not provide, he showed himself to be incapable of dealing with the problems of a responsible adult and ought not to look to others to get him out of his predicament. His condition would be considered to result from lack of the moral qualities required of a person who had taken upon himself the responsibilities of adult life.

Type
Articles
Information
The Journal of Economic History , Volume 14 , Issue 3 , Summer 1954 , pp. 229 - 253
Copyright
Copyright © The Economic History Association 1954

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Webb, Beatrice, My Apprenticeship (London: Longmans, Green and Co., 1926), passimGoogle Scholar; Lynd, Helen MerrcU, England in the Eighteen Eighties—Toward a Social Basis for Freedom (London: Oxford University Press, 1945)Google Scholar.

2 Levy, Herman, “The Economic History of Sickness and Medical Benefits since the Puritan Revolution,” Economic History Review, IV (1944), 135–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

3 Aschrott, Paul Felix, The English Poor Law System, Past and Present (2nd ed.; London: Knight and Co., 1902), pp. 302–3Google Scholar, For the financial condition of friendly societies, see Parliamentary Papers, 1884–1865, X, no. 370, 1-2, and 1887, XI, no. 257, viii-ix. References to Parliamentary Papers will give the paging of the individual paper rather than of the bound volumeGoogle Scholar.

4 Parl. Pap., 1874, XXIII, pt i, cd. 961 cxcvu-cxcviii, and Appendix no. ix, pp. 112–15.Google Scholar

5 Rev. Blackley, W. JL, “National Insurance, a cheap, practical, and popular Means of abolishing Poor Rates,” Nineteenth Century, IV (July 1878), 834–57Google Scholar; , Blackley, Our National Providence: its Sinftdnest, Prevalence, and moral Harm—a Sermon preached in Wcttmintter Abbey … (London: Edward Stanford, 1879)Google Scholar ; Rev. Wilkinson, J. Frome, The Blackley National Provident Insurance Scheme—a Protest and an Appeal (London: Swann Sonnenschein and Co., 1887)Google Scholar: Parl. Pap., 1884–1885, X, no. 270, 1–6Google Scholar.

6 The three reports are in Parl. Pap., 1884–1885, X, no. 370;1886, XI, no. 208; 1887, XI, no. 257Google Scholar.

7 See Parl. Pap., 1887, XI, no. 257, question 238 (hereinafter designated as q.) for a strong resolution against the Blackley scheme passed by the National Conference of Friendly Societies in 1887Google Scholar. Moffrey, R. W., A Century of Oddfellowship—being a brief Record of the Rise and Progress of the Manchester Unity of the Independent Order of Oddfellows, from its Formation to the present Time (Manchester: published by the G. M. and the Board of Directors, 1910), pp. 109–10Google Scholar; Parl. Pap., 1884–1885, X, no. 270, 57–58, 72–73Google Scholar.

8 Parl. Pap., 1887, XI, no. 257, iv-iv.Google Scholar

9 Webb, Sidney, “The Reform of the Poor Law,” Contemporary Review, LVM (July 1890), 95–130Google Scholar; Booth, Charles, Pauperism, a Picture; and Endowment of Old Age, an Argument (London: Macmillan and Co., 1893)Google Scholar; , Aschrott, English Poor Law System, p. 106Google Scholar.

10 Garvin, J. L., Life of Joseph Chamberlain (3 vols.; London: Macmillan and Co., 1932–1934), II, 508–9Google Scholar; Times, March 18, 1891, p. 10, col. dGoogle Scholar.

11 Parl. Pap., 1895, XV, cd. 7684, pt. ii, 661.Google Scholar

12 Parl. Pap., 1895, XIV, cd. 7684, IxxviGoogle Scholar; , Aschrott, English Poor Law System, p. 107. The interest in old-age pensions among members of the House of Commons is shown by the considerable number of prirate members' bills presented in the yean 1891–95; Parl. Deb., 1891–95, passimGoogle Scholar.

13 Parl. Pap., 1895, XIV, cd. 7684, lxzxiii-lxzzviiGoogle Scholar; Part. Pap., 1907, LXVIII, cd. 3618, 5-6Google Scholar.

14 Timer, May 27, 1895, p. 10, col. b; July 2, 189;, p. 5, col. fGoogle Scholar; The General Election. July 1895—The Addresses of every Candidate at tent out to the various Constituencies. Section I. The County of London (London: Romeike and Curtice, 1895)Google Scholar; Facts for Electors—A Hand- book for Unionist Committee Men … (Edinburgh, 1895)Google Scholar charged the Liberals with trying ot carry out revolutionary changes in the constitution while leaving social evils untouched. “The Unionists propose to use the machinery of the state as it exists for practical measures of social reform.” It recommended that the state spend money to assist young men to make provision for old age. For arguments whether ironclad promises had been made by the Conservatives in the election of 1895, see The Unionist Record, 1893–1903 (Westminster, nA.), p. 482, andGoogle ScholarThe Liberal Magazine, VI (December 1898), 543Google Scholar.

15 This body is generally referred to as the Rothschild committee.— Parl. Pap., 1898, XLV, cd. 8911, 9–10Google Scholar ; Parl. Pap., 1907, LXVIII, cd. 3618, 6Google Scholar.

