Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rcrh6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-02T21:19:49.799Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Why Was It Europeans Who Conquered the World?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 August 2012

PHILIP T. HOFFMAN
PHILIP T. HOFFMAN*
Affiliation:
Rea A. and Lela G. Axline Professor of Business Economics and Professor of History, Division of the Humanities and Social Sciences, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA 91125. E-mail: [email protected].
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

By the 1700s Europeans dominated the gunpowder technology, which was surprising, because it had originated in China and been used with expertise throughout Eurasia. To account for their dominance, historians have invoked competition, but it cannot explain why they pushed this technology further than anyone else. The answer lies with a simple tournament model of military competition that allows for learning by doing. Political incentives and military conditions then explain why the rest of Eurasia fell behind Europeans in developing the gunpowder technology. The consequences were huge, from colonialism to the slave trade and even the Industrial Revolution.

Type
ARTICLES
Information
The Journal of Economic History , Volume 72 , Issue 3 , 22 August 2012 , pp. 601 - 633
Copyright
Copyright © The Economic History Association 2012

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Agoston, G.Guns for the Sultan: Military Power and the Weapons Industry in the Ottoman Empire. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2005.Google Scholar
Alam, M., and Subrahmanyam, S.. “L'état moghol et sa fiscalité (XVIe-XVIIIe siècles).” Annales: Histoire, Sciences Sociales 49 (1994): 189–217.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alavi, S.The Sepoys and the Company: Tradition and Transition in Northern India, 1770-1830. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1995.Google Scholar
Alder, K.Engineering the Revolution: Arms and Enlightenment in France, 1763-1815. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1997.Google Scholar
Anisimov, E. V.The Reforms of Peter the Great: Progress through Coercion in Russia. London: M. E. Sharpe, 1993.Google Scholar
Atwell, W. “The T'ai-ch'ang, T'ien-ch'i, and Ch'ung-chen Reigns, 1620-1644.” In The Cambridge History of China, Volume 8, edited by Fairbank, J. K. and Twitchett, D. C., 585–640. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1988.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barfield, T. J.The Perilous Frontier: Nomadic Empires and China. Oxford: Blackwell, 1989.Google Scholar
Barua, P. “Military Developments in India, 1750-1850.” Journal of Military History 58, no. 4 (1994): 599–616.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bell, D. A.The First Total War: Napoleon's Europe and the Birth of Warfare As We Know It. Boston and New York: Houghton Mifflin, 2007.Google Scholar
Berry, M. E.Hideyoshi. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1982.Google Scholar
Berry, M. E. “Public Peace and Private Attachment: The Goals and Conduct of Power in Early Modern Japan.” Journal of Japanese Studies 12, no. 2 (1986): 237–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berry, M. E. “Presidential Address: Samurai Trouble: Thoughts on War and Loyalty.” The Journal of Asian Studies 64, no. 4 (2005): 831–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Black, J.War and the World: Military Power and the Fate of Continents, 1450-2000. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 1998.Google Scholar
Bonaparte, N.-L., and Favé, I.. Etudes sur le passé et l'avenir de l'artillerie. Paris: J. Dumaine, 1846-1872.Google Scholar
Boudriot, J., and Berti, H.. Les vaisseaux de 50 et 64 canons: Etude historique 1650-1780. Paris: ANCRE, 1994.Google Scholar
Brandt, L., Ma, D., and Rawski, T. G.. “From Divergence to Convergence: Reevaluating the History Behind China's Economic Boom.” Working Paper, Economic History Department, London School of Economics, 2011.Google Scholar
Brito, D. L., and Intriligator, M. D.. “Conflict, War, and Redistribution.” The American Political Science Review 79, no. 4 (1985): 943–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brown, P. C.Central Authority and Local Autonomy in the Formation of Early Modern Japan. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press, 1993.Google Scholar
Brzoska, M. “World Military Expenditures.” In Handbook of Defense Economics, edited by Hartley, K. and Sandler, T., 45–67. Amsterdam: Elsevier, 1995.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chase, K. W.Firearms: A Global History to 1700. Cambridge, UK and New York: Cambridge University Press, 2003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cipolla, C. M.Guns, Sails, and Empires: Technological Innovation and the Early Phases of European Expansion, 1400-1700. New York: Pantheon Books, 1965.Google Scholar
Clark, G.A Farewell to Alms: A Brief Economic History of the World. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2007.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clodfelter, M.Warfare and Armed Conflicts: A Statistical Guide to Casualty and Other Figures, 1500-2000. Jefferson, NC: McFarland, 2002.Google Scholar
