Published online by Cambridge University Press: 06 February 2009
Certainly since the time of the Emperor Constantine there had been little doubt in the Christian world that Christ was crucified, buried and rose from the dead on the site later occupied by the Church of the Holy Sepulchre in Jerusalem. Eusebius described the discovery of the tomb beneath the site of the Roman temple to Venus and the construction of the church, dedicated in 335. Constantine's church underwent numerous changes and rebuilding, through invasions, occupations, earthquakes and the disastrous fire of 1808, which caused extensive damage. But at no time did anyone seriously dispute the convictions of the competing Christian factions – Greeks, Latins, Armenians, Georgians, Copts and Ethiopians – who had chapels, or at least a recognised foothold, within that sacred precinct. While earlier travel accounts, such as those of Willibald (AD 724) and John Mandeville (1322), had recognised that the Church of the Holy Sepulchre was located well within the walls of Jerusalem, it was generally accepted that this was because the city had expanded and surrounded the site, and that new perimeter walls enclosed the place of the crucifixion and the tomb which according to the biblical texts had to lie ‘without’ the city walls.
1 Eusebius, , The life of Constantine, ed. Richardson, E. C., Oxford 1890, i. 526–30Google Scholar; Walker, P. W. L., Holy city, holy places: Christian attitudes to Jerusalem and the Holy Land in the fourth century, Oxford 1990, 113Google Scholar, 128–30, ch. viii.
2 Wilson, C. W., Golgotha and the Holy Sepulchre, London 1906, 104–5Google Scholar. Many early maps of Jerusalem were drawn with the Holy Sepulchre outside the walls: Ben-Arieh, Y., ‘Some notes on the maps of Jerusalem, 1470–1600’, in Cohen, A. (ed.), Jerusalem in the early Ottoman period, Jerusalem 1979, 112–41 (Hebrew)Google Scholar.
3 Stanley, A. P., Sinai and Palestine in connection with their history, London 1856, p. xiiGoogle Scholar.
4 Renan, E., The life of Jesus, London 1864, 31Google Scholar.
5 Pals, Daniel L., The Victorian lives of Jesus, San Antonio, Tx. 1982, 82, 94, 102, 111, 115Google Scholar.
6 Hymns ancient and modem, London 1861, 332Google Scholar.
7 Gordon, C., Reflections in Palestine 1883, London 1884, 7Google Scholar.
8 Stanley, , Sinai, 186Google Scholar.
9 Robinson, E. and Smith, E., Biblical researches in Palestine, London 1841, ii. 64–5Google Scholar.
10 Ibid.
11 Ibid. 72; Chateaubriand, F. A. de, Itinéraire de Paris à Jérusalem, 2nd edn, Paris 1812, ii. 1–57Google Scholar.
12 Josephus, Flavius, The Wars of the Jews iv. 2, ed. Whiston, William, London 1915Google Scholar.
13 Robinson, and Smith, , Biblical researches, i. 461–3Google Scholar.
14 Ibid. ii. 13–14.
15 [Newman, J. H.], ‘An essay on the miracles of the period’, in Fleury, Claude, The ecclesiastical history, Oxford 1842, i, p. xiGoogle Scholar.
16 Ibid. p. civ.
17 Ibid. p. clvii.
18 Ibid. p. dxx.
19 Robinson, E., ‘The reputed site of the Holy Sepulchre’, Bibliotheca Sacra (1843), 190Google Scholar.
20 Ibid. 162, 170.
21 Williams, G., The holy city: or historical and topographical notes of Jerusalem, London 1845, 260–6Google Scholar.
22 Ibid. 297. See also Robinson's, reply to Williams in Bibliotheca Sacra xi, xii (08 and 11 1846)Google Scholar.
23 Williams, G., Holy city, 2nd edn.London 1849, i. 240Google Scholar.
24 Finlay, G., A history of Greece, new edn, Oxford 1877, i. 459Google Scholar.
25 Ibid. 473.
26 Korte, J., Reise nach dem gelobten Lande, n.p. 1741, 168–95Google Scholar.
27 Clarke, E. D., Travels in various countries of Europe, Asia and Africa, London 1816–1924, iv. 309–19, 335–45CrossRefGoogle Scholar.
28 Fergusson, J., Motes on the site of the Holy Sepulchre, an answer to the Edinburgh Review, London 1861, 61–2Google Scholar.
29 Wilson, C. W., Golgotha and the Holy Sepulchre, London 1906, 118Google Scholar.
30 Warren, C., Underground Jerusalem: an account of some of the principal difficulties encountered in its exploration and the results obtained, London 1876, 557Google Scholar. Later Warren presented sixty-three arguments refuting Fergusson's, theory in The temple or the tomb, London 1880Google Scholar.
