Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-j824f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-05T05:30:50.864Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

St Bernard of Clairvaux, The Low Countries and the Lisbon Letter of the Second Crusade

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 February 2009

Jonathan Phillips
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

On 24 December 1144 'Imad ad-Din Zengi, the Muslim ruler of Aleppo and Mosul, captured the Christian city of Edessa. This was the most serious setback suffered by the Frankish settlers in the Levant since their arrival in the region at the end of the eleventh century. In reaction the rulers of Antioch and Jerusalem dispatched envoys to the west appealing for help. The initial efforts of Pope Eugenius in and King Louis VII of France met with little response, but at Easter 1146, at Vézelay, Bernard of Clairvaux led a renewed call to save the Holy Land and the Second Crusade began to gather momentum. As the crusade developed, its aims grew beyond an expedition to the Latin East and it evolved into a wider movement of Christian expansion encom-passing further campaigns against the pagan Wends in the Baltic and the Muslims of the Iberian peninsula. One particular group of men participated in two elements of the crusade; namely, the northern Europeans who sailed via the Iberian peninsula to the Holy Land. In thecourse of this journey they achieved the major success of the Second Crusade when they captured the city of Lisbon in October 1147. This article will consider how this aspect of the expedition fitted into the conception of the crusade as a whole and will try to establish when Lisbon became the principal target for the crusaders. St Bernard's preaching tour of the Low Countries emerges as an important, yet hitherto neglected, event.

Type
Articles
Information
The Journal of Ecclesiastical History , Volume 48 , Issue 3 , July 1997 , pp. 485 - 497
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1997

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

I would like to thank Dr Susan Edgington, Dr Diana Greenway, Dr Thérèse de Hemptinne, Dr Richard Alston, Professor Jonathan Riley-Smith and Professor Robert Huygens for their advice and assistance in preparing this paper. The research upon which it is based was undertaken with the generous financial support of the British Academy, the Flemish Community in Belgium, the Department of History, University of Southampton, and the Department of History, Royal Holloway College, University of London.

1 Mayer, H. E., The crusades, 2nd edn, trans. Gillingham, J. B., Oxford 1988, 93–100Google Scholar; Phillips, J. P., Defenders of the Holy Land: relations between the Latin-east and the west 1119–87, Oxford 1996, 73–99CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

2 Constable, G., ‘The Second Crusade as seen by contemporaries’, Traditio ix (1953), 213–79CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

3 De expugnatione Lyxbonensi: the conquest of Lisbon, ed. and trans. David, C. W., Columbia 1936Google Scholar; Livermore, H. V., ‘The “conquest of Lisbon” and its author’, Portuguese Studies vi (1990), 1–16Google Scholar.

4 An edition of this letter and a discussion of its origins can be found in Edgington, S. B., ‘The Lisbon letter of the Second Crusade’, Historical Research lxix (1996), 328–39Google Scholar. Individual versions of the letter survive in Recueil des historiens des Gaules et de la France, ed. Bouquet, M. and others, Paris 1738–1904, xiv. 325–7Google Scholar; ‘Annales Sancti Disibodi’, in Monumenta Germaniae historica: scriptores (hereinafter cited as MGH SS), ed. Pertz, G. H., Hanover, Weimar, Stuttgart, Cologne 1826–1934, xvii. 27–8Google Scholar; ‘Annales Magdeburgenses’, ibid. xvi. 189–90.

5 De expugnatione Lyxbonensi, 52–7, 104–5.

6 Helmold, of Bosau, , Chronica Slavorum, ed. Schindler, B., Hanover 1937, 117Google Scholar; ‘Annales Magdeburgenses’, 190. The expedition to Lisbon has been described by Giles Constable as Anglo-Flemish, but this is misleading; it seems that the forces from imperial lands formed an important element in the fleet: ‘A note on the route of the Anglo-Flemish crusaders of 1147’, Speculum xxviii (1953), 525–6Google Scholar.

