Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-hc48f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T17:59:13.488Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Discussion

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 May 2010

David Feeny  and
Cynthia Taft Morris
David Feeny
Affiliation:
McMaster University and Northeastern University
Cynthia Taft Morris
Affiliation:
The American University
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Papers Presented at the Thirty-Ninth Annual Meeting of the Economic History Association
Information
The Journal of Economic History , Volume 40 , Issue 1 , March 1980 , pp. 119 - 122
Copyright
Copyright © The Economic History Association 1980

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 “See Jones, Ronald W., “A Three-Factor Model in Theory, Trade, and History,” in Bhagwati, Jagdish N., et al., eds., Trade, Balance of Payments and Growth: Papers in International Economics in Honor of Charles P. Kindleberger (Amsterdam, 1971), pp. 3–21Google Scholar.

2 Such a model can be found in Hueckel, Glenn R., “The Napoleonic Wars and Their Impact on Factor Returns and Output Growth in England, 1793–1815” (Ph.D. diss., Univ. of Wisconsin-Madison, 1972Google Scholar).

3 Kuznets, Simon, Modern Economic Growth: Rate, Structure, and Spread (New Haven, 1966), p. 1.Google Scholar