Hostname: page-component-6bf8c574d5-9nwgx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-02-21T17:04:25.418Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Penance and the Market Place: a Reformation Dialogue with the Medieval Church (c. 1250–c. 1600)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 August 2003

DAVE POSTLES
DAVE POSTLES
Affiliation:
Centre for English Local History, University of Leicester, Marc Fitch House, 5 Salisbury Road, Leicester LE1 7QR; e-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

During the later Middle Ages the ecclesiastical jurisdiction generally abandoned ritual humiliation in the market place as an integral part of penance imposed by sentence in its courts, although intermittently this punishment continued into the early sixteenth century. In the early decades of the ecclesia anglicana of Elizabeth, however, several jurisdictions reintroduced shaming in the market place as a consistent part of a disciplinary regime. Although constituting no more than an episode, as public penance had again declined by the 1580s, the reintroduction of penance in the public forum reveals much about the character of the Anglican Church in the first decades after the settlement of 1558, but also reflects back on the pre-Reformation Church.

Type
Research Article
Information
The Journal of Ecclesiastical History , Volume 54 , Issue 3 , July 2003 , pp. 441 - 468
Copyright
© 2003 Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

The final version of this paper has benefited immensely from the critical comments of three referees, including Professor Diarmaid MacCulloch, without which it would have been immeasurably poorer. Professor Charles Phythian-Adams kindly read an early draft and Dr Paul Griffiths a later one. An embryonic version was read at the Mid West Conference on British Studies in Cincinnati in October 2000. Professor Margo Todd read a version of the paper and made some helpful comments, as noted below. I am also, of course, inordinately grateful to the searchroom staff of all the record offices listed above.