Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7czq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-30T00:27:07.275Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

William Dean' Theory of Urban Growth: Chicago's Commerce and Industry, 1854–1871

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 March 2009

Louis P. Cain
Louis P. Cain
Affiliation:
The author is Professor of Economics, Loyola University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois 60611.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

William H. Dean, Jr. argued the development of a commercial agglomeration at any site is a function of three interrelated variables: trade routes, position, and nodality. Industrial agglomerations follow commercial ones. Dean's theory is discussed and applied to Chicago's growth before the Great Fire of 1871. The initial development of Chicago's transportation infrastructure is described. Data for the balance of receipts and shipments of selected items and growth rates for receipts and shipments from 1854 to 1871 are presented.

Type
Papers Presented at the Forty-fourth Annual Meeting of the Economic History Association
Information
The Journal of Economic History , Volume 45 , Issue 2 , June 1985 , pp. 241 - 249
Copyright
Copyright © The Economic History Association 1985

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Cooley, Charles H., “The Theory of Transportation”, Publications of the American Economic Association, 9 (1894), pp. 223–371.Google Scholar

2 Vidal de la Blanche, Paul M. J., Principles of Human Geography, ed. by Martonne, E.de, trans. by Bingham, M. T. (New York, 1926), p. 473.Google Scholar

3 Smolensky, Eugene and Ratajczak, Duane, “The Conception of Cities”, Explorations in Entrepreneurial History, 2 (Winter 1965), p. 90.Google Scholar

4 Stolper, Wolfgang, review of Die Räumliche Ordnung der Wirtschaft by August Lösch in American Economic Review, 33 (09 1943), p. 632.Google ScholarSmolensky and Ratajczak, “The Conception of Cities”, recognized that variables such as the region's topography were necessary to explain the site of San Diego.Google Scholar

5 Dean, William H. Jr, “The Theory of the Geographic Location of Economic Activities”, (unpublished doctoral dissertation, Harvard University, 1938); selections were published by Edward Bros., Inc. (Ann Arbor, 1938).Google Scholar One exception is Isard, Walter, Location and Space-Economy (Cambridge, Mass., 1956).Google Scholar See also Cain, Louis P., “From Mud to Metropolis: Chicago before the Fire”, Research in Economic History (forthcoming). Dean delivered a paper on “The History and Present Status of Location Theory” to the second meeting of the Economic History Association in Williamstown on 5 September 1942, but the paper was not published. Dean had accepted a position as price administrator for the Office of Price Administration in the Virgin Islands.Google Scholar

6 See Cooley, “The Theory of Transportation”, p. 236.Google Scholar

7 Dean, “The Theory of Geographic Location of Economic Activities”, p. 179.Google Scholar

8 Stolper, Wolfgang, review of Die Räumliche Ordnung der Wirtschaft by August Lösch in American Economic Review, 33 (09 1943), p. 179.Google Scholar

9 Stolper, Wolfgang, review of Die Räumliche Ordnung der Wirtschaft by August Lösch in American Economic Review, 33 (09 1943), p. 192.Google Scholar

10 Stolper, Wolfgang, review of Die Räumliche Ordnung der Wirtschaft by August Lösch in American Economic Review, 33 (09 1943), p. 202.Google Scholar

11 Usher, Abbott P., “A Dynamic Analysis of the Location of Economic Activity”, (unpublished manuscript from the files of Harold F. Williamson), p. 35.Google Scholar

12 Dean, “The Theory of Geographic Location of Economic Activities”, p. 160.Google Scholar

13 Stolper, Wolfgang, review of Die Räumliche Ordnung der Wirtschaft by August Lösch in American Economic Review, 33 (09 1943), p. 178.Google Scholar

14 Stolper, Wolfgang, review of Die Räumliche Ordnung der Wirtschaft by August Lösch in American Economic Review, 33 (09 1943), p. 134.Google Scholar

15 Stolper, Wolfgang, review of Die Räumliche Ordnung der Wirtschaft by August Lösch in American Economic Review, 33 (09 1943), p. 145.Google Scholar

16 Stolper, Wolfgang, review of Die Räumliche Ordnung der Wirtschaft by August Lösch in American Economic Review, 33 (09 1943), p. 394.Google Scholar

17 Stolper, Wolfgang, review of Die Räumliche Ordnung der Wirtschaft by August Lösch in American Economic Review, 33 (09 1943), p. 402.Google Scholar

18 Stolper, Wolfgang, review of Die Räumliche Ordnung der Wirtschaft by August Lösch in American Economic Review, 33 (09 1943), p. 427.Google Scholar

19 Stolper, Wolfgang, review of Die Räumliche Ordnung der Wirtschaft by August Lösch in American Economic Review, 33 (09 1943), p. 429.Google Scholar

20 Stolper, Wolfgang, review of Die Räumliche Ordnung der Wirtschaft by August Lösch in American Economic Review, 33 (09 1943), p. 441.Google Scholar

21 Goode, J. Paul, The Geographic Background of Chicago (Chicago, 1926), p. 30.Google Scholar

22 Cain, Louis P., Sanitation Strategy for a Lakefront Metropolis (DeKalb, III., 1978).Google Scholar

23 Belcher, Wyatt W., The Economic Rivalry between St. Louis and Chicago, 1850–1880 (New York, 1947). Dean also commented on the significance of this rivalry in his dissertation.Google Scholar

24 Andreas, Alfred T., History of Chicago from the Earliest Period to the Present Time (Chicago, 1884), vol. 1, p. 251.Google Scholar

25 Pierce, Bessie Louise, A History of Chicago (New York, 1940), vol. 2, p. 43.Google Scholar

26 Belcher, The Economic Rivalry between St. Louis and Chicago, 1850–1880, p. 69.Google Scholar