Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-dh8gc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-13T12:27:04.387Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

STOCHASTIC DOMINANCE AND DEMOGRAPHIC POLICY EVALUATION: A CRITIQUE

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 February 2016

Juan Carlos Cordoba  and
Xiying Liu
Juan Carlos Cordoba
Affiliation:
Iowa State University, USA Email: [email protected]
Xiying Liu
Affiliation:
Economics and Management School of Wuhan University, China Email: [email protected]
Get access

Abstract:

Stochastic dominance (SD) is commonly used to rank income distributions and assess social policies. The literature argues that SD is a robust criterion for policy evaluation because it requires minimal knowledge of the social welfare function. We argue that, on the contrary, SD is not a robust criterion. We do this by carefully introducing microfoundations into a model by Chu and Koo (1990) who use SD to provide support to family-planning programs aiming at reducing the fertility of the poor. We show that fertility restrictions are generally detrimental for both individual and social welfare in spite of the fact that SD holds. Our findings are an application of the Lucas’ Critique.

Keywords

fertilitychildrenwelfaredemographic policiesone child policyincome distributionstochastic dominanceD31D63I32J13
Type
Research Papers
Information
Journal of Demographic Economics , Volume 82 , Issue 1 , March 2016 , pp. 111 - 138
Copyright
Copyright © Université catholique de Louvain 2016 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Alvarez, Fernando (1999) Social mobility: The Barro-Becker children meet the Laitner-Loury dynasties. Review of Economic Dynamics 2, 65–103.Google Scholar
Atkinson, Anthony B. (1970) On the measurement of inequality. Journal of Economic Theory 2 (3), 244–263.Google Scholar
Atkinson, Anthony B. and Brandolini, Andrea (2010) On analyzing the world distribution of income. World Bank Economic Review 24 (1), 1–37.Google Scholar
Barro, Robert J. and Becker, Gary S. (1989) Fertility choice in a model of economic growth. Econometrica 57 (2), 481–501.Google Scholar
Becker, Gary S. (1960) An economic analysis of fertility. In Coale, A. J. (ed.), Demographic and Economic Change in Developed Countries, pp. 209–240. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Becker, Gary S. and Barro, Robert J. (1988) A reformulation of the economic theory of fertility. The Quarterly Journal of Economics 103 (1), 1–25.Google Scholar
Chu, C. Y. Cyrus and Koo, Hui-Wen (1990) Intergenerational income-group mobility and differential fertility. American Economic Review 80 (5), 1125–1138.Google Scholar
Cordoba, Juan Carlos and Liu, Xiying (2014) Altruism, fertility and risk. Working paper 14010, Department of Economics, Iowa State University.Google Scholar
Cordoba, Juan Carlos, Liu, Xiying, and Ripoll, Marla (forthcoming) Fertility, social mobility and long run inequality. Journal of Monetary Economics.Google Scholar
Cordoba, Juan Carlos and Ripoll, Marla (2014) The elasticity of intergenerational substitution, parental altruism, and fertility choice. Working paper 14015, Department of Economics, Iowa State University.Google Scholar
Cordoba, Juan Carlos and Ripoll, Marla (in press) Intergenerational transfers and the fertility-income relationship. The Economic Journal.Google Scholar
Dasgupta, Partha, Sen, Amartya, and Starrett, David (1973) Notes on the measurement of inequality. Journal of Economic Theory 6 (2), 180–187.Google Scholar
Davidson, Russell and Duclos, Jean-Yves (2000) Statistical inference for stochastic dominance and for the measurement of poverty and inequality. Econometrica 68 (6), 1435–1464.Google Scholar
Doepke, Matthias (2004) Accounting for fertility decline during the transition to growth. Journal of Economic Growth 9 (3), 347–383.Google Scholar
Eckstein, Zvi. and Wolpin, Kenneth I. (1985) Endogenous fertility and optimal population size. Journal of Public Economics 27 (1), 93–106.Google Scholar
Foster, James E. and Shorrocks, Anthony F. (1988a) Poverty orderings. Econometrica 56 (1), 173–177.Google Scholar
Foster, James E. and Shorrocks, Anthony F. (1988b) Poverty orderings and welfare dominance. Social Choice and Welfare 5 (2), 179–198.Google Scholar
Golosov, Mikhail, Jones, Larry E., and Tertilt, Michele (2007) Efficiency with endogenous population growth. Econometrica 75 (4), 1039–1071.Google Scholar
Guvenen, Fatih (2006) Reconciling conflicting evidence on the elasticity of intertemporal substitution: A macroeconomic perspective. Journal of Monetary Economics 53 (7), 1451–1472.Google Scholar
Hansen, Gary D. and Prescott, Edward C. (2002) Malthus to solow. American Economic Review 92 (4), 1205–1217.Google Scholar
Jones, Larry E., Schoonbroodt, Alice, and Tertilt, Michele (2008) Fertility theories: Can they explain the negative fertility-income relationship? Working Paper 14266, NBER.Google Scholar
Jones, Larry E. and Tertilt, Michele (2006) An economic history of fertility in the US: 1826–1960. Working paper 12796, NBER.Google Scholar
Kolm, Serge-Christophe (1969) The optimal production of social justice. Chapter 7. In Margolis, J. and Guitton, H. (eds.), Public Economics: An Analysis of Public Production and Consumption and their Relations to the Private Sectors, pp. 145–200. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Kremer, Michael (1993) Population growth and technological change: One million B.C. to 1990. Quarterly Journal of Economics 108 (3), 681–716.Google Scholar
Lam, David (1986) The dynamics of population growth, differential fertility, and inequality. American Economic Review 76 (5), 1103–1116.Google Scholar
Lam, David (1997) Demographic variables and income inequality. In Rosenzweig, M. K. and Stark, O. (ed.), Handbook of Population and Family Economics, pp. 1015–1059. New York: Elsevier Science.Google Scholar
Liao, Pei-Ju (2013) The one-child policy: A macroeconomic analysis. Journal of Development Economics 101, 49–62.Google Scholar
Lucas, Robert E. JR (1976) Econometric policy evaluation: A critique. Carnegie-Rochester Conference Series on Public Policy 1 (1), 19–46.Google Scholar
Manuelli, Rodolfo E. and Seshadri, Ananth (2009) Explaining international fertility differences. The Quarterly Journal of Economics 124 (2), 771–807.Google Scholar
Pazner, Elisha A. and Razin, Assaf (1980) Competitive efficiency in an overlapping-generation model with endogenous population. Journal of Public Economics 13 (2), 249–258.Google Scholar
Raut, Lakshmi K. (1990) Capital accumulation, income distribution and endogenous fertility in an overlapping generations general equilibrium model. Journal of Development Economics 34 (1–2), 123–150.Google Scholar
Rothschild, Michael and Stiglitz, Joseph E. (1973) Some further results on the measurement of inequality. Journal of Economic Theory 6 (2), 188–204.Google Scholar
Saposnik, Rubin (1981) Rank-dominance in income distributions. Public Choice 36 (1), 147–151.Google Scholar
Schoonbroodt, Alice and Tertilt, Michele (2014) Property rights and efficiency in OLG models with endogenous fertility. Journal of Economic Theory 150 (C), 551–582.Google Scholar
Shorrocks, Anthony F. (1983) Ranking income distributions. Economica 50 (197), 3–17.Google Scholar
Willis, Robert J. (1987) Externalities and population. In Johnson, D. Gale and Lee, R. D. (eds.), Population Growth and Economic Development: Issues and Evidence, Madison, WI: University of Wisconsin Press.Google Scholar