7 Odo, of Deuil, , De profectione Ludovici VII in orientem, ed. and trans. Berry, V. G., Columbia 1948, 22–3Google Scholar, 54–5, 74–5, 122–3.

8 John, of Salisbury, , Historia pontificalis, ed. and trans. Chibnall, M., Oxford 1956, 56Google Scholar; De expugnatione Lyxbonensi, passim.

9 de Borchgrave, E., Hisloire des colonies belges qui s'établirent en Allemagnependant le douzième et le treizième siècle, Brussels 1865, 64Google Scholar, 69–70.

10 Nicholas, D., Medieval Flanders, London 1992, 107–23Google Scholar.

11 Murray, A. V., ‘The origins of the Frankish nobility in the Kingdom of Jerusalem, 1100–1118’, Mediterranean Historical Review iv (1989), 281–300CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Runciman, S., A history of the crusades, Cambridge 1951–1954, i. 179Google Scholar.

12 Galbert, of Bruges, , De multro, traditione et occisione gloriosi Karoli comitis Flandriarum, ed. Rider, J. (Corpus Christianorum, continuatio medievalis 81), Turnhout, 1994, pp. xiiGoogle Scholar, 15, 31.

13 Cartulaire de l'abbaye d'Eename, ed. Piot, C., Bruges 1881Google Scholar, no. 28; Phillips, J. P., ‘Hugh of Payns and the 1129 Damascus crusade’, in Barber, M. (ed.), The Military Orders: fighting for the faith and caring for the sick, Aldershot 1994, 141–7Google Scholar.

14 de Hemptinne, T. and Parisse, M., ‘Thierry d'Alsace, comte de Flandre: biographie et actes’, Annales de l'est xliii (1991), 98Google Scholar.

15 Runciman, , History of the crusades, ii. 253–60Google Scholar.

16 Williams, W., Saint Bernard of Clairvaux, Manchester 1935, 268–81Google Scholar, 397–8; Vacandard, E., Vie de Saint Bernard, abbé de Clairvaux, Paris 1927, ii. 287–312Google Scholar.

17 Pitra, J., ‘De itinere S. Bernardi per tractus Flandricos’, PL clxxxv. 1797–1832Google Scholar.

18 De oorkonden der graven van Vlaanderen (Juli 1128–September 1191), ed. de Hemptinne, T. and Verhulst, A., brussels 1988, iGoogle Scholar, no. 90.

19 Williams, , Saint Bernard, 269Google Scholar, 397; Vacandard, , Vie de Saint Bernard, ii. 287–8Google Scholar.

20 De oorkonden der graven van Vlaanderen, i, no. 92.

21 Ibid.

22 ‘Sancti Bernardi vita prima’, PL clxxxv. 395–8; ‘Chronicon Laetiense’, MGH SS xiv. 500.

23 Williams, , Saint Bernard, 270–7Google Scholar.

24 Constable, , ‘Second Crusade’, 244–7Google Scholar.

25 Ibid. 261.

26 The Jews and the crusader: the Hebrew chronicles of the First and Second Crusades, ed. Eidelberg, S., Wisconsin 1977, 122–3Google Scholar.

27 Trier Stadtbibliothek, MS 1974, fo. 641. See also Edgington, ‘Lisbon letter’. On Rudolph's activities see Cole, P., The preaching of the crusades to the Holy Land, 1095–1274, Cambridge, Mass. 1991, 43–5Google Scholar.

28 ‘Chronicon Laetiense’, 499; Peter, J., L'abbaye de Liessies en Hainault 764–1566, Lille 1912, 20–48Google Scholar.

29 Henry, of Huntingdon, , Historia Anglorum, ed. Arnold, T. (Rolls Series lxxiv, 1879), 281Google Scholar, states that the participants in the expedition to Lisbon were not powerful and had no great leader.