16 Part. Pap., 1899, VIII, no. 296, iii-xiiiGoogle Scholar; Part. Pap., 1907, LXVIII, ed. 3618, 7–9. Thii body is usually called the Chaplin committeeGoogle Scholar.

17 Parl. Pap., 1900, Vol. X, cd. 67.Google Scholar

18 In 1898, Mr. Lionel Holland, Conservative member for Bow and Bromley (East London), in a published letter, took the government to task for its failure to promote pension legislation. He pointed out that the royal commission that had reported in 1895 had provided any government with adequate information on the problem of pensions; the treasury committee appointed by the Conservative government in 1896 did not see fit to ask the government to enlarge the scope of its inquiry and had wasted two years in its deliberation. “It remains for the Cabinet to show,” he concluded, “that they are not content to falsify the expectations they aroused at the general election, that they realize that the occasion for trifling has gone by and possess not only tfie ‘heart to resolve’ but a ‘head to contrive’ and a ‘hand to execute.’”— Times, July 11, 1898, p. to, col. cGoogle Scholar

19 Watson, Alfred W., An Account of an Investigation of the Sickness and Mortality Experience of the l.O.O.F. Manchester Unity during tie five Yean, 1893–1897 (Manchester, 1903). PP. II–34Google Scholar; Oddfellows Magcudne, XXVI (April 1895), 618; XXVIH (March 1897), 73–74; XXXV (Jan. 1904), 5–6Google Scholar; Heartt of Oak Gazette, no. 43 (January 2, 1905), p. 2Google Scholar; , Moffrey, A Century of Oddfellowship, pp. 163–63Google Scholar; Royd Oak Magazine, II (July 15, 1908), 107Google Scholar; Part. Pap., 1898, XLV, c 8911. 8–9Google Scholar; Part. Pap., 1899, VIII, no. 396, qq. 1411–13,1531–23, 1534, 1688–89Google Scholar; Ancient Order of Foresters, Progress of the Order during 1897: see the similar reports for 1898, 1900, 1902, 1903, and 1904 (in British Museum).

20 Parl. Pap., 1890–1891, LXXIX, no. 333; Parl. Pap., 1887, XI, no. 257, q. 35Google Scholar; Hearts of Oak Journal, II (January 1908), 140Google Scholar; Oddfellowś Magazine, XXXVII (July 1906), 319–30Google Scholar.

21 , Moffrey, A Century of Oddfellowthip, pp. 103, 109–10, 132–25Google Scholar; Oddfellowś Magazine, XXVI (August 1895), 260; XXVIII (January 1897), 39–40. and March 1897, 72–74, 106–8; Times, January 1, 1902, p. 4, col. c; Unionist Record, 1895–1900, pp. 39–30Google Scholar.

22 Excerpt from Annual Delegateś Meeting Reports, May 30, 1901 (ms.) furnished by Hearts of Oak Benefit Society, Euiton Road, London.

23 Oddfellows' Magazine. XXXIII (April 1902), 105–9Google Scholar. Parl. Pap., 1903, V, no. 276, 121–23; Times. February 27, 1902, p. 2, col. f; May 23, 1902, p. 8, col. f; January 1, 1903, p. 9, cols. b, c; May 21, 1903, p. 3, col. f, and October 15, 1903, p. 5, col. f; Parl. Deb., 4 ser., CV, March 19, 1902, col. 468. For opposition by the Manchester Unity and the Foresters, see Times, June 5, 1903, p. 4, col. d, and August 5, 1903, p. 5, col. dGoogle Scholar.

24 Trades Union Congress, 24th Annual Report (1891), pp. 32–36. (To be cited hereafter as T.U.C.)Google Scholar

25 T.U.C., 1892, pp. 29, 71.Google Scholar

26 Ibid., 1894, p. 24; 1896, p. 50.

27 lbid., 1897, p. 5a; 1899, p. 8a; 1900, pp. 71–73.

28 Report of the Old Age Pensions Conference held i n Memorial Hall … London on … 14th and 15th January, 1902 (London, 1902)Google Scholar; testimony of Steadman, W. C, Parl. Pap., 1903, V, no. 376, qq. 491–512Google Scholar.

29 Reports of the Cooperative Congreu, 1897 to 1901, passim.; testimony of Jesse Clement Gray, general secretary of the Cooperative Union,Parl. Pap., 1903, V, no. 376, qq. 737–801.Google Scholar

30 National Committee of Organized Labour fpr Promoting Old Age Pensions for All, First Annual Report and Balance Sheet (1899–1900), pp. 5–6 (to be hereafter cited u N.C.O.L.)Google Scholar; Rogers, Frederick, labour. Life and Literature—tome Mtmoriet of Sixty Years (London: Smith, fclder and Co., 1913), pp. 203–27, 357–68; N.C.O.L., 1901–2, p. 23; 1907–8, p. 34; Times, Jan. 20, 1903, p. 12, col. f; Why we ihould not tubtidiie Friendly Societies to get Old-Age Petitions (leaflet of N.C.OX., in British Miueum)Google Scholar.

