Article contents
Economic Growth in Colonial New England: “Statistical Renaissance”
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 11 May 2010
Abstract
During the past few years new measures of growth have begun to emerge for the colonial period in American history which allow us to understand more fully the pace and pattern of long-run economic growth. This essay summarizes what we know about colonial growth and discusses rates of growth during the seventeenth and eighteenth centuries. After summarizing previous work on the subject, the paper estimates eighteenth-century agricultural productivity in one New England county. Data on total wealth, livestock, crops, land, and agricultural capital are generated from estate inventories. A consumer price index for the period also is constructed. From these data it appears that the seventeenth century experienced growth comparable to modern times, whereas the eighteenth century was a bleak period in our history. Although real wealth per inventory grew at a rate of 0.5 percent per year during the eighteenth century, agricultural productivity declined at a rate of 0.8 percent.
- Type
- Papers Presented at the Thirty-Eighth Annual Meeting of the Economic History Association
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © The Economic History Association 1979
References
1 U.S. Bureau of the Census, Historical Statistics of the United States, Colonial Times to 1970, 1 and 2 (Washington, D.C., 1976).Google Scholar
2 For examples of more recent work on colonial population see Anderson, Terry L. and Thomas, Robert Paul, “White Population, Labor Force, and Extensive Growth of the New England Economy in the Seventeenth Century,” This JOURNAL, 33 (09. 1972)Google Scholar; and “The Growth of Population and Labor Force in the nth-Century Chesapeake,” Explorations in Economic History, 15 (06 1978)Google Scholar; Land, Aubrey C., Green, Lois, and Papenfuse, Edward C., eds., Law, Society, and Politics in Early Maryland (Baltimore, 1977)Google Scholar; Smith, Daniel Scott, “The Demographic History of Colonial New England,” this JOURNAL, 32 (03. 1972), 165–83;Google Scholarand Smith, Daniel Blake, “Mortality and Family in the Colonial Chesapeake,” Journal of Interdisciplinary History, 8 (Winter 1978)Google Scholar.
3 For the pathbreaking work in this area see Jones, Alice Hanson, “Wealth Estimates for the American Middle Colonies, 1774,” Economic Development and Cultural Change, 18 (06 1970)Google Scholar; “Wealth Estimates for the New England Colonies about 1770,” this JOURNAL, 32 (03. 1972)Google Scholar; and American Colonial Wealth: Documents and Methods (New York, 1977).Google ScholarAlso see Anderson, Terry L., “Wealth Estimates for the New England Colonies, 1650-1709,” Explorations in Economic History, 12 (1975), 151–76;Google ScholarKelly, Kevin Peter, “Economic and Social Development of Seventeenth-Century Surry County, Virginia,” unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, University of Washington, 1972Google Scholar; Main, Gloria Lund, “Personal Wealth in Colonial America: Explorations in the Use of Probate Records from Maryland and Massachusetts, 1650-1720,” unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, Columbia University, 1970Google Scholar; and Menard, Russell Robert, “Economy and Society in Early Colonial Maryland,” unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, University of Iowa, 1975Google Scholar.
4 Kuznets, Simon, “Long-Term Changes in the National Income of the United States of America since 1870,” in Income and Wealth of the United States, Trends and Structure (Baltimore, 1952).Google Scholar
5 Gallman, Robert E., “Estimates of American National Product Made Before the Civil War,” Economic Development and Cultural Change, 9 (04. 1961),Google Scholarand “The Pace and Pattern of American Economic Growth,” in Davis, Lance E., Easterlin, Richard, Parker, William, et al., American Economic Growth (New York, 1972)Google Scholar.
6 David, Paul A., “New Light on a Statistical Dark Age: U.S. Real Product Growth before 1840,” American Economic Review, 57 (05 1967)Google Scholar; and “The Growth of Real Product in the United States before 1840: New Evidence and Controlled Conjectures,” this JOURNAL, 27 (05 1967)Google Scholar.
7 Goldsmith, Raymond W., “Long Period Growth in Income and Product, 1839-1960,” in Andreano, Ralph, New Views of American Economic Development (Cambridge, Mass., 1965). For the use this graphGoogle Scholarsee North, Douglass C., Growth and Welfare in the American Past (Englewood Cliffs, N.J 1974), p. 27Google Scholar.