30 De expugnatione Lyxbonensi, 52–3.

31 The identification of Christian of Gistel as castellan of Diksmuide has only become possible with the discovery by Professor R. B. C. Huygens of the University of Leiden of an anonymous twelfth-century manuscript briefly outlining the history of the Latin east. This source refers to the expedition to Lisbon being led by Christian of Diksmuide which means that he was probably the same Christian of Gistel, who, as we have already seen, was identified as the commander by other writers. This manuscript will be published as an appendix in Professor Huygens's forthcoming edition of Guibert, of Nogent's, Dei gesta per Francos (Corpus Christianorum, continuatio medievalis), Turnhout 1996Google Scholar, appendix ii, lines 73–7. See also Warlop, E., The Flemish nobility before 1300, Courtrai 1975–1976, i. 188Google Scholar, 226; Galbert, of Bruges, , De multro, traditione, occisione…, 163Google Scholar; De oorkonden der graven van Vlaanderen, nos 8, 23, 47, 49, 50, 92.

32 De expugnatione Lyxbonensi, 54–7.

33 Ibid. 52–3; ‘Annales Sancti Disibodi’, 27.

34 Nicholas, , Medieval Flanders, 3Google Scholar, 5, 9, 32; Hoeniger, R., Kölner Schreins Urkunden. Quellen zur Rechts and Wirthschaftsgeschichte der Stadt Köln, Bonn 1884–1893, ii. 20Google Scholar, 22 25 50, 53.

35 Warlop, , Flemish nobility, i. 55Google Scholar.

36 Jenkinson, H., ‘William Cade, a financier of the twelfth century’, English Historical Review xxviii (1913), 209–27CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Nicholas, , Medieval Flanders, 57–8Google Scholar.

37 Robert's brother, Gilbert 11 of Ghent, became earl of Lincoln c. 1149, and Gilbert's grandfather, Gilbert 1, was recorded as holding substantial lands in Lincolnshire and Yorkshire in the Domesday Book: Cronne, H. A., The reign of Stephen: anarchy in England 1135–54, London 1970, 59Google Scholar, 143, 209; Sherman, R., ‘The continental origins of the Ghent family of Lincolnshire’, Nottingham Medieval Studies xxii (1978), 23–35CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

38 Amt, E., The accession of Henry II in England: royal government restored 1149–1159, Woodbridge 1994, 82–93Google Scholar.

39 The activities of Saher of Archelle, one of the leaders of the expedition to Lisbon, display the close connections between England, Normandy and the Low Countries. Archelle is near Dieppe, but Saher also held lands in England in the honour of Gand (= Ghent) in Lincolnshire and witnessed charters of Gilbert of Gant to the Cistercian abbeys of Rievaulx and Rufford. After Saher's death Gilbert made a gift to Bardney abbey for his soul, suggesting a close relationship between the two men. Saher was also a benefactor of the Templars: De expugnatione Lyxbonensi, 57; Statutes of Lincoln cathedral, arr. Bradshaw, H., ed. Wordsworth, C., Cambridge 1892–1897, ii, p. ccxxxviiiGoogle Scholar. To demonstrate the Anglo-Flemish connection even further, it should be noted that Bardney was refounded in 1087 by Gilbert 1 of Ghent: Beech, G., ‘Aquitanians and Flemings in the refoundation of Bardney abbey (Lincolnshire) in the later eleventh century’, Haskins Society Journal i (1989), 73–90Google Scholar.

40 De expugnatione Lyxbonensi, 12–26.

41 Ibid. 68–9, 84–5.

42 ‘Narratio de itinere navali peregrinorum Hierosolymam tendentium et Silviam capientium, AD 1189’, ed. David, C. W., Proceedings of the American Philosophical Society lxxxi (1939). 610–13Google Scholar.

43 ‘Annales Stadenses’, MGH SS xvi. 340; De expugnatione Lyxbonensi, 58–9.

