Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-s2hrs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-05T10:48:19.628Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Institutional (Dis)Incentives to Innovate: An Explanation for Singapore's Innovation Gap

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 March 2016

Richard W. Carney  and
Loh Yi Zheng
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Despite having the fifth highest per capita GDP in the world (according to IMF PPP statistics for 2007), and despite numerous government efforts to spur innovation, Singapore has faced difficulties in establishing a durable base of entrepreneurial activity. Many ascribe this failure to the city-state's policies, which are often portrayed as generating a culture of risk aversion and a lack of creativity. In contrast to this conventional view, this article argues that the city-state's institutional arrangements generate conflicting innovation incentives and ultimately undermine innovative activity. Statistical tests across twenty-three countries offer evidence that is consistent with this argument.

Keywords

innovationvarieties of capitalisminstitutionsSingaporetechnologytechnologicalpoliticsresearchgross expenditure on research and developmentnational innovative capacity
Type
Articles
Information
Journal of East Asian Studies , Volume 9 , Issue 2 , August 2009 , pp. 291 - 319
Copyright
Copyright © East Asia Institute 

References

Acs, Zoltan J., and Audretsch, David B. 1988. “Innovation in Large and Small Firms: An Empirical Analysis.” American Economic Review 78, 4: 678–690.Google Scholar
Agency for Science, Technology and Research (A*STAR). 2006. “National Survey of R&D in Singapore 2005.” Singapore: A*STAR.Google Scholar
Akkermans, Dirk, Castaldi, Carolina, and Los, Bart. 2007. “Do ‘Liberal Market Economies’ Really Innovate More Radically Than ‘Coordinated Market Economies’? Hall and Soskice Reconsidered.” Research Memorandum GD-91. Groningen: Groningen Growth and Development Centre.Google Scholar
Bhaskaran, Manu. 2003. Re-inventing the Asian Model: The Case of Singapore. Singapore: Institute of Policy Studies.Google Scholar
Black, Bernard S., and Gilson, Ronald J. 1998. “Venture Capital and the Structure of Capital Markets: Banks Versus Stock Markets.” Journal of Financial Economics 47: 243–277.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boyer, Robert. 2005a. “Complementarity in Regulation Theory.” Socio-Economic Review 3, 2: 366–371.Google Scholar
Boyer, Robert. 2005b. “How and Why Capitalisms Differ.” Economy and Society 34, 4: 509–557.Google Scholar
Bruton, Garry D., Ahlstrom, David, and Singh, Kulwant. 2002. “The Impact of the Institutional Environment on the Venture Capital Industry in Singapore.” Venture Capital 4, 3: 197–218. Budget Statement. 2006. Ministry of Finance, Singapore.Google Scholar
Chibber, V. 2002. “Bureaucratic Rationality and the Developmental State.” American Journal of Sociology 107, 4: 951–989.Google Scholar
Chiesa, Vittorio, and Chiaroni, Davide. 2004. Industrial Clusters in Biotechnology: Driving Forces, Development Processes and Management Practices. London: Imperial College Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chua, Hak Bin. 2006. “Singapore: A Dual Economy?” Citigroup Global Markets Singapore Pte. Ltd. Google Scholar
Crouch, Colin. 2005. Capitalist Diversity and Change: Recombinant Governance and Institutional Entrepreneurs. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Crouch, Colin, and Farrell, Henry. 2004. “Breaking the Path of Institutional Development? Alternatives to the New Determinism.” Rationality and Society 16, 1: 5–43.Google Scholar
Cusack, Thomas, Iversen, Torben, and Soskice, David. 2007. “Economic Interests and the Origins of Electoral Systems.” American Political Science Review 101, 3: 373–391.Google Scholar
Economist. 1997. “What It Takes to Come Top in Technology: Vital Intangibles.” A Survey on Silicon Valley. March 29.Google Scholar
Economist Intelligence Unit. 2006. Main Report. Country Commerce Singapore.Google Scholar
EISC (Entrepreneurship and Internationalisation Subcommittee) Report. 2002. Economic Review Committee, September 13, Singapore.Google Scholar
Ernst, E. C. 2004. “Financial Systems, Industrial Relations, and Industry Specialization: An Econometric Analysis of Institutional Complementarities.” In Proceedings of the First OeNB Workshop. Vienna: Osterreichische Nationalbank.Google Scholar
