Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-4rdpn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-03T08:27:37.725Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Delivering the Vote: The Political Effect of Free Mail Delivery in Early Twentieth Century America

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  30 August 2016

Elisabeth Ruth Perlman  and
Steven Sprick Schuster
Elisabeth Ruth Perlman
Affiliation:
Elisabeth Ruth Perlman is Ph.D. Candidate, Department of Economics, Boston University, 270 Bay State Road, Boston, MA 02215. E-mail: [email protected].
Steven Sprick Schuster
Affiliation:
Steven Sprick Schuster is Assistant Professor, Department of Economics, Colgate University, 13 Oak Drive, Hamilton, NY, 13346. E-mail: [email protected].
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The rollout of Rural Free Delivery (RFD) in the early twentieth century dramatically increased the frequency with which rural voters received information. This article examines the effect of RFD on voters' and Representatives' behavior using a panel dataset and instrumental variables. Communities receiving more routes spread their votes to more parties; there is no evidence it changed turnout. RFD shifted positions taken by Representatives in line with rural constituents, including increased support for pro-temperance and anti-immigration policies. These results appear only in counties with newspapers, supporting the hypothesis that information flows play a crucial role in the political process.

“As the whole world has been drawn closer together by the inventions and uses of steam and electricity, so farmers may be drawn closer together by the universal practice of free delivery.”

—Matthew Williams of Verndale, Minnesota as quoted in the 1900 Yearbook of the United States Department of Agriculture

Type
Articles
Information
The Journal of Economic History , Volume 76 , Issue 3 , September 2016 , pp. 769 - 802
Copyright
Copyright © The Economic History Association 2016 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

We are extremely grateful to Laurent Bouton, Bob Margo, Carola Frydman, Daniele Paserman, Florian Ploeckl, Richard Baker, Claudio Ferraz, Debbie Goldschmidt, Nate Young, Briana Sprick Schuster, Peter Sims, Matt Berntsen, Ross Corliss, James Feigenbaum, anonymous referees, and numerous seminar participants for their helpful ideas, advice, and comments. All errors are our own.

