Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dsjbd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T15:56:38.396Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Dissertation Comments

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 May 2010

Gavin Wright
Affiliation:
University of Michigan
Paul M. Hohenberg
Affiliation:
Sir George Williams University

Abstract

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Papers Presented at the Thirty-third Annual Meeting of the Economic History Association
Copyright
Copyright © The Economic History Association 1974

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Lockridge's, K. work on “Land, Population, and the Evolution of New England Society,” in Past and Present, 39 (1968), 6280Google Scholar, stresses land scarcity as a colonial reality. But he treats the late colonial period, by contrast with an earlier time of land abundance, and focuses on eastern Massachusetts, with more people and perhaps less good soil than Hampshire County. As he points out, and this is relevant to Leet's work especially, the crucial issue is probably not land scarcity as such but apparent reluctance to migrate toward the frontier. I return to this point below.