Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-fscjk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-19T00:56:15.922Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Androgenic and estrogenic indices in human newborns and infants: the MIREC-ID study

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 March 2019

T-V. Nguyen Open the ORCID record for T-V. Nguyen [Opens in a new window] ,
P. Monnier ,
G. Muckle ,
S. Sathyanarayana ,
E. Ouellet ,
M. P. Velez ,
L. Dodds  and
T. E. Arbuckle
T-V. Nguyen*
Affiliation:
Department of Psychiatry, McGill University, Royal Victoria Hospital, Montreal, QC, Canada Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, McGill University, Royal Victoria Hospital, Montreal, QC, Canada Research Institute of the McGill University Health Centre (RI-MUHC), Royal Victoria Hospital, Montreal, QC, Canada
P. Monnier
Affiliation:
Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, McGill University, Royal Victoria Hospital, Montreal, QC, Canada Research Institute of the McGill University Health Centre (RI-MUHC), Royal Victoria Hospital, Montreal, QC, Canada
G. Muckle
Affiliation:
School of Psychology, Laval University, Quebec CHU Research Centre, Quebec City, QC, Canada
S. Sathyanarayana
Affiliation:
Department of Pediatrics, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA Seattle Children’s Research Institute, Seattle, WA, USA Department of Environmental and Occupational Health Sciences, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
E. Ouellet
Affiliation:
School of Psychology, Laval University, Quebec CHU Research Centre, Quebec City, QC, Canada
M. P. Velez
Affiliation:
Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, Queen’s University, Kingston, ON, Canada
L. Dodds
Affiliation:
Departments of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Pediatrics, Dalhousie University, Halifax, NS, Canada
T. E. Arbuckle
Affiliation:
Population Studies Division, Environmental Health Science and Research Bureau, Health Canada, Ottawa, ON, Canada
*
Author for correspondence: T-V. Nguyen, Department of Psychiatry, McGill University, Royal Victoria Hospital, 1001 Decarie, C6.1188 Suite, Montreal, QC, H4A 3J1, Canada. E-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Prenatal sex steroid exposure plays an important role in determining child development. Yet, measurement of prenatal hormonal exposure has been limited by the paucity of newborn/infant data and the invasiveness of fetal hormonal sampling. Here we provide descriptive data from the MIREC-ID study (n=173 girls; 162 boys) on a range of minimally invasive physical indices thought to reflect prenatal exposure to androgens [anogenital distances (AGDs); penile length/width, scrotal/vulvar pigmentation], to estrogens [vaginal maturation index (VMI) – the degree of maturation of vaginal wall cells] or to both androgens/estrogens [2nd-to-4th digit ratio (2D:4D); areolar pigmentation, triceps/sub-scapular skinfold thickness, arm circumference]. VMI was found to be associated with triceps skinfold thickness (β=0.265, P=0.005), suggesting that this marker may be sensitive to estrogen levels produced by adipose tissue in girls. Both estrogenic and androgenic markers (VMI: β=0.338, P=0.031; 2D:4D – right: β=−0.207, P=0.040; left: β=−0.276, P=0.006; AGD-fourchette − β=0.253, P=0.036) were associated with areolar pigmentation in girls, supporting a role for the latter as an index of both androgen and estrogen exposure. We also found AGD-penis (distance from the anus to the penis) to be associated with scrotal pigmentation (β=0.290, P=0.048), as well as right arm circumference (β=0.462, P<0.0001), supporting the notion that these indices may be used together as markers of androgen exposure in boys. In sum, these findings support the use of several physical indices at birth to convey a more comprehensive picture of prenatal exposure to sex hormones.

