Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-vdxz6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-27T11:25:04.516Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Economic Logic of Asian Preferential Trade Agreements: The Role of Intra-Industry Trade

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 March 2016

Mark S. Manger
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Are preferential trade agreements (PTAs) in the Asia-Pacific region merely a political phenomenon with no economic basis, as some critics say? I challenge this interpretation; in this article I present an explanatory model based on intra-industry trade to indicate what economic interests should drive Japanese and South Korean PTAs with ASEAN partners, and derive specific predictions. An analysis of the actual tariff barrier elimination in the agreements suggests important, but highly specific, economic benefits. First, preference margins are substantively greater for intra-industry trade, and second, intra-industry trade is much less likely to be excluded from tariff reductions when imported into Japan or South Korea. This indicates that PTAs help firms specialize their production throughout the region, and provides an economic rationale for these agreements. A qualitative case study of the Japan-Malaysia PTA and a statistical analysis of tariff liberalization in the PTAs of Japan and South Korea with the ASEAN countries support this view.

Keywords

preferential trade agreementsfree trade agreementsJapanSouth KoreaASEANintra-industry tradetrade policy
Type
Articles
Information
Journal of East Asian Studies , Volume 14 , Issue 2 , August 2014 , pp. 151 - 184
Copyright
Copyright © East Asia Institute 

References

Abd-el-Rahman, Kamal. 1991. “Firms Competitive and National Comparative Advantages as Joint Determinant of Trade Composition.” Weltwirtschaftliches Archiv 127, 1: 83–97.Google Scholar
Achen, Christopher H. 2002. “Toward a New Political Methodology: Microfoundations and ART.” Annual Review of Political Science 5, 1: 423–450.Google Scholar
Aggarwal, Vinod K. 1994. “Comparing Regional Cooperation Efforts in the Asia-Pacific and North America.” In Pacific Cooperation: Building Economic and Security Regimes in the Asia-Pacific Region, ed. Mack, Andrew and Ravenhill, John, 40–65. St. Leonards, NS: Allen and Unwin.Google Scholar
Aggarwal, Vinod K., and Urata, Shujiro. 2006. Bilateral Trade Arrangements in the Asia-Pacific: Origins, Evolution, and Implications. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Alfaro, Laura, and Charlton, Andrew. 2009. “Intra-Industry Foreign Direct Investment.” American Economic Review 99, 5: 2096–2119.Google Scholar
Athukorala, Prema-chandra. 2005. “Trade Policy in Malaysia: Liberalization Process, Structure of Protection, and Reform Agenda.” ASEAN Economic Bulletin 22, 1: 19–34.Google Scholar
Athukorala, Prema-chandra. 2010. “Production Networks and Trade Patterns in East Asia: Regionalization or Globalization?” ADB Working Paper Series on Regional Economic Integration 56. Manila: Asian Development Bank.Google Scholar
Baccini, Leonardo, and Dür, Andreas. Forthcoming. “Investment Discrimination and the Proliferation of Preferential Trade Agreements.” Journal of Conflict Resolution. Google Scholar
Baccini, Leonardo, and Dür, Andreas. 2012. “The New Regionalism and Policy Interdependence.” British Journal of Political Science 42, 1: 57–79.Google Scholar
Baier, Scott L., and Bergstrand, Jeffrey H. 2004. “Economic Determinants of Free Trade Agreements.” Journal of International Economics 64, 1: 29–63.Google Scholar
Baldwin, Richard E. 1996. “A Domino Theory of Regionalism.” In Expanding Membership of the European Union, ed. Baldwin, Richard E., Haaparanta, Pertti, and Kiander, Jaakko, 25–48. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Baldwin, Richard E., Forslid, Rikard, and Haaland, Jan I. 1996. “Investment Creation and Diversion in Europe.” World Economy 19, 6: 635–659.Google Scholar
Bergsten, C. Fred. 1997. “Open Regionalism.” World Economy 20, 5: 545–565.Google Scholar
Bischof, Jonathan M. 2009. “A Bootstrap Approach to Time Invariance in Panel Data.” Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association, Chicago, September 1–4.Google Scholar
Borrus, Michael G., Ernst, Dieter, and Haggard, Stephan. 2000. International Production Networks in Asia: Rivalry or Riches?. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Brenton, Peter A., and Alan Winters, L. 1992. “Estimating the International Trade Effects of ‘1992’: West Germany.” Journal of Common Market Studies 30, 2: 143–156.Google Scholar
Capling, Ann. 2008. “Preferential Trade Agreements as Instruments of Foreign Policy: An Australia-Japan Free Trade Agreement and Its Implications for the Asia Pacific Region.” Pacific Review 21, 1: 27–43.Google Scholar
Centre d'Etudes Prospectives et d'Informations Internationales (CEPII). 2010. BACI: International Trade Database at the Product-Level. The 1994–2007 Version. www.cepii.fr/anglaisgraph/bdd/baci.htm.Google Scholar
Chase, Kerry A. 2003. “Economic Interests and Regional Trading Arrangements: The Case of NAFTA.” International Organization 57, 1: 137–174.Google Scholar
Cooper, Douglas, Greenaway, David, and Rayner, Anthony J. 1993. “Intra-Industry Trade and Limited Producer Horizons: An Empirical Investigation.” Review of World Economics 129, 2: 345–366.Google Scholar
Davis, Christina L. 2004. “International Institutions and Issue Linkage: Building Support for Agricultural Trade Liberalization.” American Political Science Review 98, 1: 153–169.Google Scholar
Dent, Christopher M. 2003. “Networking the Region? The Emergence and Impact of Asia-Pacific Bilateral Free Trade Agreement Projects.” Pacific Review 16, 1: 1–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Deyo, Frederic C. 1987. The Political Economy of the New Asian Industrialism. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Efron, Bradley, and Tibshirani, Robert J. 1998. An Introduction to the Bootstrap. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.Google Scholar
Feenstra, Robert C. 2004. Advanced International Trade: Theory and Evidence. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Finlayson, Jock A., and Zacher, Mark W. 1981. “The GATT and the Regulation of Trade Barriers: Regime Dynamics and Function.” International Organization 35, 4: 561–602.Google Scholar
Flam, Harry, and Helpman, Elhanan. 1987. “Vertical Product Differentiation and North-South Trade.” American Economic Review 77, 5: 810–822.Google Scholar
Fontagné, Lionel, and Freudenberg, Michael. 1997. “Intra-Industry Trade: Methodological Issues Reconsidered.” Paris: Centre d'Etudes Prospectives et d'Informations Internationales (CEPII).Google Scholar
Fontagné, Lionel, Freudenberg, Michael, and Gaulier, Guillaume. 2005. “Disentangling Horizontal and Vertical Intra-Industry Trade.” Paris: CEPII.Google Scholar
Fukao, Kyoji, Ishido, Hikari, and Ito, Keiko. 2003. “Vertical Intra-Industry Trade and Foreign Direct Investment in East Asia.” Tokyo: Research Institute of the Ministry of Economy, Trade, and Industry (RIETI).Google Scholar
Gallant, Nicole, and Stubbs, Richard. 1997. “APEC's Dilemmas: Institution-Building Around the Pacific Rim.” Pacific Affairs 70, 2: 203–218.Google Scholar
Gilligan, Michael J. 1997. “Lobbying as a Private Good with Intra-Industry Trade.” International Studies Quarterly 41, 3: 455–474.Google Scholar
Gowa, Joanne, and Mansfield, Edward D. 1993. “Power-Politics and International Trade.” American Political Science Review 87, 2: 408–420.Google Scholar
Gray, Julia. 2014. “Life, Death, or Zombies? The Survival and Revival of Regional Organizations.” Paper presented at the Political Economy of International Organizations Conference, Niehaus Center for Globalization and Governance, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ, January 16–18.Google Scholar
Greenaway, David, Hine, Robert, and Milner, Chris. 1994. “Country-Specific Factors and the Pattern of Horizontal and Vertical Intra-Industry Trade in the UK.” Weltwirtschaftliches Archiv 130, 1: 77–100.Google Scholar
Grieco, Joseph M. 1997. “Systemic Sources of Variation in Regional Institutionalization in Western Europe, East Asia, and the Americas.” In The Political Economy of Regionalism, ed. Mansfield, Edward D. and Milner, Helen V., 164–187. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Grossman, Gene M., and Helpman, Elhanan. 1994. “Protection for Sale.” American Economic Review 84, 4: 833–850.Google Scholar
Hale, Thomas. 2011. “The de Facto Preferential Trade Agreement in East Asia.” Review of International Political Economy 18, 3: 299–327.Google Scholar
