Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-8ctnn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T09:19:18.509Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

An Evolutionary Explanation for Competitive Decline: The British Shipbuilding Industry, 1890–1970

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 March 2009

Edward H. Lorenz
Edward H. Lorenz
Affiliation:
Assistant Professor of Economics at the University of Notre Dame, Notre Dame, IN 46556.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

British shipbuilding enjoyed undisputed international supremacy between 1890 and 1914. Following a gradual loss of world market share during the interwar years, Britain sustained an absolute decline in output between 1948 and 1970. European shipbuilding expanded at an unprecedented rate after World War II. This article attributes Britain's dramatic competitive decline in part to management's uncertaintly about the need to reform work administration methods during the decade or so following world War II, and in part to lack of trust between labor and management, which resulted in a failure of cooperation over proposed institutional reform between 1958 and 1965.

Type
Articles
Information
The Journal of Economic History , Volume 51 , Issue 4 , December 1991 , pp. 911 - 935
Copyright
Copyright © The Economic History Association 1991

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Aldcroft, Derek H., “The Entrepreneur and the British Economy, 1870–1914,” Economic History Review, 2d series, 17 (08 1964).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alexander, Kenneth, and Jenkins, Clive, Fairfields: A Study of Industrial Change (London, 1970).Google Scholar
Archives des Ateliers et Chantiers de Provence, Centre Culturel, report by CEGOS (industry consultants) on the Ateliers et Chantiers de Provence (Port-de-Bouc, France 1956).Google Scholar
Arrow, Kenneth, Individual Choice Under Uncertainty (Cambridge, MA, 1984).Google Scholar
Barbance, Marthe, “Saint Nazaire: Le port, la ville, le travail” (Thèse, Faculté de Droit, Université de Rennes, 1948).Google Scholar
Bartin, L. E., ”Rapport sur une seconde mission en Angleterre: 5 août–15 sept. 1884,” Collection de la Bibliothèque de la Marine Marchande (Paris, 1884).Google Scholar
Basso, Louis, “Les Entreprises françaises de construction navales” (Thesè, Faculté de Droit, Université de Paris, 1910).Google Scholar
Binmore, Ken, and Dasgupta, Partha, “Game Theory: A Survey,” in Binmore, K. and Dasgupta, P., eds., Economic Organisations as Games (Oxford, 1986).Google Scholar
Boekholt, R., “Welding—a Key Factor in Shipbuilding,” Shipbuilding International (Sept. 1971).Google Scholar
Booz-Allen, and Hamilton Report, British Shipbuilding 1972: A Report to the Department of Trade and Industry (London, 1973).Google Scholar
Charpentier, Henri, La Construction de navires marchands (Paris, 1945).Google Scholar
Chasseriau, René, “De la Protection de l'industrie des constructions navales” (Thèse, Faculté de Droit, Université de Paris, 1901).Google Scholar
Cormack, William S., “An Economic History of Shipbuilding and Marine Engineering with Special Reference to the West of Scotland” (Ph.D. thesis, University of Glasgow, 1930).Google Scholar
Cuthbert, D., “Welding in Modern Ship Construction,” Welding and Metal Fabrication, Exhibition No. (Apr. 1969).Google Scholar
Dougan, David, The Shipwrights (Newcastle-upon-Tyne, 1975).Google Scholar
Drewry, H. P., “The Rising Cost of Ship Construction” (London, 1974).Google Scholar
Dugas, René, “L'Industrie de la construction navale,” Enquête du Conseil National Économique, 1929–1930, Situation de la construction navale, Chambre Syndical des Constructeurs de Navires, circulaire 11B (Paris, 1930).Google Scholar
Elbaum, Bernard, “Why Apprenticeship Persisted in Britain but Not in the United States,” this JOURNAL, 49 (06 1989).Google Scholar
Elbaum, Bernard, and Lazonick, William, The Decline of the British Economy (Oxford, 1986).Google Scholar
Fairburn, William A., “Methods of Handling Material over Shipbuilding Berths in American Shipyards,” Transactions of the Institution of Naval Architects, 44 (1902).Google Scholar
Friedman, James, Game Theory with Applications to Economics (New York, 1986).Google Scholar
Gambetta, Diego, “Can We Trust Trust?” in Gambetta, D., ed., Trust: Making and Breaking Cooperative Relations (Oxford, 1988).Google Scholar
Hardy, Jean, “L'Industrie des constructions navales en France” (Thèse, Faculté de Droit de Rennes, 1951).Google Scholar
Holms, C. A., Practical Shipbuilding (London, 1918).Google Scholar