References

REFERENCES

Angrist, Joshua D., Imbens, Guido W., and Rubin, Donald B.. “Identification of Causal Effects Using Instrumental Variables.” Journal of the American Statistical Association 91, no. 434 1996: 444–55.Google Scholar
Bemidji [MN] Daily Pioneer, 25 October 1904. Chronicling America: Historic American Newspapers, http://chroniclingamerica.loc.gov/.Google Scholar
Blair, Harry. “Participation and Accountability at the Periphery: Democratic Local Governance in Six Countries.” World Development 28, no. 1 2000: 21–39.Google Scholar
Bowden, Roger J. “Repeated Sampling in the Presence of Publication Effects.” Journal of the American Statistical Association 82, no. 398 1987: 476–84.Google Scholar
Browning, Raymond C., Baker, Emily A., Herron, Jessica A., et. al. “Effects of Obesity and Sex on the Energetic Cost and Preferred Speed of Walking.” Journal of Applied Physiology 100, no. 2 2006: 390–98.Google Scholar
Buck, Solon Justus. The Granger Movement: A Study of Agricultural Organization and Its Political, Economic, and Social Manifestations, 1870–1880. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1913.Google Scholar
Carpenter, Daniel. “State Building through Reputation Building: Coalitions of Esteem and Program Innovation in the National Postal System, 1883–1913.” Studies in American Political Development 14 (Fall 2000: 121–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carson, Jamie L., and Jenkins, Jeffery A.. “Examining the Electoral Connection across Time.” Annual Review of Political Science 14 2011: 25–46.Google Scholar
Chiang, Chun-Fang, and Knight, Brian. “Media Bias and Influence: Evidence from Newspaper Endorsements.” Review of Economic Studies 78, no. 3 2011: 795–820.Google Scholar
Clubb, Jerome M., Flanigan, William H., and Zingale, Nancy H.. Electoral Data for Counties in the United States: Presidential and Congressional Races, 1840–1972 [Computer File]. 2006.Google Scholar
Condorcet, Nicolas de. Essay on the Application of Analysis to the Probability of Majority Decisions. Paris: 1785.Google Scholar
DellaVigna, Stefano, and Kaplan, Ethan. “The Fox News Effect: Media Bias and Voting.” Quarterly Journal of Economics 122, no. 3 2007: 1187–234.Google Scholar
Engs, Ruth C. The Progressive Era's Health Reform Movement: A Historical Dictionary. Westport, CT: Praeger Publishers, 2003.Google Scholar
Engstrom, Erik J. “The Rise and Decline of Turnout in Congressional Elections: Electoral Institutions, Competition, and Strategic Mobilization.” American Journal of Political Science 56, no. 2 2012: 373–86.Google Scholar
Enikolopov, Ruben, Petrova, Maria, and Zhuravskaya, Ekaterina. “Media and Political Persuasion: Evidence from Russia.” American Economic Review 101, no. 7 2009: 3253–85.Google Scholar
Falck, Oliver, Gold, Robert, and Heblich, Stephan. “E-lections: Voting Behavior and the Internet.” American Economic Review 104, no. 7 2014: 2238–65.Google Scholar
Feddersen, Timothy J., and Pesendorfer, Wolfgang. “The Swing Voter's Curse.” American Economic Review 86, no. 3 1996: 404–24.Google Scholar
Feigenbaum, James J., and Rotemberg, Martin. “Information and Investment: Impacts of the Introduction of Rural Free Delivery.” Unpublished Manuscript, n.d.Google Scholar
Fuller, Wayne Edison. “Good Roads and Rural Free Delivery of Mail.” Mississippi Valley Historical Review 42, no. 1 1955: 67–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fuller, Wayne Edison. “The South and Rural Free Delivery of Mail.” Journal of Southern History 25, no. 4 1959: 499–521.Google Scholar
Fuller, Wayne Edison. RFD: The Changing Face of Rural America. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press, 1964.Google Scholar
Gentzkow, Matthew, Glaeser, Edward L., and Goldin, Claudia. “The Rise of the Fourth Estate: How Newspapers Became Informative and Why It Mattered.” In Corruption and Reform: Lessons from America's Economic History, edited by Glaeser, Edward L. and Goldin, Claudia, 187–230. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2006.Google Scholar
Gentzkow, Matthew, Shapiro, Jesse M., and Sinkinson, Michael. “The Effect of Newspaper Entry and Exit on Electoral Politics.” American Economic Review 101, no. 7 2011, 2980–3018.Google Scholar
Gentzkow, Matthew, Shapiro, Jesse M., and Sinkinson, Michael. Number and Circulation of US Daily Newspapers by City and Political Affiliation, 1869–2004 [Computer File]. 2012.Google Scholar
Gerber, Alan S., Karlan, Dean, and Bergan, Daniel. “Does the Media Matter? A Field Experiment Measuring the Effect of Newspapers on Voting Behavior and Political Opinions.” American Economic Journal: Applied Economics 1, no. 2 2009: 35–52.Google Scholar