Hayakawa, Kazunobu. 2011. “Measuring Fixed Costs for Firms' Use of a Free Trade Agreement: Threshold Regression Approach.” Economics Letters 113, 3: 301–303.Google Scholar
Hayakawa, Kazunobu, Kim, Hansung, and Lee, Hyun-hoon. 2013. “Determinants on Utilization of the Korea-ASEAN Free Trade Agreement: Margin Effect, Scale Effect, and ROO Effect.” World Trade Review FirstView.Google Scholar
Hicks, Raymond, and Kim, Soo Yeon. 2012. “Reciprocal Trade Agreements in Asia: Credible Commitment to Trade Liberalization or Paper Tigers?” Journal of East Asian Studies 12, 1: 1–29.Google Scholar
Higgott, Richard A., Leaver, Richard, and Ravenhill, John. 1993. Pacific Economic Relations in the 1990s: Cooperation or Conflict?. Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner.Google Scholar
Hiratsuka, Daisuke. 2011. “Production Networks in Asia: A Case Study from the Hard Disk Drive Industry.” ADBI Working Paper Series 301. Tokyo: Asian Development Bank Institute.Google Scholar
Japan Business Council for Trade and Investment Facilitation. 2003. Issues and Requests Relating to Trade and Investment in 2003. Tokyo: Japan Business Council for Trade and Investment Facilitation.Google Scholar
Johnson, Chalmers A. 1982. MITI and the Japanese Miracle: The Growth of Industrial Policy, 1925-1975. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Kahler, Miles. 1994. “Institution-Building in the Pacific.” In Pacific Cooperation: Building Economic and Security Regimes in the Asia-Pacific Region, ed. Mack, Andrew and Ravenhill, John, 16–39. St. Leonards, NS: Allen and Unwin.Google Scholar
Katada, Saori N., Solís, Mireya, and Stallings, Barbara. 2009. Competitive Regionalism: Explaining the Diffusion of FTAs in the Pacific Rim. London: Palgrave.Google Scholar
Katzenstein, Peter J., and Shiraishi, Takashi. 2006. Beyond Japan: The Dynamics of East Asian Regionalism. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Kim, Soo Yeon. 2014. “Negotiating the Nexus: Production Networks and Behind-the-Border Commitments in RTAs.” Paper presented at the Political Economy of International Organizations Conference, Niehaus Center for Globalization and Governance, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ, January 16–18.Google Scholar
Kimura, Fukunari, and Ando, Mitsuyo. 2005. “Two-Dimensional Fragmentation in East Asia: Conceptual Framework and Empirics.” International Review of Economics and Finance 14, 3: 317–348.Google Scholar
Kiyota, Kozo. 2006. “Why Countries Are So Eager to Establish Bilateral Free Trade Agreements: A Case Study of Thailand.” In Bilateral Trade Agreements in the Asia-Pacific: Origins, Evolution, and Implications, ed. Aggarwal, Vinod K. and Urata, Shujiro, 206–231. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Kono, Daniel Y. 2009. “Market Structure, Electoral Institutions, and Trade Policy.” International Studies Quarterly 53, 4: 885–906.Google Scholar
Krauss, Ellis S. 2003. “The US, Japan, and Trade Liberalization: From Bilateralism to Regional Multilateralism to Regionalism.” Pacific Review 16, 3: 307–329.Google Scholar
Krugman, Paul R. 1981. “Intraindustry Specialization and the Gains from Trade.” Journal of Political Economy 89, 5: 959–973.Google Scholar
Lamy, Pascal. 2012. “Foreword by the WTO Director-General.” In World Trade Report 2011: The WTO and Preferential Trade Agreements: From Co-Existence to Coherence, 3–4. Geneva: World Trade Organization.Google Scholar
Manger, Mark S. 2005. “Competition and Bilateralism in Trade Policy: The Case of Japan's Free Trade Agreements.” Review of International Political Economy 12, 5: 804–828.Google Scholar
Manger, Mark S. 2009. Investing in Protection: The Politics of Preferential Trade Agreements Between North and South. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Manger, Mark S. 2012. “Vertical Trade Specialization and the Formation of North-South PTAs.” World Politics 64, 4: 622–658.Google Scholar
Mansfield, Edward D., and Bronson, Rachel. 1997. “Alliances, Preferential Trading Arrangements, and International Trade.” American Political Science Review 91, 1: 94–107.Google Scholar
Mansfield, Edward D., and Milner, Helen V. 2010. “Regime Type, Veto Points, and Preferential Trading Arrangements.” Stanford Journal of International Law 46, 2: 219–242.Google Scholar
Mansfield, Edward D., Milner, Helen V., and Peter Rosendorff, B. 2002. “Why Democracies Cooperate More: Electoral Control and International Trade Agreements.” International Organization 56, 3: 477–513.Google Scholar
