Hostname: page-component-6587cd75c8-vj8bv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-04-23T23:13:23.587Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

DOHaD in science and society: emergent opportunities and novel responsibilities

Part of: DOHaD 2017 World Congress

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 November 2018

M. Penkler ,
M. Hanson ,
R. Biesma  and
R. Müller
M. Penkler
Affiliation:
Munich Center for Technology in Society, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany
M. Hanson
Affiliation:
Institute of Developmental Sciences and NIHR Biomedical Research Centre, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK
R. Biesma
Affiliation:
Department of Health Sciences, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
R. Müller*
Affiliation:
Munich Center for Technology in Society, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany
*
*Author for correspondence: Prof. Ruth Müller, Munich Center for Technology in Society, Technical University of Munich, Augustenstraße 46, Munich 80333, Germany. E-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The field of Developmental Origins of Health and Disease (DOHaD) has grown considerably in recent decades and is receiving increasing recognition from health policymakers. Today, DOHaD research aims to offer a comprehensive perspective on health and disease that traces how different life experiences shape health and disease risks over the entire life course. This integrative perspective opens up distinct possibilities for improving health. At the same time, it raises questions regarding the specific social responsibilities of DOHaD as a field and about possible pathways to a socially just and scientifically robust implementation of DOHaD knowledge in society. In this article, we review the history and key characteristics of DOHaD as a field of scientific knowledge production. We argue that based on its key assumptions – that life circumstances, health and disease are closely linked on a molecular scale – DOHaD is an inherently political research field. When tracing how life environments affect health and disease, it is of utmost social and political importance to specify how DOHaD understands and frames these life environments, which aspects of life worlds are included and which excluded, and how research results are interpreted and translated into health recommendations at individual, societal and policy levels. We suggest a number of ways by which the DOHaD community can constructively and responsibly meet the demands that these inherent characteristics place on knowledge production and dissemination in the field.

Keywords

co-creationDevelopmental Origins of Health and Diseasehealth messageslife courseresponsible researchsocial complexitysocial and political aspects
Type
Review
Information
Journal of Developmental Origins of Health and Disease , Volume 10 , Issue 3 , June 2019 , pp. 268 - 273
Copyright
© Cambridge University Press and the International Society for Developmental Origins of Health and Disease 2018 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