Greathouse, Charles H. “Free Delivery of Rural Mails.” In Yearbook of the Department of Agriculture 1900, 513–528 Washington, D.C.: GPO, 1901.Google Scholar
Haines, Michael R. Historical, Demographic, Economic, and Social Data: The United States, 1790–2002 [Computer File]. 2010.Google Scholar
Hornbeck, Richard. “Barbed Wire: Property Rights and Agricultural Development.” Quarterly Journal of Economics 125, no. 2 2010: 767–810.Google Scholar
Kernell, Samuel. “Rural Free Delivery as a Critical Test of Alternative Models of American Political Development.” Studies in American Political Development 15, no. 1 2001: 103–12.Google Scholar
Kernell, Samuel, and Jacobson, Gary C.. “Congress and the Presidency as News in the Nineteenth Century.” Journal of Politics 49 1987: 1016–35.Google Scholar
Kernell, Samuel, and McDonald, Michael P.. “Congress and America's Political Development: The Transformation of the Post Office from Patronage to Service.” American Journal of Political Science 43, no. 3 1999: 792–811.Google Scholar
Lipset, Seymour Martin. “Some Social Requisites of Democracy: Economic Development and Political Legitimacy.” American Political Science Review 53, no. 1 1959: 69–105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mayhew, David. The Electoral Connection. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 1974.Google Scholar
McKibbin, Carroll. Roster of United States Congressional Officeholders and Biographical Characteristics of Members of the United States Congress, 1789–1996: Merged Data [Computer File]. 1997.Google Scholar
Mehrabian, Albert. “Effects of Poll Reports on Voter Preferences.” Journal of Applied Social Psychology 28, no. 23 1998: 2119–30.Google Scholar
N. W. Ayer & Son. N. W. Ayer & Son's American Newspaper Annual: Containing a Catalogue of American Newspapers, a List of All Newspapers of the United States and Canada. Philadelphia, PA: N. W. Ayer & Son, 1900.Google Scholar
Poole, Keith T., and Rosenthal, Howard. “D-Nominate After 10 Years: A Comparative Update to Congress: A Political-Economic History of Roll-Call Voting.” Legislative Studies Quarterly 26, no. 1 2001: 5–29.Google Scholar
Post Office Department. Rural Free Delivery: Its History and Development. Extracts from the Annual Report of First Assistant Postmaster-General Perry S. Heath for the Fiscal Year Ended June 30, 1899. Washington, D.C.: GPO, 1899.Google Scholar
Post Office Department. United States Official Postal Guide. Albany, NY: J. B. Lyon Company, Printers, 1908.Google Scholar
Prat, Andrea, and Strömberg, David. “The Political Economy of Mass Media.” Unpublished Manuscript, February 2011.Google Scholar
Schaffer, Mark E. xtivreg2: Stata Module to Perform Extended IV/2SLS, GMM and AC/HAC, LIML and k-class Regression for Panel Data Models [Computer File]. 2010.Google Scholar
Simon, Herbert A. “Bandwagon and Underdog Effects and the Possibility of Election Predictions.” Public Opinion Quarterly 18, no. 3 1954: 245–53.Google Scholar
Stone, Roy. State Laws Relating to the Management of Roads Enacted in 1888–1893. U.S. Department of Agriculture. Washington, D.C.: GPO, 1894.Google Scholar
Stone, Roy. State Laws Relating to the Management of Roads Enacted in 1894–1895. U.S. Department of Agriculture. Washington, D.C.: GPO, 1896.Google Scholar
Strömberg, David. “Radio's Impact on Public Spending.” Quarterly Journal of Economics 119, no. 1 2004: 189–221.Google Scholar
Strömberg, David, and Synder, James M.. “Press Coverage and Political Accountability.” Journal of Political Economy 118, no. 2 2010: 355–408.Google Scholar
Upton, Jacob Kendrick. Report on Wealth, Debt and Taxation at the Eleventh Census, 1890. Part II: Valuation and Taxation. Washington, D.C.: GPO, 1895.Google Scholar
U.S. Committee on the Post Office and Post Road. Post Office Appropriation Bill. Post Office Appropriation Bill, 1912: Hearings Before The Committee On The Post Office And Post Roads, House Of Representatives. December, 1910. Washington, D.C.: GPO, 1912.Google Scholar
U.S. Department of Agriculture. “Appendix: Free Delivery of Rural Mails.” In Yearbook of the Department of Agriculture, 1902, 746–47. Washington, D.C.: GPO, 1903.Google Scholar
Woolcock, Michael. “The Place of Social Capital in Understanding Social and Economic Outcomes.” Canadian Journal of Policy Research 2, no. 1 2001: 11–17.Google Scholar
Wooldridge, Jeremy M. Econometric Analysis of Cross Section and Panel Data. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 2006.Google Scholar
Supplementary material: PDF

Perlman and Schuster supplementary material

Online Appendix

Download Perlman and Schuster supplementary material(PDF)
PDF 105.9 KB