Evans, A. 2005. “Preemptive Modernisation and the Politics of Sectoral Defense: Adjustment to Globalisation in the Portuguese Pharmacy Sector.” Mimeo.Google Scholar
Financial Times. 2003. “Singapore Cracks Down on Airline Pilots' Union.” December 2.Google Scholar
Financial Times. 2007. “Brussels Threat to Reform Takeover Laws.” February 27.Google Scholar
Furman, J. L., Porter, M. E., and Stern, S. 2002. “The Determinants of National Innovative Capacity.” Research Policy 31: 899–933.Google Scholar
Gilson, Ronald J. 1999. “The Legal Infrastructure of High Technology of Industrial Districts: Silicon Valley, Route 128, and Covenants Not to Compete.” New York University Law Review 74, 3: 575–629.Google Scholar
Gilson, Ronald J., and Roe, Mark J. 1999. “Lifetime Employment: Labor Peace and the Evolution of Japanese Corporate Governance.” Columbia Law Review 99: 508–540.Google Scholar
Gourevitch, Peter, and Shinn, James. 2005. Political Power and Corporate Control: The New Global Politics of Corporate Governance. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Hall, Peter, and Soskice, David. 2001. Varieties of Capitalism: The Institutional Foundations of Comparative Advantage. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hancké, Bob, Rhodes, Martin, and Thatcher, Mark. 2007. Beyond Varieties of Capitalism: Conflict, Contradictions, and Complementarities in the European Economy. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hayek, Friedrich A. 1945. “The Use of Knowledge in Society.” American Economic Review 35, 4: 519–530.Google Scholar
Ho, Kong Weng, Tee, Koh Ai, and Thangavelu, Shandre. 2002. “Enhancing Technopreneurship: Issues and Challenges.” In Singapore Economy in the 21st Century: Issues and Strategies, ed. Tee, Koh Ai. Singapore: McGraw Hill.Google Scholar
Hu, Albert G., and Jang-Sup, Shin. 2002. “Climbing the Technology Ladder: Challenges Facing Singapore in a Globalized World.” In Singapore Economy in the 21st Century: Issues and Strategies, ed. Tee, Koh Ai. Singapore: McGraw Hill.Google Scholar
Katzenstein, Peter. 1984. Corporatism and Change: Austria, Switzerland, and the Politics of Industry. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Khong, Cho-Oon. 1995. “Singapore: Political Legitimacy Through Managing Conformity.” In Political Legitimacy in Southeast Asia: The Quest for Moral Authority, ed. Alagappa, Muthiah. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Koh, Francis C. C., and Koh, Winston T. H. 2002. “Venture Capital and Economic Growth: An Industry Overview and Singapore's Experience.” Singapore Management University Economics and Statistics Working Paper No. 21-2002.Google Scholar
Koh, Francis C. C., Koh, Winston T. H., and Tschang, Feichin Ted. 2003. “An Analytical Framework for Science Parks and Technology Districts with an Application to Singapore.” Singapore Management University Economics and Statistics Working Paper No. 18-2003.Google Scholar
Koh, Winston T. H. 2006. “Towards Innovation-driven Economic Growth: R&D Capabilities and Entrepreneurship in Singapore.” In The Economic Prospects in Singapore, ed. Koh, Winston and Mariano, Robert. Singapore: Pearson Addison Wesley.Google Scholar
La Porta, Rafael, Lopez-de-Silanes, Florencio, and Shleifer, Andrei. 1999. “Corporate Ownership Around the World.” Journal of Finance 14, 2: 471–517.Google Scholar
Lee, Lena, and Wong, Poh-Kam. 2004. “Venture Capital in Singapore.” National University of Singapore Entrepreneurship Centre Working Paper 2004–19.Google Scholar
Leung, Hing Man. 2006. “Industrial Policy and Economic Development: Comparing Singapore with Hong Kong, Korea and Taiwan.” In The Economic Prospects in Singapore, ed. Koh, Winston and Mariano, Robert. Singapore: Pearson Addison Wesley.Google Scholar
Lopez-Claros, Augusto, Porter, Michael E., Sala-i-Martin, Xavier, and Schwab, Klaus. 2006. Global Competitiveness Report 2006–2007: Creating an Improved Business Environment. Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Low, Linda. 2006. The Political Economy of a City-State Revisited. Singapore: Marshall Cavendish Academic.Google Scholar
Morck, Randall, and Steier, Lloyd. 2005. “The Global History of Corporate Governance: An Introduction.” NBER Working Paper 11062. Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research.Google Scholar
