Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-t5tsf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-15T17:14:10.737Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Association between extrauterine growth restriction and changes of intestinal flora in Chinese preterm infants

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 March 2019

J. Zhang*
Affiliation:
Department of Pediatric, East Campus of Shanghai Sixth People’s Hospital, Shanghai University of Medicine & Health Sciences, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China
Y. Dai
Affiliation:
Department of Neonatology, Children’s Hospital of Fudan University, Shanghai, China
S. Fan
Affiliation:
Department of Pediatric, East Campus of Shanghai Sixth People’s Hospital, Shanghai University of Medicine & Health Sciences, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China
K. Zhang
Affiliation:
Department of Pediatric, East Campus of Shanghai Sixth People’s Hospital, Shanghai University of Medicine & Health Sciences, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China
C. Shuai
Affiliation:
Maternal and Child Health Hospital of Guangdong Province, Guangzhou, China
X. Bian
Affiliation:
Department of Pediatric, East Campus of Shanghai Sixth People’s Hospital, Shanghai University of Medicine & Health Sciences, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China
L. Hui
Affiliation:
Department of Pediatric, East Campus of Shanghai Sixth People’s Hospital, Shanghai University of Medicine & Health Sciences, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China
Z. Wu
Affiliation:
Department of Pediatric, East Campus of Shanghai Sixth People’s Hospital, Shanghai University of Medicine & Health Sciences, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China
J. Zhang
Affiliation:
Department of Pediatric, East Campus of Shanghai Sixth People’s Hospital, Shanghai University of Medicine & Health Sciences, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China
Z. Guo
Affiliation:
Department of Pediatric, East Campus of Shanghai Sixth People’s Hospital, Shanghai University of Medicine & Health Sciences, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China
F. Deng
Affiliation:
Department of Pediatric, East Campus of Shanghai Sixth People’s Hospital, Shanghai University of Medicine & Health Sciences, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China
M. Guo
Affiliation:
Department of Pediatric, East Campus of Shanghai Sixth People’s Hospital, Shanghai University of Medicine & Health Sciences, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China
*
Address for correspondence: J. Zhang, Department of Pediatrics, East Campus of Shanghai Sixth People’s Hospital, Affiliated to Shanghai University of Medicine & Health Sciences Affiliated to Shanghai Jiaotong University, No. 222 Huanhuxisan Road, Pudongxin District, Shanghai 201306, China. E-mail: [email protected]

Abstract

The aim of the study was to investigate any association between extrauterine growth restriction (EUGR) and intestinal flora of <30-week-old preterm infants. A total of 59 preterm infants were assigned to EUGR (n=23) and non-EUGR (n=36) groups. Intestinal bacteria were compared by using high-throughput sequencing of bacterial rRNA. The total abundance of bacteria in 344 genera (7568 v. 13,760; P<0.0001) and 456 species (10,032 v. 18,240; P<0.0001) was significantly decreased in the EUGR group compared with the non-EUGR group. After application of a multivariate logistic model and adjusting for potential confounding factors, as well as false-discovery rate corrections, we found four bacterial genera with higher and one bacterial genus with lower abundance in the EUGR group compared with the control group. In addition, the EUGR group showed significantly increased abundances of six species (Streptococcus parasanguinis, Bacterium RB5FF6, two Klebsiella species and Microbacterium), but decreased frequencies of three species (one Acinetobacter species, Endosymbiont_of_Sphenophorus_lev and one Enterobacter_species) compared with the non-EUGR group. Taken together, there were significant changes in the intestinal microflora of preterm infants with EUGR compared to preterm infants without EUGR.

Type
Original Article
Copyright
© Cambridge University Press and the International Society for Developmental Origins of Health and Disease 2019 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

Jinping Zhang, Yi Dai and Sainan Fan contributed equally to the article.