Keywords

birthgonadal hormonespregnancysex differencessex steroids
Type
Original Article
Information
Journal of Developmental Origins of Health and Disease , Volume 10 , Issue 5 , October 2019 , pp. 578 - 586
Copyright
© Cambridge University Press and the International Society for Developmental Origins of Health and Disease 2019 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abbott, DH, Padmanabhan, V, Dumesic, DA. Contributions of androgen and estrogen to fetal programming of ovarian dysfunction. Reprod Biol Endocrinol. 2006; 4, 17.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hines, M. Prenatal endocrine influences on sexual orientation and on sexually differentiated childhood behavior. Front Neuroendocrinol. 2011; 32, 170–182.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hollier, LP, Keelan, JA, Hickey, M, Maybery, MT, Whitehouse, AJ. Measurement of androgen and estrogen concentrations in cord blood: accuracy, biological interpretation, and applications to understanding human behavioral development. Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2014; 5, 64.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Keelan, JA, Mattes, E, Tan, HW, et al. Androgen concentrations in umbilical cord blood and their association with maternal, fetal and obstetric factors. PLoS One. 2012; 7, e42827.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Foradori, CD, Weiser, MJ, Handa, RJ. Non-genomic actions of androgens. Front Neuroendocrinol. 2008; 29, 169–181.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Luconi, M, Forti, G, Baldi, E. Genomic and nongenomic effects of estrogens: molecular mechanisms of action and clinical implications for male reproduction. J Steroid Biochem Mol Biol. 2002; 80, 369–381.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Reyes, FI, Winter, JS, Faiman, C. Studies on human sexual development. I. Fetal gonadal and adrenal sex steroids. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 1973; 37, 74–78.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Reyes, FI, Boroditsky, RS, Winter, JS, Faiman, C. Studies on human sexual development. II. Fetal and maternal serum gonadotropin and sex steroid concentrations. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 1974; 38, 612–617.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Eisenberg, ML, Hsieh, MH, Walters, RC, Krasnow, R, Lipshultz, LI. The relationship between anogenital distance, fatherhood, and fertility in adult men. PLoS One. 2011; 6, e18973.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hsieh, MH, Breyer, BN, Eisenberg, ML, Baskin, LS. Associations among hypospadias, cryptorchidism, anogenital distance, and endocrine disruption. Curr Urol Rep. 2008; 9, 137–142.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mitchell, RT, Mungall, W, McKinnell, C, et al. Anogenital distance plasticity in adulthood: implications for its use as a biomarker of fetal androgen action. Endocrinology. 2015; 156, 24–31.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dean, A, Sharpe, RM. Anogenital distance or digit length ratio as measures of fetal androgen exposure: relationship to male reproductive development and its disorders. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2013; 98, 2230–2238.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Thankamony, A, Pasterski, V, Ong, KK, Acerini, CL, Hughes, IA. Anogenital distance as a marker of androgen exposure in humans. Andrology. 2016; 4, 616–625.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Harlid, S, Adgent, M, Jefferson, WN, et al. Soy formula and epigenetic modifications: analysis of vaginal epithelial cells from infant girls in the IFED study. Environ Health Perspect. 2017; 125, 447–452.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
van der Laak, JAWM, de Bie, LMT, de Leeuw, H, de Wilde, PCM, Hanselaar, AGJM. The effect of Replens (R) on vaginal cytology in the treatment of postmenopausal atrophy: cytomorphology versus computerised cytometry. J Clin Pathol. 2002; 55, 446–451.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
van der Laak, JAWM, Schijf, CP, Kerstens, HMJ, et al. Development and validation of a computerized cytomorphometric method to assess the maturation of vaginal epithelial cells. Cytometry. 1999; 35, 196–202.3.0.CO;2-V>CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wilson, MJ, Spaziani, E. Testosterone regulation of pigmentation in scrotal epidermis of the rat. Z Zellforsch Mikrosk Anat. 1973; 140, 451–458.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Natale, CA, Duperret, EK, Zhang, JQ, et al. Sex steroids regulate skin pigmentation through nonclassical membrane-bound receptors. Elife. 2016; 5, e15104.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ali, A, Berens, P, Siddiqui, G, Ali, V. Nipple and areolar hyperpigmentation secondary to the use of estradiol spray on the ipsilateral forearm skin: a report of two cases. J Womens Health. 2012; 21, 363–365.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Diven, DG, Crawford, JM. Ipsilateral areolar hyperpigmentation following unilateral application of estradiol spray. Am J Obstetr Gynecol. 2010; 203, E8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tadokoro, T, Itami, S, Hosokawa, K, Terashi, H, Takayasu, S. Human genital melanocytes as androgen target cells. J Invest Dermatol. 1997; 109, 513–517.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fullerton, A, Fischer, T, Lahti, A, et al. Guidelines for measurement of skin colour and erythema – a report from the standardization group of the European society of contact dermatitis. Contact Dermatitis. 1996; 35, 1–10.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Takiwaki, H, Overgaard, L, Serup, J. Comparison of narrow-band reflectance spectrophotometric and tristimulus colorimetric measurements of skin color - 23 anatomical sites evaluated by the dermaspectrometer(R) and the chroma-meter-Cr-200(R). Skin Pharmacol. 1994; 7, 217–225.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Garn, SM, Hertzog, KP, Poznanski, AK, Nagy, JM. Metacarpophalangeal length in the evaluation of skeletal malformation. Radiology. 1972; 105, 375–381.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Galis, F, Ten Broek, CM, Van Dongen, S, Wijnaendts, LC. Sexual dimorphism in the prenatal digit ratio (2D:4D). Arch Sex Behav. 2010; 39, 57–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Manning, JT, Fink, B. Sexual dimorphism in the ontogeny of second (2D) and fourth (4D) digit lengths, and digit ratio (2D:4D). Am J Hum Biol. 2018; 30, e23138.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Malas, MA, Dogan, S, Evcil, EH, Desdicioglu, K. Fetal development of the hand, digits and digit ratio (2D:4D). Early Hum Dev. 2006; 82, 469–475.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fink, B, Manning, JT. Direct versus indirect measurement of digit ratio: new data from Austria and a critical consideration of clarity of report in 2D:4D studies. Early Hum Dev. 2018; 127, 28–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ribeiro, E, Neave, N, Morais, RN, Manning, JT. Direct versus indirect measurement of digit ratio (2D:4D): a critical review of the literature and new data. Evol Psychol-Us. 2016; 14, 1–8.Google Scholar
