Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gxg78 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-28T16:47:26.310Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Impact of mode of delivery on the milk microbiota composition of healthy women

Part of: The Gut Microbiome: How it is Shaped by Early Life

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 August 2015

R. Cabrera-Rubio ,
L. Mira-Pascual ,
A. Mira  and
M. C. Collado
R. Cabrera-Rubio
Affiliation:
Department of Biotechnology. Av. Agustin Escardino 7, Institute of Agrochemistry and Food Technology, Spanish National Research Council (IATA-CSIC), Valencia, Spain
L. Mira-Pascual
Affiliation:
Department of Biotechnology. Av. Agustin Escardino 7, Institute of Agrochemistry and Food Technology, Spanish National Research Council (IATA-CSIC), Valencia, Spain
A. Mira
Affiliation:
Department of Health and Genomics. Av. Cataluña 21, FISABIO Foundation, Center for Advanced Research in Public Health, Valencia, Spain
M. C. Collado*
Affiliation:
Department of Biotechnology. Av. Agustin Escardino 7, Institute of Agrochemistry and Food Technology, Spanish National Research Council (IATA-CSIC), Valencia, Spain
*
*Address for correspondence: M. C. Collado – IATA-CSIC, Av. Agustin Escardino 7, 49860 Paterna, Valencia, Spain. (Email [email protected])
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Breast milk constitutes one of the most important sources of postnatal microbes. However, the influence of perinatal factors on the milk microbiome is still poorly understood. The aim of our study was to assess the impact of mode of delivery on the microbiome composition and diversity present in breast milk of healthy mothers. Mature milk samples (n=10) were taken from mothers after 1 month of exclusively breastfeeding. Microbiomes from milk samples were analyzed with 16S ribosomal RNA gene pyrosequencing and targeted quantitative polymerase chain reaction (PCR). Despite inter-individual variability in bacterial composition, The Principal Coordinates Analysis clearly separated milk microbiome from mothers with vaginal delivery (n=6) from those who undergo C-section (n=4). In addition, higher bacterial diversity and richness was found in milk samples from vaginal deliveries. Quantitative PCR data showed that higher levels of Bifidobacterium spp. were related significantly to lower levels of Staphylococcus spp. Despite the low sample size, our data suggest that mode of delivery has an important impact on milk microbiome composition. Further studies with larger sample sizes are needed to confirm these results and to understand the biological effects of C-section associated microbes on infant’s health.