References

Clark, RH, Thomas, P, Peabody, J. Extrauterine growth restriction remains a serious problem in prematurely born neonates. Pediatrics. 2003; 111(5 Pt 1), 986990.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Radmacher, PG, Looney, SW, Rafail, ST, Adamkin, DH. Prediction of extrauterine growth retardation (EUGR) in VVLBW infants. J Perinatol. 2003; 23, 392395.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
De Curtis, M, Rigo, J. Extrauterine growth restriction in very-low-birthweight infants. Acta Paediatr. 2004; 93, 15631568.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lee, SM, Kim, N, Namgung, R, et al. Prediction of postnatal growth failure among very low birth weight infants. Sci Rep. 2018; 8, 3729.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Goulart, AL, Morais, MB, Kopelman, BI. Impact of perinatal factors on growth deficits of preterm infants. Rev Assoc Med Bras. 1992; 2011;57, 269275.Google Scholar
Wright, K, Dawson, JP, Fallis, D. New postnatal growth grids for very low birth weight infants. Pediatrics. 2010; 91, 922926.Google Scholar
Bashir, ME, Louie, S, Shi, HN, Nagler-Anderson, C. Toll-like receptor 4 signaling by intestinal microbes influences susceptibility to food allergy. J Immunol. 2004; 172, 69786987.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cooke, RJ, Ainsworth, SB, Fenton, AC. Postnatal growth retardation: a universal problem in preterm infants. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 2004; 89, F428F430.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Denne, SC. Protein and energy requirements in preterm infants. Semin Neonatol. 2001; 6, 377382.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ehrenkranz, RA, Younes, N, Lemons, JA, et al. Longitudinal growth of hospitalized very low birth weight infants. Pediatrics. 1999; 104(2 Pt 1), 280289.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sakurai, M, Itabashi, K, Sato, Y, Hibino, S, Mizuno, K. Extrauterine growth restriction in preterm infants of gestational age <or =32 weeks. Pediatr Int. 2008; 50, 7075.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lima, PA, Carvalho, M, Costa, AC, Moreira, ME. Variables associated with extra uterine growth restriction in very low birth weight infants. J Pediatr (Rio J). 2014; 90, 2227.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
American Academy of Pediatrics. Committee on Nutrition. Nutritional Needs of the Preterm Infant, 2009. American Academy of Pediatrics: Elk Grove Village, Illinois.Google Scholar
Agostoni, C, Buonocore, G, Carnielli, VP, et al. Enteral nutrient supply for preterm infants: commentary from the European Society of Paediatric Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition Committee on Nutrition. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr. 2010; 50, 8591.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cole, TJ, Statnikov, Y, Santhakumaran, S, et al. Birth weight and longitudinal growth in infants born below 32 weeks’ gestation: a UK population study. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 2014; 99, F34F40.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Henry, MC, Lawrence Moss, R. Surgical therapy for necrotizing enterocolitis: bringing evidence to the bedside. Semin Pediatr Surg. 2005; 14, 181190.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Petty, JK, Ziegler, MM. Operative strategies for necrotizing enterocolitis: The prevention and treatment of short-bowel syndrome. Semin Pediatr Surg. 2005; 14, 191198.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Stoll, BJ, Hansen, NI, Bell, EF, et al. Neonatal outcomes of extremely preterm infants from the NICHD Neonatal Research Network. Pediatrics. 2010; 126, 443456.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Embleton, NE, Pang, N, Cooke, RJ. Postnatal malnutrition and growth retardation: an inevitable consequence of current recommendations in preterm infants? Pediatrics. 2001; 107, 270273.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Panigrahi, P. Necrotizing enterocolitis: a practical guide to its prevention and management. Paediatr Drugs. 2006; 8, 151165.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jefferis, BJ, Power, C, Hertzman, C. Birth weight, childhood socioeconomic environment, and cognitive development in the 1958 British birth cohort study. BMJ. 2002; 325, 305.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jie, Y. Obstetrics and Gynecology, 7th edn, 2008. People’s Medical Publishing House: Beijing.Google Scholar
Eriksson, JG, Forsen, T. Unravelling the fetal origins hypothesis. Lancet. 2002; 360, 659665.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
American Academy of Pediatrics Committee on Nutrition. Nutritional needs of low-birth-weight infants. Pediatrics. 1985;75:976–986.Google Scholar
Kochling, T, Sanz, JL, Gavazza, S, Florencio, L. Analysis of microbial community structure and composition in leachates from a young landfill by 454 pyrosequencing. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2015; 99, 56575668.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Schloss, PD, Westcott, SL, Ryabin, T, et al. Introducing Mothur: Open-Source, platform-independent, community-supported software for describing and comparing microbial communities. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2009; 75, 75377541.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wang, Q, Garrity, GM, Tiedje, JM, Cole, JR. Naive Bayesian classifier for rapid assignment of rRNA sequences into the new bacterial taxonomy. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2007; 73, 52615267.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Korpela, K, Blakstad, EW, Moltu, SJ, et al. Intestinal microbiota development and gestational age in preterm neonates. Sci Rep. 2018; 8, 2453.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Antonopoulos, DA, Huse, SM, Morrison, HG. Reproducible community dynamics of the gastrointestinal microbiota following antibiotic perturbation. Infect Immun. 2009; 77, 23672375.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Penders, J, Thijs, C, Vink, C. Factors influencing the composition of the intestinal microbiota in early infancy. Pediatrics. 2006; 118, 511521.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Groer, MW, Luciano, AA, Dishaw, LJ, et al. Development of the preterm infant gut microbiome: a research priority. Microbiome. 2014; 2, 38.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Butel, MJ, Suau, A, Campeotto, F, et al. Conditions of bifidobacterial colonization in preterm infants: a prospective analysis. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr. 2007; 44, 577582.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sukanyaa, S, Vinoth, S, Ramesh, S. Role of probiotics in preterm infants: a randomized controlled trial. Int J Contemp Pediatr. 2017; 4, 447449.Google Scholar
Huffnagle, GB. The microbiota and allergies/asthma. PLoS Pathog. 2010; 6, e1000549.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Oyama, N, Sudo, N, Sogawa, H, Kubo, C Antibiotic use during infancy promotes a shift in the T(H)1/T(H)2 balance toward T(H)2-dominant immunity in mice. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2001; 107, 153159.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ortiz-Espejo, M, Perez-Navero, JL, Olza-Meneses, J, et al. Prepubertal children with a history of extra-uterine growth restriction exhibit low-grade inflammation. Br J Nutr. 2014; 112, 338346.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
de la Cochetiere, MF, Piloquet, H, des Robert, C, et al. Early intestinal bacterial colonization and necrotizing enterocolitis in premature infants: the putative role of Clostridium. Pediatr Res. 2004; 56, 366370.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed