Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dzt6s Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-18T02:31:56.757Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Discussion*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 February 2011

Eugene Smolensky
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Discussion
Information
The Journal of Economic History , Volume 23 , Issue 4 , December 1963 , pp. 472 - 476
Copyright
Copyright © The Economic History Association 1963

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Undoubtedly, historically, Temin must have started with the compositional change and moved to the identification problem. I think it fair to say, though, that in the paper the methodology is what emerges as central and the facts as subsidiary.

2 See Dorothy S. Brady, “Relative Price Movements,” to be published in a forthcoming issue of this Journal.

3 Chamberlin, Edward, The Theory of Monopolistic Competition (Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1963).Google Scholar