Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-tf8b9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T05:09:42.527Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Rethinking of the Pre-Modern East Asian Region Order

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 March 2016

Bongjin Kim
Bongjin Kim*
Affiliation:
University of Kitakyushu
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The preconceived image of the pre-modern East Asian region order, known commonly as the tributary system, is problematic. That is because it is represented by ‘the Other’ — not only the external (Westerners) but also the internal (Asians) — and in turn the inaccurate image has gone on reproducing, expanding, and dominating. In order to solve this problem, in question, this paper will first critically review the preconceived image of the pre-modern Chinese world order and identify the problems of Orientalism and modernism. Then, in search for a real image, the paper reinterprets Confucian ideas and concepts as the principles undergirding the pre-modern East Asian regional order. The paper also discusses the Korean kyorin system, one of the subsystems of the pre-modern East Asian order. The objective is to decipher the ways in which Korea interpreted and institutionalized the Confucian ideas on foreign policy or international relationships during the Choson dynasty (1392–1910).

By doing these, we can describe a more real image of the pre-modern East Asian region order. The more “real” interstate relationship was based on li (principle) and li* (rites), and harmonized with another concept of gong (the public/publicness), as shown by pingfen or junfen (the fairly allocated). Based on such conceptions of the human world, the pre-modern East Asian regional order was divided into different territories and dominions, each with its own sovereign. Once the formality of the suzerain and tributary state was recognized, moreover, China did not intervene in the internal and external affairs of the tributary as well as hushi (a foreign trade system) states. Like interpersonal relationships, interstate ones were hierarchic, but they were also based on the idea of reciprocity, fair allocation as well as impartiality, harmony, and coexistence.