8 , Goldsmith, “Long Period Growth,” p. 355.Google Scholar
9 Taylor, George Rogers, “American Growth Before 1840: An Exploratory Essay,” this JOURNAL, 24 (12. 1964), 429.Google Scholar
10 , Gallman, “The Pace and Pattern,” p. 22.Google Scholar
11 See footnote 3.
12 , Kelly, “Economic and Social Development of Seventeenth-Century Surry County,” pp. 242–43.Google Scholar
13 , Main, “Personal Wealth in Colonial America,” p. 93.Google Scholar
14 , Menard, “Economy and Society,” p. 320.Google Scholar
15 Anderson, Terry L. and Thomas, Robert Paul, “Economic Growth in the Seventeenth-Century Chesapeake Colonies,” Explorations in Economic History, 15 (09. 1978).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
16 , Main, “Personal Wealth in Colonial America,” p. 308.Google Scholar
17 , Anderson, “Wealth Estimates for the New England Colonies,” p. 171.Google Scholar
18 Anderson, Terry L., The Economic Growth of Seventeenth-Century New England (New York, 1975), p. 114.Google Scholar
19 , Taylor, “American Growth Before 1840,” p. 429.Google Scholar
20 See , Gallman, “The Pace and Pattern,” p. 20.Google Scholar
21 , Anderson, The Economic Growth, p. 112.Google Scholar
22 , Anderson, The Economic Growth, p. 117.Google Scholar
23 , Gallman, “The Pace and Pattern,” p. 22.Google Scholar
24 , David, “The Growth of Real Product.”Google Scholar
25 McCusker, John J., “Sources of Investment Capital in the Colonial Philadelphia Shipping Industry,” this JOURNAL, 32 (03. 1972), 155.Google Scholar
26 Egnal, Marc, “The Economic Development of the Thirteen Continental Colonies, 1720 to 1775,” William and Mary Quarterly, 3rd Series, 32 (04. 1975), 200.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
27 Ball, Duane E. and Walton, Gary M., “Agricultural Productivity Change in Eighteenth-Century Pennsylvania,” this JOURNAL, 36 (03. 1976), 114.Google Scholar
28 Ibid., p. 116.
29 For an excellent example of measuring agricultural factor productivity see Gallman, Robert E., “Changes in Total U.S. Agricultural Factor Productivity in the Nineteenth Century,” Agricultural History, 46 (1972)Google Scholar.
30 , Main, “Personal Wealth in Colonial America,” p. 239.Google Scholar
31 Greene, Evarts B. and Harrington, Virginia D., American Population Before the Federal Census of 1790 (Gloucester, Mass., 1966), p. 21.Google Scholar
32 For a discussion of the trade between the interior counties and the coast, see Bidwell, Percy Wells and Falconer, John I., History of Agriculture in the Northern United States 1620-1860 (Washington, D.C., 1925), pp. 141–42Google Scholar.
33 , Anderson., “Wealth Estimates for the New England Colonies,” p. 162,Google Scholarand , Jones, “Wealth Estimates for the New England Colonies,” p. 126Google Scholar.
34 , Jones, “Wealth Estimates for the New England Colonies,” p. 114.Google Scholar
35 , Anderson, “Wealth Estimates for the New England Colonies,” pp. 156–57.Google Scholar
36 For detailed discussion of the problems with the use of probates see Jones, “Wealth Estimates for the American Middle Colonies”; and Main, “Personal Wealth in Colonial America.”
37 , Gallman, “The Pace and Pattern,” p. 20Google Scholar; and , Anderson, “Wealth Estimates for the New England Colonies,” p. 162Google Scholar.
38 , Egnal, “The Economic Development of the Thirteen Continental Colonies,” p. 200.Google Scholar
39 , Goldsmith, “Long Period Growth,” p. 355.Google Scholar
40 , Taylor, “American Growth Before 1840,” p. 429.Google Scholar
41 See , Gallman, “Agricultural Factor Productivity,” p. 192.Google Scholar
42 Lockridge, Kenneth, “Land, Population and the Evolution of New England Society 1630-1790,” Past and Present, 39 (04. 1968), 80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
43 Note that Jones finds the same number of slaves, American Colonial Wealth, p. 1789.Google Scholar
44 , Bidwell and , Falconer, “History of Agriculture,” p. 116. Also see p. 163.Google Scholar
45 Ibid., p. 33.
46 Ibid., pp. 116-17.
47 This procedure is similar to that used by , Ball and , Walton, “Agricultural Productivity Change,” pp. 108–09Google Scholar.
48 Although the use of completed family size as a proxy for the size of all families has been criticized by Menard, Russell R., “Comment on Paper by Ball and Walton,” this JOURNAL, 36 (03. 1976), 120, it is the only proxy available for this period and must stand until further demographic studies are madeGoogle Scholar.
49 , Anderson, The Economic Growth, p. 112.Google Scholar
50 , Egnal, “The Economic Development of the Thirteen Continental Colonies,” p. 200.Google Scholar
- 16
- Cited by