1. Hanson, M, Gluckman, PD. Early developmental conditioning of later health and disease: physiology or pathophysiology? Physiol Rev. 2014; 94, 1027–1076.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
2. Horton, R, Sargent, J. 2018 must be the year for action against NCDs. The Lancet. 2018; 391, 1971–1973.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
3. Hanson, M, Cooper, C. DOHaD: The concept, its implications and applications. In Osteoporosis. A Lifecourse Epidemiology Approach to Skeletal Health (eds Harvey NC, Cooper C), 2018; pp 37–48. CRC Press: Boca Raton.Google Scholar
4. Kuruvilla, S, Sadana, R, Montesinos, EV, et al. A life-course approach to health: synergy with sustainable development goals. Bull World Health Organ. 2018; 96, 42–50.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
5. Godfrey, KM, Gluckman, PD, Hanson, MA. Developmental origins of metabolic disease: life course and intergenerational perspectives. Trends Endocrinol Metab. 2010; 21, 199–205.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
6. Barker, DJ. Mothers, Babies and Health in Later Life. 1998. Elsevier: Oxford.Google Scholar
7. McMillen, IC, Robinson, JC. Developmental origins of the metabolic syndrome: prediction, plasticity, and programming. Physiol Rev. 2005; 85, 571–633.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
8. Wadhwa, PD, Buss, C, Entringer, S, Swanson, JM. Developmental origins of health and disease: brief history of the approach and current focus on epigenetic mechanisms. Semin Reprod Med. 2009; 27, 358–68.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
9. Fleming, TP, Watkins, AJ, Velazquez, MA, et al. Origins of lifetime health around the time of conception: causes and consequences. Lancet. 2018; 391, 1842–52.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
10. Gilbert, SF, Epel, D. Ecological Developmental Biology: The Environmental Regulation of Development, Health, and Evolution. 2015. Oxford University Press: Oxford.Google Scholar
11. Ben-Shlomo, Y, Mishra, G, Kuh, D. Life course epidemiology. In Handbook of Epidemiology (eds. Ahrens W, Pigeot I), 2014; pp 1521–1549. Springer: New York.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
12. Richardson, SS, Stevens, H. (eds.) Postgenomics. Perspectives on Biology After the Genome. 2015. Duke University Press: Durham.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
13. Gluckman, PD, Hanson, MA, Buklijas, T, Low, FM, Beedle, AS. Epigenetic mechanisms that underpin metabolic and cardiovascular diseases. Nat Rev Endocrinol. 2009; 5, 401–408.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
14. Fox Keller, E. The postgenomics genome. In Postgenomics: Perspectives on Biology after the Genome (eds. Richardson S, Stevens H), 2015; pp 9–31. Duke University Press: Durham.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
15. Gluckman, PD, Hanson, MA, Cooper, C, Thornburg, KL. Effect of in utero and early-life conditions on adult health and disease. N Engl J Med. 2008; 359, 61–73.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
16. Hanson, MA, Cooper, C, Aihie Sayer, A, et al. Developmental aspects of a life course approach to healthy ageing. J Physiol. 2016; 594, 2147–60.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
17. O’Donnell, KJ, Meaney, MJ. Fetal origins of mental health: the developmental origins of health and disease hypothesis. Am J Psychiatry. 2016; 174, 319–28.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
18. United Nations General Assembly. Political Declaration of the High-level Meeting of the General Assembly on the Prevention and Control of Non-communicable Diseases, September 16, 2011.Google Scholar
19. Nugent, R, Bertram, MY, Jan, S, et al. Investing in non-communicable disease prevention and management to advance the sustainable development goals. Lancet. 2018; 391, 2029–35.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
20. Hanson, M, Gluckman, P, Ma, R, Matzen, P, Biesma, R. Early life opportunities for prevention of diabetes in low and middle-income countries. BMC Public Health. 2012; 12, 1025.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
21. Warin, M, Moore, V, Zivkovic, T, Davies, M. Telescoping the origins of obesity to women’s bodies: how gender inequalities are being squeezed out of Barker’s hypothesis. Ann Hum Biol. 2011; 38, 453–60.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
22. World Health Organization. Report of the Commission on Ending Childhood Obesity 2016, Geneva.Google Scholar
23. Barker, DJ, Osmond, C. Infant mortality, childhood nutrition, and ischaemic heart disease in England and Wales. Lancet. 1986; 8489, 1077–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
24. Kenney, M, Müller, R. Of rats and women: narratives of motherhood in environmental epigenetics. BioSocieties. 2017; 12, 23–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
25. Richardson, S. Maternal bodies in the postgenomic order: gender and the explanatory landscape of epigenetics. In Postgenomics: Perspectives on Biology after the Genome (eds Richardson S, Stevens H), 2015; pp. 210–31. Duke University Press: Durham.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
26. Richardson, S, Daniels, C, Gillman, M, et al. Don’t blame the mothers. Nature. 2014; 512, 131–132.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
27. Müller, R, Hanson, C, Hanson, M, et al. The biosocial genome? Interdisciplinary perspectives on environmental epigenetics, health and society. EMBO Rep. 2017; 18, 1677–82.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
28. Foresight. Tackling Obesities – Future Choices: Modelling Future Trends in Obesity and Their Impact on Health. 2007. Office of Science and Technology: London.Google Scholar
29. Ismaili M’hamdi, H, de Beaufort, I, Jack, B, Steegers, E. Responsibility in the age of Developmental Origins of Health and Disease (DOHaD) and epigenetics. J Dev Orig Health Dis. 2018; 9, 1–5.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
30. Pentecost, M, Ross, F, Macnab, A. Beyond the dyad: making Developmental Origins of Health and Disease (DOHaD) interventions more inclusive. J Dev Orig Health Dis. 2018; 9, 10–14.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
31. Geddes, D, Prescott, S. Developmental Origins of Health and Disease: the role of human milk in preventing disease in the 21st century. J Hum Lact. 2013; 29, 123–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
32. Bordo, S. Unbearable Weight: Feminism, Western Culture, and the Body. 1993. Univ. of California Press: Berkeley.Google Scholar
33. Wright, J, Harwood, V. (eds.) Biopolitics and the ‘Obesity Epidemic’: Governing Bodies. 2009. Routledge: New York.Google Scholar
34. Greenhalgh, S. Fat-talk Nation: The Human Costs of America’s War on Fat. 2015. Cornell University Press: Ithaca.Google Scholar
35. Mann, T, Tomiyama, A, Westling, E, et al. Medicare’s search for effective obesity treatments: diets are not the answer. Am Psychol. 2007; 62, 220–233.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
36. Crawford, R. Health as a meaningful social practice. Health: Interdiscip J Soc Study Health, Illness and Med. 2006; 10, 401–20.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
37. Gudowsky, N, Peissl, W. Human centred science and technology—transdisciplinary foresight and co-creation as tools for active needs-based innovation governance. Eur J Futures Res. 2016; 4, 8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
38. Irwin, A, Wynne, B. (eds.) Misunderstanding Science? The Public Reconstruction of Science and Technology. 1996. Cambridge University Press: Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
39. Davies, S, Horst, M. Science Communication: Culture, Identity and Citizenship. 2016. Palgrave: London.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
40. Simons, R, Lei, M, Beach, S, et al. Economic hardship and biological weathering: The epigenetics of aging in a U.S. sample of black women. Soc Sci Med. 2016; 150, 192–200.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
41. Slaughter-Acey, J, Sealy-Jefferson, S, Helmkamp, L, et al. Racism in the form of micro aggressions and the risk of preterm birth among Black women. Ann Epidemiol. 2016; 26, 7–13, e1.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
42. Tinati, T, Lawrence, W, Ntani, G, et al. Implementation of new healthy conversation skills to support lifestyle changes—what helps and what hinders? Experiences of Sure Start Children’s Centre staff. Health Soc Care Community. 2012; 20, 430–7.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
43. Skau, JK, Nordin, AB, Cheah, JC, et al. A complex behavioural change intervention to reduce the risk of diabetes and prediabetes in the pre-conception period in Malaysia: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial. Trials. 2016; 17, 215.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
44. Epstein, S. Impure Science: AIDS, Activism, and the Politics of Knowledge. 1996. University of California Press: Berkeley.Google ScholarPubMed