Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-mkpzs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T20:44:09.809Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Political Conflict Resolution and Democratic Consolidation in Indonesia: The Role of the Constitutional Court

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 March 2016

Marcus Mietzner
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This article argues that Indonesia's Constitutional Court has played a significant role in that country's transformation from a violence-prone polity into Southeast Asia's most stable democracy. The Court has advanced institutional conflict resolution mechanisms and expanded democratic rights—two achievements identified by Linz and Stepan as major indicators of a consolidating democracy. Building on models developed by Ginsburg and Horowitz, my analysis also illustrates why the Court has been able to defend its autonomy and become an agent of democratization. While sharing Ginsburg's emphasis on high levels of power diffusion as a key reason for the Court's success, this article moves beyond such an approach. Most importantly, it suggests that the judges' “judicial activism”—as expressed in a number of controversial but popular decision—increased Indonesian society's support for the Court to such an extent that is has now become largely invulnerable to attempts of external intervention.

Keywords

Indonesiademocratic consolidationconflict resolutionconstitutional court
Type
Articles
Information
Journal of East Asian Studies , Volume 10 , Issue 3 , December 2010 , pp. 397 - 424
Copyright
Copyright © East Asia Institute 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Aspinall, Edward. 2010. “Indonesia: The Irony of Success.” Journal of Democracy 21, 2: 20–34.Google Scholar
Asshiddiqie, Jimly. 2009. Munuju Negara Hukum Yang Demokratis [Toward a democratic state based on law]. Jakarta: BIP.Google Scholar
Bresnan, John, ed. 2005. Indonesia: The Great Transition. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.Google Scholar
Budiman, Arief, ed. 1990. State and Civil Society in Indonesia. Clayton: Centre of Southeast Asian Studies, Monash University.Google Scholar
Budiman, Arief, Hatley, Barbara, and Kingsbury, Damien, eds. 1999. Reformasi: Crisis and Change in Indonesia. Melbourne: Monash Asia Institute.Google Scholar
Butt, Simon. 2006. “Judicial Review in Indonesia: Between Civil Law and Accountability—A Study of Constitutional Court Decisions, 2003–2005.” PhD diss., University of Melbourne.Google Scholar
Butt, Simon. 2007. “The Constitutional Court's Decision in the Dispute Between the Supreme Court and the Judicial Commission: Banishing Judicial Accountability?” In Indonesia: Democracy and the Promise of Good Governance, ed. McLeod, Ross and MacIntyre, Andrew, 178–200. Singapore: Institute of Southeast Asian Studies.Google Scholar
Crouch, Harold. 1999. “Wiranto and Habibie: Military-Civilian Relations Since May 1998.” In Reformasi: Crisis and Change in Indonesia, ed. Budiman, Arief, Hatley, Barbara, and Kingsbury, Damien, 127–148. Melbourne: Monash Asia Institute.Google Scholar
Crouch, Harold. 2010. Political Reform in Indonesia After Soeharto. Singapore: Institute of Southeast Asian Studies.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davidson, Jamie S. 2009. “Dilemmas of Democratic Consolidation in Indonesia.” Pacific Review 22, 3: 293–310.Google Scholar
Diamond, Larry. 2010. “Indonesia's Place in Global Democracy.” In Problems of Democratisation in Indonesia: Elections, Institutions and Society, ed. Aspinall, Edward and Mietzner, Marcus, 21–52. Singapore: Institute of Southeast Asian Studies.Google Scholar
Dressel, Bjoern. 2009. “Thailand's Elusive Quest for a Workable Constitution.” Contemporary Southeast Asia 31, 2: 296–325.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Feillard, Andrée. 2002. “Indonesian Traditionalist Islam's Troubled Experience with Democracy.” Archipel 64: 117–144.Google Scholar
Freedom House. 2006. Freedom in the World 2006: The Annual Survey of Political Rights and Civil Liberties. New York: Freedom House.Google Scholar
Freedom House. 2008. Freedom in the World 2008: The Annual Survey of Political Rights and Civil Liberties. New York: Freedom House.Google Scholar
Freedom House. 2010. Freedom in the World 2010: The Annual Survey of Political Rights and Civil Liberties. New York: Freedom House.Google Scholar
Funston, John, ed. 2009. Divided Over Thaksin: Thailand's Coup and Problematic Transition. Singapore: Institute of Southeast Asian Studies.Google Scholar
Ginsburg, Tom. 2003. Judicial Review in New Democracies: Constitutional Courts in Asian Cases. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Greenless, Don, and Garran, Robert. 2002. Deliverance: The Inside Story of East Timor's Fight for Freedom. Crows Nest, Australia: Allen & Unwin.Google Scholar
Hilbink, L. 2006. “Beyond Manicheanism: Assessing the New Constitutionalism.” Maryland Law Review 65, 1: 15–31.Google Scholar