Szwed, A, Kosinska, M, Manning, JT. Digit ratio (2D:4D) and month of birth: a link to the solstitial-melatonin-testosterone effect. Early Hum Dev. 2017; 104, 23–26.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Velez, MP, Arbuckle, TE, Monnier, P, Fraser, WD. Is maternal periconceptional smoking associated with 2D:4D digit ratio in their children? J Dev Orig Hlth Dis. 2017; 8, 597–603.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Velez, MP, Arbuckle, TE, Monnier, P, Fraser, WD. Female digit length ratio (2D:4D) and time-to-pregnancy. Hum Reproduct. 2016; 31, 2128–2134.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Welsh, M, MacLeod, DJ, Walker, M, Smith, LB, Sharpe, RM. Critical androgen-sensitive periods of rat penis and clitoris development. Int J Androl. 2010; 33, e144–152.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fritsch, H, Hoermann, R, Bitsche, M, Pechriggl, E, Reich, O. Development of epithelial and mesenchymal regionalization of the human fetal utero-vaginal anlagen. J Anat. 2013; 222, 462–472.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wilson, MJ. Inhibition of development of both androgen-dependent and androgen-independent pigment-cells in scrotal skin dermis of the rat by anti-androgen treatment during fetal growth. Endocrinology. 1983; 112, 321–325.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Javed, A, Lteif, A. Development of the human breast. Semin Plast Surg. 2013; 27, 5–12.Google ScholarPubMed
Wilson, JD, Leihy, MW, Shaw, G, Renfree, MB. Androgen physiology: unsolved problems at the millennium. Mol Cell Endocrinol. 2002; 198, 1–5.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fritsch, M, Orfanos, CE, Zouboulis, C. Sebocytes are the key regulators of androgen homeostasis in human skin. J Invest Dermatol. 2001; 117, 785–785.Google Scholar
Thornton, MJ. The biological actions of estrogens on skin. Exp Dermatol. 2002; 11, 487–502.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dusek, A, Bartos, L. Variation in ano-genital distance in spontaneously cycling female mice. Reprod Domest Anim. 2012; 47, 984–987.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Manning, JT, Scutt, D, Wilson, J, Lewis-Jones, DI. The ratio of 2nd to 4th digit length: a predictor of sperm numbers and concentrations of testosterone, luteinizing hormone and oestrogen. Hum Reprod. 1998; 13, 3000–3004.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sathyanarayana, S, Beard, L, Zhou, C, Grady, R. Measurement and correlates of ano-genital distance in healthy, newborn infants. Int J Androl. 2010; 33, 317–323.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Swan, SH, Main, KM, Liu, F, et al. Decrease in anogenital distance among male infants with prenatal phthalate exposure. Environ Health Persp. 2005; 113, 1056–1061.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Santos, S, Gaillard, R, Oliveira, A, et al. Associations of infant subcutaneous fat mass with total and abdominal fat mass at school-age: the generation R study. Paediatr Perinat Ep. 2016; 30, 511–520.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gale, C, Logan, KM, Jeffries, S, et al. Sexual dimorphism in relation to adipose tissue and intrahepatocellular lipid deposition in early infancy. Int J Obesity. 2015; 39, 629–632.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bluher, M. Importance of estrogen receptors in adipose tissue function. Mol Metab. 2013; 2, 130–132.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Arbuckle, TE, Fraser, WD, Fisher, M, et al. Cohort profile: the maternal-infant research on environmental chemicals research platform. Paediatr Perinat Ep. 2013; 27, 415–425.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bernbaum, JC, Umbach, DM, Ragan, NB, et al. Pilot studies of estrogen-related physical findings in infants. Environ Health Perspect. 2008; 116, 416–420.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Farage, M, Maibach, H. Lifetime changes in the vulva and vagina. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2006; 273, 195–202.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Adgent, MA, Umbach, DM, Zemel, BS, et al. A longitudinal study of estrogen-responsive tissues and hormone concentrations in infants fed soy formula. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2018; 103, 1899–1909.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pedersen, SB, Bruun, JM, Hube, F, Kristensen, K, Hauner, H, et al. Demonstration of estrogen receptor subtypes alpha and beta in human adipose tissue: influences of adipose cell differentiation and fat depot localization. Mol Cell Endocrinol. 2001; 182, 27–37.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bhasin, S. Effects of testosterone administration on fat distribution, insulin sensitivity, and atherosclerosis progression. Clin Infect Dis. 2003; 37, S142–S149.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bhasin, S, Taylor, WE, Singh, R, et al. The mechanisms of androgen effects on body composition: Mesenchymal pluripotent cell as the target of androgen action. J Gerontol a-Biol. 2003; 58, 1103–1110.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Supplementary material: File

Nguyen et al. supplementary material

Nguyen et al. supplementary material 1

Download Nguyen et al. supplementary material(File)
File 22.4 KB
Supplementary material: File

Nguyen et al. supplementary material

Nguyen et al. supplementary material 2

Download Nguyen et al. supplementary material(File)
File 21.2 KB
Supplementary material: File

Nguyen et al. supplementary material

Nguyen et al. supplementary material 3

Download Nguyen et al. supplementary material(File)
File 1.1 MB