Hume, J. R., “Shipbuilding Machine Tools,” in Bull, John and Ward, J. T., eds., Scottish Themes: Essays in Honour of Professor S. G. E. Lythe (Edinburgh, 1976).Google Scholar
Jones, Leslie, Shipbuilding in Britain: Mainly Between the Two World Wars (Cardiff, 1957).Google Scholar
Landes, David S., The Unbound Prometheus (Cambridge, 1969).Google Scholar
Latty, Jean, Traité d'économie maritime (Paris, 1951), tome 1: La Construction navale dans l'économie nationale.Google Scholar
Lavaleé, L., “Résultats obtenus par l'application des nouvelles méthodes de travail dans un chantier de 3000 ouvriers,” Bulletin de la Société d'Encouragement pour l'Industrie Nationale, 118 (1919).Google Scholar
Le Maistre, C. L., “The Trade Value of Simplification and Standardization in the Details of Ships and their Machinery,” Transactions of the North-East Coast Institution of Engineers and Shipbuilders, 43 (1926/27).Google Scholar
Lloyd's Register of Shipping, Annual Shipbuilding Returns (London).Google Scholar
Lorenz, Edward H., “The Labour Process and Industrial Relations in the British and French Shipbuilding Industries: The Interwar Years,” in Kusse, Jon and Slaven, Anthony, eds., Proceedings of the SSRC Conference on Scottish and Scandinavian Shipbuilding (Gothenburg, 1980).Google Scholar
Lorenz, Edward H., “Two Patterns of Development: The Labour Process in the British and French Shipbuilding Industries, 1880–1930,” Journal of European Economic History, 13 (Winter 1984).Google Scholar
Lorenz, Edward H., “L'Offre de travail et les stratégies d'emploi dans la construction navale en France et en Grande-Bretagne (1890–1970),” Le Mouvement Social, 138 (01–03 1987).Google Scholar
Lorenz, Edward H., “Neither Friends nor Strangers: Informal Networks of Subcontracting in French Industry,” in Gambetta, D., ed., Trust: Making and Breaking Cooperative Relations (Oxford, 1988).Google Scholar
Lorenz, Edward H., Economic Decline in Britain: The Shipbuilding Industry, 1890–1970 (Oxford, in press).Google Scholar
Lorenz, Edward, and Wilkinson, Frank, “The Shipbuilding Industry, 1880–1965,” in Elbaum, Bernard and Lazonick, William, eds., The Decline of the British Economy (Oxford, 1986).Google Scholar
McCloskey, Donald N., Enterprise and Trade in Victorian Britain (London, 1981).Google Scholar
McGoldrick, James, “Crisis and the Division of Labour: Clydeside Shipbuilding in the Inter-war Period,” in Dickson, A., ed., Capital and Class in Scotland (Edinburgh, 1982).Google Scholar
McGoldrick, James, “Industrial Relations and the Division of Labour in the Shipbuilding Industry Since the War,” British Journal of Industrial Relations, 21 (07 1983).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mirowski, Philip, “An Evolutionary Biology, Technological Change, and Economic History,” Journal of Economic Issues, 17 (09. 1983).Google Scholar
Mokyr, Joel, “Evolutionary Biology, Technological Change, and Economic History,” Bulletin of Economic Research, 43 (04 1991).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Montgomerie, J., “Shipbuilding Practice Abroad,” Transactions of the North-East Coast Institute of Engineers and Shipbuilders, 54 (1937/1938).Google Scholar
Mortimer, James E., History of the Boilermakers Society, vol. 1 (London, 1973).Google Scholar
Mortimer, James E., History of the Boilermakers Society, vol. 2 (London, 1982).Google Scholar
Navires, Ports et Chantiers (Jan. 1962).Google Scholar
Nelson, Richard, and Winter, Sidney, An Evolutionary Theory of the Firm (Cambridge, MA, 1982).Google Scholar
Olsson, Kent, “Tankers and Technical Development in the Swedish Shipbuilding Industry,” in Kusse, Jon and Slaven, Anthony, eds., Proceedings of the SSRC Conference on Scottish and Scandinavian Shipbuilding (Gothenburg, 1980).Google Scholar
Olsson, Kent, “Markets and Production in Swedish Shipbuilding” (Discussion paper for the Gothenburg conference on shipbuilding history, University of Gothenburg, Nov. 27–29, 1981).Google Scholar
Orenstein, H., “Method and Motion Study Applied to the Shipbuilding Industry,” Transactions of the North-East Coast Institution of Engineers and Shipbuilders, 61 (1944/1945).Google Scholar
Parkinson, John R., “Trends in the Output and Export of Merchant Ships,” Scottish Journal of Political Economy, 3 (10 1956).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Parkinson, John R., The Economics of Shipbuilding in the United Kingdom (Cambridge, 1960).Google Scholar