Nelson, R. R., ed. 1993. National Innovation Systems: A Comparative Analysis. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Olson, Mancur. 1996. “Distinguished Lecture on Economics in Government: Big Bills Left on the Sidewalk: Why Some Nations Are Rich, and Others Poor.” Journal of Economic Perspectives 10, 2: 3–24.Google Scholar
Patel, Hitendra. 2006. “The State of Innovation in Singapore: Study Presentation.” In The Fifth Singapore Economic Roundtable. Singapore: SNP Reference for Institute of Policy Studies.Google Scholar
Phelps, Edmund S. 2006. “Toward a Model of Innovation and Performance Along the Lines of Knight, Keynes, Hayek and M. Polanyi.” Prepared for the Conference on Entrepreneurship and Economic Growth, Max-Planck Institute and the Kauffman Foundation.Google Scholar
Porter, M. E. 1990. The Competitive Advantage of Nations. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
Porter, M. E. 1998. On Competition. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.Google Scholar
Porter, M. E., and Stern, S. 2001. National Innovative Capacity. The Global Competitiveness Report, 2001–2002. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Price Waterhouse and Coopers and Partnership for New York City. 2007. “Cities of Opportunity: Business-Readiness Indicators for the 21st Century.” Available at www.pwc.com/cities.Google Scholar
Rodan, Garry. 2006. “Singapore: Globalisation, the State and Politics.” In The Political Economy of South-east Asia: Markets, Power and Contestation. 3rd ed., ed. Rodan, Garry, Hewison, Kevin, and Robison, Richard. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Romer, P. 1990. “Endogenous Technological Change.” Journal of Political Economy 98: 71–102.Google Scholar
Saxenian, AnnaLee. 1994. Regional Advantage: Culture and Competition in Silicon Valley and Route 128. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Saxenian, AnnaLee. 1999. Silicon Valley's New Immigrant Entrepreneurs. San Francisco: Public Policy Institute of California.Google Scholar
Straits Times. 2004. “Why Amend Act? Alpa-S Saga Shows Workers' Interests Not Protected.” April 21.Google Scholar
Straits Times. 2007. “A Singapore Secret That Cannot Be Easily Copied.” January 25.Google Scholar
Taylor, M. Z. 2004. “Empirical Evidence Against Varieties of Capitalism's Theory of Technological Innovation.” International Organization 58: 601–631.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Taylor, M. Z. 2007. “Family Capitalism: Our Company Right or Wrong.” March 17.Google Scholar
Tsui-Auch, Lai Si. 2004a. “Bureaucratic Rationality and Nodal Agency in a Developmental State: The Case of State-led Biotechnology Development in Singapore.” International Sociology 19, 4: 451–477.Google Scholar
Tsui-Auch, Lai Si. 2004b. “The Professionally Managed Family-ruled Enterprise: Ethnic Chinese Business in Singapore.” Journal of Management Studies 41, 4: 693–723.Google Scholar
Tylecote, Andrew, and Conesa, Emmanuelle. 1999. “Corporate Governance, Innovation Systems and Industrial Performance.” Industry and Innovation 6, 1: 25–50.Google Scholar
Wang, Clement K., Qi, Mao, and Wong, Poh-Kam. 2002. “The Effect of VC Industry Maturity on VC-Backed IPOs: Evidence from the U.S., Singapore and China.” NUS Centre for Entrepreneurship Working Paper 2002/09/04, National University of Singapore.Google Scholar
Whitley, Richard. 1996. Continuity and Change in East Asian Capitalism: The Limited Effects of Internationalism and Domestic Change on the Business Systems of Japan, Korea, and Taiwan. Manchester: Manchester Business School.Google Scholar
Whitley, Richard. 2005. “How National Are Business Systems? The Role of States and Complementary Institutions in Standardizing Systems of Economic Coordination and Control at the National Level.” In Changing Capitalisms? Internationalization, Institutional Change, and Systems of Economic Organization, ed. Morgan, G., Whitley, R., and Moen, E. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Wong, Poh-Kam, Lee, Lena, Ho, Yuen-Ping, and Wong, Finna. 2006. “Gobal Entrepreneurship Monitor 2005 Singapore Report.” NUS Entrepreneurship Centre, National University of Singapore.Google Scholar
Wyatt, Steve. 2006. “State of Innovation in Singapore: Some Findings of the IPS-Monitor Innovation Survey.” Singapore Perspectives 2006. Singapore: Marshall Cavendish Academic.Google Scholar