Keywords

16S pyrosequencingC-sectiondiversitymilk microbiotaqPCRvaginal delivery
Type
Original Article
Information
Journal of Developmental Origins of Health and Disease , Volume 7 , Supplement 1: Themed Issue: The Gut Microbiome and Immunity: How it is Shaped by Early Life , February 2016 , pp. 54 - 60
Check for updates
Copyright
© Cambridge University Press and the International Society for Developmental Origins of Health and Disease 2015 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Kozyrskyj, AL, Bahreinian, S, Azad, MB. Early life exposures: impact on asthma and allergic disease. Curr Opin Allergy Clin Immunol. 2011; 11, 400–406.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
2. Rodríguez, JM, Murphy, K, Stanton, C, et al. The composition of the gut microbiota throughout life, with an emphasis on early life. Microb Ecol Health Dis. 2015; 26, 26050.Google ScholarPubMed
3. Collado, MC, Rautava, S, Isolauri, E, Salminen, S. Gut microbiota: a source of novel tools to reduce the risk of human disease? Pediatr Res. 2015; 77, 182–188.Google Scholar
4. Dominguez-Bello, MG, Costello, EK, Contreras, M, et al. Delivery mode shapes the acquisition and structure of the initial microbiota across multiple body habitats in newborns. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2010; 107, 11971–11975.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
5. Azad, MB, Konya, T, Maughan, H, et al. Gut microbiota of healthy Canadian infants: profiles by mode of delivery and infant diet at 4 months. CMAJ. 2013; 185, 385–394.Google Scholar
6. Bäckhed, F, Roswall, J, Peng, Y, et al. Dynamics and stabilization of the human gut microbiome during the first year of life. Cell Host Microbe. 2015; 17, 690–703.Google Scholar
7. Decker, E, Engelmann, G, Findeisen, A, et al. Cesarean delivery is associated with celiac disease but not inflammatory bowel disease in children. Pediatrics. 2010; 125, e1433–e1440.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
8. Kulas, T, Bursac, D, Zegarac, Z, et al. New views on cesarean section, its possible complications and long-term consequences for children’s health. Med Arch. 2013; 67, 460–463.Google Scholar
9. Dogra, S, Sakwinska, O, Soh, SE, et al. Dynamics of infant gut microbiota are influenced by delivery mode and gestational duration and are associated with subsequent adiposity. MBio. 2015; 6 pii:e02419-14.Google Scholar
10. Roger, LC, McCartney, AL. Longitudinal investigation of the faecal microbiota of healthy full-term infants using fluorescence in situ hybridization and denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis. Microbiology. 2010; 156(Pt 11), 3317–3328.Google Scholar
11. Vallès, Y, Artacho, A, Pascual-García, A, et al. Microbial succession in the gut: directional trends of taxonomic and functional change in a birth cohort of Spanish infants. PLoS Genet. 2014; 10, e1004406.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
12. Koenig, JE, Spor, A, Scalfone, N, et al. Succession of microbial consortia in the developing infant gut microbiome. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2011; 108, 4578–4585.Google Scholar
13. Aaltonen, J, Ojala, T, Laitinen, K, et al. Impact of maternal diet during pregnancy and breastfeeding on infant metabolic programming: a prospective randomized controlled study. Eur J Clin Nutr. 2011; 65, 10–19.Google Scholar
14. Cabrera-Rubio, R, Collado, MC, Laitinen, K, et al. The human milk microbiome changes over lactation and is shaped by maternal weight and mode of delivery. Am J Clin Nutr. 2012; 96, 544–551.Google Scholar
15. Jost, T, Lacroix, C, Braegger, CP, Rochat, F, Chassard, C. Vertical mother-neonate transfer of maternal gut bacteria via breastfeeding. Environ Microbiol. 2014; 16, 2891–2904.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
16. Jost, T, Lacroix, C, Braegger, C, Chassard, C. Assessment of bacterial diversity in breast milk using culture-dependent and culture-independent approaches. Br J Nutr. 2013; 110, 1253–1262.Google Scholar
17. Hunt, KM, Foster, JA, Forney, LJ, et al. Characterization of the diversity and temporal stability of bacterial communities in human milk. PLoS One. 2011; 6, e21313.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
18. Fernández, L, Langa, S, Martín, V, et al. The microbiota of human milk in healthy women. Cell Mol Biol (Noisy-le-grand). 2013; 59, 31–42.Google Scholar
19. Grönlund, MM, Gueimonde, M, Laitinen, K, et al. Maternal breast-milk and intestinal bifidobacteria guide the compositional development of the Bifidobacterium microbiota in infants at risk of allergic disease. Clin Exp Allergy. 2007; 37, 1764–1772.Google Scholar
20. Khodayar-Pardo, P, Mira-Pascual, L, Collado, MC, Martínez-Costa, C. Impact of lactation stage, gestational age and mode of delivery on breast milk microbiota. J Perinatol. 2014; 34, 599–605.Google Scholar