Patton, Report, “Productivity and Research in Shipbuilding” (Report prepared under the chairmanship of Mr. J. Patton to the Joint Committee of the Shipbuilding Conference, the Shipbuilding Employers Association, and the British Shipbuilding Research Association, London, 1962).Google Scholar
Pinczon, M., “Mission en Angleterre et an Écosse avec la délégation du Conseil National Économique,” Enquête du Conseil National Économique, 1929–1930, Situation de l'industrie de la construction navale, Chambre Syndical des Construeteurs de Navires, circulaire 11B (Paris, 1930).Google Scholar
Pollard, Sidney, “British and World Shipbuilding, 1890–1914: A Study in Comparative Costs,” Journal of Economic History, 18 (09 1957).Google Scholar
Pollard, Sidney, and Robertson, Paul L., The British Shipbuilding Industry, 1890–1914 (Cambridge, MA, 1979).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Price, Sylvia, “Labour Mobility in Clyde Shipbuilding 1889–1913” (Discussion paper for the Gothenburg conference on shipbuilding history, University of Gothenburg, Nov. 27–29, 1981).Google Scholar
Rapping, Leonard, “Learning and World War II Production Functions,” Review of Economics and Statistics, 48 (02 1965).Google Scholar
Ravaille, André, “Le Planning en construction navale,” Nouveautés Techniques Maritimes (1964).Google Scholar
Reid, Alastair, “The Division of Labour in the Shipbuilding Industry 1880–1920, with Special Reference to Clydeside” (Ph.D. thesis, University of Cambridge, 1980).Google Scholar
Report of the Commission on American Shipbuilding (Washington, DC, 1973).Google Scholar
Roux-Freissineng, Marcel, “L'Industrie des constructions navales en France” (Thèse, Faculté de Droit d'Aix, 1929).Google Scholar
Royal Commission on Depression in Trade, C. 4621, vols. 21–23(London, 1886).Google Scholar
Sandberg, Lars G., “The Entrepreneur and Technological Change,” in Floud, Roderick and McCloskey, Donald, eds., The Economic History of Britain since 1700 (Cambridge, 1981), vol. 2, pp. 99–120.Google Scholar
Saxonhouse, Gary, and Wright, Gavin, “Stubborn Mules and Vertical Integration: The Disappearing Constraint?” Economic History Review, 2d series, 40 (02 1987).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schirach-Szmigiel, Christopher von, Liner Shipping and General Cargo Transport (Stockholm, 1979).Google Scholar
Schwartz, T., and von Halle, E., Die Schiffbauindustrie in Deutschland und im Auslande (Berlin, 1902).Google Scholar
Shipbuilder and Marine Engine Builder (trade journal, London).Google Scholar
SNRA (Shipbuilders and Repairers National Association) Archives, National Maritime Museum (Greenwich, England). “Federation Circulars.” Industrial Relations Cabinet, Shelf I, File No. 5083 B 8, “Reorganization of Labour in Shipyards.” Industrial Relations Cabinet, Shelf 2, File No. 3918 BC I, “Demarcation Questions: Boilermakers and Steel Metal Workers.” Industrial Relations Cabinet, Shelf 2, File No. 3918 PB I, “Demarcation Questions: Joiners and Sheet Metal Workers.” “London Minute Books.”Google Scholar
Shipping World and World Shipbuilding (trade journal, London).Google Scholar
Simon, Herbert, Administrative Behavior (New York, 1957).Google Scholar
SSA (Shipconstructors and Shipwrights Association), Executive Committee Reports (Newcastle-upon-Tyne, 1933, 1934, 1944).Google Scholar
Stinchcombe, Arthur L., “Bureaucratic and Craft Administration of Production: A Comparative Study,” Administrative Science Quarterly, 4 (09 1959).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stinchcombe, Arthur L., “Social Structure and Organizations,” in March, J. G., ed., Handbook of Organizations (Chicago, 1960).Google Scholar
Stopford, Martin, “U. K. Cost Competitiveness” (Mimeo, British Shipbuilders, Newcastle-upon-Tyne, 1979).Google Scholar
Stopford, Martin, Maritime Economics (London, 1988).Google Scholar
Sturmey, Stanley G., British Shipping and World Competition (London, 1962).Google Scholar
Trades Union Congress Library, Shipbuilding File, “Shipbuilding Employers Federation, Proceedings in General Conference with the Federation of Engineering and Shipbuilding Trades” (London, Nov. 1, 1933).Google Scholar
Van Donkelaar, A., “Modern Dutch Shipyard Arrangement and Practice,” Shipbuilding and Shipping Record, 39 (03 3, 1932).Google Scholar
Wiener, Martin, English Culture and the Decline of the Industrial Spirit, 1850–1980 (Cambridge, 1981).Google Scholar
Wilkinson, Frank, “Demarcation in Shipbuilding” (Department of Applied Economics Working Paper, University of Cambridge, 1973).Google Scholar
Winter, Sidney, “Economic ‘Natural Selection’ and the Theory of the Firm,” Yale Economic Essays, 4 (1964).Google Scholar