31 N.C.0.L., 1900–1901, p. 11.Google Scholar

32 Ibid.

33 N.C.O.L., 1904–1905, pp. 13–15.Google Scholar

34 The report of the select committee is in Parl. Pap., 1903, Vol. V, no. 276. See the speech of Walter Long on the complexities and financial difficulties of the problem,Google ScholarParl. Deb., 4th ser., Vol. CXXII, May 32, 1903, cols. 1564–70Google Scholar. Chamberlain insisted that pensions were not a dead issue, but that rinding the necessary money would “involve a review of the fiscal system which I have indicated as necessary and desirable at an early date.”—Ibid., cols. 1549–63.

35 Reports of political speeches, Times, December 1905 and January 1906, passim. For a cross-section of thinking among Liberal leaders, see The liberal View—a Series of Articles on Current Polities by Members of the '80 Club—With a preface by Spencer, Rt. Hon. Eafl (London: P. S. King and Son, 1904), in which “social reform” was allotted five pages in a total of 161. A fuller recognition of the importance of social problems may be found inGoogle ScholarSamuel, Herbert, Liberalism—an Attempt to state the Principles and Proposals of Contemporary Liberalism in England (London: Grant Richards, 1902), andGoogle ScholarVilliers, Brougham, The Opportunity of Liberalism (London: T. Fisher Unwin, 1904). Note the letter of James Gairdner to the Timets, January 24, 1906, in which he said that the election of 1906 was the most conservative election ever seen, inasmuch as the Liberals were not elected to do anything i n particular but to keep something from being done; Campbell-Bannerman was “bound to no particular programme. He has now got the ‘dean slate’ that Lord Rosebery wished for; and we want to tee what he is going to write upon it.” See also the circular issued byGoogle Scholarthe National Liberal Federation, printed in the Times, October 16, 1905, p. 10, col. a, in which old-age pensions are not mentioned and no promises on social legislation are given—unless one wishes to place the education and licensing acts in this categoryGoogle Scholar.

36 T.U.C., 1906, pp. 85–89.Google Scholar

37 Parl. Deb., 4th ser., Vol. CLIII, March 14, 1906, cols. 1330–64.Google Scholar

38 N.C.O.L., 1906–1907, p. 8.Google Scholar

39 Ibid., pp. 10–12; Labour Party, Eighth Annual Conference, Hull, 1908, Report and Balance Sheet, pp. 37–43Google Scholar.

40 N.c.O.L., 1906–1907, pp. 12–14;Google Scholar A T.U.C., 1907, pp. 181–82, and 1908, p. 57.

41 Parl. Deb., 4th ser., Vol. CLXXXVIII, May 7, 1908, cols. 445–80Google Scholar; T.U.C., 1908, pp. 60–62, 192-94Google Scholar.

42 Parl. Deb., 4th ser., Vol. CXC, July 16, 1908, cols. 823–32Google Scholar. On the day of the introduction of the budget, Austen Chamberlain said that he doubted whether there were half a dozen persons in the House who were opposed to a system of pension legislation on principle; he recognized that public opinion had reached the point where the question had to be dealt with in one way or another.—Ibid., Vol. CLXXXVIII, May 7, 1908, cols. 480-84.

43 lbid., Vol. CLXXXIX, June i6, 1908, cols. 813–22.

44 Ibid., May 25, 1908, cols. 824-30, and Vol. CLXUI, July 9, 1908, cols. 148–58.

45 Ibid., Vol. CLXL, June 15, 1908, cols. 596ff, 761–67; Vol. CLXUI, July 9, cols. 201–4. The vote on the motion to postpone was 10 to 315. Balfour, Bonar Law, and Austen Chamberlain did not take part in the division.

46 Ibid., Vol. CLXLII, House of Lords, July to, 1908, cols. 1330–31. 1346, 1432.

47 Ibid., colt. 1360–69.

48 Ibid., coll. 1369–78.

49 Ibid., cols. 1379–89.

50 A proviso was included whereby continuous payments for ten years up to the age of sixty years to a recognized thrift society (friendly society, trade union, etc.) would be considered as satisfactory, evidence of having made provision for oneself and dependents and would protect the wife of the person from disqualification under the relevant provision.

51 Computation will show that qualified persons with income from £21 to £31/10 per annum from nonpension sources would enjoy total incomes of between twelve and thirteen shillings a week from both sources. A qualified person receiving a nonpension income of £13 (five shillings a week) would have an income of ten shillings from both sources.

52 8 Edward VII, c. 40; Barlow, C. A. Montague and Gomme, G. L., The Old Age Pensions Act, 1908 (London: Eyre and Spottiswoode, 1908). Clause 11 provided the necessary verbal changes for administration of the act in Ireland and ScodandGoogle Scholar.

53 For figures as to reductions in the number of persons on indoor and outdoor relief after January I, 1911, see: Parl. Pap., 1911, XXXI, cd. 5865, lxxiii-lxxiv, 33, 37, 44, 99–100Google Scholar; Parl. Pap., 1912–1913, XXXV, cd. 6327, 149–50, 160Google Scholar.