Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-tf8b9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-30T19:58:50.553Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Asia Pacific and Global Order in the Post 9–11 World

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 March 2016

Sung-Joo Han*
Affiliation:
Korea University

Abstract

This article contends that the September 11th terrorist attacks have had a significant effect on the Asian regional order as well as on the global order. Globally, they have had two seemingly contradictory effects. On the one hand, the post-9.11 situation has presented the major powers of the world, including the United States, Russia and China, to build a “system of concert,” overcoming their rivalries and conflicting interests. It seems to have given new impetus to the promotion of multilateralism in international relations. On the other hand, it has helped to revive and rediscover what is known as realism in international politics, realism that recognizes the supremacy of the state and national interest as individual states become the main protector of their citizens in times of crises.

The system of concert is also evolving in East Asia which, until September 11th, 2001, had been slow in catching up with the Western world (Europe and America) in international cooperation and multilateral mechanisms. Most remarkable in this regard is the improved relations between China and the United States and, secondarily, between China and Japan. Even though sources of conflict remain among various countries, major powers such as the United States, Russia, China and Japan now place greater emphasis upon cooperation and mutual assistance in fighting global terrorism. It nevertheless seems that Asians will continue to live in a regional order where a new system of concert that evolves in the aftermath of the 9–11 attacks coexists with a traditional geopolitical and real politics order.

Type
Regional Report
Copyright
Copyright © East Asia Institute 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Cossa, Ralph A.Ushering in the Post Post-Cold War Era,” Pacific Forum CSIS Comparative Connections (http://www.csis.org/pacfor/cc/0103Qoverview.html).Google Scholar
Kissinger, Henry. 2001. America at the Apex. The National Interest, No. 64: 918.Google Scholar
New York Times. 2001. The World: Russia, China and the US; In Terror, At Last a Common Enemy for the Big Three. October 28, Section 4, Page 1.Google Scholar
Sanger, David E. 2001. After ABM Treaty: New Freedom for US in Different Kind of Arms Control. The New York Times, December 15.Google Scholar
Vinocur, John. 2001. Schroeder ‘Ready’ to Provide Anti-Bioterror Forces. International Herald Tribune, October 18.Google Scholar