Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-m8s7h Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-21T04:50:51.216Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Der antikonziliaristische Dominikaner Leonhard Huntpichler: ein Beitrag zum Konziliarismus der wiener Universität im 15. Jahrhundert. By Isnard Wilhelm Frank, O.P. (Archiv für österreichische Geschichte, 131). Pp. 416. Vienna: Österreichischen Akademie der Wissenschaften, 1976. DM. 80.

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 March 2011

Walter Ullmann
Walter Ullmann
Affiliation:
Trinity College, Cambridge
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Reviews
Information
The Journal of Ecclesiastical History , Volume 28 , Issue 1 , January 1977 , pp. 77 - 80
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1977

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

page 78 note 1 I have tried to explain this in my Short History of the Papacy in the Middle Ages, 2nd ed. (London 1974), 311 ff.Google Scholar

page 79 note 1 Cf. ‘Eugenius iv, Cardinal Kemp and Archbishop Chichele’ in Medieval Studies presented to Aubrey Gwynn, ed. Watt, J. A. et al., Dublin, 1961, 359–83Google Scholar, now reprinted in The Papacy and Political Ideas in the Middle Ages, London, 1976Google Scholar, ch. 13. One wonders whether the bishop of Cracow (Sbigneus Olesnicki, cf. ibid. 380 ff.) had taken part in drafting the Declaration of Cracow University: he had the singular distinction of having been created a cardinal by the pope, Eugenius iv, and the antipope, Felix v.

page 79 note 2 Cf. ‘The legality of the papal electoral pacts’ in Ephemerides Iuris Canonici, XII (1956), 3–36 (now reprinted loc. cit., preceding note, ch. 15).Google Scholar

page 79 note 3 The Humbertine fragment embodied in Gratian, Dist. 40, c. 6, should have been noted (cf. 358 f.).

page 79 note 4 For this amalgam cf. the new preface to the reprint of Origins of the Great Schism, Hamden, Conn. 1972, xiv ff.; for Zabarella see 191–231.Google Scholar