21. Delgado, S, Collado, MC, Fernández, L, Rodríguez, JM. Bacterial analysis of breast milk: a tool to differentiate Raynaud’s phenomenon from infectious mastitis during lactation. Curr Microbiol. 2009; 59, 59–64.Google Scholar
22. Collado, MC, Laitinen, K, Salminen, S, Isolauri, E. Maternal weight and excessive weight gain during pregnancy modify the immunomodulatory potential of breast milk. Pediatr Res. 2012; 72, 77–85.Google Scholar
23. Soto, A, Martín, V, Jiménez, E, et al. Lactobacilli and bifidobacteria in human breast milk: influence of antibiotherapy and other host and clinical factors. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr. 2014; 59, 78–88.Google Scholar
24. Martín, V, Maldonado-Barragán, A, Moles, L, et al. Sharing of bacterial strains between breast milk and infant feces. J Hum Lact. 2012; 28, 36–44.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
25. Makino, H, Kushiro, A, Ishikawa, E, et al. Mother-to-infant transmission of intestinal bifidobacterial strains has an impact on the early development of vaginally delivered infant’s microbiota. PLoS One. 2013; 8, e78331.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
26. Benito, D, Lozano, C, Jiménez, E, et al. Characterization of Staphylococcus aureus strains isolated from faeces of healthy neonates and potential mother-to-infant microbial transmission through breastfeeding. FEMS Microbiol Ecol. 2015; 91, fiv007.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
27. Edgar, RC. Search and clustering orders of magnitude faster than BLAST. Bioinformatics. 2010; 26, 2460–2461.Google Scholar
28. Li, W, Godzik, A. CD-HIT: a fast program for clustering and comparing large sets of protein or nucleotide sequences. Bioinformatics. 2006; 22, 1658–1659.Google Scholar
29. Holland, SM. Analytical rarefaction v.1.3. User’s guide and application, 2003. UGA Stratigraphy Lab, University of Georgia, Athens, GA. http://www.uga.edu/strata/software/anRareReadme.html Google Scholar
30. Hamady, M, Lozupone, C, Knight, R. Fast UniFrac: facilitating high-throughput phylogenetic analyses of microbial communities including analysis of pyrosequencing and PhyloChip data. ISME J. 2010; 4, 17–27.Google Scholar
31. Collado, MC, Isolauri, E, Laitinen, K, Salminen, S. Effect of mother’s weight on infant’s microbiota acquisition, composition, and activity during early infancy: a prospective follow-up study initiated in early pregnancy. Am J Clin Nutr. 2010; 92, 1023–1030.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
32. Jiménez, E, de Andrés, J, Manrique, M, et al. Metagenomic analysis of milk of healthy and mastitis-suffering women. J Hum Lact. 2015; 31, 406–415.Google Scholar
33. Ward, TL, Hosid, S, Ioshikhes, I, Altosaar, I. Human milk metagenome: a functional capacity analysis. BMC Microbiol. 2013; 13, 116.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
34. WHO. Global status report on noncommunicable diseases 2014, 2014. http://www.who.int/nmh/publications/ncd-status-report-2014/en/ Google Scholar
35. Sevelsted, A, Stokholm, J, Bønnelykke, K, Bisgaard, H. Cesarean section and chronic immune disorders. Pediatrics. 2015; 135, e92–e98.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
36. Wang, M, Karlsson, C, Olsson, C, et al. Reduced diversity in the early fecal microbiota of infants with atopic eczema. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2008; 121, 129–134.Google Scholar
37. Forno, E, Onderdonk, AB, McCracken, J, et al. Diversity of the gut microbiota and eczema in early life. Clin Mol Allergy. 2008; 6, 11.Google Scholar
38. Luoto, R, Laitinen, K, Nermes, M, Isolauri, E. Impact of maternal probiotic-supplemented dietary counselling on pregnancy outcome and prenatal and postnatal growth: a double-blind, placebo-controlled study. Br J Nutr. 2010; 103, 1792–1799.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
39. Doege, K, Grajecki, D, Zyriax, BC, et al. Impact of maternal supplementation with probiotics during pregnancy on atopic eczema in childhood – a meta-analysis. Br J Nutr. 2012; 107, 1–6.Google Scholar
40. Luoto, R, Kalliomäki, M, Laitinen, K, Isolauri, E. The impact of perinatal probiotic intervention on the development of overweight and obesity: follow-up study from birth to 10 years. Int J Obes (Lond). 2010; 34, 1531–1537.Google Scholar
41. Rautava, S, Collado, MC, Salminen, S, Isolauri, E. Probiotics modulate host-microbe interaction in the placenta and fetal gut: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Neonatology. 2012; 102, 178–184.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
42. Abrahamsson, TR, Sinkiewicz, G, Jakobsson, T, et al. Probiotic lactobacilli in breast milk and infant stool in relation to oral intake during the first year of life. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr. 2009; 49, 349–354.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Supplementary material: File

Cabrera-Rubio supplementary material

Table S1

Download Cabrera-Rubio supplementary material(File)
File 14 KB