Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-s2hrs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-03T08:47:53.305Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Comment on Paper by Sylla

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 May 2010

Lance E. Davis  and
Thomas C. Cochran
Lance E. Davis
Affiliation:
California Institute of Technology
Thomas C. Cochran
Affiliation:
University of Pennsylvania
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Papers Presented at the Thirty-Fifth Annual Meeting of the Economic History Association
Information
The Journal of Economic History , Volume 36 , Issue 1 , March 1976 , pp. 189 - 197
Copyright
Copyright © The Economic History Association 1976

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 See Arrington, L., The Great Basin Kingdom: Economic History of the Latter Day Saints (Lincoln, Nebraska, 1966), pp. 13–14.Google Scholar

2 The usefulness of the latter evidence is slightly tempered by some temporal distortion, and the strength of the conclusion rests in large measure on the experience of only three states. The number of “banks incorporated in all years before year of restraining act” should be adjusted for interstate differences in the time period covered (perhaps by reporting the rate of formation). Of the ninety-four banks chartered in the two years after the passage, sixty-eight come from New York, Ohio, and Pennsylvania, aha forty-one from the last named alone.