Cooper, R. G. S.The Anglo-Maratha Campaigns and the Contest for India. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2003.Google Scholar
Corvisier, A. et al. Histoire militaire de la France. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France, 1997.Google Scholar
Dincecco, M. “Fiscal Centralization, Limited Government, and Public Revenues in Europe, 1650-1913.” The Journal of Economic History 69, no. 1 (2009): 48–103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Esper, T. “Military Self-Sufficiency and Weapons Technology in Muscovite Russia.” Slavic Review 28, no. 2 (1969): 185–208.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fearon, J. D. “Rationalist Explanations for War.” International Organization 49, no. 3 (1995): 379–414.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Finer, S. E.The History of Government. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1997.Google Scholar
Fletcher, E., and Iyigun, M.. “The Clash of Civilizations: A Cliometric Investigation.” Working Paper, Institute for the Study of Labor, University of Colorado, 2010.Google Scholar
Franke, H. “Siege and Defense of Towns in Medieval China.” In Chinese Ways in Warfare, edited by Kiernan, F. A. and Fairbank, J. K., 151-201. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1974.Google Scholar
Fullerton, R. L., and McAfee, R. P.. “Auctioning Entry into Tournaments.” The Journal of Political Economy 107, no. 3 (1999): 573–605.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Garfinkel, M. R., and Skaperdas, S.. “Economics of Conflict: An Overview.” In Handbook of Defense Economics, Volume 2, edited by Sandler, T. and Hartley, K., 649–709. Amsterdam: Elsevier, 2007.Google Scholar
Glete, J.Navies and Nations: Warships, Navies, and State Building in Europe and America, 1500-1800. Stockholm: Almqvist & Wiksell International, 1993.Google Scholar
Gommans, J.Mughal Warfare: Indian Frontiers and High Roads to Empire, 1500-1700. London: Taylor and Francis, 2003.Google Scholar
Gommans, J., and Kolff, D. H. A., eds. Warfare and Weaponry in South Asia, 1000-1800. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2001.Google Scholar
Goodman, D. C.Power and Plenty: Government, Technology, and Science in Philip II's Spain. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1988.Google Scholar
Guilmartin, J. F.Gunpowder and Galleys: Changing Technology and Mediterranean Warfare at Sea in the Sixteenth Century. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1974.Google Scholar
Guilmartin, J. F. “‘The Guns of the Santissimo Sacramento'.” Technology & Culture 24, no. 4 (1983): 559–601.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guilmartin, J. F. “Ideology and Conflict: The Wars of the Ottoman Empire, 1453-1606.” Journal of Interdisciplinary History 18, no. 4 (1988): 721–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guilmartin, J. F.Galleons and Galleys. London: Cassell, 2002.Google Scholar
Hale, J. R.War and Society in Renaissance Europe, 1450-1620. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1985.Google Scholar
Hall, B. S.Weapons and Warfare in Renaissance Europe: Gunpowder, Technology, and Tactics. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1997.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harding, R.Amphibious Warfare in the Eighteenth Century: The British Expedition to the West Indies, 1740-1742. Woodbridge, UK: The Royal Historical Society, 1991.Google Scholar
Headrick, D. R.The Tools of Empire: Technology and European Imperialism in the Nineteenth Century. New York and Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1981.Google Scholar
Guilmartin, J. F.Power over Peoples: Technology, Environments, and Western Imperialism, 1400 to the Present. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2010.Google Scholar
Hellie, R.Enserfment and Military Change in Muscovy. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1971.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hoffman, P. T.Growth in a Traditional Society. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1996.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Headrick, D. R. “The Politics and Economics of Europe's Comparative Advantage in Violence.” Global Price and Income History Working Paper No. 13, December 2008.Google Scholar
Hoffman, P. T. “Prices, the Military Revolution, and Western Europe's Comparative Advantage in Violence.” Economic History Review 64, S1 (2011): 39–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Headrick, D. R. “Why Was It Europeans Who Conquered the World?” California Institute of Technology, Social Science Working Paper 1344, March 2012.Google Scholar
Hoffman, P. T., and Norberg, Kathryn, eds. Fiscal Crises, Liberty, and Representative Government, 1450-1789. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press, 1994.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hoffman, P. T., and Rosenthal, J.-L.. “The Political Economy of Warfare and Taxation in Early Modern Europe: Historical Lessons for Economic Development.” In The Frontiers of the New Institutional Economics, edited by Drobak, J. N. and Nye, J. V. C. N., 31-55. San Diego, CA: Academic Press, 1997.Google Scholar
