Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-hc48f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-28T22:29:22.941Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Prenatal maternal stress shapes children’s theory of mind: the QF2011 Queensland Flood Study

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 March 2017

G. Simcock ,
S. Kildea ,
G. Elgbeili ,
D. P. Laplante Open the ORCID record for D. P. Laplante [Opens in a new window] ,
V. Cobham  and
S. King
G. Simcock
Affiliation:
Mater Research Institute, University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD, Australia School of Psychology, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD, Australia
S. Kildea
Affiliation:
Mater Research Institute, University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD, Australia School of Nursing, Midwifery, and Social Work, The University of Queensland, QLD, Australia
G. Elgbeili
Affiliation:
Schizophrenia and Neurodevelopmental Disorders Research Program, Douglas Mental Health University Institute, Verdun, QC, Canada
D. P. Laplante
Affiliation:
Schizophrenia and Neurodevelopmental Disorders Research Program, Douglas Mental Health University Institute, Verdun, QC, Canada
V. Cobham
Affiliation:
Mater Research Institute, University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD, Australia School of Psychology, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD, Australia
S. King*
Affiliation:
Schizophrenia and Neurodevelopmental Disorders Research Program, Douglas Mental Health University Institute, Verdun, QC, Canada Department of Psychiatry, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada
*
*Address for correspondence: Professor S. King, Department of Psychiatry, McGill University, Montreal, H3A 1A2 Quebec, Canada.(Email [email protected])
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Research shows that stress in pregnancy has powerful and enduring effects on many facets of child development, including increases in behavior problems and neurodevelopmental disorders. Theory of mind is an important aspect of child development that is predictive of successful social functioning and is impaired in children with autism. A number of factors related to individual differences in theory of mind have been identified, but whether theory of mind development is shaped by prenatal events has not yet been examined. In this study we utilized a sudden onset flood that occurred in Queensland, Australia in 2011 to examine whether disaster-related prenatal maternal stress predicts child theory of mind and whether sex of the child or timing of the stressor in pregnancy moderates these effects. Higher levels of flood-related maternal subjective stress, but not objective hardship, predicted worse theory of mind at 30 months (n=130). Further, maternal cognitive appraisal of the flood moderated the effects of stress in pregnancy on girls’ theory of mind performance but not boys’. These results illuminate how stress in pregnancy can shape child development and the findings are discussed in relation to biological mechanisms in pregnancy and stress theory.

Keywords

fetal programmingnatural disastersprenatal stressstress theorytheory of mind
Type
Original Article
Information
Journal of Developmental Origins of Health and Disease , Volume 8 , Issue 4: Themed Issue: Assisted Reproductive Treatments (ART) and DOHAD , August 2017 , pp. 483 - 492
Check for updates
Copyright
© Cambridge University Press and the International Society for Developmental Origins of Health and Disease 2017 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Blair, MM, Glynn, LM, Sandman, C, Davis, EP. Prenatal maternal anxiety and early childhood temperament. Stress. 2011; 14, 644–651.Google Scholar
2. Buitelaar, JK, Huizink, AC, Mulder, EJ, de Medina, PG, Visser, GH. Prenatal stress and cognitive development and temperament in infants. Neurobiol Aging. 2003; 24(Suppl. 1), S53–S60.Google Scholar
3. Davis, EP, Sandman, CA. The timing of prenatal exposure to maternal cortisol and psychosocial stress is associated with human infant cognitive development. Child Dev. 2010; 81, 131–148.Google Scholar
4. Laplante, DP, Brunet, A, Schmitz, N, Ciampi, A, King, S. Project ice storm: prenatal maternal stress affects cognitive and linguistic functioning in 5(1/2)-year-old children. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2008; 47, 1063–1072.Google Scholar
5. Cao, X, Laplante, DP, Brunet, A, Ciampi, A, King, S. Prenatal maternal stress affects motor function in 5(1/2)-year-old children: project ice storm. Dev Psychobiol. 2014; 56, 117–125.Google Scholar