Mansfield, Edward D., and Reinhardt, Eric. 2003. “Multilateral Determinants of Regionalism: The Effects of GATT/WTO on the Formation of Preferential Trading Arrangements.” International Organization 57, 4: 829–862.Google Scholar
Mansfield, Edward D., and Reinhardt, Eric. 2008. “International Institutions and the Volatility of International Trade.” International Organization 62, 4: 621–652.Google Scholar
Mason, Amy M. 2004. “The Degeneralization of the Generalized System of Preferences (GSP): Questioning the Legitimacy of the US GSP.” Duke Law Journal 54, 2: 513–547.Google Scholar
McDonald, John F., and Moffitt, Robert A. 1980. “The Uses of Tobit Analysis.” Review of Economics and Statistics 62, 2: 318–321.Google Scholar
Milner, Helen V. 1997. “Industries, Governments, and the Creation of Regional Trade Blocs.” In The Political Economy of Regionalism, ed. Mansfield, Edward D. and Milner, Helen V., 77–106. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Milner, Helen V., and Kubota, Keiko. 2005. “Why the Move to Free Trade? Democracy and Trade Policy in the Developing Countries.” International Organization 59, 1: 107–143.Google Scholar
Munakata, Naoko. 2001. “Evolution of Japan's Policy Toward Economic Integration.” Washington, DC: Center for Northeast Asian Policy Studies (CNAPS), The Brookings Institution.Google Scholar
Nelson, Douglas. 1988. “Endogenous Tariff Theory: A Critical Survey.” American Journal of Political Science 88, 3: 796–838.Google Scholar
Nishitateno, Shuhei. 2013. “Global Production Sharing and the FDI-Trade Nexus: New Evidence from the Japanese Automobile Industry.” Journal of the Japanese and International Economies 27, 1: 64–80.Google Scholar
Ogita, Tatsushi. 2002. “An Approach Towards Japan's FTA Policy.” Chiba: Institute of Developing Economies, Japan External Trade Organization.Google Scholar
Ogita, Tatsushi. 2003. “Japan as a Late-Coming FTA Holder: Trade Policy Change for Asian Orientation?” In Wither Free Trade Agreements? Proliferation, Evaluation, and Multilateralization, ed. Okamoto, Jiro, 216–251. Chiba: Institute of Developing Economies, Japan External Trade Organization.Google Scholar
Pekkanen, Saadia M. 2005. “Bilateralism, Multilateralism, or Regionalism? Japan's Trade Forum Choices.” Journal of East Asian Studies 5, 1: 77–103.Google Scholar
Pekkanen, Saadia M., Solís, Mireya, and Katada, Saori N. 2007. “Trading Gains for Control: International Trade Forums and Japanese Economic Diplomacy.” International Studies Quarterly 54, 4: 945–970.Google Scholar
Pempel, T. J. 2006. “The Race to Connect East Asia: An Unending Steeple-chase.” Asian Economic Policy Review 1, 2: 239–254.Google Scholar
Ravenhill, John. 2006. “The Political Economy of the New Asia-Pacific Bilateralism: Benign, Banal, or Simply Bad?” In Bilateral Trade Agreements in the Asia Pacific: Origins, Evolution, and Implications, ed. Aggarwal, Vinod K. and Urata, Shujiro, 27–49. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Ravenhill, John. 2010. “The ‘New East Asian Regionalism’: A Political Domino Effect.” Review of International Political Economy 17, 2: 178–208.Google Scholar
Schrodt, Philip. 2010. “Seven Deadly Sins of Contemporary Quantitative Political Analysis.” Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association, Washington, DC, September 2–5.Google Scholar
Sekizawa, Yoichi. 2008. “Nihon No FTA Seisaku: Sono Seiji Katei No Bunseki” [Japan's FTA policy: Analysis of the political process]. ISS Research Series 26. Tokyo: Institute of Social Science, University of Tokyo.Google Scholar
Solís, Mireya. 2003. “Japan's New Regionalism: The Politics of Free Trade with Mexico.” Journal of East Asian Studies 3, 3: 377–404.Google Scholar
Takahashi, Katsuhide, and Urata, Shujiro. 2010. “On the Use of FTAs by Japanese Firms: Further Evidence.” Business and Politics 12, 1: 1–17.Google Scholar
Woo-Cumings, Meredith. 1999. The Developmental State. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
WTO. 2011. “World Trade Report 2011: The WTO and Preferential Trade Agreements: From Co-Existence to Coherence.” Geneva: World Trade Organization.Google Scholar
Yoshimatsu, Hidetaka. 2005. “Japan's Keidanren and Free Trade Agreements: Societal Interests and Trade Policy.” Asian Survey 45, 2: 258–278.Google Scholar