Huang, R. “Military Expenditures in Sixteenth-Century China.” Oriens Extremus 17 (1970): 39–62.Google Scholar
Hellie, R. “The Ming Fiscal Administration.” The Cambridge History of China, Volume 8, edited by Fairbank, J. K. and Twitchett, D. C., 106–71. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1998.Google Scholar
Jackson, M. O., and Morelli, M.. “Political Bias and War.” American Economic Review 97, no. 4 (2007): 1353–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huang, R. “Strategic Militarization, Deterrence, and Wars.” Quarterly Journal of Political Science 4, no. 4 (2009): 279–313.Google Scholar
Hellie, R. “The Reasons for Wars: An Updated Survey.” In Handbook on the Political Economy of War, edited by Coyne, C. and Mathers, R., Part 3. New York: Elgar, 2011.Google Scholar
Josson, H. and Willaert, L., eds. Correspondance de Ferdinand Verbiest de la compagnie de Jésus (1623-1688) Directeur de l'obervatoire de Pékin. Brussels: Palais des académies, 1938.Google Scholar
Kennedy, P. M.The Rise and Fall of the Great Powers: Economic Change and Military Conflict from 1500 to 2000. New York: Random House, 1987.Google Scholar
Kolff, D. H. A.Naukar, Rajput and Sepoy: The Ethnohistory of the Military Labour Market in Hindustan, 1450-1850. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1990.Google Scholar
Kotilaine, J. T. “In Defense of the Realm: Russian Arms Trade and Production in the Seventeenth and Early Eighteenth Century.” The Military and Society in Russia: 1450-1917, edited by Lohr, Eric and Poe, Marshall, 94–95. Leiden: Brill, 2002.Google Scholar
Kung, James. Personal communication of data on frequency of Chinese wars involving nomads, December 9, 2010.Google Scholar
La Noue, F. d.Discours politiques et militaires du seigneur de la Noue. Basel: L'imprimerie de F. Forest, 1587.Google Scholar
Lavery, B.The Ship of the Line. London: Naval Institute Press, 1983-1984.Google Scholar
Levy, J. S.War in the Modern Great Power System, 1945-1975. Lexington: University Press of Kentucky, 1983.Google Scholar
Li, B. “The Late Ming Military Reform under the Shadow of Financial Crisis.” Utrecht, World Economic History Conference, 2009.Google Scholar
Liu, G. W. “The Nexus of Power: Warfare, Market, and State Formation in Late Imperial China, 1000-1600.” Utrecht, World Economic History Conference, 2009.Google Scholar
Lorge, P.War, Politics and Society in Early Modern China: 900-1795. London: Routledge, 2005.Google Scholar
Lucas, R. E. “Making a Miracle.” Econometrica 61, no. 2 (1993): 251–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lynn, J. A.Giant of the Grand Siècle: The French Army, 1610-1715. Cambridge, UK and New York: Cambridge University Press, 1997.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lorge, P. “International Rivalry and Warfare.” In The Eighteenth Century, edited by Blanning, T. C. W., 178–217. New York: Oxford University Press, 2000.Google Scholar
Machiavelli, Niccolo.. The Prince. Tr. James B. Atkinson. Indianapolis: Bobbs-Merrill, 1977.Google Scholar
Mallett, M. E.Mercenaries and Their Masters: Warfare in Renaissance Italy. Totowa, NJ: Rowman and Littlefield, 1974.Google Scholar
Martin, C., and Parker, G.. The Spanish Armada. Manchester: Manchester University Press, 1999.Google Scholar
Mathias, P., and O'Brien, P.. “Taxation in Britain and France, 1715-1810: A Comparison of the Social and Economic Incidence of Taxes Collected for the Central Government.” Journal of European Economic History 5, (1976): 601–50.Google Scholar
Mattingly, G. “International Diplomacy and International Law.” The New Cambridge Modern History, edited by Wernham, R. B., 149–70. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1968.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McBride, M., and Skaperdas, S.. “Explaining Conflict in Low-Income Countries: Incomplete Contracting in the Shadow of the Future. In Institutions and Norms in Economic Development, edited by Gradstein, M. and Konrad, K. A., 141–61. Cambridge, MA: MIT, 2007.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McNeill, W. H.Europe's Steppe Frontier. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1964.Google Scholar
Minost, L. “Jean II Maritz (1711-1790): La fabrication des canons au XVIIIe siècle.” Cahiers d'Etudes et de Recherches du Musée de l'Armée hors-série numéro 2 (2005): 1–287.Google Scholar
Mokyr, J.The Gifts of Athena: Historical Origins of the Knowledge Economy. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2002.Google Scholar
Murphey, R. “The Ottoman Attitude Towards the Adoption of Western Technology: The Role of Efrenci Technicians in Civil and Military Applications.” In Contributions à l'histoire économique et sociale de l'Empire ottoman, edited by Bacqué-Gramont, J. L. and Dumont, P., 287-98. Louvain, Belgique: Peeters Publishers, 1983.Google Scholar
Myers, R. H., and Wang, Y.-C.. “Economic Developments, 1644-1800.” In The Cambridge History of China, Volume 9, edited by Fairbank, J. K. and Twitchett, D. C., 563–646. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Needham, J.Science and Civilisation in China. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1954-.Google Scholar
