Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-q99xh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T18:01:37.043Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Community and Growth: Muddling Through with Russian Credit Cooperatives

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 May 2010

Anita B. Baker
Anita B. Baker
Affiliation:
University of Utah
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This article examines the evolution of the Russian government's policies between 1861 and 1917 in the sphere of rural credit, especially the extent to which social and cultural factors and ministerial politics impinged on the choice of banks and their development. Discussions concerned measures for economic change that could take place within the traditional and legal framework of the village community. The Ministry of Interior supported a classbased estate bank. The Ministry of Finance opted for the cooperative credit association which was to foster rural pacification and agricultural development by mobilizing peasant collective habits and private initiative that favored cooperative organizations.

Type
Papers Presented at the Thirty-Sixth Annual Meeting of the Economic History Association
Information
The Journal of Economic History , Volume 37 , Issue 1 , March 1977 , pp. 139 - 160
Copyright
Copyright © The Economic History Association 1977

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Information on the problems of rural banking is based on “Istoricheskii obzor i sovremennoe polozhenie uchrezhdenii melkogo kredita v rossii,” Central State Historical Archives (TsGIA), Leningrad, f. 1233, op. 1 (1902), d. 45, pp. 1–6–; “Kratkaia zapiska o sel'skoi kredite v rossii,” f. 583, op. 19 (1892), d. 61, pp. 282–96; “Sravnitel'nye dannye o razvitii melkogo kredita na 1 ianvaria 1910 i 1912 gg., i material'nogo sodeistvii pravitel'stva etomu kreditu,” f. 582, op. 6, d. 486. The reports of 49 provinces on small credit presented to Witte's Special Conference were published in Borodaevskii, S. V., ed., Kredit: Svod trudov komitetov po 49 guberniiakh evropeiskoi rossii (St. Petersburg, 1904), pp. 183–219, 1–26Google Scholar. An excellent source on the yearly developments in rural banking are the accounts (Otchety) of the Komiteta o sel'skikh, ssudosberegatel'nykh i promyshlennykh tovarishchestvakh of the Imperial Moscow Agricultural Society, St. Petersburg, 29 accounts, 1873–1914, and the Ministry of Finance's Otchety o sostoianii kreditnykh tovarishchestv, ssudo-sberegatel'nykh i zemskikh kass melkogo kredita, St. Petersburg, 1907–1914.

2 Iakovlev, A. V., “Assotsiatsiia i artel',” Russkie obshchestvennye voprosy (St. Petersburg, 1872), p. 203.Google Scholar

3 “Zhurnaly zasedanii osobogo soveshchaniia po voprosu o melkom narodnom kredite. Zapiski, perepiska s razmenymi litsami po etomu zhe voprosu,” f. 1233, op. 1, (1902–03), d. 45, p. 487.

4 Borodaevskii, Svod trudov, p. 205.

5 “Po zakonoproektu ministerstva finansov ob ustroistve melkogo kredita,” f. 1152, op. 13, d. 446, p. 14.

6 Borodaevskii, Svod trudov, p. 203.

7 “Zhurnaly vysochaiishe uchrezhdennoi kommisii po peresmotru ustava gosudarstvennogo banka,” f. 583, op. 19 (1893), d. 61, p. 397.

8 Borodaevskii, Svod trudov, p. 215.

9 “Po proektu o sel'skikh kreditnykh uchrezhdeniiakh,” f. 1233, op. 1 (1902), d. 45, p. 4.

10 “Stenograficheskie protokoly zasedanii vysochaiische uchrezhdennoi osobogo soveshchaniia o nuzhdakh sel'sko-khoziaistvennoi promyshlennosti,” f. 1233, op. 1 (1902), d. 9, pp. 319–24. Laws are listed in “Istoricheskii obzor,” pp. 33–43.

