Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-gb8f7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-01T00:05:33.080Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Agenda for the Study of British Imperial Economy, 1850-1950*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 February 2011

W. K. Hancock
W. K. Hancock
Affiliation:
University of London
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

“Imperialism is no word for scholars.” I quote my own printed words of ten years ago. The bewildering changes of content and color of that chameleon word throughout the brief century of its existence are. now being explored by R. F. Koebner of the University of Jerusalem. Here indeed is a fit task for scholars—to take a key word such as imperialism or despotism, to trace the history of its usage and abusage, to fit it into its true context of ideology, propaganda, and political warfare throughout successive historical phases. What a scholar can NOT do with these emotionally reverberant words is to make them reliable instruments of scientific exploration and explanation.

Type
Articles
Information
The Journal of Economic History , Volume 13 , Issue 3 , Summer 1953 , pp. 257 - 273
Copyright
Copyright © The Economic History Association 1953

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Hancock, W. K., Survey of British Commonwealth Affairs (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1940), II, Pt. I, 1Google Scholar; also Wealth of Colonies (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1950), pp. 8–17Google Scholar.

2 Koebner, R. F., “The Concept of Economic Imperialism,” Economic History Review, Second Series, II, No. 1, 1–29Google Scholar; also “The Emergence of the Concept of Imperialism,” The Cambridge Journal, V, No. 12, 726–41Google Scholar. A book by Koebner on this subject is in progress.

3 Hosclitz, Bcrthold, ed., The Progress of Underdeveloped Areas (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1952)Google Scholar.

4 Measures for the Economic Development of Under-Developed Countries. Report by a Group of Experts appointed by the Secretary-General of the United Nations (United Nations, Department of Economic Affairs: New York, 05 1951)Google Scholar.

5 Frankel, S. H., “United Nations Primer for Development,” Quarterly Journal of Economics, LXVI, No. 3, 301–26Google Scholar; also Some Conceptual Aspects of International Economic Development of Underdeveloped Territories (Princeton Essays in International Finance, No. 14, May 1952).

6 Quarterly Journal of Economics, LXVI, No. 3, 314Google Scholar.

7 Ibid., p. 309.

8 Tayeb, Ali, “Geo-Economic Trends in South Asia,” Canadian Journal of Economics and Political Science, XVHI, No. 3, 359Google Scholar

9 Kirby, E. Stuart, “The Reception of Western Economics in the Orient,” Quarterly Journal of Economics, LXVI, No. 3, 409–17Google Scholar; cf. Viner, Jacob, International Trade and Economic Development (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1953)Google Scholar.

10 Rostow, W. W., The Process of Economic Growth (New York: W. W. Norton & Co., 1952) 1 P. 8Google Scholar.

11 Simkin, C. G. F., The Instability of a Dependent Economy. Economic Fluctuations in New Zealand, 1840-1014 (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1951)Google Scholar.

12 This point of view is clearly stated, with reference for example to Maori participation in the New Zealand dairy industry, by Goldschmidt, W. R., in The Progress of Underdeveloped Areas, p. 151Google Scholar.

13 M. J. Herskovits in The Progress of Underdeveloped Areas.