Pamuk, S., and Karaman, K.. “Ottoman State Finances in European Perspective, 1500-1914.” The Journal of Economic History 70, no. 3 (2010): 593–627.Google Scholar
Parker, G.The Military Revolution: Military Innovation and the Rise of the West, 1500-1800. Cambridge, UK and New York: Cambridge University Press, 1996.Google Scholar
Parrot, D.Richelieu's Army: War, Government, and Society in France, 1624-1642. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2001.Google Scholar
Parry, V. J., and Yapp, M. E., eds. War, Technology, and Society in the Middle East. London: Oxford University Press, 1975.Google Scholar
Parthasarathi, P.Why Europe Grew Rich and Asia Did Not: Global Economic Divergence, 1600-1850. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2011.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Paul, M. C. “The Military Revolution in Russia, 1550-1682.” Journal of Military History 68, no. 1 (2004): 9–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Perdue, P. C.China Marches West: The Qing Conquest of Central Eurasia. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press, 2005.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pettegree, A. “Elizabethan Foreign Policy.” The Historical Journal 31, no. 4 (1988): 965–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pintner, W. M. “The Burden of Defense in Imperial Russia, 1725-1914.” Russian Review 43, no. 3 (1984): 231–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Powell, R. “Guns, Butter, and Anarchy.” The American Political Science Review 87, no. 1 (1993): 115–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pryor, J. R.Geography, Technology, War: Studies in the Maritime History of the Mediterranean, 649-1571. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1988.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reischauer, E. O., Fairbank, J. K., and Craig, A. M.. A History of East Asian Civilization. Boston: Houghton Mifflin, 1960.Google Scholar
Rodger, N. A. M.The Command of the Ocean: A Naval History of Britain, 1649-1815. New York: W. W. Norton & Company, 2004.Google Scholar
Rossabi, M. “The Ming and Inner Asia.” In The Cambridge History of China, Volume 8, edited by Twitchett, D. C. and Mote, F. W., 221–71. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1998.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roy, K. “The Hybrid Military Establishment of the East India company in South Asia: 1750-1849.” Journal of Global History 6, no. 2 (2011):195–218.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roy, T. “Rethinking the Origins of British India: State Formation and Military-Fiscal Undertakings in an Eighteenth-Century World Region.” Beijing, Centre for China in the World Economy, Tsinghua University, 2010.Google Scholar
Schroeder, P.The Transformation of European Politics, 1763-1848. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1994.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, T. C. “The Land Tax in the Tokugawa Period.” The Journal of Asian Studies 18, no. 1 (1958): 3–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sng, T.-H. “Size and Dynastic Decline: The Principal Agent Problem in Late Imperial China, 1700-1850.” Unpublished Manuscript, Princeton University, Niehaus Center for Globalization and Governance, 2011.Google Scholar
Sonnino, P., ed. Louis XIV King of France and of Navarre: Mémoires for the Instruction of the Dauphin. New York, Free Press, 1970.Google Scholar
Spence, J. D.To Change China: Western Advisers in China, 1620-1960. Boston: Little Brown, 1969.Google Scholar
Stearns, P. N., ed. The Encyclopedia of World History. Boston: Houghton Mifflin, 2001.Google Scholar
Stein, B. “State Formation and Economy Reconsidered.” Modern Asian Studies 19, no. 3 (1984): 387–413.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Subrahmanyam, S. “The Kagemusha Effect: The Portuguese Firearms and the State in Early Modern South India.” Moyen Orient et Océan Indien, XVIe-XIXe siècles 4 (1987): 97–123.Google Scholar
Tilly, C.Coercion, Capital, and European States, AD 990-1990. Cambridge, MA: Blackwell, 1990.Google Scholar
Totman, C. “Review of Giving Up the Gun: Japan's Reversion to the Sword, 1543-1879. By Noel Perrin.” The Journal of Asian Studies 39, no. 3 (May 1980): 599–601.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Väth, A.Johann Adam Schall von Bell S. J. Missionar in China, kaiserlicher Astronom und Ratgeber am Hofe von Peking, 1592-1666. Nettetal: Steyler Verlag, 1991.Google Scholar
Waley-Cohen, J. “China and Western Technology in the Late Eighteenth Century.” The American Historical Review 98, no. 5 (1993): 1525–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Washbrook, David.. “Progress and Problems: South Asian Economic and Social History, c. 1720-1860.” Modern Asian Studies 22, no. 1 (1988): 57–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Williams, R.The Works of Sir Roger Williams. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1972.Google Scholar
Wright, Q.A Study of War. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1942.Google Scholar
Wrigley, E. A., and Schofield, R. S.. The Population History of England, 1541-1871: A Reconstruction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1989.Google Scholar