11 Pervyi s'ezd predstavitelei ssudo-sberegatel' nykh tovarishchestv v Moskve 27 i 28 sentiabria, 1876 (Moscow, 1877), pp. 95–152.Google Scholar

12 Borodaevskii, Svod trudov, pp. 60–61.

13 Levitskii, N., “Den' i emblema kooperatsii,” Kooperativnaia zhizn', 7 (Apr. 10, 1914), 499–500.Google Scholar

14 Shishkin, M. D., lz vospominanii kooperativnykh i politicheskikh (New York, 1960), p. 8.Google Scholar

15 “Stenograficheskie protokoly,” p. 361.

16 Vasil'chikov, A. I. and Iakovlev, A. V., Mel'kii zemel'nyi kredit v rossii (St. Petersburg, 1876), p. 45.Google Scholar

17 “Vsepoddaneishii otchet saratovskogo gubernatora za 1902 god,” f. 1282, op. 3, d. 545, p. 4.

18 Schulze-Delitzsch, Herman, Die arbeitenden klassen und das genossenschaftswesen in Deutschland, vol. I (Berlin, 1909), p. 239Google Scholar. Vasil'chikov is quoted in Sokolovskii, P. A., Ssudosberegatel'nye tovarishchestva po otzyvam literatury (St. Petersburg, 1889), p. 221.Google Scholar

19 Istoricheskii obzor deiatel'nosti komiteta ministrov, vol. III (St. Petersburg, 1902), prilozhenie d, p. 290.Google Scholar

20 Doklad V. N. Khitrovo v III-ii otdelenii impetatorskogo vol'no-ekonomicheskogo obshchestva, 2 noiabria 1874 (St. Petersburg, 1874), pp. 1–20.Google Scholar

21 “Ob ustroistve sel'skikh bankov,” f. 1263, op. 1 (1865), d. 3160, p. 131; “Ob ustroistve sel'skikh bankov,” f. 1263, op. 1 (1871), d. 3242, pp. 231–41; “O poriadke uchrezhdeniia sel'skikh ssudo-sberegatel'nykh kass,” f. 1152, op. 1882 god, d. 651, pp. 3–10.

22 “O zarozhdenii i razvitii uchrezhdenii melkogo kredita v rossii,” f. 582, p. 6 (1917), d. 457, p. 3.

23 Chetyrnadtsatyi otchet komiteta o sel'skikh, ssudo-sberegatel'nykh i promyshlennykh tovarishchestvakh (St. Petersburg, 1889), pp. 1–4.Google Scholar

24 “O poriadke uchrezhdeniia sel'skikh ssudo-sberegatel'nykh kass,” f. 1160, op. 2, (1882), d. 309, pp. 536–38.

25 “O neobkhodimosti i zadachakh reformy gosudarstvennogo bánka,” Materialy i trudy kommissi po peresmotru ustava gosudarstvennogo banka, f. 583, op. 19 (1894), d. 61, pp. 1–85.

26 Witte explained his policy in “Ob ustroistve melkogo narodnogo kredita,” f. 1152, op. 12 (1895), d. 168, pp. 1–57 and “Ob'iasneniia ministra finansov po povodu zamechanii na proekt polozheniia ob uchrezhdeniiakh melkogo kredita,” ibid., pp. 171–88.

27 Quoted in “Dokladnaia zapiska. O merakh k razvitiiu uchrezhdenii melkogo kredita,” f. 582, op. 6 (1917), d. 457, p. 17.

28 “Otchet po deloproizvodstvu gosudarstvennogo soveta,” f. 1152, op. 12 (1895), d. 168, p. 729 and “Ob ustroistve melkogo kredita,” f. 1291, op. 3 (1895), pp. 24, 78.

29 “Stenograficheskie protokoly zasedanii vysochaiische uchrezhdennoi osobogo soveshchaniia o nuzhdakh sel'sko-khoziaistvennoi promyshlennosti,” f. 1233, op. 1 (1902), d. 9, p. 377.

30 “Protokoly zasedanii osobogo soveshchaniia. Delo ob organizatsii melkogo narodnogo kredita,” f. 1233, op. 1 (1903), d. 26, pp. 159–64.