6. Grace, T, Bulsara, M, Robinson, M, Hands, B. The impact of maternal gestational stress on motor development in late childhood and adolescence: a longitudinal study. Child Dev. 2015; doi:10.1111/cdev.12449.Google Scholar
7. Simcock, G, Kildea, S, Elgbeili, G, et al. Age-related changes in the effects of stress in pregnancy on infant motor development by maternal report: The Queensland Flood Study. Dev Psychobiol. 2016; 58, 640–659.Google Scholar
8. Barker, DJ. The fetal and infant origins of adult disease. BMJ. 1990; 301, 1111.Google Scholar
9. Grant, K-A, Sandman, CA, Wing, DA, Dmitrieva, J, Davis, EP. Prenatal programming of postnatal susceptibility of memory impairments: a developmental double jeopardy. Psychol Sci. 2015; 26, 1054–1062.Google Scholar
10. Clifton, VL. Review: sex and the human placenta: mediating differential strategies of fetal growth and survival. Placenta. 2010; 31, S33–S39.Google Scholar
11. Sandman, CA, Glynn, LM, Davis, EP. Is there a viability-vulnerability tradeoff? Sex differences in fetal programming. J Psychosom Res. 2013; 75, 327–335.Google Scholar
12. King, S, Laplante, DP. Using natural disasters to study prenatal maternal stress in humans. In Perinatal Programming of Neurodevelopment. Advances in Neurobiology (ed. Antonelli MC), 2015; 10, pp. 285–313. Springer: New York.Google Scholar
13. Tees, MT, Harville, EW, Xiong, X, et al. Hurricane Katrina-related maternal stress, maternal mental health, and early infant temperament. Matern Child Health J. 2010; 14, 511–518.Google Scholar
14. Laplante, DP, Fraser, S, Brunet, A, et al. Prenatal exposure to a natural disaster increases risk for obesity in 5 1/2 year old children. Pediatr Res. 2012; 71, 126–131.Google Scholar
15. Blanc, J, Antoine, A, Mouchenik, Y. Autistic behaviors prevalence in young children three years after the devastating Haiti earthquake. J Preg Child Health. 2015; 2, 138–141.Google Scholar
16. Kinney, DK, Miller, AM, Crowley, DJ, Gerber, E. Autism prevalence following prenatal exposure to hurricanes and tropical storms in Louisiana. J Autism Dev Disord. 2008; 38, 481–488.Google Scholar
17. Walder, DJ, Laplante, DP, Sousa-Pires, A, et al. Prenatal maternal stress predicts autism traits in 6 1/2 year-old children: Project Ice Storm. Psychiatry Res. 2014; 219, 353–360.Google Scholar
18. Peterson, CC, Siegal, M. Representing inner worlds: theory of mind in autistic, deaf, and normal hearing children. Psychol Sci. 1999; 10, 126–129.Google Scholar
19. Wellman, HM, Woolley, JD. From simple desires to ordinary beliefs: the early development of everyday psychology. Cognition. 1990; 35, 245–275.Google Scholar
20. Wellman, HM, Liu, D. Scaling of theory-of-mind tasks. Child Dev. 2004; 75, 523541.Google Scholar
21. Happe, FGE. An advanced test of theory of mind: understanding of story characters’ thoughts and feelings by able autistic, mentally handicapped and normal children and adults. J Autism Dev Disord. 1994; 24, 129–154.Google Scholar
22. Ashington, J, Jenkins, J. Theory of mind development and and social understanding. Cogn Emot. 1995; 9, 151–165.Google Scholar
23. Dunn, J. Children as psychologists: the later correlates of individual differences in understanding of emotions and other minds. Cogn Emot. 1995; 9, 187–201.Google Scholar
24. Londale, CE, Chandler, MJ. False belief understanding goes to school: on the social emotional consequences of coming early or late to a first theory of mind. Cogn Emot. 1995; 9, 167–185.Google Scholar
25. Slaughter, V, Imuta, K, Peterson, C, Henry, J. Meta-analysis of theory of mind and peer popularity in the preschool and early school years. Child Dev. 2015; 86, 1159–1174.Google Scholar
26. Perner, J, Ruffman, T, Leekam, SR. Theory of mind is contagious: you catch it from your sibs. Child Dev. 1994; 65, 1228–1238.Google Scholar
27. Ashington, J, Jenkins, J. A longitudinal study of the relation between language and theory of mind development. Dev Psychol. 1999; 35, 1311–1320.Google Scholar
28. Lillard, AS. Pretend play skills and teh child’s theory of mind. Child Dev. 1993; 64, 348–371.Google Scholar
29. Schwebel, DC, Rosen, CS, Singer, JL. Preschoolers’ pretend play and theory of mind: the role of jointly constructed pretence. Br J Dev Psychol. 1997; 17, 333–348.Google Scholar
30. Cole, K, Mitchell, P. Family background in relation to deceptive ability and understanding of the mind. Social Dev. 2000; 7, 181–197.Google Scholar
31. Ruffman, T, Slade, L, Crowe, E. The relation between children’s and mothers’ mental state language and theory-of-mind understanding. Child Dev. 2002; 73, 734–751.Google Scholar