44 O'Callaghan, J. F., A history of medieval Spain, Cornell 1975, 230Google Scholar. Similarly see Tyerman, C. J., England and the crusades 1095–1588, Chicago 1988, 33Google Scholar, and Forey, A. J., ‘The Second Crusade: scope and objectives’, Durham University Journal lxxxvi (1994)Google Scholar; ‘Sources referring to the siege of Lisbon do not normally imply that the crusade set out with the intention of fighting in the Iberian peninsula’ (p 168); ‘the narrative sources imply that the question of co-operation with the Portuguese was not raised until the crusaders had arrived in the Peninsula’ (p. 169).

45 Constable, , ‘Second Crusade’, 220Google Scholar–1, 246.

46 Livermore, , ‘The “conquest of Lisbon” and its author’, 1–16Google Scholar.

47 Bernard, of Clairvaux, , Opera, ed. Leclerq, J. and Rochais, H., Louvain 1955–1977, viii, no. 308Google Scholar.

48 Livermore, H. V., A history of Portugal, Cambridge 1947, 61–2, 81Google Scholar; Williams, , Saint Bernard, 64, 67, 84–5Google Scholar.

49 Barber, M., The new knighthood: a history of the order of the Temple, Cambridge 1994, 32–3Google Scholar.

50 ‘We have heard with our ears, O God, our fathers have told us, what work thou didst in their days, in the times of old. How thou didst drive out the heathen with thy hand, and plantedst them; how thou didst afflict the people, and cast them out. For they got not the land in possession by their own sword, neither did their own arm save them: but thy right hand, and thine arm, and the light of thy countenance, because thou hadst a favour unto them. Thou art my King, O God: command deliverances for Jacob. Through thee will we push down our enemies: through thy name we will tread them under that rise up against us’: Psalm xliv. 1–5.

51 De oorkonden der graven van Vlaanderen, no. 92.

52 ‘De expugnation e Scalabi’, Portugaliae monumenta historica: scriptores, Lisbon 1856, 93–5Google Scholar; Reilly, B. F., The contest of Christian and Muslim Spain, 1031–1157, Oxford 1992, 212Google Scholar; Livermore, , History of Portugal, 74Google Scholar.

63 Chancelarios medievais Portuguesas: documentos da chancelaria de Afonso Henriques, ed. Reuter, A., Coimbra 1938Google Scholar, no. 145.

54 De expugnatione Lyxbonensi, 68–9.

55 Ibid. 84–5.

56 ‘Annales Sancti Disibodi’, 27.

57 De expugnatione Lyxbonensi, 56–7.

58 ‘Der text der Kreuzzugsbulle Eugens III’, ed. Rassow, P., Neues Archiv der Gesellschaft für ältere deutsche Geschichlskunde xlv (1924), 302–5Google Scholar.

59 Livermore, , ‘The “conquest of Lisbon” and its author’, 16Google Scholar.

60 For the Pisan, see ‘Annales Sancti Disibodi’, 28Google Scholar. Note also De expugnatione Lyxbonensi, 175–6. Rogers, R., Latin siege warfare in the twelfth century, Oxford 1992, 187Google Scholar, is surely in error to suggest that the Pisan joined the siege after news of the investment began to circulate.

61 De expugnatione Lyxbonensi, 56–7, 176–7.

62 Ibid. 16–17.

63 Constable, , ‘Second Crusade’, 255–60Google Scholar.

64 Although see the important arguments of Forey, ‘Second Crusade’.

65 Helmold, of Bosau, , Chronica Slavorum, 115Google Scholar.

66 Annales Magdeburgenses', MGH SS xvi. 188–90.

67 Eugenius, III , ‘Epistolae et privilegia’, PL clxxxv. 1203–4Google Scholar.

68 Rogers, , Latin siege warfare, 182–3Google Scholar.

69 Constable, ‘Route of the Anglo-Flemish crusaders’, 525–6Google Scholar.