31 Wilson, , Golgotha, 1–4Google Scholar.
32 Howe, Fisher, Turkey, Greece and Palestine, Glasgow 1854, 21Google Scholar.
33 Robinson, Charles S., ‘Where was “The place called Calvary”?’, Century Magazine xxxvii, 11 1888, 99Google Scholar.
34 Ibid. 100.
35 See Thenius, Otto, ‘Golgotham et sanctum Sepulcrum’, Zeitschrift für die historische Theologie vi, pt 4, 1–34Google Scholar.
36 Robinson, , ‘Place called Calvary’, 107Google Scholar.
37 Hanauer, J. E., ‘Notes on the controversy regarding the site of Calvary’, Palestine Exploration Fund Quarterly Statement (hereinafter cited as PEFQS) (1892), 300Google Scholar.
38 Merrill, Selah, The site of Calvary, Jerusalem 1886, 5Google Scholar, repr. from the Andover Review, Nov. 1885.
39 Conder, C. R., Tentwork in Palestine, London 1878, i. 133–4Google Scholar.
41 Emerson, G. R., General Gordon, soldier, administrator and Christian hero, 6th edn, London 1885, 114Google Scholar; Hill, Richard, ‘The Gordon literature’, Durham University Journal n.s. xvi (1955), 97–103Google Scholar. For a contemporary account of Gordon's beliefs see the introduction to an edition of Hall's, JosephChrist mystical, published in London in 1893Google Scholar, with Gordon's marginal notes.
42 [Surtees-Allnatt, Elizabeth], Gordon: a woman's memories of him and his letters to her from the Holy Land, London 1885, 24Google Scholar.
43 Gordon to his brother Henry, 30 Apr. 1883, British Library, Add. MS 33,222A, fo. 48 r–v.
44 Gordon, C., ‘Eden and Golgotha’, PEFQS (1885), 78–81Google Scholar.
45 Gordon, , Reflections, 1–3Google Scholar; Letters of General C. G. Gordon to his sister, M. A. Gordon London 1888, 289–90Google Scholar.
46 These drawings are now in the Jewish National and University Library, Jerusalem, ‘Letters of General Gordon to Conrad Schick’, MS Var. 458.
47 Gordon, , ‘Golgotha’, 79–84Google Scholar.
48 Merrill, S., The site of Calvary, Jerusalem 1886, 7Google Scholar. Rupert Chapman, executive secretary of the Palestine Exploration Fund, London, has shown me a model of Skull Hill given to the Fund by Mrs Charles Wilson and this is most likely one of the models prepared by C. Paulus.
49 Oliphant, L., Haifa or life in modern Palestine, Edinburgh 1887, 296Google Scholar.
50 Ibid. 300.
51 Dixon, W. Hepworth, ‘The Holy Sepulchre’, Gentleman's Magazine n.s. (1877), 334–42Google Scholar. For a description of these tombs see, Clermont-Ganneau, C., ‘The Holy Sepulchre, I: Tomb of Joseph of Arimathe’, PEFQS (1877), 76–85Google Scholar.
52 Conder, , Tentwork, i. 372–3Google Scholar.
53 Ibid. 372.
54 Idem, ‘The place of the Skull’, Good Words, Apr. 1892, 250; Warren, Charles and Conder, C. R., The survey of western Palestine: Jerusalem, London 1884, 432–5Google Scholar.
55 Conder, C. R., ‘Jerusalem’, PEFQS (1881), 204–5Google Scholar; idem, ‘The Holy Sepulchre’, ibid. (1883), 78; J. E. Hanauer, ‘On the identification of Calvary’, ibid. (1892), 199.
56 ‘Letters from Herr Schick’, ibid. 120.
57 Ibid. 120–4. Selah Merrill excavated the area outside the door of the tomb without any great result: Selah Merrill to George Armstrong, 31 May 1892, Palestine Exploration Fund. Archives, Schick/55.
58 Dawson, J. W., Egypt and Syria, their physical features in relation to Bible history, London 1885Google Scholar.
59 Idem, Modem science in Bible lands, London 1888, 515.
60 Hanauer, J. E., ‘Notes on the controversy regarding the site of Calvary’, PEFQS (1892), 307–8Google Scholar. For the debate surrounding these two inscriptions see Murphy-O'Connor, J., ‘The Garden Tomb and the misfortunes of an inscription’, Biblical Archaeology Review xii (03/04 1986), 54–5Google Scholar.
61 Smith, H., ‘Calvary and the tomb of Christ’, Murray's Magazine, 09 1891, 13Google Scholar.
62 Murray's handbook for travellers in Syria and Palestine, London 1892, 73–6Google Scholar.
63 Smith, , ‘Calvary’, 312Google Scholar.
64 Ibid.
65 Ibid. 314–19.
66 Farrar, F. W., The life of Christ, 2nd edn, London 1874, ii. 398Google Scholar.
67 Wallace, Lew, Ben-Hur, a tale of Christ, London 1881, 534Google Scholar.
68 Edersheim, A., Life and times of Jesus the Messiah, London 1883, ii. 583–4Google Scholar.
69 Geikie, C., The Holy Land and the Bible: a book of Scripture illustrations gathered in Palestine, London 1887, 538–40Google Scholar.