32. Symons, DK, Peterson, CC, Slaughter, V, Roche, J, Doyle, E. Theory of mind and mental state discourse during book reading and story telling. Br J Dev Psychol. 2005; 23, 81–102.Google Scholar
33. Hughes, C, Cutting, A. Nature, nurture and individual differences in early understanding of mind. Psychol Sci. 1999; 10, 429–432.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
34. Sabbagh, MA, Seamans, EL. Intergenerational transmission of theory-of-mind. Dev Sci. 2008; 11, 354–360.Google Scholar
35. Baron-Cohen, S, Hammer, J. Parents of children with Asperger syndrome: what is the cognitive phenotype? J Cognitive Neurosci. 1997; 9, 548–554.Google Scholar
36. Tracy, SK, Hartz, D, Hall, B, et al. A randomised controlled trial of caseload midwifery care: M@NGO (Midwives @ New Group practice Options). BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2011; 11, 82.Google Scholar
37. King, S, Kildea, S, Austin, MP, et al. QF2011: a protocol to study the effects of the Queensland flood on pregnant women, their pregnancies, and their children’s early development. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2015; 15, 109.Google Scholar
38. Weiss, DS, Marmar, CR. The Impact of Event Scale – Revised. In Assessing psychological trauma and PTSD (eds Wilson JP, Keane TM), 1997, pp. 399–411. Guilford: New York.Google Scholar
39. Creamer, M, Bell, R, Failla, S. Psychometric properties of the impact of event scale – revised. Behav Res Ther. 2003; 41, 1489–1496.Google Scholar
40. Brunet, A, Weiss, DS, Metzler, TJ, et al. The peritraumatic distress inventory: a proposed measure of PTSD criterion A2. Am J Psychiatry. 2001; 158, 1480–1485.Google Scholar
41. Brunet, A, Weiss, DS, Metzler, TJ, Best, SR, et al. The peritraumatic distress inventory: a proposed measure of PTSD criterion A2. Am J Psychiatry. 2001; 158, 1480–1485.Google Scholar
42. Marmar, CR, Weiss, DS, Metzler, TJ. The peritraumatic dissociative experiences questionnaire. In Assessing Psychological Trauma and PTSD (eds. Wilson JP, Keane TM), 1997; pp. 412–428. Guilford Press: New York.Google Scholar
43. Yohannes, AM, Dodd, M, Morris, J, Webb, K. Reliability and validity of a single item measure of quality of life scale for adult patients with cystic fibrosis. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2011; 9, 105. doi:10.1186/1477-7525-9-105.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
44. Baron-Cohen, S, Wheelwright, S. The empathy quotient: an investigation of adults with Asperger syndrome or high functioning autism and normal sex differences. J Autism Dev Disord. 2004; 34, 163–175.Google Scholar
45. Fenson, L, Marchman, VA, Thal, DJ, et al. MacArthur-Bates Communicative Development Inventories: User’s Guide and Technical Manual, 2nd edn, 2007. Brookes Publishing: Baltimore, MD.Google Scholar
46. Hayes, AF. Introduction to Mediation, Moderation, and Conditional Process Analysis. 2013. The Guilford Press: New York.Google Scholar
47. Harville, EW, Xiong, X, Buekens, P. Disasters and perinatal health: a systematic review. Obstet Gynecol Surv. 2010; 65, 713–728.Google Scholar
48. Laplante, DP, Brunet, A, King, S. The effects of maternal stress and illness during pregnancy on infant temperament: Project Ice Storm. Pediatr Res. 2016; 79, 107–113.Google Scholar
49. Folkman, S, Lazarus, RS. Coping as a mediator of emotion. J Pers Soc Psychol. 1988; 54, 466–475.Google Scholar
50. Smith, CA, Lazarus, RS. Emotion and adaption. In Handbook of Personality: Theory and Research (ed. LP), 1990, pp. 609–637. Guilford Press: New York.Google Scholar
51. Cao-Lei, L, Dancause, KN, Elgbeili, G, et al. DNA methylation mediates the impact of exposure to prenatal maternal stress on BMI and central adiposity in children at age 13 1/2 years. Project Ice Storm Epigenetics. 2015; 8, 749–761.Google Scholar
52. Fineberg, AM, Ellman, LM, Schaefer, CA, et al. Fetal exposure to maternal stress and risk for schizophrenia spectrum disorders among offspring: differential influences of fetal sex. Psychiatry Res. 2016; 236, 91–97.Google Scholar
53. Ronald, A, Pennell, CE, Whitehouse, AJO. Prenatal maternal stress associated with ADHD and autistic traits in early childhood. Front Psychol. 2011; 1, 1–8.Google Scholar
54. Lazarus, RS, Folkman, S. Stress, Appraisal and Coping. 1984. Springer: New York.Google Scholar
55. Laplante, DP, Barr, RG, Brunet, A, et al. Stress during pregnancy affects general intellectual and language functioning in human toddlers. Pediatr Res. 2004; 56, 400–410.Google Scholar
56. Wellman, HM, Fang, F, Peterson, CC. Sequential progression in a Theory of Mind Scale: longitudinal perspectives. Child Dev. 2011; 82, 780–792.Google Scholar