Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gvvz8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T14:17:55.317Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The significance of DOHaD for Small Island Developing States

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 July 2018

S. Tu’akoi ,
M. H. Vickers ,
K. Tairea ,
Y. Y. M. Aung ,
N. Tamarua-Herman ,
M. ’Ofanoa  and
J. L. Bay
S. Tu’akoi
Affiliation:
Liggins Institute, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand
M. H. Vickers*
Affiliation:
Liggins Institute, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand
K. Tairea
Affiliation:
Rarotonga Hospital, Te Marae Ora-Ministry of Health, Cook Islands
Y. Y. M. Aung
Affiliation:
Community Health Services, Te Marae Ora-Ministry of Health, Cook Islands
N. Tamarua-Herman
Affiliation:
Rarotonga Hospital, Te Marae Ora-Ministry of Health, Cook Islands
M. ’Ofanoa
Affiliation:
School of Population Health, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand
J. L. Bay
Affiliation:
Liggins Institute, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand
*
*Address for correspondence: Liggins Institute, University of Auckland, 2-6 Park Avenue, Grafton, Auckland, Auckland 1023, New Zealand.E-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Small Island Developing States (SIDS) are island nations that experience specific social, economic and environmental vulnerabilities associated with small populations, isolation and limited resources. Globally, SIDS exhibit exceptionally high rates of non-communicable disease (NCD) risk and incidence. Despite this, there is a lack of context-specific research within SIDS focused on life course approaches to NCD prevention, particularly the impact of the early-life environment on later disease risk as defined by the Developmental Origins of Health and Disease (DOHaD) framework. Given that globalization has contributed to significant nutritional transitions in these populations, the DOHaD paradigm is highly relevant. SIDS in the Pacific region have the highest rates of NCD risk and incidence globally. Transitions from traditional foods grown locally to reliance on importation of Western-style processed foods high in fat and sugar are common. The Cook Islands is one Pacific SIDS that reports this transition, alongside rising overweight/obesity rates, currently 91%/72%, in the adult population. However, research on early-life NCD prevention within this context, as in many low- and middle-income countries, is scarce. Although traditional research emphasizes the need for large sample sizes, this is rarely possible in the smaller SIDS. In these vulnerable, high priority countries, consideration should be given to utilizing ‘small’ sample sizes that encompass a high proportion of the total population. This may enable contextually relevant research, crucial to inform NCD prevention strategies that can contribute to improving health and well-being for these at-risk communities.

