Article contents
Business History, Entrepreneurial History, and Business Administration
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 03 February 2011
Extract
The Economic History Association is an interdisciplinary organization of widely varying interests. The Association has several times considered the relationships between Economic Theory and Economic History, but it has paid little attention to that between the applied field of Business Administration and Economic History. It is appropriate to do so now because significant special interests have arisen within and around Economic History in recent years which have been of particular interest to students of Business Administration. I refer to the studies in Business History, Entrepreneurial History, Economic Development, and Innovation. Like Economic History, Business Administration is interdisciplinary, at least in part, and relies considerably, though at the applied level, on the same fundamental social sciences that interest economic historians. Also we have seen an outpouring of histories of individual enterprises, as American business, once more proud of its accomplishments and increasingly conscious of the value of public relations, has sat for its portrait. At the same time, in the field of Business Administration there has been a growing recognition of the importance of the long-range view in appraising administration, and of the use of the social sciences to improve its quality. It therefore is time to attempt some integration of these strands of thought.
- Type
- Articles
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © The Economic History Association 1958
References
1 Redlich, Fritz, “Academic Education for Business: Its Development and the Contribution of Ignaz Jastrow (1856–1937),” The Business History Review, XXXI (Spring 1957), 35 ffCrossRefGoogle Scholar.
2 Newcomer, Mabel, The Big Business Executive, the Factors which Made Him, 1900–1950 (New York: Columbia University Press, 1955), p. 75Google Scholar.
3 Cole, Arthur H., “An Approach to the Study of Entrepreneurship,” The Journal of Economic History, VI supplement (1946)Google Scholar.
4 Earle, Edward Mead, Ed., Makers of Modern Strategy: Military Thought from Machiavelli to Hitler (Princeton: Princeton University Press; 1943), pp. 179–80Google Scholar.
5 Frost, Holloway H., The Battle of Jutland (Annapolis: U.S. Naval Institute, 1936)Google Scholar.
6 Usher, Abbott P., A History of Mechanical Inventions(rev. ed.; Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1954)Google Scholar; Maclaurin, W. R., Invention and Innovation in the Radio Industry (New York: The Macmillan Co., 1949)Google Scholar; Jewkes, John, Sawers, David, and Stillerman, R., The Sources of Invention (London: Macmillan & Co., 1958)Google Scholar.
7 Rostow, W. W., The Process of Economic Growth (New York: Norton, 1952)Google Scholar.
8 Lane, F. C., Andrea Barbarigo, Merchant of Venice, 1418–1449, (Baltimore: Johns Hopkins Studies in Historical and Political Science, 1944)Google Scholar; Baxter, W. T., The House of Hancock (Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1945)CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Hedges, James B., The Browns of Providence Plantations (Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1952)CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Navin, T. R., The Whitin Machine Works Since 1831 (Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1950)CrossRefGoogle Scholar.
9 Furber, Holden, john Company at Work (Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1948)CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Clapham, John, The Bank of England (2 vols.; Cambridge, Eng.: Cambridge University Press, 1945)Google Scholar; Knowlton, Evelyn H., Pepperell's Progress (Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1948)CrossRefGoogle Scholar.
10 Litchfield, Edward H., “Notes on a General Theory of Administration,” Administrative Science Quarterly, I (1956)Google Scholar.
11 Hidy, Ralph W. and Hidy, Muriel E., Pioneering in Big Business, History of the Standard Oil Company (New Jersey), 1882–1911 (New York: Harper & Brothers, 1955)Google Scholar; Gibb, George H. and Knowlton, Evelyn H., The Resurgent Years, History of the Standard Oil Company (New Jersey), 1911–1927 (New York: Harper & Brothers, 1956)Google Scholar; Nevins, Allan, Ford, the Times, the Man, the Company (New York: Charles Scribner's Sons, 1954)Google Scholar; Nevins, Allan and Hill, Frank E., Ford, Expansion and Challenge, 1915–1933 (New York: Charles Scribner's Sons, 1957)Google Scholar.
12 Kaysen, Carl, United States vs. United Shoe Machinery Corporation (Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1956)Google Scholar.
- 5
- Cited by