Published online by Cambridge University Press: 15 November 2013
The Soviet dictatorship used secrecy to shield its processes from external scrutiny. A system of accounting for classified documentation assured the protection of secrets. The associated procedures resemble a turnover tax applied to government transactions. There is evidence of both compliance and evasion. The burden of secrecy was multiplied because the system was also secret and so had to account for itself. Unique documentation of a small regional bureaucracy, the Lithuania KGB, is exploited to yield an estimate of the burden. Measured against available benchmarks, the burden looks surprisingly heavy.
I thank participants in the 2011 National Convention of the Association for Slavic, East European, and Eurasian Studies, Washington, DC, the 2011 Vilnius Symposium on Late Soviet and Post-Soviet Issues, the 2012 World Economic History Conference, Stellenbosch, seminars at the Universities of Warwick and Uppsala and the Graduate Institute, Geneva, and especially Steven Aftergood, Golfo Alexopoulos, Richard Aldrich, Gareth Austin, Johann Custodis, R. W. Davies, Marc Flandreau, Saulius Grybkauskas, Alex Hazanov, James Heinzen, Emily Johnson, Andrei Markevich, David Alan Rich, Leonora Soroka, Amir Weiner, Inga Zaksauskiene, and Amy Zegart for advice; the University of Warwick for research leave and the Centre on Competitive Advantage in the Global Economy for research support; the Hoover Institution and its Workshop on Totalitarian Regimes for generous hospitality; and the staff of the Hoover Archive for excellent assistance.