Keywords

Small Island Developing StatesDOHaDNCDsObesity
Type
Original Article
Information
Journal of Developmental Origins of Health and Disease , Volume 9 , Issue 5 , October 2018 , pp. 487 - 491
Copyright
© Cambridge University Press and the International Society for Developmental Origins of Health and Disease 2018 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. World Health Organization. Small Island Developing States Health and WHO: Country Presence Profile. 2017. WHO: Geneva.Google Scholar
2. United Nations. Small Island Developing States, 2017. United Nations: New York.Google Scholar
3. The United Nations Office of the High Representative for the Least Developed Countries, Landlocked Developing Countries and Small Island Developing States. Small Island Developing States in Numbers, 2015. United Nations: New York.Google Scholar
4. World Health Organization. Global Status Report on Noncommunicable Diseases. 2014. WHO: Geneva.Google Scholar
5. United Nations. United Nations conference on trade and development: Is a special treatment of small island developing states possible?, 2004. United Nations: New York and Geneva.Google Scholar
6. Thow, AM, Heywood, P, Schultz, J, et al. Trade and the nutrition transition: strengthening policy for health in the Pacific. Ecol Food Nutr. 2011; 50, 18–42.Google Scholar
7. Gluckman, P, Hanson, M. Mismatch: Why Our World No Longer Fits Our Bodies. 2006. OUP: Oxford.Google Scholar
8. Hanson, M, Gluckman, P. Early developmental conditioning of later health and disease: physiology or pathophysiology? Physiol Rev. 2014; 94, 1027–1076.Google Scholar
9. Aiken, CE, Ozanne, SE. Transgenerational developmental programming. Hum Reprod Update. 2014; 20, 63–75.Google Scholar
10. Hanson, MA, Gluckman, PD, Ma, RC, Matzen, P, Biesma, RG. Early life opportunities for prevention of diabetes in low and middle income countries. BMC Public Health. 2012; 12, 1025.Google Scholar
11. Uauy, R, Kain, J, Corvalan, C. How can the Developmental Origins of Health and Disease (DOHaD) hypothesis contribute to improving health in developing countries? Am J Clin Nutr. 2011; 94(Suppl.), 1759S–1764S.Google Scholar
12. Norris, SA, Daar, A, Balasubramanian, D, et al. Understanding and acting on the developmental origins of health and disease in Africa would improve health across generations. Glob Health Action. 2017; 10, 1334985.Google Scholar
13. World Health Organization. Nutrition: Stunting in a Nutshell. 2017. World Health Organization: Geneva.Google Scholar
14. UNICEF. UNICEF Statement at SIDS Meeting on Non Communicable Diseases, 2014. UNICEF: New York.Google Scholar
15. Bay, JL, Morton, SM, Vickers, MH. Realizing the potential of adolescence to prevent transgenerational conditioning of noncommunicable disease risk: multi-sectoral design frameworks. Healthcare. 2016; 4, 39.Google Scholar
16. Unwin, N, Samuels, TA, Hassell, T, Brownson, RC, Guell, C. The development of public policies to address non-communicable diseases in the Caribbean country of Barbados: the importance of problem framing and policy entrepreneurs. Int J Health Policy Manag. 2017; 6, 71.Google Scholar
17. Van Beurden, EK, Kia, AM, Zask, A, Dietrich, U, Rose, L. Making sense in a complex landscape: how the Cynefin Framework from Complex Adaptive Systems Theory can inform health promotion practice. Health Promot Int. 2011; 28, 73–83.Google Scholar
18. United Nations Population Fund. Population and development profiles: Pacific island countries. 2014. United Nations Population Fund: Pacific Sub-Regional Office: Fiji.Google Scholar
19. World Health Organization. Western Pacific Region Health Information and Intelligence Platform (HIIP): Noncommunicable Disease Mortality, Data by Country. 2008. World Health Organization: Geneva.Google Scholar
20. World Health Organization. Global School-Based Student Health Survey: Cook Islands 2015 Fact Sheet. 2015. WHO: Geneva.Google Scholar
21. Cook Islands Ministry of Health. Cook Islands NCD risk Factors: STEPS Report, 2011. Cook Islands Ministry of Health: Suva.Google Scholar
22. Cook Islands Ministry of Health. National Health Information Bulletin. 2017. Cook Islands Ministry of Health: Rarotonga.Google Scholar
23. Ulijaszek, SJ. Trends in body size, diet and food availability in the Cook Islands in the second half of the 20th century. Econ Hum Biol. 2003; 1, 123–137.Google Scholar
24. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Trouble in paradise: nutritional challenges in the Cook Islands, 2014. Retrieved September 2017 from http://www.fao.org/news/audio-video/detail-video/en/?uid=10718.Google Scholar
25. Fry, PC. Dietary survey on Rarotonga, Cook Islands I. General description, methods and food habits. Am J Clin Nutr. 1957; 5, 42–50.Google Scholar
26. Ulijaszek, SJ. Modernization and the diet of adults on Rarotonga, the Cook Islands. Ecol Food Nutr. 2002; 41, 203–228.Google Scholar
27. Ferguson, M, Brown, C, Georga, C, et al. Traditional food availability and consumption in remote Aboriginal communities in the Northern Territory, Australia. Aust N Z J Public Health. 2017; 41, 294–298.Google Scholar
28. Airhihenbuwa, CO, Ford, CL, Iwelunmor, JI. Why culture matters in health interventions: lessons from HIV/AIDS stigma and NCDs. Health Educ Behav. 2014; 41, 78–84.Google Scholar
29. Etz, KE, Arroyo, JA. Small sample research: considerations beyond statistical power. Prev Sci. 2015; 16, 1033–1036.Google Scholar
30. Korngiebel, DM, Taualii, M, Forquera, R, Harris, R, Buchwald, D. Addressing the challenges of research with small populations. Am J Public Health. 2015; 105, 1744–1747.Google Scholar