31 “Stenograficheskie protokoly,” 1902, pp. 350, 363; and “Protokoly zasedaniia,” 1903, p. 135.

32 “Spravka po proektu. Ob ustroistve melkogo kredita,” f. 1152, op. 13 (1903), d. 446, pp. 109–10.

33 “Zhurnaly vysochaiische uchrezhdennoi kommissii po peresmotru ustava gosudarstvennogo banka,” f. 583, op. 19 (1895), d. 61, 363, and Witte, S. Iu., Zapiska po krestianskomu delu (St. Petersburg, 1904), pp. 108–09Google Scholar.

34 “Zapiska tainogo sovetnika Pleske ob organizatsii melkogo kredita,” f. 1233, op. 1, d. 49, pp. 2–4 and “Protokoly zasedanii,” 1902, p. 269.

35 “Po proektu o sel'skikh kreditnykh uchrezhdeniiakh,” p. 52.

36 “Stenograficheskie protokoly zasedanii,” 1903, p. 187.

37 “O raznoglasii mezhdu ministerstvami finansov i vnutrennykh del po nekotorym voprosam, otnosiashchimsia k delam melkogo kredita,” f. 1276, op. 2 (1906–07), d. 284.

38 “Materialy po osobennomu soveshchaniiu po zemledel'cheskomu kreditu,” f. 1291, op. 121 (1908), d. 141, p. 116; “Osoboe soveshchanie po melkomu kreditu,” f. 1291, op. 54 (1908–09), d. 14, p. 1.

39 “Zhurnal osobogo soveshchanii po melkomu kreditu,” f. 1291, op. 54, d. 4, pp. 20–21, 71; and “Materialy po osobennomu soveshchaniiu,” pp. 117–18.

40 “Dokladnaia zapiska. O merakh k razvitiiu,” pp. 1, 12, 45.

41 “Zhurnal zasedaniia komiteta po delam melkogo kredita 11 oktiabria 1904,” f. 582, op. 6, d. 476, p. 3.

42 “Osoboe soveshchanie po melkomu kreditu,” f. 1291, op. 54, d. 14, pp. 74–75.

43 Statisticheskii sbornik za 1913–1917, vol. VII, vypusk 2 (Moscow, 1922), p. 125.Google Scholar

44 “O merakh k razvitiiu uchrezdenii,” p. 8.

45 zemledeliia, Ministerstvo, Sbornik statistiko-ekonomicheskikh svedenii po sel'-skomu khoziaistvu rossii i inostrannykh gosudarstv, IV (Petrograd, 1916), pp. 552–75.Google Scholar

46 Statisticheskii sbornik za 1913–1917, p. 126.

47 Khizhniakov, V. V., Kooperativnye deiatel'nosti zemskikh agronomov moskovskoi gubernii (Moscow, 1914), pp. 118–19, app. 5e, p. 1Google Scholar; and Stepanov, I. P., Obzor deiatel' nosti agronomicheskoi organizatsii po volokolamskomu uezdu, 1910–1917 (Moscow, 1918), p. 8.Google Scholar

48 Chaianov, A. V., Russkoe l'novodstvo, l'nianoi rynok i l'nianaia kooperatsiia (Moscow, 1918), p. 174Google Scholar, and Martiushin, G. A., Tsentral'noe tovarishchestvo l'novodov za tri goda (Moscow, 1918), p. 9.Google Scholar

49 Vestnik melkogo kredita, 24 (June 20, 1914), p. 979, 982; and 10 (Mar. 7, 1914), p. 384. An example of the effect of credit banks in a central, industrial province is Kolobov, M., Sel'skii kredit v moskovskoi gubernii (Moscow, 1914), pp. 163–74Google Scholar. See also Petersen, Anita B., “The Development of Cooperative Credit in Rural Russia, 1871–1914,” unpub. diss., Cornell Univ., 1973, pp. 233–332.Google Scholar