Keywords

virtual imagereal imagewestern-centric distortionsChina/Asia-centered viewpointli (principle/law)li* (rites)hierarchysovereigntyequalitynatural rightvirtue/role-based rights and dutieskyorin systemsadaesaso.
Type
Articles
Information
Journal of East Asian Studies , Volume 2 , Issue 2 , August 2002 , pp. 67 - 101
Copyright
Copyright © East Asia Institute 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Arano, Yasunori. 1988. Kinsei nihon to higashi azia (Early Modern Japan and East Asia). Tokyo: Tokyo University Press.Google Scholar
Bull, Hedley. 1977. The Anarchical Society: A Study of Order in World Politics. New York: Columbia University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cheng, Chung-ying. 1998. Transforming Confucian Virtues into Human Rights: A Study of Human Agency and Potency in Confucian Ethics. In Confucianism and Human Rights, edited by de Bary, Theodore and Weiming, Tu. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Chun, Hae-jong. 1968. Sino-Korean Tributary Relations in the Ch'ing Period. In The Chinese World Order: Traditional China's Foreign Relations, edited by Fairbank, John, 90–111. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Cohen, Paul A. 1984. Discovering History in China: American Historical Writings on the Recent Chinese Past. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Cua, A. S. 1999. Reason and Principle in Chinese Philosophy: An Iinterpretation of li . In A Companion to World Philosophies, edited by Deutsch, Eliot and Bontekoe, Ron. Massachusetts: Blackwell Publishers Ltd.Google Scholar
de Bary, Wm. Theodore, 1998. Asian Values and Human Rights: A Confucian Communitarian Perspective. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
de Bary, Wm. Theodore, and Bloom, Irene, eds. 1999. Sources of Chinese Tradition. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Der Derian, James and Shapiro, Michael J., eds. 1989. International/Intertextual Relations: Postmodern Readings of World Politics. Lexington, Mass.: Lexington Books.Google Scholar
Fairbank, John K., ed. 1968. The Chinese World Order: Traditional Chinas Foreign Relations., Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hamashita, Takeshi. 1990. Kindai chugoku no kokusaiteki keiki — Choko boeki sisutemu to kindai azia (International Clue of the Modern China: Tributary Trade System and Modern Asia). Tokyo: Tokyo University Press.Google Scholar
Hamashita, Takeshi. 1997. Choko sisutemu to kindai azia (Tribute Syatem and Modern Asia). Tokyo: Iwanami Syoten Press.Google Scholar
Hamashita, Takeshi. ed. 1999. Higashi azia sekai no tsiiki netowaku (Regional Network in East Asian World). Tokyo: Yamakawa Publishing Company.Google Scholar
Huruta, Kazuko. 2000. Shanghai netowaku to kindai higashi azia (Shanghai Network and Modern East Asia). Tokyo: Tokyo University Press.Google Scholar
Ishibashi, Takao. 2000. Daisin teikoku (Ch'ing the Great Empire). Tokyo: Kôdan Sha Press.Google Scholar
Kim, Bong-jin. 1994. Ōbe kokusai tsitsuzyo to higashi-azia tsiiki tsitsuzyo (The Western International Order and East Asian Region Order). Bulletin: Faculty of Foreign Studies Kitakyushu University, No. 81.Google Scholar
Kim, Bong-jin. Bong-jin, Kim 1996. Higashi azia sankoku no “kaikoku” saikō (Rethinking on “Open Door” of East Asian countries). In Ronshu Chôsen Kin-Gendaishi (Essays on the Modern and Contemporary Korean History), edited by Kazuo, Kawai et al. Tokyo: Akashi Shōten Press.Google Scholar
Kim, Bong-jin. Bong-jin, Kim 1997. Hwai jilsō ui jaehaesŏk (Reinterpretation of the Civilized-Barbaric Order). In Jŏntong gua Hyundai (Tradition and Contemporary). Seoul: The Jŏntong gua Hyundai Press.Google Scholar
Kim, Key-hiuk. 1980. The Last Phase of the East Asian World Order: Korea, Japan, and the Chinese Empire, 1860–1882. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
MacIntyre, Alasdair. 1981. After Virtue: A Study in Moral Theory, Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Press.Google Scholar
Mancall, Mark. 1968. The Chi'ng Tribute System: An Interpretative Essay. In The Chinese World Order: Traditional Chinas Foreign Relations, edited by Fairbank, John K., 63–89. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Mancall, Mark. 1984. China at the Center: 300 Years of Foreign Policy. New York: The Free Press.Google Scholar
Min, Dŏk-ki 1994. Zenkindai higashi azia no naka no Kan-Nichi kankei (Korea-Japan Relations in Pre-modern East Asia). Tokyo: Waseda University Press.Google Scholar
Miyake, Hidetoshi. 1986. Kinsei Nit-Cho kankeishi no kenkyu (A Study on the Early Modern Japanese-Korean History). Tokyo: Bunken Publishing Company.Google Scholar
Yuzo, Mizoguchi et al. 1995. Chūgoku to iu siza (The Perspective Spoken of China). Tokyo: Heibonsha Press.Google Scholar
Motegi, Toshio. 1997. Henyōsuru kindai higashi azia no kokusai tsitsuzyo (The Change of International Order in Modern East Asia). Tokyo: Yamakawa Publishing Company.Google Scholar
Osa, Setsuko. 1987. Chūsei Nit-Cho kankei to Tsushima (Japanese-Korean Relations and Tsushima in the Middle Age). Tokyo: Yoshikawa Kobunkan.Google Scholar
Said, Edward W. 1979. Orientalism. New York: A Random House.Google Scholar
Sandel, Michael J. 1982. Liberalism and the limits of Justice. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Schwartz, Benjamin I. The Chinese Perception of World Order, Past and Present. In The Chinese World Order: Traditional Chinas Foreign Relations, edited by Fairbank, John K., 276–288. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Schwartz, Benjamin I. 1996. China and Other Matters. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Sugiyama, S. and Grove, Linda, eds. 1999. Kindai azia no ryūtsū netowāku (Commercial Networks in Modern Asia). Sōbunsha Publishing Company.Google Scholar
Toby, , Ronald, P. 1990. State and Diplomacy in Early Modern Japan: Asia in the Development of the Tokugawa bakufu. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Walzer, Michael. 1983. Sphere of Justice: A Defence of Pluralism and Equality. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Wang, Gangwu. 1968. Early Ming Relations with Southeast Asia: A Background Essay. In The Chinese World Order: Traditional Chinas Foreign Relations, edited by Fairbank, John K., 34–62. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Wang, Xingxian, ed. 1988. Zhuzi yulei , 10 vols. Beijing: Renmin Chubanshe.Google Scholar
Wight, Martin. 1977. Systems of States (ed. with an introduction by Hedley Bull). New Jersey: Leicester University Press.Google Scholar
Yang, Lien-sheng. 1968. Historical Notes on the Chinese World Order. In The Chinese World Order: Traditional Chinas Foreign Relations, edited by Fairbank, John K., 20–33. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar