Hostname: page-component-6bf8c574d5-h6jzd Total loading time: 0.001 Render date: 2025-02-24T13:24:21.369Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Economics and the Modern Economic Historian

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  16 December 2015

Ran Abramitzky
Ran Abramitzky*
Affiliation:
Ran Abramitzky is Associate Professor, Department of Economics, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305-6072. E-mail: [email protected].
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Essays—The Future of Economic History
Information
The Journal of Economic History , Volume 75 , Issue 4 , December 2015 , pp. 1240 - 1251
Copyright
Copyright © The Economic History Association 2015 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

A longer version of this essay with more tables, Figures and citations can be found on my website and as NBER working paper. I would like to thank Martha Bailey, Ann Carlos, and Paul Rhode for organizing the session, and Daron Acemoglu, Leah Boustan, Tim Bresnahan, Davide Cantoni, Liran Einav, Matthew Gentzkow, Claudia Goldin, Avner Greif, Phil Hoffman, Pete Klenow, Aprajit Mahajan, Joel Mokyr, Kaivan Munshi, Suresh Naidu, Santiago Pérez, and Gavin Wright for useful discussions. I am grateful to Santiago Pérez for superb research assistance and to Aditya Kanukurthy for help with data collection.

References

REFERENCES

Acemoglu, Daron, Johnson, Simon, and Robinson, James. “The Colonial Origins of Comparative Development: An Empirical Investigation.” American Economic Review 91, no. 5 (2001): 1369–401.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ackerberg, Daniel A. and Botticini, Maristella. “Endogenous Matching and the Empirical Determinants of Contract Form.” Journal of Political Economy 110, no. 3 (2002): 564–91.Google Scholar
Alsan, Marcella. “The Effect of the TseTse Fly on African Development.” American Economic Review 105, no. 1 (2015): 382–410.Google Scholar
Angrist, Joshua D., and Pischke, Jörn-Steffen. “The Credibility Revolution in Empirical Economics: How Better Research Design Is Taking the Con out of Econometrics.” Journal of Economic Perspectives 24, no. 2 (2010): 3–30.Google Scholar
Arrow, Kenneth J. “Economic History: A Necessary Though Not Sufficient Condition for an Economist: Maine and Texas.” American Economic Review 75, no. 2 (1985): 320–23.Google Scholar
Bailey, Martha, and Andrew, Goodman-Bacon. “The War on Poverty's Experiment in Public Medicine: The Impact of Community Health Centers on the Mortality of Older Americans.”American Economic Review, 2015.Google Scholar
Banerjee, Abhijit V., Besley, Timothy, and Guinnane, Timothy W.. “Thy Neighbor's Keeper: The Design of a Credit Cooperative with Theory and a Test.” Quarterly Journal of Economics 109, no. 2 (1994): 491–515.Google Scholar
Bates, Robert H., Greif, Avner, Levi, Margaret, et al. . Analytic Narratives. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1998.Google Scholar
Bleakley, Hoyt. “Disease and Development: Evidence from Hookworm Eradication in the American South.” Quarterly Journal of Economics 122, no. 1 (2007): 73–117.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chetty, Raj. “Yes, Economics Is a Science.” The New York Times, 2013.Google Scholar
Collins, William J., and Wanamaker, Marianne H.. “Selection and Economic Gains in the Great Migration of African Americans: New Evidence from Linked Census Data.” American Economic Journal: Applied Economics 6, no. 1 (2014): 220–52.Google Scholar
Dittmar, Jeremiah E. and Seabold, Skipper. “Media, Markets and Institutional Change: The Protestant Reformation.” 2015. Available at http://www.voxeu.org/article/media-markets-and-institutional-change-evidence-protestant-reformation.Google Scholar
Donaldson, David. “Railroads of the Raj: Estimating the Impact of Transportation Infrastructure.” American Economic Review. Forthcoming, 2015.Google Scholar
Edelstein, Dan. “Intellectual History and Digital Humanities.” Modern Intellectual History. Cambridge University Press, 2015.Google Scholar
Falk, Armin and Heckman, James. “Lab Experiments are a Major Source of Knowledge in the Social Sciences.” Science 326, no. 5952 (2009): 535–8.Google Scholar
Feigenbaum, James. “Automated Census Record Linking.” Working Paper, 2015.Google Scholar