70 Day, Maurice F., Calvary and the tomb, Dublin 1887, 19Google Scholar.
71 Shick, Conrad to the offices of the Palestine Exploration Fund, 4 05 1892, PEF Archives, London, Schick/54Google Scholar.
72 ‘Notes and news’, PEFQS (1892), 177.
73 Pollock, J. C., Moody: a biographical portrait of the pacesetter in modern mass evangelicalism, New York 1963, 278Google Scholar.
74 The Times, 8 Oct. 1892, repr. in PEFQS (1893), 90–1.
75 Ibid.
76 A wealthy spinster, Louisa Hope, was the major contributor of funds to the scheme. Other supporters were: E. W. Benson, later archbishop of Canterbury; Randall Davidson, bishop of Rochester and later archbishop of Canterbury; Brooke Foss Westcott, bishop of Durham; E. Carr Glynn, bishop of Peterborough; Handley Moule, a leader in the evangelical party in the Church of England and later bishop of Durham; the bishops of Ripon, Salisbury, and Newcastle in Australia. Other prominent figures included the naturalist and explorer, Canon Henry Baker Tristram, Revd Preb. Webb-Peploe, Stuart A. Donaldson, Master of Magdalene College, Cambridge and Canons Appleton, Hobson, Lowe and Phillips. The original trustees of the Garden Tomb Fund were the duke of Argyll, the marquis of Northampton, the earl of Aberdeen, the Revd C. T. Wilson of the Church Missionary Society and Miss Louisa Hope.
77 The Times, 24 Sept. 1892.
78 Ibid. 27 Sept. 1892, 7.
79 Ibid. 29 Sept. 1892, 12.
80 Ibid.
81 Ibid. 1 Oct. 1892.
82 Ibid. 8 Oct. 1892.
83 ‘Letters from Herr Baurath Schick’, PEFQS (1893), 121.
84 McColl, M., ‘The site of Golgotha and the Holy Sepulchre’, Contemporary Review, 02. 1893, 176Google Scholar.
85 Ibid. 175.
86 Ibid. 182–3. 296
87 Idem, ‘The site of Golgotha and the Holy Sepulchre’, PEFQS (1901), 279–81.
88 Crawley-Boevey, A. W., The Holy Sepulchre and the new sites, a reply to Canon MacColl, London 1901, 4Google Scholar.
89 Ibid. 19.
90 Hughes, H. P., The morning lands of history, London 1901, 242Google Scholar.
91 Methodist Times, 4 Apr. 1901, 237.
92 See also Hopkins, E. H., Calvary and the tomb, London 1899Google Scholar.
93 [Headlam, A. C.], ‘The Holy Sepulchre’, Quarterly Review ccclxxix (1899), 106Google Scholar.
94 Republished as Wilson, C. W., Golgotha and the Holy Sepulchre, London 1906Google Scholar.
95 Ibid. 115–18.
96 Ibid. 115.
97 Ibid. 117.
98 Ibid.
99 Ibid.
100 Stalker, James, ‘Our present knowledge of the life of Christ’, Contemporary Review lxxvii (1900), 124Google Scholar.
101 Sanday, W., Sacred sites of the Gospels, Oxford 1903, 67Google Scholar.
102 Ibid. 70–1.
103 Latham, Henry, The risen master, Cambridge 1901, p. vGoogle Scholar.
104 Ibid. 5.
105 Blakemore, T., The art of Herbert Schmalz, London 1911Google Scholar.
106 Harper, H. A., An artist's walks in Bible lands, London 1901Google Scholar.
107 Hole, W., The life of Jesus of Nazareth, eighty pictures by William Hole, London 1908, nos 67, 68, 71, 72, 73Google Scholar.
108 See, for instance, Farrar, F. W., ‘The principal pictures of William Holman Hunt’, Art Annual (1893), 5–24Google Scholar.
109 See, for example, Crawley-Boevey, A. W., Gordon's tomb and Golgotha, London 1907Google Scholar.
110 Dobson, C. C., ‘Garden Tomb’, The Times, 24 07 1924, 15–16, 18Google Scholar.
111 Vincent, L.-H., ‘Garden tomb, histoire d'un mythe’, Revue Biblique xxxii (1925), 401–31Google Scholar.
112 Dobson, C. C., The empty tomb and the risen Lord, 2nd edn, London 1933, 90–5Google Scholar.
113 See, for instance, Eyre, and Spottiswoode's, Holy Bible, revised standard edition 1962Google Scholar, which has photographs of the Skull Hill face and the Garden Tomb, and Hodder and Stoughton's New international version: Holy Bible, illustrated, which has a photograph of the Skull Hill Golgotha.
114 Gavron, D., ‘Life on the seam’, Jerusalem Post Magazine, 2 06 1989, 4–5Google Scholar. A more recent defence of the site is in McBirnie, W. S., The search for the authentic tomb of Jesus, Montrose, Ca. 1975Google Scholar.