Hill, Hal, and Manning, Chris. 2009. “Indonesia's New Cabinet: A Boost for Economic Policy and Reform.” Australian Financial Review (October 27).Google Scholar
Hirschl, Ran. 2004. Towards Juristocracy: The Origins and Consequences of the New Constitutionalism. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Horowitz, Donald L. 2006. “Constitutional Courts: A Primer for Decision-Makers.” Journal of Democracy 17, 4: 125–137.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
King, Blair. 2004. “Empowering the Presidency: Interests and Perceptions in Indonesia's Constitutional Reforms, 1999–2002.” PhD diss., Ohio State University.Google Scholar
Lindsey, Tim. 1993. “Concrete Ideology: Taste, Tradition, and the Javanese Past in New Order Public Space.” In Culture and Society in New Order Indonesia, ed. Hooker, Virginia M., 166–182. Kuala Lumpur: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Linz, Juan J., and Stepan, Alfred. 1996. Problems of Democratic Transition and Consolidation: Southern Europe, South America, and Post-Communist Europe. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Mahfud, Mohammad MD. 2009. Konstitusi dan Hukum Dalam Kontroversi Isu [Constitution and law in a controversy of issues]. Jakarta: Rajawali Pers.Google Scholar
Manning, Chris, and van Diemen, Peter, eds. 2000. Indonesia in Transition: Social Aspects of Reformasi and Crisis. Singapore: Institute of Southeast Asian Studies.Google Scholar
McGregor, Katharine E. 2009. “A Bridge and a Barrier: Islam, Reconciliation and the 1965 Killings in Indonesia.” In Reconciling Indonesia: Grassroots Agency for Peace, ed. Bräuchler, Birgit, 214–232. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
McIntyre, Angus. 2005. The Indonesian Presidency: The Shift from Personal Toward Constitutional Rule. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.Google Scholar
Mietzner, Marcus. 2006. “The Politics of Military Reform in Post-Soeharto Indonesia: Elite Conflict, Nationalism and Institutional Resistance.” Policy Studies Series 23. Washington, DC: East West Center.Google Scholar
Mietzner, Marcus. 2008. “Comparing Indonesia's Party Systems in the 1950s and the Post-Soeharto Era: Centrifugal Versus Centripetal Inter-Party Competition.” Journal of Southeast Asian Studies 39, 3: 431–453.Google Scholar
Mietzner, Marcus. 2009. Military Politics, Islam and the State in Indonesia: From Turbulent Transition to Democratic Consolidation. Singapore: Institute of Southeast Asian Studies.Google Scholar
Mujani, Saiful, and Liddle, William R. 2010. “Voters and the New Indonesian Democracy.” In Problems of Democratisation in Indonesia: Elections, Institutions and Society, ed. Aspinall, Edward and Mietzner, Marcus, 75–99. Singapore: Institute of Southeast Asian Studies.Google Scholar
Pompe, Sebastiaan. 2005. The Indonesian Supreme Court: A Study of Institutional Collapse. Ithaca: Southeast Asia Program Publications, Cornell University.Google Scholar
Rotman, Anna. 2004. “Benin's Constitutional Court: An Institutional Model for Guaranteeing Human Rights.” Harvard Human Rights Journal 17: 281–314.Google Scholar
Royan, Naomita. 2008. “Increasing Press Freedom in Indonesia: The Abolition of the Lèse Majesté and ‘Hate-Sowing’ Provisions.” Australian Journal of Asian Law 10, 2: 290–311.Google Scholar
Scheppele, Kim Lane. 1999. “The New Hungarian Constitutional Court.” East European Constitutional Review 8: 81–87.Google Scholar
Schmidt, Adam. 2010. “Indonesia's 2009 Elections: Performance Challenges and Negative Precedents.” In Problems of Democratisation in Indonesia: Elections, Institutions and Society, ed. Aspinall, Edward and Mietzner, Marcus, 100–121. Singapore: Institute of Southeast Asian Studies.Google Scholar
Schulte Nordholt, Henk, and Asnan, Gusti, eds. 2003. Indonesia in Transition: Work in Progress. Jakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.Google Scholar
Sherlock, Stephen. 2010. “People's Forum or Chamber of Cronies? The Parliament in Indonesia's Decade of Democracy.” In Problems of Democratisation in Indonesia: Elections, Institutions and Society, ed. Aspinall, Edward and Mietzner, Marcus, 160–180. Singapore: Institute of Southeast Asian Studies.Google Scholar
Stephenson, Matthew C. 2003. “‘When the Devil Turns …’: The Political Foundations of Independent Judicial Review.” Journal of Legal Studies 53, 3: 59–89.Google Scholar
Sukma, Rizal. 2009. “Indonesian Politics in 2009: Defective Elections, Resilient Democracy.” Bulletin of Indonesian Economic Studies 45, 3: 317–336.Google Scholar
Tadjoeddin, Mohammad Zulfan, and Murshed, Syed Mansoob. 2007. “Socio Economic Determinants in Everyday Violence in Indonesia: An Empirical Investigation of Javanese Districts, 1994–2003.” Journal of Peace Research 44, 6: 689–709.Google Scholar
Teitel, Ruti. 2007. “Militating Democracy: Comparative Institutional Perspectives.” Michigan Journal of International Law 29, 1: 49–70.Google Scholar
Tomsa, Dirk. 2009. “The Eagle Has Crash-Landed.” Inside Indonesia 97 (July–September).Google Scholar
Welsh, Bridget. 2008. “Local and National: Keroyokan Mobbing in Indonesia.” Journal of East Asian Studies 8, 3: 473–504.Google Scholar