Frydman, Carola, Hilt, Eric, and Zhou, Lily Y.. “Economic Effects of Runs on Early Shadow Banks: Trust Companies and the Panic of 1907.” Journal of Political Economy. Forthcoming 2015.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gentzkow, Matthew, Glaeser, Edward, and Goldin, Claudia. “The Rise of the Fourth Estate: How Newspapers Became Informative and Why It Mattered.” In Corruption and Reform: Lessons from America's History, edited by Glaeser, Edward L. and Goldin, Claudia, pp. 187–230. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press, 2006.Google Scholar
Gentzkow, Matthew, Shapiro, Jesse M., and Michael Sinkinson. “Competition and Ideological Diversity: Historical Evidence from US Newspapers.” American Economic Review 104, no. 10 (2014): 3073–114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goldin, Claudia. The Gender Gap: An Economic History of American Women. New York: Cambridge University Press, 1990.Google Scholar
Goldin, Claudia. “A Grand Gender Convergence: Its Last Chapter.” American Economic Review 104, no. 4 (2014): 1091–119.Google Scholar
Greif, Avner. “Cliometrics After Forty Years.” American Economic Review 87, no. 2 (1997): 400–3.Google Scholar
Hamermesh, Daniel S. “Six Decades of Top Economics Publishing: Who and How?” Journal of Economic Literature 51, no. 1 (2013): 162–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hanlon, W. Walker. “Necessity Is the Mother of Invention: Input Supplies and Directed Technical Change.” Econometrica 83, no. 1 (2015): 67–100.Google Scholar
Hornbeck, Richard and Naidu, Suresh. “When the Levee Breaks: Black Migration and Economic Development in the American South.” American Economic Review 104, no. 3 (2014): 963–90.Google Scholar
Klamer, Arjo. “An Accountant among Economists: Conversations with Sir John R. Hicks.” Journal of Economic Perspectives 3, no. 4 (1989): 167–80.Google Scholar
Koudijs, Peter. “The Boats That Did Not Sail: Asset Price Volatility in a Natural Experiment.” Journal of Finance. Forthcoming, 2015.Google Scholar
Lamoreaux, Naomi. “The Future of Economic History Must Be Interdisciplinary.” Journal of Economic History 75, no. 4 (2015): 1251–1257.Google Scholar
Lyons, John S., Cain, Louis P., and Williamson, Samuel H., eds. Reflections on the Cliometrics Revolution: Conversations with Economic Historians. Routledge Explorations in Economic History series. London, U.K.: Routledge, 2008.Google Scholar
Margo, Robert. “Review of A Farewell to Alms: A Brief Economic History of the World.” Mimeo, 2008.Google Scholar
McCloskey, Deirdre N. “Does the Past Have Useful Economics?” Journal of Economic Literature 14, no. 2 (1976): 434–61.Google Scholar
Mill, Roy. “Assessing Individual-Level Record Linkage between Historical Datasets.” Working Paper, 2012.Google Scholar
Mokyr, Joel. “The Oxford Encyclopedia of Economic History” (Vol. 1). New York, NY: Oxford University Press, 2003.Google Scholar
Parker, William Nelson. Economic History and the Modern Economist. Hoboken, NJ: Blackwell Publishers, 1986.Google Scholar
Redding, Stephen J., and Sturm, Daniel M.. “The Costs of Remoteness: Evidence from German Division and Reunification.” American Economic Review 98, no. 5 (2008): 1766–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rhode, Paul W., and Strumpf, Koleman S.. “Assessing the Importance of Tiebout Sorting: Local Heterogeneity from 1850 to 1990.” American Economic Review 93, no. 5 (2003): 1648–77.Google Scholar
Richardson, Gary and Troost, William. “Monetary Intervention Mitigated Banking Panics during the Great Depression: Quasi-experimental Evidence from a Federal Reserve District Border, 1929–1933.” Journal of Political Economy 117, no. 6 (2009): 1031–73.Google Scholar
Solow, Robert M. “Economic History and Economics.” American Economic Review 75, no. 2 (1985): 328–31.Google Scholar
Stiglitz, Joseph. “Incentives and Risk Sharing in Sharecropping.” The Review of Economic Studies 41, no. 2 (1974): 219–55.Google Scholar
Temin, Peter. “The Rise and Fall of Economic History at MIT.” Cambridge, MA: Department of Economics, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, 2013.Google Scholar
Waldinger, Fabian. “Peer Effects in Science: Evidence from the Dismissal of Scientists in Nazi Germany.” Review of Economic Studies 79, no. 2 (2012): 838–61.Google Scholar
Wright, Gavin. 2015. “Quantitative Economic History in the United States.” In International Encyclopedia of the Social & Behavioral Sciences, 2nd edition, edited by Wright, D. James. pp. 55–60. Elsevier Science, 2015.CrossRefGoogle Scholar