Hostname: page-component-669899f699-swprf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-04-24T18:38:01.209Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Party System Institutionalization Without Parties: Evidence from Korea

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 March 2016

Olli Hellmann
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Formally institutionalized party organization is usually considered a prerequisite for the development of programmatic linkages between parties and voters. However, in this article I show that political parties in South Korea have succeeded in stabilizing interparty competition through programmatic linkages without making any significant efforts to build a formal organizational base. In fact, it could be argued that South Korea is a “partyless” democracy, as political parties get easily captured by the interests of ambitious politicians, thus failing to establish themselves as independent actors. I therefore make a more general argument about the concept of party system institutionalization: we need to rethink the current practice of aggregating the different attributes of party system institutionalization into a single scale, as these attributes do not seem to be connected in a linear fashion.

Keywords

South Koreaparty system institutionalizationpolitical party organizationvoting behaviorelectoral volatilityprogrammatic linkages
Type
Articles
Information
Journal of East Asian Studies , Volume 14 , Issue 1 , April 2014 , pp. 53 - 84
Copyright
Copyright © East Asia Institute 

References

Birnir, Jóhanna Kristín. 2007. “Divergence in Diversity? The Dissimilar Effects of Cleavages on Electoral Politics in New Democracies.” American Journal of Political Science 51, 3: 602–619.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brady, David W., Han, Hahrie, and Pope, Jeremy C.. 2007. “Primary Elections and Candidate Ideology: Out of Step with the Primary Electorate?” Legislative Studies Quarterly 32, 1: 79–105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Choi, Jun Young, and Cho, Jinman. 2005. “Is the Regional Cleavage in Korea Disappearing? An Empirical Analysis of the Ideological and Generational Effects on the Outcomes of the Seventeenth Congressional Election.” Korean Political Science Review 39, 3: 375–394 [in Korean].Google Scholar
Cox, Gary W., and McCubbins, Mathew D.. 1993. Legislative Leviathan: Party Government in the House. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Croissant, Aurel, and Völkel, Philip. 2012. “Party System Types and Party System Institutionalization: Comparing New Democracies in East and Southeast Asia.” Party Politics 18, 2: 235–265.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gray, Kevin. 2008. “Challenges to the Theory and Practice of Polyarchy: The Rise of the Political Left in Korea.” Third World Quarterly 29, 1: 107–124.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hellmann, Olli. 2011. Political Parties and Electoral Strategy: The Development of Party Organization in East Asia. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hellmann, Olli. 2013. “The Developmental State and Electoral Markets in East Asia: How Strategies of Industrialization Have Shaped Party Institutionalization.” Asian Survey 53, 4: 653–678.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heo, Uk, and Stockton, Hans. 2005. “The Impact of Democratic Transition on Elections and Parties in South Korea.” Party Politics 11, 6: 674–688.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hicken, Allen. 2011. “Clientelism.” Annual Review of Political Science 14: 289–310.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hicken, Allen, and Kuhonta, Erik Martinez. 2011. “Shadows from the Past: Party System Institutionalization in Asia.” Comparative Political Studies 44, 5: 572–597.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Im, Hyug Baeg. 2004. “Faltering Democratic Consolidation in South Korea: Democracy at the End of the ‘Three Kims’ Era.” Democratization 11, 5: 179–198.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jang, Seung-Jin. 2012. “Vote Choices in the Nineteenth National Assembly Election: Referendum, Ideological Voting, and Affective Feeling.” Korean Political Science Review 46, 5: 99–120 [in Korean].Google Scholar
Jones, Philip, and Hudson, John. 1998. “The Role of Political Parties: An Analysis Based on Transaction Costs.” Public Choice 94, 1: 175–189.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kim, Byung-Kook. 1998. “Korea's Crisis of Success.” In Democracy in East Asia, ed. Diamond, L. and Plattner, M. F., 113–132. Baltimore and London: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Kim, HeeMin. 1997. “Rational Choice Theory and Third World Politics: The 1990 Party Merger in Korea.” Comparative Politics 30, 1: 83–100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kim, HeeMin, Choi, Jun Young, and Cho, Jinman. 2008. “Changing Cleavage Structure in New Democracies: An Empirical Analysis of Political Cleavages in Korea.” Electoral Studies 27: 136–150.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kim, Kwang Soo. 1997. “Candidate Selection in the 1996 Korean Election.” Korea Observer 28, 1: 25–53.Google Scholar
Kim, Wonik. 2010. “Does Class Matter? Social Cleavages in South Korea's Electoral Politics in the Era of Neoliberalism.” Review of Political Economy 22, 4: 589–616.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kim, Yong-ho. 1998. “Korea.” In Political Party Systems and Democratic Development in East and Southeast Asia, vol. 2, ed. Sachsenröder, W. and Frings, U. E., 132–175. Aldershot: Ashgate.Google Scholar
Kitschelt, Herbert, Hawkins, Kirk A., Luna, Juan Pablo, Rosas, Guillermo, and Zechmeister, Elizabeth J.. 2010. Latin American Party Systems. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kitschelt, Herbert, and Kselman, Daniel. 2010. “The Organizational Foundations of Democratic Accountability: Organizational Form and the Choice of Electoral Linkage Strategy.” Paper prepared for the Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association, Washington, DC, September 1–5.Google Scholar
Kitschelt, Herbert, and Wilkinson, Steven I.. 2007. “Citizen-Politician Linkages: An Introduction.” In Patrons, Clients, and Policies: Patterns of Democratic Accountability and Political Competition, ed. Kitschelt, H. and Wilkinson, S. I., 1–49. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kuenzi, Michelle, and Lambright, Gina. 2001. “Party System Institutionalization in 30 African Countries.” Party Politics 7, 4: 437–468.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kwon, Hyeok Yong. 2010. “Unemployment, Partisan Issue Ownership, and Vote Switching.” Party Politics 16, 4: 497–521.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Laakso, Markku, and Taagepera, Rein. 1979. “Effective Number of Parties: A Measure with Application to West Europe.” Comparative Political Studies 12, 1: 3–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lee, Yeonho, and Lim, Yoo-Jin. 2006. “The Rise of the Labor Party in South Korea: Causes and Limits.” Pacific Review 19, 3: 305–335.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Luna, Juan Pablo, and Altman, David. 2011. “Uprooted but Stable: Chilean Parties and the Concept of Party System Institutionalization.” Latin American Politics and Society 53, 2: 1–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mainwaring, Scott. 1998. “Party Systems in the Third Wave.” Journal of Democracy 9, 3: 67–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mainwaring, Scott. 1999. Rethinking Party Systems in the Third Wave of Democratization: The Case of Brazil. Stanford: Stanford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mainwaring, Scott, and Scully, Timothy R.. 1995. “Introduction: Party Systems in Latin America.” In Building Democratic Institutions: Party Systems in Latin America, ed. Mainwaring, S. and Scully, T. R., 1–34. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Mainwaring, Scott, and Torcal, Mariano. 2006. “Party System Institutionalization and Party System Theory After the Third Wave of Democratization.” In Handbook of Party Politics, ed. Katz, R. S. and Crotty, W., 204–227. London: SAGE.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mainwaring, Scott, and Zoco, Edurne. 2007. “Political Sequences and the Stabilization of Interparty Competition: Electoral Volatility in Old and New Democracies.” Party Politics 13, 2: 155–178.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moon, Woojin. 2005. “Decomposition of Regional Voting in South Korea: Ideological Conflicts and Regional Interests.” Party Politics 11, 5: 579–599.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mozaffar, Shaheen, and Scarritt, James R.. 2005. “The Puzzle of African Party Systems.” Party Politics 11, 4: 399–421.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Park, Chan Wook. 1988. “Legislators and Their Constituents in South Korea: The Patterns of District Representation.” Asian Survey 28, 10: 1049–1065.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Park, Chan Wook. 2002. “Elections in Democratizing Korea.” In How Asia Votes, ed. Hsieh, J. F.-S. and Newman, D., 118–146. New York: Seven Bridges Press.Google Scholar
Park, Cheol Hee. 2008. “A Comparative Institutional Analysis of Korean and Japanese Clientelism.” Asian Journal of Political Science 16, 2: 111–129.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Park, Kyungmee. 2010. “Party Mergers and Splits in New Democracies: The Case of South Korea (1987–2007).” Government and Opposition 45, 4: 531–552.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Payne, J. Mark. 2005. “Party Systems and Democratic Governability.” In Democracies in Development: Politics and Reform in Latin America, ed. Payne, J. M., Zovatto, D. G., and Mateo Díaz, M., 149–177. Washington, DC: Inter-American Development Bank.Google Scholar
Pedersen, Mogens N. 1979. “The Dynamics of European Party Systems: Changing Patterns of Electoral Volatility.” European Journal of Political Research 7, 1: 1–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rahat, Gideon. 2007. “Candidate Selection: The Choice Before the Choice.” Journal of Democracy 18, 1: 157–170.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Samuels, David J., and Shugart, Matthew S.. 2010. Presidents, Parties, and Prime Ministers: How the Separation of Powers Affects Party Organization and Behavior. Cambridge and New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shin, Doh Chull. 2001. “Democratic Consolidation in Korea: A Trend Analysis of Public Opinion Surveys, 1997–2001.” Japanese Journal of Political Science 2, 2: 177–209.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, Gareth. 2009. “Conceptualizing and Testing Brand Personality in British Politics.” Journal of Political Marketing 8, 3: 209–232.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, Gareth, and French, Alan. 2009. “The Political Brand: A Consumer Perspective.” Marketing Theory 9, 2: 209–226.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sonn, Hochul. 2003. “Regional Cleavage in Korean Politics and Elections.” Korea Journal 43, 2: 32–54.Google Scholar
Steinberg, David I., and Shin, Myung. 2006. “Tensions in South Korean Political Parties in Transition: From Entourage to Ideology?” Asian Survey 46, 4: 517–537.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stockton, Hans. 2001. “Political Parties, Party Systems, and Democracy in East Asia: Lessons from Latin America.” Comparative Political Studies 34, 1: 94–119.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Strom, Kaare. 1990. “A Behavioral Theory of Competitive Political Parties.” American Journal of Political Science 34, 2: 565–598.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Transparency International. 2006. The National Integrity Systems TI Country Study Report of Korea. Berlin: Transparency International.Google Scholar
Ware, Alan. 1992. “Activist-Leader Relations and the Structure of Political Parties: ‘Exchange’ Models and Vote-Seeking Behaviour in Parties.” British Journal of Political Science 22, 1: 71–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zucco, Cesar. Forthcoming. “Estabilidad sin raices: La institucionalización del sistema de partidos Brasileño” [Stability without roots: The institutionalization of the Brazilian party system]. In Los problemas de la institucionalización de los sistemas de partidos en America Latina, ed. Torcal, M., ch. 3. Barcelona: Anthropos.Google Scholar